[1] Almeida Sá A G, Moreno Y M F, Carciofi B A M. Plant proteins as high-quality nutritional source for human diet. Trends Food Sci Technol, 2020, 97: 170–184. 

[2] Garner W W, Allard H A. Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants. Mon Wea Rev, 1920, 48: 415. 

[3] Fang C, Du H P, Wang L S, Liu B H, Kong F J. Mechanisms underlying key agronomic traits and implications for molecular breeding in soybean. J Genet Genom, 2024, 51: 379–393. 

[4] Bernard R L. Two major genes for time of flowering and maturity in soybeans. Crop Sci, 1971, 11: 242–244. 

[5] Buzzell R I. Inheritance of a soybean flowering response to fluorescent-daylength conditions. Can J Genet Cytol, 1971, 13: 703–707. 

[6] McBlain B A, Bernard R L. A new gene affecting the time of flowering and maturity in soybeans. J Hered, 1987, 78: 160–162. 

[7] Bonato E R, Vello N A. E6, a dominant gene conditioning early flowering and maturity in soybeans. Genet Mol Biol, 1999, 22: 229–232. 

[8] Ray J D, Hinson K, Mankono J E B, Malo M F. Genetic control of a long-juvenile trait in soybean. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 1001–1006. 

[9] Cober E R, Voldeng H D. A new soybean maturity and photoperiod-sensitivity locus linked to E1 and T. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 698–701. 

[10] Cober E R, Molnar S J, Charette M, Voldeng H D. A new locus for early maturity in soybean. Crop Sci, 2010, 50: 524–527. 

[11] Kong F J, Nan H Y, Cao D, Li Y, Wu F F, Wang J L, Lu S J, Yuan X H, Cober E R, Abe J, et al. A new dominant gene E9 conditions early flowering and maturity in soybean. Crop Sci, 2014, 54: 2529–2535. 

[12] Samanfar B, Molnar S J, Charette M, Schoenrock A, Dehne F, Golshani A, Belzile F, Cober E R. Mapping and identification of a potential candidate gene for a novel maturity locus, E10, in soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2017, 130: 377–390. 

[13] Wang F F, Nan H Y, Chen L Y, Fang C, Zhang H Y, Su T, Li S C, Cheng Q, Dong L D, Liu B H, et al. A new dominant locus, E11, controls early flowering time and maturity in soybean. Mol Breed, 2019, 39: 70. 

[14] Xia Z J, Watanabe S, Yamada T, Tsubokura Y, Nakashima H, Zhai H, Anai T, Sato S, Yamazaki T, Lyu S X, et al. Positional cloning and characterization reveal the molecular basis for soybean maturity locus E1 that regulates photoperiodic flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: E2155–E2164. 

[15] Kong F J, Liu B H, Xia Z J, Sato S, Kim B M, Watanabe S, Yamada T, Tabata S, Kanazawa A, Harada K, et al. Two coordinately regulated homologs of FLOWERING LOCUS T are involved in the control of photoperiodic flowering in soybean. Plant Physiol, 2010, 154: 1220–1231. 

[16] Sun H B, Jia Z, Cao D, Jiang B J, Wu C X, Hou W S, Liu Y K, Fei Z H, Zhao D Z, Han T F. GmFT2a, a soybean homolog of FLOWERING LOCUS T, is involved in flowering transition and maintenance. PLoS One, 2011, 6: e29238. 

[17] Nan H Y, Cao D, Zhang D Y, Li Y, Lu S J, Tang L L, Yuan X H, Liu B H, Kong F J. GmFT2a and GmFT5a redundantly and differentially regulate flowering through interaction with and upregulation of the bZIP transcription factor GmFDL19 in soybean. PLoS One, 2014, 9: e97669. 

[18] Xia Z J, Zhai H, Zhang Y F, Wang Y Y, Wang L, Xu K, Wu H Y, Zhu J L, Jiao S, Wan Z, et al. QNE1 is a key flowering regulator determining the length of the vegetative period in soybean cultivars. Sci China Life Sci, 2022, 65: 2472–2490. 

[19] Liu W, Jiang B J, Ma L M, Zhang S W, Zhai H, Xu X, Hou W S, Xia Z J, Wu C X, Sun S, et al. Functional diversification of flowering locus T homologs in soybean: GmFT1a and GmFT2a/5a have opposite roles in controlling flowering and maturation. New Phytol, 2018, 217: 1335–1345. 

[20] Zhai H, Lyu S X, Liang S, Wu H Y, Zhang X Z, Liu B H, Kong F J, Yuan X H, Li J, Xia Z J. GmFT4, a homolog of FLOWERING LOCUS T, is positively regulated by E1 and functions as a flowering repressor in soybean. PLoS One, 2014, 9: e89030. 

[21] Xu M L, Yamagishi N, Zhao C, Takeshima R, Kasai M, Watanabe S, Kanazawa A, Yoshikawa N, Liu B H, Yamada T, et al. The soybean-specific maturity gene E1 family of floral repressors controls night-break responses through down-regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T orthologs. Plant Physiol, 2015, 168: 1735–1746. 

[22] Liu B H, Kanazawa A, Matsumura H, Takahashi R, Harada K, Abe J. Genetic redundancy in soybean photoresponses associated with duplication of the phytochrome A gene. Genetics, 2008, 180: 995–1007. 

[23] Watanabe S, Hideshima R, Xia Z J, Tsubokura Y, Sato S, Nakamoto Y, Yamanaka N, Takahashi R, Ishimoto M, Anai T, et al. Map-based cloning of the gene associated with the soybean maturity locus E3. Genetics, 2009, 182: 1251–1262. 

[24] Lin X Y, Dong L D, Tang Y, Li H Y, Cheng Q, Li H, Zhang T, Ma L X, Xiang H L, Chen L N, et al. Novel and multifaceted regulations of photoperiodic flowering by phytochrome A in soybean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2022, 119: e2208708119. 

[25] Dong L D, Fang C, Cheng Q, Su T, Kou K, Kong L P, Zhang C B, Li H Y, Hou Z H, Zhang Y H, et al. Genetic basis and adaptation trajectory of soybean from its temperate origin to tropics. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 5445 

[26] Lu S J, Dong L D, Fang C, Liu S L, Kong L P, Cheng Q, Chen L Y, Su T, Nan H Y, Zhang D, et al. Stepwise selection on homeologous PRR genes controlling flowering and maturity during soybean domestication. Nat Genet, 2020, 52: 428–436. 

[27] Watanabe S, Xia Z J, Hideshima R, Tsubokura Y, Sato S, Yamanaka N, Takahashi R, Anai T, Tabata S, Kitamura K, et al. A map-based cloning strategy employing a residual heterozygous line reveals that the GIGANTEA gene is involved in soybean maturity and flowering. Genetics, 2011, 188: 395–407. 

[28] Dong L D, Hou Z H, Li H Y, Li Z B, Fang C, Kong L P, Li Y L, Du H, Li T, Wang L S, et al. Agronomical selection on loss-of-function of GIGANTEA simultaneously facilitates soybean salt tolerance and early maturity. J Integr Plant Biol, 2022, 64: 1866–1882. 

[29] 徐昕, 秦超, 赵涛, 刘斌, 李宏宇, 刘军. GmELF3s调控大豆开花时间和生物钟节律的功能分析. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 812–824.

Xu X, Qin C, Zhao T, Liu B, Li H Y, Liu J. Function analysis of GmELF3s in regulating soybean flowering time and circadian rhythm. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 812–824(in Chinese with English abstract).

[30] Lu S J, Zhao X H, Hu Y L, Liu S L, Nan H Y, Li X M, Fang C, Cao D, Shi X Y, Kong L P, et al. Natural variation at the soybean J locus improves adaptation to the tropics and enhances yield. Nat Genet, 2017, 49: 773–779.

[31] Fang X L, Han Y P, Liu M S, Jiang J C, Li X, Lian Q C, Xie X R, Huang Y A, Ma Q B, Nian H, et al. Modulation of evening complex activity enables north-to-south adaptation of soybean. Sci China Life Sci, 2021, 64: 179–195. 

[32] Bu T T, Lu S J, Wang K, Dong L D, Li S L, Xie Q G, Xu X D, Cheng Q, Chen L Y, Fang C, et al. A critical role of the soybean evening complex in the control of photoperiod sensitivity and adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2021, 118: e2010241118. 

[33] Jung C H, Wong C E, Singh M B, Bhalla P L. Comparative genomic analysis of soybean flowering genes. PLoS One, 2012, 7: e38250. 

[34] Lyu J, Cai Z D, Li Y H, Suo H C, Yi R, Zhang S, Nian H. The floral repressor GmFLC-like is involved in regulating flowering time mediated by low temperature in soybean. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21: 1322. 

[35] Zhang W, Xu W J, Zhang H M, Liu X Q, Cui X Y, Li S S, Song L, Zhu Y L, Chen X, Chen H T. Comparative selective signature analysis and high-resolution GWAS reveal a new candidate gene controlling seed weight in soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2021, 134: 1329–1341. 

[36] Kang H M, Sul J H, Service S K, Zaitlen N A, Kong S Y, Freimer N B, Sabatti C, Eskin E. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet, 2010, 42: 348–354. 

[37] Li M X, Yeung J M Y, Cherny S S, Sham P C. Evaluating the effective numbers of independent tests and significant p-value thresholds in commercial genotyping arrays and public imputation reference datasets. Hum Genet, 2012, 131: 747–756. 

[38] Dong S S, He W M, Ji J J, Zhang C, Guo Y, Yang T L. LDBlockShow: a fast and convenient tool for visualizing linkage disequilibrium and haplotype blocks based on variant call format files. Brief Bioinform, 2021, 22: bbaa227. 

[39] Wang K, Li M Y, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res, 2010, 38: e164. 

[40] Brummer E C, Graef G L, Orf J, Wilcox J R, Shoemaker R C. Mapping QTL for seed protein and oil content in eight soybean populations. Crop Sci, 1997, 37: 370–378. 

[41] Chung J, Babka H L, Graef G L, Staswick P E, Lee D J, Cregan P B, Shoemaker R C, Specht J E. The seed protein, oil, and yield QTL on soybean linkage group I. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 1053–1067. 

[42] Patil G, Mian R, Vuong T, Pantalone V, Song Q J, Chen P Y, Shannon G J, Carter T C, Nguyen H T. Molecular mapping and genomics of soybean seed protein: a review and perspective for the future. Theor Appl Genet, 2017, 130: 1975–1991. 

[43] Zhang H M, Zhang G W, Zhang W, Wang Q, Xu W J, Liu X Q, Cui X Y, Chen X, Chen H T. Identification of loci governing soybean seed protein content via genome-wide association study and selective signature analyses. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13: 1045953. 

[44] Cober E R, Morrison M J. Regulation of seed yield and agronomic characters by photoperiod sensitivity and growth habit genes in soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 120: 1005–1012 

[45] Fang C, Ma Y M, Wu S W, Liu Z, Wang Z, Yang R, Hu G H, Zhou Z K, Yu H, Zhang M, et al. Genome-wide association studies dissect the genetic networks underlying agronomical traits in soybean. Genome Biol, 2017, 18: 161. 

[46] Zhou Z K, Jiang Y, Wang Z, Gou Z H, Lyu J, Li W Y, Yu Y J, Shu L P, Zhao Y J, Ma Y M, et al. Resequencing 302 wild and cultivated accessions identifies genes related to domestication and improvement in soybean. Nat Biotechnol, 2015, 33: 408–414. 

[47] Wang C, Hao X S, Liu X Q, Su Y Z, Pan Y P, Zong C M, Wang W B, Xing G N, He J B, Gai J Y. An improved genome-wide association procedure explores gene-allele constitutions and evolutionary drives of growth period traits in the global soybean germplasm population. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24: 9570. 

[48] Wang Y, Gu Y Z, Gao H H, Qiu L J, Chang R Z, Chen S Y, He C Y. Molecular and geographic evolutionary support for the essential role of GIGANTEAa in soybean domestication of flowering time. BMC Evol Biol, 2016, 16: 79. 

[49] Guo S Y, Li Y F, Qiu H M, Hu G Y, Zhao C S, Wang R Z, Zhang H, Tian Y, Li X Y, Liu B, et al. GmAP1d regulates flowering time under long-day photoperiods in soybean. Crop J, 2024, 12: 845–855. 

[50] Cloix C, Kaiserli E, Heilmann M, Baxter K J, Brown B A, O’Hara A, Smith B O, Christie J M, Jenkins G I. C-terminal region of the UV-B photoreceptor UVR8 initiates signaling through interaction with the COP1 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: 16366–16370.

[51] Yamamoto Y Y, Deng X, Matsui M. Cip4, a new COP1 target, is a nucleus-localized positive regulator of Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell, 2001, 13: 399–411.

[52] González Besteiro M A, Bartels S, Albert A, Ulm R. Arabidopsis MAP kinase phosphatase-1 and its target MAP kinases-3 and 6 antagonistically determine UV-B stress tolerance, independent of the UVR8 photoreceptor pathway. Plant J, 2011, 68: 727–737.

[53] Hori K, Watanabe Y. UPF3 suppresses aberrant spliced mRNA in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2005, 43: 530–540. 

[54] Jeong H J, Kim Y J, Kim S H, Kim Y H, Lee I J, Kim Y K, Shin J S. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay factors, UPF1 and UPF3, contribute to plant defense. Plant Cell Physiol, 2011, 52: 2147–2156. 

[55] Shi C, Baldwin I T, Wu J Q. Arabidopsis plants having defects in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay factors UPF1, UPF2, and UPF3 show photoperiod-dependent phenotypes in development and stress responses. J Integr Plant Biol, 2012, 54: 99–114.