欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 1884-1890.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01884

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

吐丝期干旱胁迫对玉米生理特性和物质生产的影响

张仁和,郭东伟*,张兴华,路海东,刘建超,李凤艳,郝引川,薛吉全*   

  1. 郭东伟, E-mail: gdwei1973@126.com; 薛吉全, E-mail: xjq2934@yahoo.com.cn
  • 收稿日期:2012-02-27 修回日期:2012-05-20 出版日期:2012-10-12 网络出版日期:2012-07-27
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划973计划(2009CB118604)项目, 国家自然科学基金项目(30971722), 西北农林科技大学创新专项(QN2011086)和西北农林科技大学博士科研启动基金资助。

Effects of Drought Stress on Physiological Characteristics and Dry Matter Production in Maize Silking Stage

ZHANG Ren-He,GUO Dong-Wei*,ZHANG Xing-Hua,LU Hai-Dong,LIU Jian-Chao,LI Feng-Yan,HAO Yin-Chuan,XUE Ji-Quan*   

  1. 郭东伟, E-mail: gdwei1973@126.com; 薛吉全, E-mail: xjq2934@yahoo.com.cn
  • Received:2012-02-27 Revised:2012-05-20 Published:2012-10-12 Published online:2012-07-27

摘要:

以玉米品种郑单958 (抗旱性强)和陕单902 (抗旱性弱)为材料,采用抗旱池栽控水试验,研究了叶片光合特性、保护酶活性以及干物质转运对吐丝期干旱胁迫的响应。结果表明,在吐丝期干旱胁迫下2个品种产量分别降低39.10%和44.87%;叶片净光合速率(Pn)和气孔导度(Gs)显著下降,胞间CO2浓度(Ci)先升后降。PSII最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)、实际量子产额(ΦPSII)、光化学猝灭(qP)降低,非光化学猝灭(qN)升高;抗氧化酶(SOD、POD和CAT)活性先升高后降低,而丙二醛(MDA)含量一直升高。说明吐丝期干旱胁迫增加了花前营养器官贮藏同化物转运量(率)及其对籽粒转运的贡献率;但郑单958受干旱影响程度小于陕单902。说明抗旱品种郑单958具高抗氧化酶活性清除活性氧,使得膜脂过氧化程度轻,维持较高的光化学效率,延长叶片光合功能期,促进花前营养器官贮藏同化物转运量对籽粒的贡献率。这可能是其在干旱胁迫下仍能获得较高产量的重要原因之一。

关键词: 玉米, 干旱胁迫, 生理特性, 干物质积累与转运, 籽粒产量

Abstract:

Maize cultivars Zhengdan 958 (drought-tolerance) and Shaandan 902 (drought-sensitive) were used to determine the responses of photosynthetic traits, protective enzyme activity and dry matter production at silking stage to in drought pool experiment. The results showed that under drought stress, the yield of drought-tolerant maize Zhengdan 958 reduced 39.10 percent compared with control, while drought-sensitive maize Shaandan 902 reduced 44.87 percent. At 15 d after anthesis, leafs net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and stomatal conductance (Gs) decreased significantly, whereas intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) first decreased and then increased under drought stress in both cultivars. The quantum yield (ΦPSII), photochemical quenching (qP) and non-photochemical quenching (qN) of photosystem II decreased under drought stress in leaves of both cultivars. Meanwhile, the superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT) activities first increased then decreased while malondialdehyde (MDA) content increased under drought stress in both cultivars. In addition, drought stress significantly increased dry matter translocation, dry matter translocation efficiency, and contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates to grains, however, the effect was smaller in Zhengdan 958 than in Shaandan 902. Our results indicated that higher ability of oxidative enzyme defense system eliminates reactive oxygen, and the absorbed energy is effectively utilized, resulting in the greater photosynthesis capacity in Zhengdan 958, so extending the period of leaf’s photosynthesis and enhancing the contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates to grains, which may be one of the important roles in getting high yield of drought-tolerant maize Zhengdan 958 under drought conditions.

Key words: Maize, Drought stress, Physiological characteristics, Dry matter accumulation and translocation, Grain yield

[1]Li S-K(李少昆), Wang C-T(王崇桃). Innovation and Diffusion of Corn Production Technology (玉米生产技术创新•扩散). Beijing: Science Press, 2010. pp 1–32 (in Chinese)



[2]Xu D-Q(许大全). Photosynthetic Efficiency (光合作用效率). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2002. pp 821–834 (in Chinese)



[3]Jiang G-M(蒋高明). Plant Physio-Ecology (植物生理生态学). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004. pp 24–28 (in Chinese)



[4]Nielsen D C, Vigil M F, Benjamin J G. The variable response of dry land corn yield to soil water content at planting. Agric Water Manag, 2009, 96: 330–336



[5]Chen J(陈军), Dai J-Y(戴俊英). Effect of drought on photosynthesis and grain yield of corn hybrids with different drought tolerance. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1996, 22(6): 757–762 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Liu Z-G(刘祖贵), Chen J-P(陈金平), Duan A-W(段爱旺), Meng Z-J(孟兆江), Zhang J-Y(张寄阳), Liu Z-D(刘战东). Effects of different soil moisture treatments on physiological characteristics of summer maize leave. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2006, 24(1): 90–95 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Tollernaar M, Lee E A. Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica, 2006, 51: 399–408



[8]Levitt J. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses: Water, Radiation, Salt and Other Stresses, 2nd edn. New York: Academic Press, 1980. pp 25–280



[9]Baker N R, Rosenqvist E. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 1607–1621



[10]Aroca R, Irigoyen J J, Sánchez-díaz M. Drought enhances maize chilling tolerance: II. Photosynthetic traits and protective mechanisms against oxidative stress. Physiol Plant, 2003, 117: 540–549



[11]Efeoglu B, Ekmekci Y, Cicek N. Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. South Afr J Bot, 2009, 75: 34–42



[12]Massacci A, Nabiv S M, Pietrosanti L, Nematov S K, Chernikova T N, Thor K, Leipner J. Response of photosynthesis apparatus of cotton to the onset of drought stress under field conditions by gas change analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2008, 46: 189–195



[13]Ephrath J E. The effects of drought stress on leaf elongation, photosynthesis and transpiration rate in maize leaves. Photosynthetica, 1991, 25: 607–619



[14]Ding L, Wang K J, Jiang G M, Li Y G, Jiang C D, Liu M Z, Niu S L, Peng Y. Diurnal variation of gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and xanthophylls cycle components of maize hybrids released in different years. Photosynthetica, 2006, 44: 26–31



[15]Selmani A, Wasson C E. Daytime chlorophyll fluorescence measurement in field-grown maize and its genetic variability under well-water and water-stressed conditions. Field Crops Res, 2003, 31: 173–184



[16]Leipner J, Stamo P, Sinsawat V, Fracheboud Y. Effect of heat stress on the photosynthetic apparatus in maize (Zea mays L.) grown at control or high temperature. Environ Exp Bot, 2004, 52: 123–129



[17]Ge T-D(葛体达), Sui F-G(隋方功), Bai L-P(白莉萍), Lü Y-Y(吕银燕), Zhou G-S(周广胜). Effects of water stress on the protective enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in roots and leaves of summer maize. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2005, 38(5): 922–928 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Zheng S-H(郑盛华), Yan C-R(严昌荣). The ecophysiological and morphological characteristics of maize in seedling stage under water stress. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2006, 26(4): 1138–1143 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]Betran F J, Beck D, Banziger M, Edmeades G O. Secondary traits in parental inbreds and hybrids under stress and non-stress environments in tropical maize. Field Crops Res, 2003, 83: 51–65



[20]Zhang R-H(张仁和), Ma G-S(马国胜), Bu L-D(卜令铎), Shi J-T(史俊通), Xue J-Q(薛吉全). Appraisement and comprehensive evaluation of different genotype maize cultivars for drought resistance. Seed (种子), 2009, 28(10): 91–93 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]Hsiao T C. Rapid changes is levels of poyribosomes in maize in response to water stress. Plant Physiol, 1970, 46: 281–285.



[22]Demmig-Adams B, Adams W W, Baker D H, Logan B A, Bowling D R, Verhoreven A S. Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipation of excess excitation. Physiol Plant, 1996, 98: 253–264



[23]Gao J-F(高俊凤). Plants Physiology Experimentation Guidance (植物生理学实验技术). Xi’an: World Book Publishing House, 2000. pp 101–103 (in Chinese)



[24]Cox M C, Qualset C O, Rains D W. Genetic variation for nitrogen assimilation and translocation in wheat: I. Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation to grain. Crop Sci, 1985, 25: 430–435



[25]Farquhar G D, Sharkey T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1982, 33: 317–345



[26]Bai L P, Sui F G, Ge T D, Sun Z H, Lu Y Y, Zhou G S. Effect of soil drought stress on leaf water status, membrane permeability and enzymatic antioxidant system of maize. Pedosphere, 2006, 16: 326–332



[27]Li G(李耕), Gao H-Y(高辉远), Zhao B(赵斌), Dong S-T(董树亭), Zhang J-W(张吉旺), Yang J-S(杨吉顺), Wang J-F(王敬锋), Liu P(刘鹏). Effects of drought stress on activity of photosynthesis in leaves of maize at grain filling stage. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(10): 1916–1922 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[28]Kumer R, Sarawgi A K, Ranos C, Amarante S T, Smali A M, Wade L J. Partitioning of dry matter during drought stress in rainfed rowland rice. Field Crops Res, 2006, 98: 1–11



[29]Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z Zhu Q, Liu L. Water deficit induced senescence and its relationship to the remobilization of pre-stored carbon in wheat during grain filling. Agron J, 2001, 93: 196–206



[30]Foulkes M J, Scott R K, Sylrester B R. The ability of wheat cultivars to withstand drought in UK condition: formation of grain yield. Agric Sci, 2002, 138: 153–169



[31]Jiang D(姜东), Xie Z-J(谢祝捷), Cao W-X(曹卫星), Dai T-B(戴廷波), Jing Q(荆奇). Effects of post-anthesis drought and waterlogging on photosynthetic traits assimilates transportation in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(2): 175–182 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[32]Beheshti B, Behbood F. Dry matter accumulation and remobilization in grain sorghum genotypes under drought stress. Aust J Crop Sci, 2010, 4: 185–189

[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 崔连花, 詹为民, 杨陆浩, 王少瓷, 马文奇, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平, 杨青华. 2个玉米ZmCOP1基因的克隆及其转录丰度对不同光质处理的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1312-1324.
[3] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[7] 单露英, 李俊, 李亮, 张丽, 王颢潜, 高佳琪, 吴刚, 武玉花, 张秀杰. 转基因玉米NK603基体标准物质研制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1059-1070.
[8] 王霞, 尹晓雨, 于晓明, 刘晓丹. 干旱锻炼对B73自交后代当代干旱胁迫记忆基因表达及其启动子区DNA甲基化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1191-1198.
[9] 许静, 高景阳, 李程成, 宋云霞, 董朝沛, 王昭, 李云梦, 栾一凡, 陈甲法, 周子键, 吴建宇. 过表达ZmCIPKHT基因增强植物耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 851-859.
[10] 刘磊, 詹为民, 丁武思, 刘通, 崔连花, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平. 玉米矮化突变体gad39的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 886-895.
[11] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[12] 徐宁坤, 李冰, 陈晓艳, 魏亚康, 刘子龙, 薛永康, 陈洪宇, 王桂凤. 一个新的玉米Bt2基因突变体的遗传分析和分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 572-579.
[13] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
[14] 宋仕勤, 杨清龙, 王丹, 吕艳杰, 徐文华, 魏雯雯, 刘小丹, 姚凡云, 曹玉军, 王永军, 王立春. 东北主推玉米品种种子形态及贮藏物质与萌发期耐冷性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 726-738.
[15] 渠建洲, 冯文豪, 张兴华, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 基于全基因组关联分析解析玉米籽粒大小的遗传结构[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 304-319.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!