欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (12): 2481-2489.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.01090

所属专题： 玉米：耕作栽培·生理生化

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦玉米同步增密有利于优化种间关系而提高间作产量

张金丹(), 范虹, 杜进勇, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强*()   

  1. 甘肃农业大学农学院 / 甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-30 接受日期:2021-04-14 出版日期:2021-12-12 网络出版日期:2021-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 柴强
  • 作者简介:E-mail: zhangjd9522@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31771738);甘肃省基础研究创新群体项目(20JR5RA037);甘肃省自然科学基金项目(20JR5RA008);中央引导地方科技发展专项(ZCYD-2020-1-4)

Synchronously higher planting density can increase yield via optimizing interspecific interaction of intercropped wheat and maize

ZHANG Jin-Dan(), FAN Hong, DU Jin-Yong, YIN Wen, FAN Zhi-Long, HU Fa-Long, CHAI Qiang*()   

  1. Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science / College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
  • Received:2020-11-30 Accepted:2021-04-14 Published:2021-12-12 Published online:2021-06-15
  • Contact: CHAI Qiang
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31771738);Innovation Group of Basic Research in Gansu Province(20JR5RA037);Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province(20JR5RA008);Central Government will Guide Local Science and Technology Development Projects(ZCYD-2020-1-4)

RichHTML

36

PDF

742

摘要：

增密是间作高产的主要措施, 研究间作组分密度变化对其种间关系、产量的影响, 对于夯实间作理论与技术意义重大。2018—2019年, 在河西绿洲灌区开展田间试验, 设单作玉米、单作小麦、小麦/玉米3种种植模式, 4.5万株 hm-2(传统)、6.0万株 hm-2(中)、7.5万株 hm-2(高) 3种玉米密度, 284万粒 hm-2(传统)、341万粒 hm-2(高)两种小麦密度, 研究了小麦玉米同步增密对间作种间关系及产量的影响。结果表明, 间作小麦、玉米密度同步增大强化了共生期小麦相对于玉米的竞争力(Awm), 小麦高密度间作与传统密度间作相比, Awm提高了10.9%~20.1%; 玉米高、中密度间作与传统玉米密度间作相比, 其Awm分别提高了25.3%~32.0%、15.8%~17.3%; 小麦、玉米高密度间作与传统密度间作相比, Awm提高了35.5%~56.5%。间作小麦、玉米密度同步提高可增大麦后间作玉米的恢复效应(Rm), 小麦高密度间作较传统密度间作的Rm提高了14.6%~17.1%; 玉米高、中密度间作与传统密度间作相比, Rm分别提高了27.4%~48.5%、10.3%~30.5%; 小麦高密/玉米高密度较小麦/玉米传统密度处理Rm提高了43.7%~65.5%。增密有利于提高间作优势, 小麦高密/玉米高密度较小麦/玉米传统密度处理土地当量比高8.3%~10.8%。两作物同步增密可进一步提高间作增产优势, 小麦高密度间作较传统密度间作增产3.6%~5.1%, 玉米高、中密度间作较传统密度间作增产14.1%~19.3%、7.3%~15.2%, 小麦高密/玉米高密度较小麦/玉米传统密度处理增产19.0%~24.0%。间作小麦对玉米的竞争力及麦后玉米的恢复效应与间作籽粒产量均呈正相关。小麦玉米同步增密可优化间作种间关系、提高产量, 小麦播种量341万粒 hm-2和玉米7.5万株 hm-2是绿洲灌区小麦间作玉米高产的适宜密度。

关键词: 小麦间作玉米, 种植密度, 种间竞争力, 恢复效应, 产量

Abstract:

Increasing planting density is the main measure for high yield in intercropping. It is of great significance for the theory and technology of enhancing intercropping system to investigate the effects of intercrop’s density changes on the interspecific interaction and yield. In 2018 and 2019, a field experiment was carried out in Hexi oasis irrigation area, with three cropping patterns of monocropping maize, monocropping wheat, wheat-maize intercropping, and three maize densities of 45,000 plants hm-2 (traditional), 60,000 plants hm-2 (medium), 75,000 plants hm-2 (high), and two wheat densities of 2.84 million grains hm-2 (traditional) and 3.41 million grains hm-2 (high). The effect of synchronously higher planting densities of wheat and maize on inter-specific relationship and yield of intercropping system was studied. The results showed that the densities of intercropped wheat and maize were increased simultaneously, which strengthened the competitiveness of wheat relative to maize (Awm) during the co-growth period. For the intercropped wheat, compared to traditional planting density, high density increased the Awm by 10.9%-20.1%. For the intercropping maize, compared to traditional planting density, high density and medium density improved the Awm by 25.3%-32.0% and 15.8%-17.3%, respectively. In addition, compared to intercropped wheat and maize with traditional density, synchronously higher planting density for intercropped wheat and maize increased the Awm by 35.5%-56.5%. The simultaneous increase of the density of intercropped wheat and maize could increase the recovery growth effect of intercropped maize (Rm) after the intercropped wheat harvested. For the intercropped wheat, compared to traditional planting density, high density increased the Rm by 14.6%-17.1%. For the intercropping maize, compared to traditional planting density, high density and medium density improved Rm by 27.4%-48.5% and 10.3%-30.5%, respectively. In addition, compared to intercropped wheat and maize with traditional density, synchronously higher planting density for intercropped wheat and maize increased Rm by 43.7%-65.5%. Increasing planting density was conducive to improve the advantage of intercropping. The land equivalent ratio of high-density for both intercropped wheat and maize was 8.3%-10.8% higher than that of intercropped wheat and maize with traditional density. The simultaneous increase in the density of intercropped wheat and maize could further improve the advantage of intercropping. For the intercropped wheat, compared to traditional planting density, high density increased the grain yield of intercropping system by 3.6%-5.1%. For the intercropping maize, compared to traditional planting density, high density and medium density improved grain yield of intercropping system by 14.1%-19.3% and 7.3%-15.2%, respectively. Synchronously higher planting density for intercropped wheat and maize had greater grain yield of intercropping system by 19.0%-24.0% than that of intercropped wheat and maize with traditional density. A positive relationship was observed between total grain yield of intercropping system and the competitiveness of wheat relative to maize and the recovery growth of intercropped maize after intercropped wheat harvest. In conclusion, synchronously higher planting density could increase grain yield via optimizing interspecific interaction of intercropped wheat and maize. Our results revealed that 4.5 million grains hm-2 of wheat and 75,000 plants hm-2 of maize were the suitable planting densities for high yield of wheat and maize in intercropping system in oasis irrigation area.

Key words: wheat/maize intercropping, planting density, interspecific competitiveness, recovery effect, yield

表1

试验处理及代码"

处理
Treatment		 种植方式
Tillage method		 种植密度Planting density (×104 plants hm-2)
玉米Maize 小麦Wheat
SM1 单作玉米
Sole maize		 7.8 —
SM2 10.35 —
SM3 12.9 —
SW1 单作小麦
Sole wheat		 — 675
SW2 — 810
IW1M1 玉米间作小麦
Maize/wheat intercropping		 4.5 284
IW1M2 6.0 284
IW1M3 7.5 284
IW2M1 4.5 341
IW2M2 6.0 341
IW2M3 7.5 341

图1

间作作物田间结构示意图 处理同表1。"

表2

不同密度处理对小麦/玉米间作系统竞争力的主效应分析"

处理
Treatment		 竞争力Competition
5/10 # 5/30 6/19 7/9 7/29
小麦密度Density of wheat 0.048* 0.001** 0.000** 0.024* 0.000**
玉米密度Density of maize 0.626 0.000** 0.000** 0.000** 0.428
小麦密度×玉米密度Density of wheat × Density of maize 0.251 0.102 0.044* 0.001** 0.409

图2

2018年和2019年不同密度处理下间作系统小麦相对于玉米的竞争力表现 处理同表1。"

图3

2018年和2019年不同密度处理下玉米生长率动态 处理同表1。"

表3

不同玉米和小麦密度处理下小麦收获后间作玉米的恢复效应"

年际
Year		 处理
Treatment		 恢复效应Recovery effect
7/29-8/17 8/17-9/6 9/6-9/25
2018 IW1M1 1.49±0.05 b 1.35±0.03 c 1.18±0.14 d
IW1M2 1.36±0.04 c 1.54±0.12 b 1.23±0.04 d
IW1M3 1.26±0.05 d 1.62±0.14 b 2.13±0.09 ab
IW2M1 1.62±0.04 a 1.37±0.03 c 1.43±0.08 c
IW2M2 1.49±0.03 b 1.64±0.09 b 2.07±0.05 b
IW2M3 1.48±0.06 b 2.03±0.05 a 2.28±0.19 a
2019 IW1M1 0.96±0.05 c 1.35±0.03 c 1.04±0.02 d
IW1M2 1.18±0.04 b 1.43±0.02 b 1.60±0.08 c
IW1M3 1.18±0.01 b 1.56±0.02 a 1.99±0.07 b
IW2M1 1.13±0.04 b 1.40±0.06 c 1.06±0.15 d
IW2M2 1.34±0.13 a 1.44±0.04 b 2.10±0.06 b
IW2M3 1.19±0.01 b 1.64±0.01 a 2.72±0.06 a
主效应分析Main effects analysis
小麦密度Density of wheat 0.041* 0.016* 0.002**
玉米密度Density of maize 0.709 0.000** 0.000**
小麦密度×玉米密度
Density of wheat × Density of maize		 0.962 0.039* 0.017*

图4

2018-2019年小麦/玉米间作不同密度处理的土地当量比 不同小写字母表示同一年份各处理间差异达到显著水平(P < 0.05)。"

图5

2018年和2019年小麦/玉米间作不同密度处理的籽粒产量 不同小写字母表示同一年份各处理间差异达到显著水平(P < 0.05)。"

图6

小麦/玉米间作种间关系与籽粒产量间的相关性"

[1] 杨文钰, 杨峰. 发展玉豆带状复合种植, 保障国家粮食安全. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52:3748-3750.
Yang W Y, Yang F. Developing maize-soybean strip intercropping for demand security of national food. Sci Agric Sin, 2019, 52:3748-3750 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 茹振钢, 冯素伟, 李淦. 黄淮麦区小麦品种的高产潜力与实现途径. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48:3388-3393.
Ru Z G, Feng S W, Li G. High-yield potential and effective ways of wheat in Yellow & Huai river valley facultative winter wheat region. Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48:3388-3393 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 赵德强, 李彤, 侯玉婷, 元晋川, 廖允成. 玉米大豆间作模式下干物质积累和产量的边际效应及其系统效益. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53:1971-1985.
Zhao D Q, Li T, Hou Y T, Yuan J C, Liao Y C. Benefits and marginal effect of dry matter accumulation and yield in maize and soybean intercropping patterns. Sci Agric Sin, 2020, 53:1971-1985 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Li X, Yang S. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Res, 2001, 71:123-137.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00156-3
[5] Mariott M, Massoni A, Ercoli L, Arduini I. Above- and below-ground competition between barley, wheat, lupin and vetch in a cereal and legume intercropping system. Grass Forage Sci, 2010, 64:401-412.
doi: 10.1111/gfs.2009.64.issue-4
[6] 张恩和, 黄高宝. 间套种植复合群体根系时空分布特征. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14:1301-1304.
Zhang E H, Huang G B. Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of the crop root in intercropping system. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2003, 14:1301-1304 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 柴强, 殷文. 间作系统的水分竞争互补机理. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36:233-239.
Chai Q, Yin W. Research advances in water competition and complementary interaction of intercropping agroecosystems. Chin J Ecol, 2017, 36:233-239 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 陈国栋, 万素梅, 柴强, 赵宏福, 陈锦锋. 带型对小麦间作玉米产量和种间竞争力的影响. 西北农业学报, 2017, 26:990-997.
Chen G D, Wan S M, Chai Q, Zhao H F, Chen J F. Effects of zone type on yield and interspecific competitiveness of wheat intercropping maize. Acta Agric Boreali-occident Sin, 2017, 26:990-997 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 齐万海, 柴强. 不同隔根方式下间作小麦玉米的竞争力及产量响应. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18:31-34.
Qi W H, Chai Q. Yield response to wheat/maize competitiveness in wheat/maize intercropping system under different root partition patterns. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2010, 18:31-34 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 李隆, 杨思存, 孙建好, 李晓林, 张福锁. 小麦/大豆间作中作物种间的竞争作用和促进作用. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10:197-200.
Li L, Yang S C, Sun J H, Li X L, Zhang F S. Interspecific competition and facilitation in wheat/soybean intercropping system. Chin J Appl Ecol, 1999, 10:197-200 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 肖焱波, 李隆, 张福锁. 小麦/蚕豆间作体系中的种间相互作用及氮转移研究. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38:965-973.
Xiao Y B, Li L, Zhang F S. The interspecific nitrogen facilitation and the subsequent nitrogen transfer between the intercropped wheat and fababean. Sci Agric Sin, 2005, 38:965-973 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 赵建华, 孙建好, 陈亮之. 3种豆科作物与玉米间作对玉米生产力和种间竞争的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29:86-94.
Zhao J H, Sun J H, Chen L Z. Productivity and interspecific competition of maize intercropped with faba bean, soybean or pea. Acta Pratac Sin, 2020, 29:86-94 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 雍太文, 刘小明, 宋春, 周丽, 李星辰, 杨峰, 王小春, 杨文钰. 种植方式对玉米-大豆套作体系中作物产量、养分吸收和种间竞争的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23:659-667.
Yong T W, Liu X M, Song C, Zhou L, Li X C, Yang F, Wang X C, Yang W Y. Effect of planting patterns on crop yield, nutrients uptake and interspecific competition in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2015, 23:659-667 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 任旭灵, 滕园园, 王一帆, 殷文, 柴强. 玉米间作豌豆种间竞争互补对少耕密植的响应. 中国生态农业学报, 2019, 27:860-869.
Ren X L, Teng Y Y, Wang Y F, Yin W, Chai Q. Response of interspecific competition and complementarity of maize/pea inter-cropping to reduced tillage and high-density planting. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2019, 27:860-869 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 王利立, 朱永永, 殷文, 郑德阳, 柴强. 大麦/豌豆间作系统种间竞争力及产量对地下作用和密度互作的响应. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24:265-273.
Wang L L, Zhu Y Y, Yin W, Zheng D Y, Chai Q. Competitiveness and yield response to belowground interaction and density in barley-pea intercropping system. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2016, 24:265-273 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 杨吉顺, 高辉远, 刘鹏, 李耕, 董树亭, 张吉旺, 王敬锋. 种植密度和行距配置对超高产夏玉米群体光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 2010, 36:1226-1233.
Yang J S, Gao H Y, Liu P, Li G, Dong S T, Zhang J W, Wang J F. Effects of planting density and row spacing on canopy apparent photosynthesis of high-yield summer corn. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36:1226-1233 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] Haugguurd-nielsen H, Andersen M, Rnsgaard B, Jensen E S. Density and relative frequency effects on competitive interactions and resource use in pea-barley intercrops. Field Crops Res, 2006, 95:256-267.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.03.003
[18] 赵洋, 赵怀勇, 张红菊, 柴强. 荒漠绿洲区间作和密植对作物产量和水分利用效率的影响. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36:681-687.
Zhao Y, Zhao H Y, Zhang H J, Chai Q. Crop yield and WUE under intercropping and high-planting density system in desert oasis region. J Desert Res, 2016, 36:681-687 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 王一帆, 秦亚洲, 冯福学, 赵财, 于爱忠, 刘畅, 柴强. 根间作用与密度协同作用对小麦间作玉米产量及产量构成的影响. 作物学报, 2017, 43:754-762.
Wang Y F, Qin Y Z, Feng F X, Zhao C, Yu A Z, Liu C, Chai Q. Synergistic effect of root interaction and density on yield and yield components of wheat/maize intercropping system. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43:754-762 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] Willey R W. Intercropping its importance and research needs: I. Competition and yield advantage. Field Crops Abstr, 1979, 32:1-10.
[21] Willey R W, Rao M R. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Exp Agric, 1980, 16:117-125.
doi: 10.1017/S0014479700010802
[22] Yin W, Chen G P, Feng F X, Guo Y, Hu F L, Chen G D, Zhao C, Yu A Z, Chai Q. Straw retention combined with plastic mulching improves compensation of intercropped maize in arid environment. Field Crops Res, 2017, 204:42-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.005
[23] 殷文, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强, 胡发龙, 冯福学. 秸秆还田后少耕对小麦/玉米间作系统中种间竞争和互补的影响. 作物学报, 2015, 41:633-641.
Yin W, Zhao C, Yu A Z, Chai Q, Hu F L, Feng F X. Effect of straw returning and reduced tillage on interspecific competition and complementation in wheat/maize intercropping system. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41:633-641 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] Mu Y P, Chai Q, Yu A Z, Yang C H, Wan H. Performance of wheat/maize intercropping is a function of belowground interspecies interactions. Crop Sci, 2013, 53:2186-2194.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.11.0619
[25] Zhang F S, Li L. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant Soil, 2003, 248:305-312.
doi: 10.1023/A:1022352229863
[26] 陈国栋. 间作小麦玉米的水分竞争与生态位分离机制. 甘肃农业大学博士学位论文, 甘肃兰州, 2015.
Chen G D. Mechanism of Water Competition and Niche Differentiation between Intercropped Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Maize (Zea mays). PhD Dissertation of Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China, 2015 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 刘广才, 杨祁峰, 李隆, 孙建好. 小麦/玉米间作优势及地上部与地下部因素的相对贡献. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32:477-484.
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.027
Liu G C, Yang Q F, Li L, Sun J H. Intercropping advantage and contribution of above- and below-ground interactions in wheat-maize intercropping. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32:477-484 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 魏廷邦, 柴强, 王伟民, 王军强. 水氮耦合及种植密度对绿洲灌区玉米光合作用和干物质积累特征的调控效应. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52:428-444.
Wei T B, Chai Q, Wang W M, Wang J Q. Effects of coupling of irrigation and nitrogen application as well as planting density on photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation characteristics of maize in oasis irrigated areas. Sci Agric Sin, 2019, 52:428-444 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[6] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[7] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[8] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[9] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[10] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2