欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 1516-1529.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01516

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同穗型超级稻品种籽粒灌浆特性

魏颖娟,赵杨,邹应斌*   

  1. 湖南农业大学农学院, 湖南长沙 410128
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-15 修回日期:2016-06-06 出版日期:2016-10-12 网络出版日期:2016-06-16
  • 通讯作者: 邹应斌, E-mail: ybzou123@126.com, Tel: 0731-84618758
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项子课题水稻栽培与土壤岗位科学家项目(CARS-01-34)和湖南农业大学研究生科研创新项目(CX2014B296)资助。

Grain-filling Characteristics in Super Rice with Different Panicle Types

WEI Ying-Juan,ZHAO Yang,ZOU Ying-Bin*   

  1. Agronomy College of Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China?
  • Received:2016-02-15 Revised:2016-06-06 Published:2016-10-12 Published online:2016-06-16
  • Contact: 邹应斌, E-mail: ybzou123@126.com, Tel: 0731-84618758
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the China Agriculture Research System(CARS-01-34) and the Scientific Innovation Program for Graduate Students of Hunan Agriculture University.

摘要:

为探明不同穗粒型超级稻产量构成特点、籽粒灌浆特性及其与后期生理指标的关系。以不同生育期品种准两优527、两优培九、Y两优1号、玉香油占、黄花占为试验材料,在大田栽培条件下分期播种以确保不同生育期品种在相似的温光条件下灌浆结实。结果表明,不同播期平均产量及其构成因子的品种间差异显著,以两优培九产量最高(9.47 t hm-2),玉香油占产量最低(8.39 t hm-2)。依据每穗粒数和千粒重系统聚类分析,可将品种分为大粒型(准两优527)、中粒型(两优培九、Y两优1号)和小粒型(玉香油占、黄花占)。籽粒灌浆强度及持续时间的品种间差异明显。其中,大粒型品种籽粒灌浆起步快、强度大、峰值持续时间短,上、中、下部枝梗籽粒均为一段式灌浆;中粒型品种籽粒灌浆起步快、强度较小、峰值持续时间长,其上部枝梗籽粒为一段式灌浆,中、下部枝梗籽粒为两段式灌浆,高峰值分别在抽穗后12~18 d和24~30 d;小粒型品种籽粒灌浆起步慢、强度小、峰值持续时间长,其上、中部枝梗籽粒为一段式灌浆,下部枝梗籽粒为两段式灌浆。平均籽粒灌浆速率与品种的穗粒类型密切相关,其中,大粒型品种为0.68 mg d-1,中粒型品种为0.48~0.51 mg d-1,小粒型品种为0.41~0.47 mg d-1。籽粒灌浆强度及持续时间与后期剑叶、根系生理指标有关,籽粒灌浆启动后,叶绿素含量、叶绿素a/b值、类胡萝卜素含量逐渐降低,剑叶可溶性糖含量、MDA含量逐渐上升,POD活性、CAT活性及根系活力先后出现2次升降过程。可见,不同穗粒型超级稻品种产量构成及籽粒灌浆特点的差异明显,籽粒灌浆强度及持续时间与品种的穗粒型及枝梗着生的部位有关,也与后期剑叶及根系衰老生理指标的变化趋势一致。

关键词: 超级稻, 籽粒灌浆, 产量, 生理指标

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to ascertain the characteristics of the grain-filling and physiological indexes after heading and the yield components of super rice with different panicle-grain types. An experiment with different sowing date was conducted using different growth duration varieties (Zhunliangyou 527, Liangyoupeijiu, Y-liangyou 1, Yuxiangyouzhan, and Huanghuazhan) under the field conditions to ensure the grain filling was under the similar temperature and solar radiation conditions. The grain yield and its components averaged in three sowing treatments displayed significant difference among tested varieties, of which the highest yield reached 9.47 t ha-1 for Liangyoupeijiu and the lowest was 8.39 t ha-1 for Yuxiangyouzhan. According to the hierarchical cluster analysis based on the grain number per panicle and 1000-grain weight, tested varieties were divided into the big grain type (Zhunliangyou 527), the medium grain type (Liangyoupeijiu and Y-liangyou 1), and the small grain type (Yuxiangyouzhan and Huanghuazhan). There were obvious differences intensity and peak duration of grain filling among the tested varieties. The big grain variety showed quick grain growth at the beginning, high intensity and short peak duration for grain filling during the middle-late periods, being one step filling in the upper, middle and lower branch grains; the medium grain variety showed quicker grain growth at the beginning, smaller intensity and longer peak duration for grain filling during the middle-late periods, with two filling peaks from 12 d to 18 d and from 24 d to 30 d after heading, respectively; the small grain variety showed slow grain growth at the beginning, smaller intensity and shorter peak duration for grain filling during the middle-late periods, which was one step filling in the upper or middle branch grains and two step filling in the lower branch grains. The average grain filling rate closely related to the panicle-grain type of varieties, was 0.68 mg d-1 for big grain variety, 0.48–0.51 mg d-1 for medium varieties, and 0.41–0.47 mg d-1 for small grain varieties. The intensity and duration of the grain-filling also associated with the changes of physiological indexes of flag leaf and roots after heading. At the beginning of the grain-filling, chlorophyll content, chlorophyll a/b ratio, carotenoids content gradually declined, leaf soluble sugar content, MDA content gradually increased, POD and CAT activities and root activity successively underwent two rise and fall processes. In conclusion, different panicle-grain types super rice have significantly different characteristics of yield components and grain filling. The intensity and the duration of grain-filling depend upon the panicle-grain type of varieties and the branch and grain positions inserted on the panicle, with the same tendency of physiological indexes variation in flag leaf and roots.

Key words: Super rice, Grain filling, Yield, Physiological index

[1]Mohapatra P K, Patel R, Sahu S K. Time of flowering affects grain quality and spikelet partitioning within the rice panicle. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1993, 20: 231–242
[2]王志琴, 杨建昌, 朱庆森, 张祖建, 郎有忠, 王学明. 亚种间杂交稻籽粒充实不良的原因探讨. 作物学报, 1998, 24: 782–787
Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhu Q S, Zhang Z J, Lang Y Z, Wang X M. Reasons for poor grain plumpness in intersubspecific hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin, 1998, 24: 782–787 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Yang J C, Peng S B, Visperas R M, Sanico A L, Zhu Q S, Gu S L. Grain filling pattern and cytokinin content in the grains and roots of rice plants. Plant Growth Regul, 2000, 30: 261–270
[4]Peng T, Lü Q, Zhao Y F, Sun H Z, Han Y C, Du Y X, Zhang J, Li J Z, Wang L L, Zhao Q Z. Superior grains determined by grain weight are not fully correlated with the flowering order in rice. J Integr Agric, 2015, 14: 847–855
[5]朱庆森, 曹显祖, 骆亦其. 水稻籽粒灌浆的生长分析. 作物学报, 1988, 14: 182–193
Zhu Q S, Cao X Z, Luo Y Q. Growth analysis on the process of grain filling in rice. Acta Agron Sin, 1988, 14: 182–193 (in Chinese with Eng-lish abstract)
[6]Ma G H. Studies on the theory of two-step-filling of Indica rice cultivars(Oryza sativa). Chin J Rice Sci, 1996, 10: 153–158
[7]黄农荣, 钟旭华, 王丰, 郑海波. 超级杂交稻结实期根系活力与籽粒灌浆特性研究. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39: 1772–1779 
Huang N R, Zhong X H, Wang F, Zheng H B. Root vigor and grain-filling characteristics in super hybrid rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2006, 39: 1772–1779 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]程旺大, 张国平, 姚海根, 吴伟, 王润屹. 密穗型水稻品种的籽粒灌浆特性研究. 作物学报, 2003, 29: 841–846
Cheng W D, Zhang G P, Yao H G, Wu W, Wang R Q. Studies on the grain filling properties of compact panicle type of rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29: 841–846 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]王嘉宇, 范淑秀, 徐正进, 陈温福. 几个不同穗型水稻品种籽粒灌浆特性的研究. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 1366–1371
Wang J Y, Fan S X, Xu Z J, Chen W F. Filling properties of grains on different positions in a panicle of rice with different panicle types. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 1366–1371 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]薛菁芳, 陈书强, 杜晓东, 潘国君, 王玉成. 黑龙江省两种不同穗型水稻品种的子粒灌浆特性. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53: 2736–2742
Xue J F, Chen S Q, Du X D, Pan G J, Wang Y C. Grain-filling characteristics of two different panicle rice varieties in Heilongjiang Province. Hubei Agric Sci, 2014, 53: 2736–2742 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]杨建昌, 苏宝林, 王志琴, 郎有忠, 朱庆森. 亚种间杂交稻籽粒灌浆特性及其生理的研究. 中国农业科学, 1998, 31: 8–15
Yang J C, Su B L, Wang Z Q, Lang Y Z, Zhu Q S. Characteristics and physiology of grain-filling in intersubspecific hybrid rice. Sci Agric Sin, 1998, 31: 8–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]谢光辉, 杨建昌, 王志琴, 朱庆森. 水稻籽粒灌浆特性及其与籽粒生理活性的关系. 作物学报, 2001, 27: 557–565
Xie G H, Yang J C, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S. Grain filling characteristics of rice and their relationships to physiological activities of grains. Acta Agron Sin, 2001, 27: 557–565 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]黄升谋, 邹应斌. 水稻强弱势籽粒核酸和蛋白质代谢差异. 中国水稻科学, 2004, 18: 374–376
Huang S M, Zou Y B. Difference of nucleic acid and protein metabolism in superior and inferior grains of rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2004, 18: 374–376 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, Liu K, Wang P. Post-anthesis development of inferior and superior spikelets in rice in relation to abscisic acid and ethylene. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57: 149–160
[15]Zhang H, Tan G, Yang L, Yang J, Zhang J, Zhao B. Hormones in the grains and roots in relation to post-anthesis development of inferior and superior spikelets in japonica/indica hybrid rice. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2009, 47: 195–204
[16]王强, 张其德, 卢从明, 匡廷云, 李成荃. 超高产杂交稻不同生育期的光合色素含量、净光合速率和水分利用效率. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26: 647–651
Wang Q, Zhang Q D, Lu C M, Kuang T Y, Li C Q. Pigments content net photosynthesis rate and water use efficiency of two super high-yield rice hybrids at different developmental stages. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2002, 26: 647–651 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]陆兴娜, 胡运高, 鄢圣敏, 胥伟秋, 申永超. 杂交水稻灌浆后剑叶光合特性比较研究. 广东农业科学, 2014, (3): 9–12
Lu X N, Hu Y G, Yan S M, Xu W Q, Shen Y C. Research on photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaves in hybrid rice during grain filling. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2014, (3): 9–12 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]庄文锋, 杨文月, 杨猛, 徐正进. 不同穗型水稻剑叶光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数的研究. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(9): 35–42
Zhuang W F, Yang W Y, Yang M, Xu Z J. Study on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of flag leaf of rice with different panicle type. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2014, 30(9): 35–42 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]梁建生, 曹显祖. 杂交水稻叶片的若干生理指标与根系伤流强度关系. 江苏农学院学报, 1993, 14(4): 25–30
Liang J S, Cao X Z. Studies on the relationship between several physiological characteristics of leaf and bleeding rate of roots hybrid rice(O. sativa L.). J Jiangsu Agric Coll, 1993, 14(4): 25–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]沈波, 王熹. 籼粳亚种间杂交稻根系伤流强度的变化规律及其与叶片生理状况的相互关系. 中国水稻科学, 2000, 14(2): 59–61
Shen B, Wang X. Changes of root exudate of Indica-Japonica hybrid rice and its relation of leaf physiological traits. Chin J Rice Sci, 2000, 14(2): 59–61 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]蔡永萍, 杨其光, 黄义德. 水稻水作与旱作对抽穗后剑叶光合特性, 衰老及根系活性的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2000, 14: 219–224
Cai, Y P, Yang Q G, Huang Y D. Effect of rice cultivated under paddy and upland condition on photosynthesis and senescence of flag leaf and activity of root system after heading. Chin J Rice Sci, 2000, 14: 219–224 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]王彦荣, 华泽田, 陈温福, 代贵金, 郝宪彬, 王岩, 张忠旭, 隋国民. 粳稻根系与叶片早衰的关系及其对籽粒灌浆的影响. 作物学报, 2003, 29: 892–898
Wang Y R, Hua Z T, Chen W F, Dai G J, Hao X B, Wang Y, Zhang Z X, Sui G M. Relation between root and leaf senescence are their effects on grain filling in Japonica rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29: 892–898 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]郭连安, 胡运高, 杨国涛, 王蕾. 不同杂交水稻品种根系生理特性差异. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26: 1171–1175
Guo L A, Hu Y G, Yang G T, Wang L. Differences of root physiological characteristics within hybrid rice varieties. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis, 2014, 26: 1171–1175 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 常勇, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 不同种植方式对超级稻籽粒灌浆特性的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 1631–1641
Li J, Zhang H C, Gong J L, Chang Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H. Influence of planting methods on grain-filling properties of super rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 1631–1641 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]韦还和, 孟天瑶, 李超, 张洪程, 史天宇, 马荣荣, 王晓燕, 杨筠文, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 籼粳交超级稻甬优538的穗部特征及籽粒灌浆特性. 作物学报, 2015, 41: 1858–1869 
Wei H H, Meng T Y, Li C, Zhang H C, Shi T Y, Ma R R, Wang X Y, Yang J W, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W. Panicle traits and grain-filling characteristics of Japonica/Indica hybrid super rice Yongyou 538. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41: 1858–1869 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]Jiang Q, Du Y L, Tian X Y, Wang Q S, Xiong R H, Xu G H, Yan C, Ding Y F. Effect of panicle nitrogen on grain filling characteristics of high-yielding rice cultivars. Eur J Agron, 2016, 74: 185–192
[27]Fu J, Huang Z H, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhang J H. Pre-anthesis on-structural carbohydrate reserve in the stem enhances the sink strength of in-ferior spikelets during grain filling of rice. Field Crops Res, 2011, 123: 170–182
[28]董明辉, 陈培峰, 顾俊荣, 乔中英, 黄萌, 朱赟德, 赵步洪. 麦秸还田和氮肥运筹对超级杂交稻茎鞘物质运转与籽粒灌浆特性的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 673–681
Dong M H, Chen P F, Gu J R, Qiao Z Y, Huang M, Zhu B D, Zhao B H. Effects of wheat straw-residue applied to field and nitrogen manage-ment on photosynthate transportation of stem and sheath and grain-filling characteristics in super hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 673–681 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]萧浪涛, 王三根. 植物生理学实验技术. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005. pp 67–118
Xiao L T, Wang S G. Plant Physiology Experiment Technology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005. pp 67–118 (in Chinese)
[30]段俊, 梁承邺, 黄毓文, 陈宝源, 罗廉源. 不同类型水稻品种组合籽粒灌浆特性及库源关系的比较研究. 中国农业科学, 1996, 29(3): 66–73
Duan J, Liang C Y, Huang Y W, Chen B Y, Luo L Y. Comparative studies on the grain-filling characteristics and relationship between source and sink among various types of rice. Sci Agric Sin, 1996, 29(3): 66–73 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]李旭毅, 池忠志, 姜心禄, 郑家国. 成都平原两熟区籼粳稻品种籽粒灌浆特性. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 3256–3264
Li X Y, Chi Z Z, Jiang X L, Zheng J G. Analysis on grain filling characteristics of indica and japonica rice in rapeseed (wheat)–rice planting area in Chengdu basin. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 3256–3264 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]王建林, 徐正进, 马殿荣. 北方杂交稻与常规稻籽粒灌浆特性的比较. 中国水稻科学, 2004, 18: 425–430
Wang J L, Xu Z J, Ma D R. Comparison on grain filling characters between hybrid and conventional rice in northern China. Chin J Rice Sci, 2004, 18: 425–430 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]姜元华, 张洪程, 赵可, 许俊伟, 韦还和, 龙厚元, 王文婷, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 长江下游地区不同类型水稻品种产量及其构成因素特征的研究. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28: 621–631
Jiang Y H, Zhang H C, Zhao K, Xu J W, Wei H H, Long H Y, Wang W T, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W. Difference in yield and its components characteristics of different type rice cultivars in the lower reaches of the Yangtze river. Chin J Rice Sci, 2014, 28: 621–631 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]殷春渊, 王书玉, 刘贺梅, 薛应征, 张栩, 王和乐, 孙建权, 胡秀明, 李习军. 氮肥施用量对超级粳稻新稻18号强弱势籽粒灌浆和稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27: 503–510
Yin C Y, Wang S Y, Liu H M, Xue Y Z, Zhang X, Wang H L, Sun J Q, Hu X M, Li X J. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application on grain filling characteristics and rice quality of superior and inferior grain in super japonica rice Xindao 18. Chin J Rice Sci, 2013, 27: 503–510 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]张强, 李自超, 傅秀林, 吴长明, 金京花. 不同株穗型水稻超高产品种叶绿素含量变化规律及籽粒灌浆动态研究. 作物学报, 2005, 31: 1198–1206
Zhang Q, Li Z C, Fu X L, Wu C M, Jin J H. Changes of chlorophyll content & grain filling characteristics of the super high-yielding rice culti-vars with different plant and panicle types. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31: 1198–1206 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]杨建昌. 水稻弱势粒灌浆机理与调控途径. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 2011−2019
Yang J C. Mechanism and regulation in the filling of inferior spikelets of rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 2011–2019 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]Yang W H, Peng S B, Maribel L. Sese D, Laza R C, Visperas R M. Grain filling duration, a crucial determinant of genotypic variation of grain yield in field-grown tropical irrigated rice. Field Crops Res, 2008, 105: 221–227
[38]Yoshinaga S, Takai T, Arai-Sanoh Y, Ishimaru T, Kondo M. Varietal differences in sink production and grain-filling ability in recently developed high-yielding rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in Japan. Field Crops Res, 2013, 150: 74–82

[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!