氮肥施用量对机插优质晚稻产量和稻米品质的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.92010

作物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (01): 117-130.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.92010

氮肥施用量对机插优质晚稻产量和稻米品质的影响

唐健¹,唐闯¹,郭保卫^1,^*(),张诚信¹,张振振¹,王科¹,张洪程¹,陈恒²,孙明珠³

1 扬州大学江苏省作物栽培生理重点实验室/江苏省粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心, 江苏扬州225009
2 江西省上高县农业局, 江西上高336400
3 江西省农业技术推广总站, 江西南昌330046

收稿日期:2019-03-05 接受日期:2019-08-09 出版日期:2020-01-12 网络出版日期:2019-09-01
通讯作者: 郭保卫
作者简介:E-mail: 2841915943@qq.com
基金资助:
本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300507);国家自然科学基金项目(31601246);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-01-27);江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目资助

Effect of nitrogen application on yield and rice quality of mechanical transplanting high quality late rice

TANG Jian¹,TANG Chuang¹,GUO Bao-Wei^1,^*(),ZHANG Cheng-Xin¹,ZHANG Zhen-Zhen¹,WANG Ke¹,ZHANG Hong-Cheng¹,CHEN Heng²,SUN Ming-Zhu³

1 Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
2 Bureau of Agriculture of Shanggao County of Jiangxi Province, Shanggao 336400, Jiangxi, China
3 Jiangxi Agricultural Technology Extension Station, Nanchang 330046, Jiangxi, China

Received:2019-03-05 Accepted:2019-08-09 Published:2020-01-12 Published online:2019-09-01
Contact: Bao-Wei GUO
Supported by:
This study was supported by the Grants from the National Key Research Program(2016YFD0300507);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31601246);National Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System Construction Special(CARS-01-27);Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本试验为筛选适合优质丰产机插晚稻的最佳氮肥用量, 以优质双季晚稻泰优398、黄华占、天优华占、美香新占4个品种为试验材料, 在机插条件下设0、135、180、255 kg hm ^-2四个施氮水平, 测定产量构成及稻米品质指标。结果表明, 适当增施氮肥可增加优质双季晚稻产量, 施氮量为180 kg hm ^-2时产量最高。除黄华占的整精米率外, 施氮量为180 kg hm ^-2时各品种的糙米率、精米率和整精米率最高。随施氮量的增加, 机插优质双季晚稻的垩白粒率和垩白度降低, 米粒长宽比变大, 蛋白质含量和胶稠度均增加, 直链淀粉含量减少; 峰值黏度、热浆黏度、崩解值、最终黏度逐渐下降, 消减值增加, 糊化温度呈上升趋势。适当增施氮肥可改善机插优质晚稻加工品质、外观品质、蒸煮和营养品质, 但RVA特性有变劣趋势。180 kg hm ^-2的施氮量可使机插优质双季晚稻优质和高产达到较好的协调统一。

关键词: 机插, 优质晚稻, 氮肥用量, 产量, 稻米品质

Abstract:

The experiment was conducted by using four high quality late rice varieties, including Taiyou 398, Huanghuazhan, Tianyouhuazhan, and Meixiangxinzhan under four nitrogen treatments of 0, 135, 180, and 255 kg hm ^-2 to select the optimum nitrogen application rate for the coordination of high quality and high yield. The appropriate increase of nitrogen application improved the yield of high quality rice, which reached maximum under the nitrogen treatment of 180 kg hm ^-2. When the nitrogen application was 180 kg hm ^-2, the indicators such as the brown rice rate, milled rice rate and head milled rice rate for all varieties reached maximum except for the head milled rice rate of Huanghuazhan. As more nitrogen was gradually applied, there were growing length-width ratio, protein content and gel consistency of double-season high-quality late rice while in contrast reduction in chalky grain percentage, chalkiness degree and amylose content, which also brought about a steady drop in peak viscosity, trough viscosity, breakdown, final viscosity while a rise in setback and pasting temperature. To sum up, the appropriate increase of nitrogen application can improve the processing quality, appearance quality, cooking and nutritional quality while deteriorate the RVA characteristics. The nitrogen application of 180 kg hm ^-2 facilitates a better coordination between quality and yield in high quality double-season late rice under mechanical transplanting.

Key words: mechanical transplanting, high quality late rice, nitrogen application, yield, rice quality

唐健,唐闯,郭保卫,张诚信,张振振,王科,张洪程,陈恒,孙明珠. 氮肥施用量对机插优质晚稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(01): 117-130.

TANG Jian,TANG Chuang,GUO Bao-Wei,ZHANG Cheng-Xin,ZHANG Zhen-Zhen,WANG Ke,ZHANG Hong-Cheng,CHEN Heng,SUN Ming-Zhu. Effect of nitrogen application on yield and rice quality of mechanical transplanting high quality late rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(01): 117-130.

图/表 10

表1

不同氮肥施用量下优质晚稻产量及其构成因素"

品种 Cultivar	处理Treatment	穗数 Panicle (×10⁴hm^-2)	每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle	总颖花量 Total number of spikelets (×10⁴hm^-2)	结实率 Seed-setting rate (%)	千粒重 1000-kernel weight (g)	理论产量 Theoretical yield (kg hm^-2)	实际产量 Actual yield (kg hm^-2)
2017
美香新占 Meixiang- xinzhan	N0	295.50 Bb	127.39 Bc	37643.45 Cc	83.43 Aa	20.35 Aa	6391.11 Cc	6218.51 Cc
	N1	347.82 ABa	146.36 ABb	50907.50 Bb	77.79 ABb	20.05 Aab	7939.99 Bb	7497.38 Bb
	N2	354.63 Aa	157.26 Aa	55768.68 Aa	77.74 ABb	19.25 Ab	8345.75 Aa	8204.39 Aa
	N3	357.92 Aa	156.04 Aa	55849.66 Aa	77.15 Bb	19.17 Aab	8186.72 ABa	8096.84 ABa
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	304.88 Cc	117.36 Bb	35780.99 Cc	82.21 Aa	22.57 Aa	6639.09 Bc	6495.88 Bc
	N1	341.09 Bb	129.04 Aa	44014.31 Bb	79.28 ABab	22.41 Aa	7819.87 Ab	7342.58 ABb
	N2	367.41 ABa	131.02 Aa	48137.55 Aa	76.83 ABbc	22.35 Aa	8265.94 Aa	7928.13 Aa
	N3	377.66 Aa	129.25 Aa	48812.10 Aa	75.02 Bc	22.30 Aa	8166.00 Aa	7733.12 Aa
天优华占 Tianyouhua- zhan	N0	269.72 Cc	111.37 Cc	30039.25 Cc	90.81 Aa	23.57 Aa	6456.85 Bc	6203.33 Bc
	N1	285.15 BCb	133.18 Bb	37975.94 Bb	88.43 Aab	23.40 Aa	7858.22 ABb	7565.08 Ab
	N2	292.93 Bb	154.12 Aa	45146.24 Aa	86.38 ABb	23.30 Aa	9086.38 Aa	8608.62 Aa
	N3	315.88 Aa	150.32 Aa	47482.38 Aa	82.14 Bc	23.19 Aa	9005.57 Aa	8517.32 Aa
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	285.21 Bb	105.05 Cc	29961.58 Cc	92.04 Aa	22.11 Aa	6097.19 Bc	5941.71 Bc
	N1	334.41 ABa	112.96 Bb	37775.11 Bb	91.45 ABa	21.87 Aa	7555.06 Ab	6987.72 ABb
	N2	337.41 ABa	121.92 Aa	41137.03 Aa	91.09 ABa	21.75 Aa	8112.63 Aa	7948.39 Aa
	N3	354.47 Aa	119.68 Aa	42423.47 Aa	88.09 Bb	21.68 Aa	8027.25 Aa	7870.37 Aa
2018
美香新占 Meixiang- xinzhan	N0	304.77 Bc	103.30 Bb	31482.50 Bc	86.17 Aa	21.10 Aa	5724.27 Bb	5602.80 Bc
	N1	317.08 ABbc	144.50 Aa	45818.28 Ab	84.16 Aab	20.12 Aab	7750.88 Aa	7326.74 Ab
	N2	326.32 ABb	148.54 Aa	48470.61 Aab	83.79 Ab	19.80 Ab	8041.17 Aa	7757.72 Aa
	N3	354.02 Aa	142.97 Aa	50615.57 Aa	83.37 Ab	19.75 Ab	7912.05 Aa	7634.58 Aab
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	273.98 Bc	97.22 Bc	26637.24 Bc	87.29 Aa	24.25 Aa	5638.66 Cc	5910.65 Bc
	N1	338.63 Aa	113.77 Ab	38526.95 Ab	85.69 Aab	24.20 Aa	7989.63 Bb	7449.88 Ab
	N2	347.87 Aab	121.08 Aa	42120.79 Aa	85.14 Ab	23.90 Aa	8571.00 Aa	8127.14 Aa
	N3	354.02 Ab	117.75 Aab	41686.22 Aab	84.74 Ab	23.85 Aa	8425.41 ABa	7942.43 Aa
天优华占 Tianyouhuazhan	N0	283.77 Ac	97.00 Cc	27525.47 Cc	85.43 Aa	24.80 Aa	5831.91 Cc	5610.65 Bc
	N1	306.42 Ab	131.32 Bb	40239.12 Bb	83.09 ABab	24.60 Aa	8225.20 Bb	7816.15 Ab
	N2	324.58 Aa	145.83 Aa	47334.81 Aa	80.51 ABbc	24.45 Aa	9280.08 Aa	8831.26 Aa
	N3	335.54 Aa	141.50 ABa	47478.53 Aa	79.36 Bc	24.40 Aa	9156.49 Aa	8646.55 Aa
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	286.53 Ac	96.65 Bb	27693.35 Cc	90.65 Aa	22.80 Aa	5723.56 Bc	5699.08 Cc
	N1	318.18 Ab	119.71 Aa	38089.35 Bb	89.22 Aab	22.75 Aa	7731.50 Ab	7345.75 Bb
	N2	338.32 Aa	123.34 Aa	41728.23 Aa	88.49 Aab	22.65 Aa	8363.81 Aa	8180.86 Aa
	N3	341.40 Aa	120.93 Aa	41284.46 Aa	87.92 Ab	22.60 Aa	8203.12 Aa	7996.15 ABa

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

表7

表8

表9

表10

参考文献 40

[1]	Yu Q G, Ye J, Yang S N, Fu J R, Ma J W, Sun W C, Jiang L N, Wang Q, Wang J M . Effects of nitrogen application level on rice nutrient uptake and ammonia volatilization. Rice Sci, 2013,20:139-147. doi: 10.1016/S1672-6308(13)60117-1
[2]	Xiang L K, Ping Z, Zhong Q S, Jin S B . Physicochemical properties of starches from diverse rice cultivars varying in apparently amylose content and gelatinisation temperature combinations. Food Chem, 2015,172:433-440. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.085 pmid: 25442575
[3]	程方民, 刘正辉, 张嵩午 . 稻米品质形成的气候生态条件评价及我国地域分布规律. 生态学报, 2002,22:636-642.
	Cheng F M, Liu Z H, Zhang S W . The evaluation of climatic-ecology condition for the rice quality formation and its distribution laws in China. Acta Ecol Sin, 2002,22:636-642 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4]	Hayashi S, Kamoshita A, Yamagishi J, Kotchasatit A, Jongdee B . Genotypic differences in grain yield of transplanted and direct-seeded rainfed lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in northeastern Thailand. Field Crops Res, 2007,102:9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.01.001
[5]	Lanning S B, Siebenmorgen T J, Counce P A, Ambardekar A A, Mauromoustakos A . Extreme nighttime air temperatures in 2010 impact rice chalkiness and milling quality. Field Crops Res, 2011,124:132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.06.012
[6]	Jun F G, Jing C, Lu C, Zhi Q W, Hao Z, Jian C Y . Grain quality changes and responses to nitrogen fertilizer ofjaponica rice cultivars released in the Yangtze river basin from the 1950s to 2000s. Crop J, 2015,3:285-297. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.03.007
[7]	Nowotna A, Gambuś H, Kratsch G . Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the physicochemical properties of starch isolated from German triticale varieties. Starch-Stärke, 2007,59:397-399. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-379X
[8]	Peng S B, Buresh R J, Huang J L, Yang J C, Zou Y B, Zhong X H, Wang G G, Zhang F S . Strategies for overcoming low agronomic nitrogen use efficiency in irrigated rice systems in china. Field Crops Res, 2006,96:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.05.004
[9]	王秀斌, 徐新朋, 孙刚, 孙静文, 梁国庆, 刘光荣, 周卫 . 氮肥用量对双季稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19:1279-1286. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0601
	Wang X B, Xu X M, Sun G, Sun J W, Liang G Q, Liu G R, Zhou W . Effects of nitrogen fertilization on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double cropping rice. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2013,19:1279-1286 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0601
[10]	郭保卫, 胡雅杰, 钱海军, 曹伟伟, 邢志鹏, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕 . 秸秆还田下适宜施氮量提高机插稻南粳9108产量和群体质量. 中国水稻科学, 2015,29:511-518. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2015.05.008
	Guo B W, Hu Y J, Qian H J, Cao W W, Xing Z P, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Xu K, Wei H Y . Optimal nitrogen rate improves grain yield and population quality of mechanical transplanted rice Nanjing 9108 under straw manuring. Chin J Rice Sci, 2015,29:511-518 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2015.05.008
[11]	徐新朋, 周卫, 梁国庆, 孙静文, 王秀斌, 何萍, 徐芳森, 余喜初 . 氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21:763-772. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0324
	Xu X M, Zhou W, Liang G Q, Sun J W, Wang X B, He P, Xu F S, Yu X C . Effects of nitrogen and density interactions on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double-rice systems. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2015,21:763-772 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0324
[12]	李敏, 张洪程, 李国业, 马群, 杨雄, 魏海燕 . 生育类型与施氮水平对粳稻淀粉RVA谱特性的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38:293-300. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00293
	Li M, Zhang H C, Li G Y, Ma Q, Yang X, Wei H Y . Effects of growth-period type and nitrogen application level on the RVA profile characteristics for japonica rice genotypes. Acta Agron Sin, 2012,38:293-300 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00293
[13]	马群, 张洪程, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 霍中洋, 许轲, 殷春渊, 杭杰, 张胜飞, 张庆 . 生育类型与施氮水平对粳稻加工品质的影响. 作物学报, 2009,35:1282-1289. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01282
	Ma Q, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Yin C Y, Hang J, Zhang S F, Zhang Q . Effects of nitrogen application rate and growth-development type on milling quality in japonica rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2009,35:1282-1289 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01282
[14]	朱大伟 . 三种关键栽培措施对软米粳稻产量与品质的影响. 扬州大学博士学位论文, 江苏扬州, 2018.
	Zhu D W . Effects of Three Key Cultivation Measures on Yield and Quality of Soft Rice Japonica Rice. PhD Dissertation of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15]	金正勋, 秋太权, 孙艳丽, 赵久明, 金学泳 . 氮肥对稻米垩白及蒸煮食味品质特性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001,7:31-35. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2001.0105
	Jin Z X, Qiu T Q, Sun Y L, Zhao J M, Jin X Y . Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on chalkness ratio and cooking and eating quality properties of rice grain. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2001,7:31-35 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2001.0105
[16]	金军, 徐大勇, 蔡一霞, 胡署云, 葛敏, 朱庆森 . 施氮量对水稻主要米质性状及RVA谱特征参数的影响. 作物学报, 2004,30:154-158.
	Jin J, Xu D Y, Cai Y X, Hu S Y, Ge M, Zhu Q S . Effect of N-fertilizer on main quality characters of rice and RVA profile parameters. Acta Agron Sin, 2004,30:154-158 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17]	郭保卫, 朱大伟, 朱聪聪, 许轲, 周兴涛, 张洪程, 陈厚存, 张军, 陈京都, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 曹利强, 李明银 . 有序摆抛栽对粳型超级稻稻米品质的影响. 作物学报, 2015,41:487-498. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00487
	Guo B W, Zhu D W, Zhu C C, Xu K, Zhou X T, Zhang H C, Chen H C, Zhang J, Chen J D, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y, Cao L Q, Li M Y . Effect of ordered transplanting and optimized broadcasting on japonica super rice quality. Acta Agron Sin, 2015,41:487-498 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00487
[18]	Zhou W, Lyu T F, Zhang P P . Regular nitrogen application increases nitrogen utilization efficiency and grain yield inindica hybrid rice. Agron J, 2016,108:1951-1961. doi: 10.2134/agronj2016.03.0137
[19]	魏海燕, 王亚江, 孟天瑶, 葛梦婕, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲 . 机插超级粳稻产量、品质及氮肥利用率对氮肥的响应. 应用生态学报, 2014,25:488-496.
	Wei H Y, Wang Y J, Meng T Y, Ge M J, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K . Response of yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency to nitrogen fertilizer from mechanical transplanting super japonica rice. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014,25:488-496 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20]	成臣, 曾勇军, 王祺, 谭雪明, 商庆银, 曾研华, 石庆华 . 施氮量对晚粳稻甬优1538产量、品质及氮素吸收利用的影响. 水土保持学报, 2018,32:222-228.
	Cheng C, Zeng Y J, Wang Q, Tan X M, Shang Q H, Zeng Y H, Shi Q H . Effects of nitrogen application rates on japonica rice yield, quality, and nitrogen uptake and utilization during the late-rice cropping seasons in southern China. J Soil & Water Conserv, 2018,32:222-228 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21]	张建军, 贾哲, 涂强, 张党省, 张效瑕 . 不同施氮量对汉中稻区晚熟稻产量及稻米品质的影响. 西北农业学报, 2014,23(8):60-65.
	Zhang J J, Jia Z, Tu Q, Zhang D S, Zhang X J . Effects of different rates of nitrogen application on the yield and quality of late-maturing rice in Hanzhong. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 2014,23(8):60-65 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22]	韩宝吉, 曾祥明, 卓光毅, 徐芳森, 姚忠清, 肖习明, 石磊 . 施用措施对湖北中稻产量、品质和氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011,44:842-850.
	Han B J, Zeng X M, Zhuo G Y, Xu F S, Yao Z Q, Xiao X M, Shi L . Effects of fertilization measures of nitrogen (N) on grain yield, grain quality and N-use efficiency of midseason rice in Hubei province. Sci Agric Sin, 2011,44:842-850 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23]	王春雨, 余华清, 何艳, 郭长春, 张绍文, 杨志远, 马均 . 播栽方式与施氮量对杂交籼稻氮肥利用特征及产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2017,25:1792-1801.
	Wang C Y, Yu H Q, He Y, Guo C C, Zhang S W, Yang Z Y, Ma J . Characteristics of nitrogen accumulation and utilization in indica hybrid rice under different planting methods and nitrogen rates. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2017,25:1792-1801 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24]	伍丹丹, 谢小兵, 陈佳娜, 邹应斌 . 种植方式对水稻生长发育和产量的影响. 作物研究, 2014,28(1):92-96.
	Wu D D, Xie X B, Chen J N, Zou Y B . Effects of planting methods on rice growth and yield. Crop Res, 2014,28(1):92-96 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25]	汪和廷, 董慧, 齐龙昌, 李学松, 王腾, 宋贺, 陈松, 董召荣, 章秀福 . 种植方式及施氮量对水稻灌浆初期氮代谢关键酶活性和产量性状的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2015,23:1210-1214.
	Wang H Y, Dong H, Qi L C, Li X S, Wang T, Song H, Chen S, Dong Z R, Zhang X F . Effects of cultivation method and nitrogen application rate on key enzyme activities of nitrogen metabolism at early milky stage and grain yield of rice. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2015,23:1210-1214 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26]	Falade K O, Semon M, Fadairo O S, Oladunjoye A O, Orou K K . Functional and physico-chemical properties of flours and starches of African rice cultivars. Food Hydrocolloids, 2014,39:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.11.002
[27]	Wu F F, Chen H Y, Na Y, Wang J P, Duan X, Jin Z Y, Xu X M . Effect of germination time on physicochemical properties of brown rice flour and starch from different rice cultivars. J Cereal Sci, 2013,58:263-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2013.06.008
[28]	万靓军, 张洪程, 霍中洋, 林忠成, 戴其根, 许轲, 张军 . 氮肥运筹对超级杂交粳稻产量、品质及氮素利用率的影响. 作物学报, 2007,33:175-182.
	Wan J J, Zhang H C, Huo Z Y, Lin Z C, Dai Q G, Xu K, Zhang J . Effects of nitrogen application regimes on yield, quality, and nitrogen use efficiency of super japonica hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2007,33:175-182 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29]	殷春渊, 王书玉, 刘贺梅, 孙建权, 胡秀明, 薛应征, 王和乐, 范永胜 . 不同密度和施氮量对稻米品质特性的影响. 河南农业科学, 2015,44(9):15-18.
	Yin C Y, Wang S Y, Liu H M, Sun J Q, Hu X M, Xue Y Z, Wang H L, Fan Y S . Effects of different planting density and amount of nitrogen fertilizer on rice quality characteristics. J Henan Agric Sci, 2015,44(9):15-18 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30]	龚金龙, 张洪程, 胡雅杰, 龙厚元, 常勇, 王艳, 邢志鹏, 霍中洋 . 灌浆结实期温度对水稻产量和品质形成的影响. 生态学杂志, 2013,32:482-491.
	Gong J L, Zhang H C, Hu Y J, Long H Y, Chang Y, Wang Y, Xing Z P, Huo Z Y . Effects of air temperature during rice grain filling period on the formation of rice grain yield and its quality. Chin J Ecol, 2013,32:482-491 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31]	张洪程, 王秀芹, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲 . 施氮量对杂交稻两优培九产量、品质及吸氮特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2003,36:800-806.
	Zhang H C, Wang X Q, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K . Effects of N-application rate on yield, quality and characters of nitrogen uptake of hybrid rice variety Liangyoupeijiu. Sci Agric Sin, 2003,36:800-806 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32]	从夕汉, 施伏芝, 阮新民, 罗玉祥, 马廷臣, 罗志祥 . 氮肥水平对不同基因型水稻氮素利用率、产量和品质的影响. 生态学报, 2017,28:1219-1226.
	Cong X H, Shi F Z, Ruan X M, Luo Y X, Ma Z C, Luo Z X . Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application rate on nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield and quality of different rice varieties. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2017,28:1219-1226 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33]	高辉, 马群, 李国业, 杨雄, 李雪侨, 殷春渊, 李敏, 张庆, 张洪程, 戴其根, 魏海燕 . 氮肥水平对不同生育类型粳稻稻米蒸煮食味品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010,43:4543-4552.
	Gao H, Ma Q, Li G Y, Yang X, Li X Q, Yin C Y, Li M, Zhang Q, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Wei H Y . Effect of nitrogen application rate on cooking and eating qualities of different growth-development types of japonica rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2010,43:4543-4552 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34]	张自常, 李鸿伟, 曹转勤, 王志琴, 杨建昌 . 施氮量和灌溉方式的交互作用对水稻产量和品质影响. 作物学报, 2013,39:84-92. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00084
	Zhang Z C, Li H W, Cao Z Q, Wang Z Q, Yang J C . Effect of interaction between nitrogen rate and irrigation regime on grain yield and quality of rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2013,39:84-92 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00084
[35]	成臣, 曾勇军, 吕伟生, 谭雪明, 商庆银, 曾研华, 石庆华 . 南方稻区优质晚粳稻产量和品质调优的播期效应. 核农学报, 2018,32:2019-2030.
	Cheng C, Zeng Y J, Lyu W S, Tan X M, Shang Q Y, Zeng Y H, Shi Q H . Effect of sowing date on rice yield and quality of high-quality japonica rice during the late-rice cropping seasons in southern china. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2018,32:2019-2030 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36]	叶全宝, 张洪程, 李华, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 夏科, 戴其根, 许轲 . 施氮水平和栽插密度对粳稻淀粉RVA谱特性的影响. 作物学报, 2005,31:124-130.
	Ye Q B, Zhang H C, Li H, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y, Xia K, Dai Q G, Xu K . Effects of amount of nitrogen applied and planting density on RVA profile characteristic of japonica rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2005,31:124-130 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[37]	闫影, 张丽霞, 万常照, 曹黎明, 吴书俊 . 稻米淀粉RVA谱特征值及理化指标与食味值的相关性. 植物生理学报, 2016,52:1884-1890.
	Yan Y, Zhang L X, Wan C Z, Cao L M, Wu S J . Correlation analysis between taste value and RVA profile characteristics as well as physical/chemical indicator in rice. Plant Physiol J, 2016,52:1884-1890 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38]	李国生, 张耗, 王志琴, 刘立军, 杨建昌 . 氮素水平对水稻产量与品质的影响. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2007,28(4):66-70.
	Li G S, Zhang H, Wang Z Q, Liu L J, Yang J C . Effects of nitrogen levels on grain yield and quality of rice. J Yangzhou Univ(Agric & Life Sci Edn), 2007,28(4):66-70 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39]	胡雅杰, 钱海军, 吴培, 朱明, 邢志鹏, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 许轲, 张洪程 . 秸秆还田条件下氮磷钾用量对软米粳稻产量和品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24:817-824.
	Hu Y J, Qian H J, Wu P, Zhu M, Xing Z P, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y, Xu K, Zhang H C . Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer rates on yield and grain quality of soft japonica rice under straw returning condition. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2018,24:817-824 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[40]	Zhu D W, Zhang H C, Guo B W, Xu K, Dai Q G, Wei C X, Wei H Y, Gao H, Hu Y J, Cui P Y, Huo Z Y . Effect of nitrogen management on the structure and physicochemical properties of rice starch. J Agric Food Chem, 2016,64:8019-8025. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03173 pmid: 27715058

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	2017			2018
品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	糙米率 BR	精米率 MR	整精米率 HMR	糙米率 BR	精米率 MR	整精米率 HMR
美香新占 Meixiangxinzhan	N0	78.41 Aa	68.67 Ab	58.94 Ab	77.01 Ab	70.71 Ab	53.58 Bb
	N1	78.67 Aa	69.48 Ab	59.72 Aab	80.98 Aa	73.60 Aa	55.28 ABb
	N2	79.30 Aa	70.74 Aa	62.25 Aa	81.20 Aa	73.88 Aa	58.02 Aa
	N3	78.82 Aa	70.21 Aab	59.51 Aab	81.10 Aa	69.96 Ab	54.87 ABb
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	79.70 Ab	66.56 Ab	53.58 Abc	78.29 Ab	63.58 Ab	50.99 Ab
	N1	80.63 Aab	69.17 Aab	55.16 Aab	79.68 Aab	67.91 Aab	53.97 Aab
	N2	81.98 Aa	70.12 Aa	57.07 Aa	81.74 Aa	70.23 Aa	57.75 Aa
	N3	81.00 Aab	69.90 Aab	52.33 Ac	81.81 Aa	69.68 Aa	52.19 Aab
天优华占 Tianyouhuazhan	N0	80.10 Ab	70.70 Aa	63.10 Bc	77.93 Ac	68.99 Ab	60.85 Bc
	N1	80.14 Ab	71.22 Aa	65.89 ABb	81.08 Aab	70.25 Aab	64.05 ABb
	N2	82.71 Aa	71.61 Aa	68.72 Aa	82.31 Aa	72.98 Aa	67.78 Aa
	N3	81.51 Aab	71.29 Aa	61.67 Bc	79.72 Abc	71.89 Aa	59.54 Bc
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	81.12 Aa	69.46 Ab	45.15 Bc	79.77 Aa	68.36 Ab	45.56 Cc
	N1	81.24 Aa	70.00 Aab	48.99 ABbc	80.56 Aa	68.97 Ab	48.14 BCb
	N2	82.51 Aa	70.63 Aa	53.11 Aab	80.68 Aa	70.13 Aa	52.32 ABa
	N3	82.01 Aa	69.21 Ab	54.13 Aa	79.44 Aa	68.87 Ab	54.67 Aa

品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	2017				2018
品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	粒长 KL (mm)	长宽比 L/W	垩白粒率 CR (%)	垩白度 CD (%)	粒长 KL (mm)	长宽比 L/W	垩白粒率 CR (%)	垩白度 CD (%)
美香新占 Meixiang xinzhan	N0	6.07 Aa	3.12 Aa	13.90 Aa	2.95 Aa	6.05 Aa	3.18 Aa	18.00 Aa	5.17 Aa
	N1	6.12 Aa	3.16 Aa	12.94 ABa	2.63 Aa	6.30 Aa	3.33 Aa	15.04 Bb	3.64 Bb
	N2	6.15 Aa	3.17 Aa	10.98 BCb	2.45 ABb	6.35 Aa	3.35 Aa	13.12 Cc	3.17 Bc
	N3	6.28 Aa	3.23 Aa	9.90 Cb	2.30 Bb	6.42 Aa	3.36 Aa	11.89 Cd	2.59 Cd
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	5.91 Aa	3.00 Aa	18.94 Aa	3.91 Aa	6.23 Aa	3.33 Ab	18.62 Aa	5.59 Aa
	N1	5.99 Aa	3.02 Aa	17.18 Aab	2.91 Bb	6.59 Aa	3.57 Aab	17.41 Aa	4.70 Bb
	N2	6.06 Aa	3.05 Aa	13.90 Bc	2.65 Bb	6.62 Aa	3.59 Aab	15.68 Ab	3.76 Cc
	N3	6.13 Aa	3.09 Aa	10.29 Cd	2.15 Bb	6.69 Aa	3.65 Aa	11.57 Ac	2.55 Dd
天优华占 Tianyouhuazhan	N0	6.15 Aa	3.27 Ab	21.05 Aa	6.14 Aa	5.73 Bb	3.02 Aa	23.76 Aa	11.58 Aa
	N1	6.19 Aa	3.31 Aab	18.73 ABb	5.41 ABab	5.93 Bb	3.16 Aa	19.77 Bb	9.21 Bb
	N2	6.23 Aa	3.38 Aab	17.25 ABbc	4.95 Bb	6.56 Aa	3.19 Aa	15.75 Cc	6.56 Cc
	N3	6.33 Aa	3.45 Aa	16.21 Bc	4.20 Bb	6.75 Aa	3.24 Aa	15.23 Cc	6.54 Cc
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	6.17 Aa	3.02 Ab	18.35 Aa	7.47 Aa	6.04 Aa	3.04 Aa	18.06 Aa	5.88 Aa
	N1	6.22 Aa	3.06 Aab	17.71 Aa	6.70 ABa	6.05 Aa	3.11 Aa	14.61 Bb	4.43 Bb
	N2	6.29 Aa	3.18 Aab	14.24 Ab	5.41 Bb	6.20 Aa	3.20 Aa	10.36 Cc	2.85 Cc
	N3	6.37 Aa	3.28 Aa	7.43 Bc	4.97 Bb	6.21 Aa	3.21 Aa	9.96 Cc	2.72 Cc

品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	2017			2018
品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	直链淀粉含量 AC (%)	胶稠度 GC (mm)	蛋白质含量 PC (%)	直链淀粉含量 AC (%)	胶稠度 GC (mm)	蛋白质含量 PC (%)
美香新占	N0	19.34 Aa	62.0 Bc	6.10 Bc	17.95 Aa	63.2 Cc	6.5 Bc
Meixiang xinzhan	N1	18.05 ABb	68.5 ABb	7.90 Ab	17.32 Aab	69.5 Bb	7.8 Ab
	N2	17.52 Bbc	76.5 Aa	7.95 Ab	16.19 ABbc	75.9 Aa	8.5 Aa
	N3	16.90 Bc	77.5 Aa	8.80 Aa	15.94 Bc	78.3 Aa	8.9 Aa
泰优398	N0	16.46 Aa	64.5 Bc	6.35 Dd	15.53 Aa	65.9 Ac	6.6 Cd
Taiyou 398	N1	15.74 Aab	68.0 ABbc	8.05 Cc	13.88 Bb	68.6 Abc	8.2 Bc
	N2	15.26 Ab	69.5 ABab	8.70 Bb	13.57 Bbc	70.9 Aab	9.3 ABb
	N3	15.23 Ab	73.0 Aa	9.70 Aa	12.85 Bc	73.5 Aa	10.1 Aa
天优华占	N0	23.78 Aa	65.8 Ab	7.10 Ab	22.51 Aa	68.8 Ab	6.7 Bc
Tianyouhuazhan	N1	22.51 ABa	66.5 Ab	7.25 Aab	18.93 Bb	71.5 Ab	7.5 ABb
	N2	19.53 BCb	75.8 Aa	7.35 Aab	18.26 Bbc	78.3 Aa	8.3 Aa
	N3	19.01 Cb	76.0 Aa	7.70 Aa	17.68 Bc	79.2 Aa	8.8 Aa
黄华占	N0	17.92 Aa	49.5 Bc	6.35 Cc	16.11 Aa	53.6 Cc	7.4 Cc
Huanghuazhan	N1	15.26 Bb	56.0 ABb	8.00 Bb	14.02 Bb	60.5 Bb	8.1 BCb
	N2	13.71 Bc	58.0 Ab	8.40 ABb	12.36 Bbc	62.6 ABb	8.7 ABb
	N3	13.41 Bbc	62.0 Aa	9.20 Aa	11.47 Bc	66.1 Aa	9.6 Aa

品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	峰值黏度 Peak viscosity (cP)	热浆黏度 Trough viscosity (cP)	崩解值 Breakdown (cP)	最终黏度 Final viscosity (cP)	消减值 Setback (cP)	糊化温度 Pasting temperature (℃)
美香新占	N0	3073.0 Aa	1777.5 Aa	1295.5 Aa	3002.5 Aa	-70.5 Dd	75.13 Bb
Meixiang xinzhan	N1	2860.0 ABb	1691.5 ABab	1168.5 ABb	2865.0 ABb	5.0 Cc	75.70 ABb
	N2	2727.0 Bbc	1676.5 ABb	1050.5 Bc	2749.0 BCc	22.0 Bb	76.65 ABb
	N3	2644.5 Bc	1608.5 Bb	1036.0 Bc	2694.0 Cc	49.5 Aa	78.23 Aa
泰优398	N0	3322.0 Aa	2036.0 Aa	1286.0 Aa	3134.5 Aa	-187.5 Dd	75.15 Ab
Taiyou 398	N1	3025.0 ABb	1958.0 ABa	1067.0 Bb	2946.5 ABb	-78.5 Cc	75.48 Ab
	N2	2794.0 ABbc	1792.5 BCb	1001.5 BCc	2833.5 Bbc	39.5 Bb	76.35 Aab
	N3	2641.0 Bc	1657.0 Cc	984.0 Cc	2745.0 Bc	104.0 Aa	77.33 Aa
天优华占	N0	2941.5 Aa	1839.0 Aa	1102.5 Aa	3093.5 Aa	152.0 Cd	76.75 Ab
Tianyouhuazhan	N1	2862.0 ABa	1838.0 Aa	1024.0 ABb	3022.5 Aab	160.5 Cc	77.13 Ab
	N2	2722.5 ABb	1782.0 Ab	940.5 Bc	2920.5 Ab	198.0 Bb	78.58 Aa
	N3	2668.0 Bb	1728.50 Ab	939.5 Bc	2896.5 Ab	228.5 Aa	78.78 Aa
黄华占	N0	3075.5 Aa	1835.0 Aa	1240.5 Aa	2923.5 Aa	-152.0 Dd	72.50 Bb
Huanghuazhan	N1	2895.5 ABb	1759.5 Aab	1136.0 ABb	2805.0 ABb	-90.5 Cc	73.65 ABb
	N2	2785.0 Bbc	1696.0 Ab	1089.0 Bbc	2747.5 Bb	-37.5 Bb	74.15 ABab
	N3	2698.0 Bc	1638.0 Ab	1060.0 Bc	2740.5 Bb	42.5 Aa	75.63 Aa

变异来源 Source of variation	年份 Y	品种 C	氮肥用量 N	年份×品种 Y×C	年份×氮肥用量 Y×N	品种×氮肥用量 C×N	年份×品种× 氮肥用量 Y×C×N
自由度 df	1	3	3	3	3	9	9
穗数Panicle	5.901^*	77.14^**	207.66^**	24.78^**	4.36^*	3.82^**	4.02^**
每穗粒数Spikelets per panicle	152.87^**	296.40^**	408.01^**	21.06^**	17.81^**	19.28^**	1.62
总颖花量Total number of spikelets	210.24^**	321.75^**	1093.84^**	68.89^**	8.42^**	11.22^**	1.54
结实率Filled-grain percentage	9.93^**	57.27^**	18.05^**	33.18^**	1.54	0.92	0.35
千粒重1000-kernel weight	61.28^**	201.49^**	7.07^**	4.97^**	0.07	1.41	0.31
产量Yield	4.37^*	32.19^**	713.21^**	9.56^**	14.47^**	7.51^**	0.95
F_0.05	4.16	2.91	2.91	2.91	2.91	2.19	2.19
F_0.01	7.53	4.48	4.48	4.48	4.48	3.04	3.04

氮肥施用量对机插优质晚稻产量和稻米品质的影响

Effect of nitrogen application on yield and rice quality of mechanical transplanting high quality late rice

RichHTML

PDF

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们

变异来源 Source of variation	年份 Y	品种 C	氮肥用量 N	年份×品种 Y×C	年份×氮肥用量 Y×N	品种×氮肥用量 C×N	年份×品种× 氮肥用量 Y×C×N
自由度 df	1	3	3	3	3	9	9
糙米率 BR	1.85	4.09^*	10.73^**	5.12^**	1.77	0.58	0.83
精米率 MR	0.46	7.96^**	11.52^**	4.17^*	0.58	2.24^*	1.14
整精米率 HMR	41.85^**	409.36^**	65.81^**	11.92^**	0.76	15.25^**	0.54
长宽比 L/W	33.99^**	11.76^**	18.89^**	61.26^**	1.90	0.39	0.53
垩白粒率 CR	2011.08^**	2241.82^**	1185.19^**	3517.08^**	30.86^**	37.38^**	26.37^**
垩白度 CD	616.49^**	7547.28^**	2116.79^**	8743.70^**	154.42^**	52.60^**	99.76^**
直链淀粉含量 AC	385.15^**	1162.91^**	326.03^**	8.88^**	5.38^**	20.13^**	6.28^**
蛋白质含量 PC	57.15^**	439.02^**	277.98^**	8.77^**	0.32	9.84^**	0.37
胶稠度 GC	69.15^**	62.814^**	515.17^**	3.46^*	5.72^**	16.93^**	5.73^**
峰值黏度 PKV	10.43^**	18.63^**	113.98^**	11.16^**	2.13	6.07^**	0.50
热浆黏度 THV	46.93^**	93.56^**	33.68^**	38.51^**	17.88^**	14.35^**	1.86
崩解值 BKD	486.79^**	85.67^**	516.85^**	83.93^**	15.58^**	5.28^**	8.78^**
最终黏度 FLV	19.92^**	78.08^**	18.96^**	28.89^**	8.84^**	3.79^**	0.88
消减值 STB	769.98^**	30348.16^**	16690.88^**	7333.67^**	1416.93^**	409.35^**	359.09^**
糊化温度 PAT	58.79^**	89.87^**	3.75^*	52.58^**	0.53	0.10	0.14
F_0.05	4.16	2.91	2.91	2.91	2.91	2.19	2.19
F_0.01	7.53	4.48	4.48	4.48	4.48	3.04	3.04

指标 Index	糙米率 BR	精米率 MR	整精米率 HMR	垩白粒率 CR	垩白度 CD	直链淀含量 AC	胶稠度 GC	蛋白质含量 PC	峰值黏度PKV	热浆黏度THV	崩解值BKD	最终黏度 FLV	消减值STB
精米率 MR	0.485	—
整精米率 HMR	0.178	0.576^*	—
垩白粒率 CR	-0.258	-0.174	0.180	—
垩白度 CD	-0.134	-0.048	0.228	0.819^**	—
直链淀粉含量AC	-0.360	0.259	0.626^**	0.691^**	0.694^**	—
蛋白质含量PC	0.238	0.462	0.720^**	-0.248	-0.320	0.216	—
胶稠度 GC	0.614^*	0.287	-0.050	-0.783^**	-0.620^*	-0.630^**	0.387	—
峰值黏度PKV	-0.511^*	-0.588^*	-0.168	0.763^**	0.432	0.309	-0.404	-0.836^**	—
热浆黏度THV	-0.281	-0.316	0.360	0.691^**	0.344	0.464	0.201	-0.600^*	0.785^**	—
崩解值BKD	-0.544^*	-0.604^*	-0.574^*	0.566^*	0.395	0.093	-0.812^**	-0.741^**	0.808^**	0.274	—
最终黏度FLV	-0.384	-0.019	0.636^**	0.649^**	0.448	0.773^**	0.382	-0.635^**	0.568^*	0.869^**	0.078	—
消减值STB	0.200	0.651^**	0.823^**	-0.225	-0.047	0.416	0.841^**	0.321	-0.575^*	-0.030	-0.843^**	0.347	—
糊化温度PAT	-0.257	0.467	0.651^**	-0.138	-0.259	0.487	0.768^**	-0.025	-0.226	0.163	-0.496	0.502^*	0.755^**

品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	日平均温度 Daily mean temperature (℃)	日最高温度 Daily maximum temperature (℃)	日最低温度 Daily minimum temperature (℃)	日平均温差 Daily mean temperature difference (℃)	日平均光照时数 Daily mean illumination hours (h)
2017
美香新占 Meixiangxinzhan	N0	20.34	23.97	16.81	7.16	7.14
	N1	20.41	23.18	16.24	6.94	6.87
	N2	19.52	22.98	16.11	6.87	6.54
	N3	19.14	22.78	15.98	6.80	6.17
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	23.87	25.49	19.68	5.81	6.87
	N1	23.24	25.12	19.37	5.75	6.69
	N2	22.17	24.41	19.25	5.16	6.26
	N3	19.98	24.19	19.07	5.12	5.76
天优华占 Tianyouhuazhan	N0	22.56	25.17	18.23	6.94	6.58
	N1	21.49	24.98	18.25	6.73	6.12
	N2	21.05	24.52	17.92	6.60	5.56
	N3	19.88	23.91	17.24	6.67	5.24
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	22.59	25.74	17.86	7.88	6.97
	N1	22.11	25.24	17.53	7.71	6.68
	N2	21.47	24.56	16.97	7.59	6.25
	N3	20.41	23.87	16.54	7.33	6.16
2018
美香新占 Meixiangxinzhan	N0	21.02	25.06	17.03	8.03	7.05
	N1	20.56	24.33	16.54	7.79	6.98
	N2	19.61	23.57	15.69	7.88	6.57
	N3	19.41	23.12	15.40	7.72	6.21
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	24.90	26.57	21.28	5.29	6.66
	N1	23.45	25.98	20.95	5.03	6.25
	N2	22.35	24.56	20.41	4.15	5.78
	N3	22.04	24.22	19.88	4.34	5.52
天优华占 Tianyouhuazhan	N0	22.76	26.32	19.23	7.09	6.15
	N1	22.46	26.12	18.84	7.28	5.57
	N2	21.15	25.74	18.35	7.39	5.68
	N3	20.94	25.16	18.02	7.14	5.21
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	22.75	26.63	18.91	7.72	6.72
	N1	22.13	25.93	18.46	7.47	6.34
	N2	21.58	25.12	18.17	6.95	5.97
	N3	20.97	24.95	17.76	7.19	6.04

指标 Index	日平均温度 Daily mean temperature (°C)	日最高温度 Daily maximum temperature (°C)	日最低温度 Daily minimum temperature (°C)	日平均温差 Daily mean temperature difference (°C)	日平均光照时数 Daily mean illumination hours (h)
糙米率 BR	-0.328	-0.451	-0.120	-0.207	-0.473
精米率 MR	-0.712^**	-0.470	-0.593*	0.406	-0.116
整精米率 HMR	-0.246	-0.075	-0.119	0.097	-0.505^*
粒长 KL	-0.202	-0.458	0.095	-0.498^*	-0.449
长宽比 L/W	0.031	-0.493	0.277	-0.768^**	-0.202
垩白率 CR	0.554^*	0.668^**	0.397	0.016	0.178
垩白度 CD	0.398	0.664^**	0.280	0.167	-0.159
直链淀粉含量 AC	-0.056	0.229	-0.200	0.451	0.099
蛋白质含量 PC	-0.457	-0.541^*	-0.259	-0.095	-0.540^*
胶稠度 GC	-0.400	-0.596^*	-0.096	-0.357	-0.588^*
峰值黏度 PKV	0.737^**	0.685^**	0.486	-0.089	0.614^*
热浆黏度THV	0.869^**	0.793^**	0.749^**	-0.350	0.169
崩解值 BKD	0.353	0.343	0.055	0.206	0.861^**
最终黏度 FLV	0.680^**	0.758^**	0.506^*	-0.057	0.187
消减值 STB	-0.401	-0.236	-0.212	0.077	-0.747^**
糊化温度 PAT	-0.394	-0.422	-0.202	-0.075	-0.609^*

[1]	王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2]	王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3]	颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4]	杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5]	陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6]	李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7]	石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8]	闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9]	柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10]	李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11]	王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12]	杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13]	陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14]	袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15]	丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.