欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (04): 665-674.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00665

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆成株期抗旱性鉴定评价方法研究

祁旭升1,**，刘章雄2,**，关荣霞2,**，王兴荣1，苟作旺1，常汝镇2，邱丽娟2,*   

  1. 1 甘肃省农业科学院作物研究所, 甘肃兰州 730070；2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2011-04-27 修回日期:2011-12-19 出版日期:2012-04-12 网络出版日期:2012-02-13
  • 通讯作者: 邱丽娟, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由农业部保种项目 [NB08-2130315-(25-31)-06, NB07-2130315-(25-30)-06, NB06-07040(22-27)-05], 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2009CB118400)和甘肃省科技支撑计划(1104NKCA076), 甘肃省农科院农业科技创新专项(2009GAAS22)资助。

Comparison of Evaluation Methods for Drought-resistance at Soybean Adult Stage

QI Xu-Sheng1,**,LIU Zhang-Xiong2,**,GUAN Rong-Xia2,**,WANG Xing-Rong1,GOU Zuo-Wang1,CHANG Ru-Zhen2,QIU Li-Juan2,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2011-04-27 Revised:2011-12-19 Published:2012-04-12 Published online:2012-02-13
  • Contact: 邱丽娟, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net

PDF

1857

被引次数

49

摘要： 以我国不同地区育成的77个大豆品种(系)为供试材料、以晋豆21为对照, 在年降雨量不足40 mm的甘肃敦煌市, 设干旱胁迫和正常灌水2个处理, 考察与产量相关的8个农艺性状, 应用简单相关、等级相关等统计学方法, 筛选优异的抗旱种质资源, 旨在明确大豆成株期抗旱性鉴定指标和评价方法。9种抗旱性评价方法比较结果表明, 基于抗旱系数法、伤害指数和敏感指数对供试材料的抗旱性评价结果完全一致, 基于生物产量、单株粒数和单株荚数的综合评价方法与基于产量的直接评价方法比并无优势。经典的抗旱系数法适宜于筛选抗旱资源, 但不一定能筛选出正常条件下的丰产资源, 而本文提出的改进抗旱指数法可筛选到抗旱性和丰产性兼备的品种, 为抗旱育种和生产应用服务；通过划分不同品种熟期组, 筛选到不同熟期类型的抗旱、丰产品种。本研究为制订“大豆抗旱性鉴定评价技术规范”提供了理论依据, 对大豆资源的抗旱性鉴定和抗旱性育种具有重要的意义。

关键词: 大豆, 成株期, 抗旱性, 鉴定指标, 评价方法

Abstract: Drought is a very important abiotic stress for soybean production in China. A number of methods have been used to evaluate drought tolerance of soybean. In this study, 77 soybean varieties with Jindou 21 as the controlwere planted under drought stress and normal irrigationin Dunhuang City, Gansu, where the annual rainfall is less than 40 mm. The identification criterions for drought-resistance wereselected fromeightyield-related agronomic traits, and different evaluation methods were compared by simple correlation, spearman correlation, stepwise regression and gray correlation.The result showed that the evaluation method of drought resistance coefficient had the same effect as that of index of damage and drought resistance index. The comprehensive evaluation methods based on biomass, grain number per plant and pod number per plant had no advantages than the direct evaluation method based on yield. Drought resistance rather than high yield could be selected by traditional drought resistance coefficient method. The soybean varieties with drought resistance and stable yield under both drought and normal conditions could be selected using the improved drought resistance index created in this study, such as Xudou 12, Zhongzuo 00-683, and Zhonghuang 24, which would be elite soybean germplasm for soybean production in dry area. We might select drought resistant soybean germplasm with different ecotypes by dividing varieties with different growing periods. This study provided a theoretical basis for evaluating drought resistant soybean germplasm and for establishing the “standard evaluation system for drought resistant soybean”.

Key words: Soybean, Adult stage, Drought resistance, Identification criterion, Evaluation method

[1]Liu X-Y(刘学义). Drought. In: Lam H-M(林汉明), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Shao G-H(邵桂花), Liu Z-T(刘忠堂), eds. Soybean Stress Tolerance Research in China (中国大豆耐逆研究). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009. pp 1–60 (in Chinese)

[2]Guo Q-Y(郭庆元), Zhu C-F(朱长甫), Miao Y-N(苗以农). Water Physiology and Irrigation-drainage of Soybean. In: Wang L-Z(王连铮), Guo Q-Y(郭庆元), eds. Modern China Soybean (现代中国大豆). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007. pp 485–546 (in Chinese)

[3]Chen Y-Z(陈应志). The production and research progress of world soybean (Cont-1). Soybean Bull (大豆通报), 2005, (1): 26–30

[4]Brazil will first release commercial genetically modified soybean by Embrapa company. 2006(1-10) http://www.esunny.com.cn

[5]Liang J-Q(梁建秋), Zhang M-R(张明荣), Wu H-Y(吴海英). Advances in drought tolerance of soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2010, 29(2): 341–346 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Oya T, Nepomuceno A L, Neumaier N. Drought tolerance characteristics of Brazilian soybean cultivars- evaluation and characterization of drought tolerance of various Brazilian soybean cultivars in the field. Plant Prod Sci, 2004, 7: 129–137

[7]Davies W J, Zhang J H. Root signs and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1991, 42: 55–76

[8]Vadez V, Sinclair T R. Leaf ureide degradation and N2 fixation tolerance to water deficit in soybean. J Exp Bot, 2001, 52: 153–159

[9]Boyer J S, Wong S C, Farquhar G D. CO2 and water vapor exchange across leaf cuticle (epidermis) at various water potentials. Plant Physiol, 1997, 114: 185–191

[10]Lodwig E M, Hosie A H F, Bordes A, Findlay K, Allaway D, Karunakaran R, Downie J A, Poole P S. Amino-acid cycling drives nitrogen fixation in the legume-rhizobium symbiosis. Nature, 2003, 422: 722–726

[11]Lü C-X(吕彩霞), Guo J-Q(郭建秋), Wang Y(王英), Leng J-T(冷建田), Yang G-M(杨光明), Hou W-S(侯文胜), Wu C-X(吴存祥), Han T-F(韩天富). Identification, Inheritance analysis, and QTL mapping of root and shoot traits in soybean variety PI471938 with tolerance to wilting. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(9): 1476–1483(in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Wu S-J(吴慎杰), Li G-Q(李贵全), Li J(李捷), Du W-J(杜维俊), Yue A-Q(岳爱琴), Wu Y-S(武云帅). Selecting targets and markers in drought-resistant breeding of soybean. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2003, 21(1): 139–142 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]Zhang H-Y(张海燕), Jiao B-C(焦碧婵), Li G-Q(李贵权). Study on selecting targets in drought-resistant breeding of soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2005, 24(3): 183–188 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Wang Q-M(王启明), Xu X-C(徐心诚), Ma Y-S(马原松), Wu S-G(吴诗光). Influences of drought stress on physiological and biochemical characters of different soybean varieties in flowering period. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2005, 23(4): 98–102 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Lu G-H(路贵和), Liu X-Y(刘学义), Ren X-J(任小俊), Shi H(史红). Diversity in soybean germplasm with drought-resistance in Huang-Huai-Hai valleys. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2001, 34(3): 251–255 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Fischer R A , Maurer R. Drought-resistance in spring wheat cultivars 1: Grain Yield Responses. Aust J Agric Res, 1978, 29: 897–912

[17]Blum A, Jordan W R. Breeding crop varieties for stress environments. Crit Rev Plant Sci, 1985, 2: 199–238

[18]Lan J-S(兰巨生), Hu F-S(胡福顺), Zhang J-R(张景瑞). The concept and statistical method of drought-resistance index in crops. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报), 1990, 5(2): 20–25 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Liu X-Y(刘学义). Discussion of drought resistance methods on soybean. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 1986, (4): 23–26 (in Chinese)

[20]Qiu L-J(邱丽娟), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), eds. Descriptors and Data Standard for Soybean (Glycine spp.)(大豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003. pp 49–83 (in Chinese)

[21]Li G-Q(李贵全), Zhang H-Y(张海燕), Ji L(季兰), Zhao E-K(赵二开), Liu J-B(刘建兵), Li L(李玲), Zhang J-R(张家榕). Comprehensive evaluation on drought-resistance of different soybean varieties. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2006, 17(12): 2408–2412 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Tang Q-Y(唐启义). DPS Data Processing System—Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining(Second Edition)(DPS 数据处理系统-实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘)(第2版). Beijing: Science Press, 2010. pp 633–829 (in Chinese)

[23]Jing R-L(景蕊莲), Hu R-H(胡荣海), Zhang C-J(张灿军), Zhu Z-H(朱志华), Chang X-P(昌小平), Wang J-L(王娟玲). Technical Specification of Identification and Evaluation for Drought Resistance in Wheat (小麦抗旱性鉴定评价技术规范). Beijing: China Standards Press, 2008. pp 1–5 (in Chinese)

[24]Hu B-L(胡标林), Yu S-W(余守武), Wan Y(万勇), Zhang Z(张铮), Qiu B-Y(邱兵余), Xie J-K(谢建坤). Drought-resistance identification of Dongxiang common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) in whole growth period. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(3): 425–432 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25]Xu R(徐蕊), Wang J-B(王启柏), Zhang C-Q(张春庆), Wu C-L(吴承来). Drought-resistance evaluation soybean of maize inbred. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(1): 72–84 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[26]Wang Q-D(王钦德), Feng S-J(冯锁江). The demonstration and application about calculating formula of spearman coefficient. J Shanxi Univ (山西农业大学学报), 1993, 13(1): 30–33 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[27]Lu G-H(路贵和), Dai J-R(戴景瑞), Zhang S-K(张书奎), Li W-M(李文明), Chen S-J(陈绍江), E L-Z(鄂立柱), Zhang Y-R(张义荣). Drought-resistance of elite maize inbred lines in different water stress. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(10): 1284–1288 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[28]Wang J-L(王金陵). Preliminary observation of soybean root. Acta Agric Sin (农业学报), 1955, 6(3): 331–334 (in Chinese)
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[3] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[4] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[5] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[6] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[7] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[8] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[9] 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746.
[10] 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[11] 殷丛丛, 李睿琦, 岳霈尧, 李晨, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 基于闭合哑铃介导等温扩增可视化检测大豆花叶病毒SC15方法的建立及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1248-1260.
[12] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾. 冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 797-811.
[13] 王语新, 陈天羽, 翟红, 张欢, 高少培, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 刘庆昌. 甘薯激酶基因IbHT1的克隆及抗旱性功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 301-311.
[14] 许睿, 何妙华, 王昊, 李卫, 任杰, 夏志强. 基于空间转录组技术解析大豆种胚对X射线辐射的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3121-3132.
[15] 林洋, 史晓蕾, 陈强, 刘兵强, 杨庆, 于慧娟, 闫龙, 武小霞, 杨春燕. 大豆蛋白质脂肪及脂肪酸组分相关QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2899-2910.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2