欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1616-1629.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23045

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

氮磷配施对夏玉米产量和叶片衰老特性的影响

张振博1(), 贾春兰1,2, 任佰朝1,2, 刘鹏1, 赵斌1, 张吉旺1,2,*()   

  1. 1山东农业大学农学院/作物生物学国家重点实验室, 山东泰安 271018
    2山东省玉米技术创新中心, 山东莱州 261400
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-29 接受日期:2022-10-10 出版日期:2023-06-12 网络出版日期:2022-10-26
  • 通讯作者: *张吉旺, E-mail: jwzhang@sdau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 1486693491@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省农业重大应用技术创新项目(SD2019ZZ013);山东省重点研发计划项目(2021LZGC014-2);财政部和农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-02-21)

Effects of combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus on yield and leaf senescence physiological characteristics in summer maize

ZHANG Zhen-Bo1(), JIA Chun-Lan1,2, REN Bai-Zhao1,2, LIU Peng1, ZHAO Bin1, ZHANG Ji-Wang1,2,*()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
    2Shandong Maize Technology Innovation Center, Laizhou 261400, Shandong, China
  • Received:2022-05-29 Accepted:2022-10-10 Published:2023-06-12 Published online:2022-10-26
  • Contact: *E-mail: jwzhang@sdau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Shandong Agricultural Application Technology Innovation Project(SD2019ZZ013);Shandong Province Key Research and Development Program(2021LZGC014-2);China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-02-21)

RichHTML

33

PDF

549

摘要：

氮和磷作为玉米生长发育的必需营养元素, 对玉米产量的提高具有重要影响。本试验以登海111 (Denghai 111, DH111)为供试材料, 在2020年和2021年分别设置11个氮磷配施处理和15个氮磷配施处理来探究氮磷配施对夏玉米叶片衰老特性和产量形成的影响。结果表明: 在相同施磷水平下, 随着施氮量增加, 夏玉米的叶面积指数(leaf area index, LAI)、叶绿素相对含量(SPAD值)、抗氧化酶活性(超氧物歧化酶(superoxide dismutase, SOD)、过氧化物酶(peroxidase, POD)和过氧化氢酶(catalase, CAT)呈现先增加后降低的趋势, 丙二醛(malondialdehyde, MDA)含量呈现先降低后增加的趋势, 产量呈现先增加后降低的趋势。在N0~N2条件下, 随施磷量增加, LAI、SPAD值、抗氧化酶活性呈现增加趋势, MDA含量呈现降低趋势, 产量呈增加趋势; 而在N3与N4条件下, 随施磷量增加, LAI、SPAD值、抗氧化酶活性呈现先增加后降低的趋势, MDA含量呈现先降低后增加的趋势, 产量呈现先增加后降低趋势。在2020年, N3 P1处理相较于N2 P3处理产量增加2.55%; 2021年, N3 P1处理相较于N3 P0处理、N2 P2处理产量分别提高7.36%、3.31%。本试验条件下, 合理氮磷配施(180 kg N hm-2、60 kg P hm-2)通过提高玉米生育后期抗氧化酶活性, 降低MDA含量, 维持较高的叶面积指数与SPAD值, 提高玉米穗粒数与千粒重, 进而增加产量。

关键词: 夏玉米, 氮磷配施, 产量, 叶片衰老

Abstract:

Nitrogen and phosphorus, as the essential nutrients for maize growth and development, play an important effect on maize yield. In this experiment, to investigate the effect of combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus on leaf senescence physiological and yield formation in summer maize, 11 combined applications of nitrogen and phosphorus treatments in 2020 and 15 combined applications of nitrogen and phosphorus treatments in 2021 were applied using Denhai 111 (DH111) as the test materials. The results showed that the leaf area index (LAI), the relative chlorophyll content (SPAD), and the antioxidant enzyme activities [superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT)] of summer maize increased first and then decreased, and the malondialdehyde (MDA) content decreased first and then increased with the increase of nitrogen application rate under the same phosphorus application conditions. Under N0-N2 conditions, with the increasing phosphorus application, LAI, SPAD value, and antioxidant enzyme activity had an increasing trend, MDA content showed a decreasing trend and yield showed an increasing trend, while with the increasing phosphorus application, LAI, SPAD value, and antioxidant enzyme activity showed an increasing trend and then a decreasing trend, MDA content showed a decreasing trend and then an increasing trend, and yield showed an increasing trend and then a decreasing trend in N3 and N4. In 2020, the N3 P1 treatment increased yields by 2.55% compared to the N2 P3 treatment. In 2021, the N3 P1 treatment increased yields by 7.36% and 3.31% compared to the N3 P0 and N2 P2 treatments, respectively. Under the experimental conditions, the reasonable combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus (180 kg N hm-2, 60 kg P hm-2) treatment can increase the activities of antioxidant enzymes at the later stage of fertility, reduce MDA content, maintain a high leaf area index and SPAD values, increase the number of grains per ear and 1000-grain weight, ultimately leading to higher maize yield.

Key words: summer maize, combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus, yield, leaf senescence physiological characteristics

表1

氮磷配施对夏玉米产量与产量构成因素的影响(2020-2021)"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 公顷穗数
Harvest ear number
(ears hm-2)		 穗粒数
Grains
per ear		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)		 公顷产量
Yield
(kg hm-2)
2020 N0 P0 62,740 c 357.5 h 337.0 g 8789 k
N0 P1 63,782 bc 371.7 g 327.6 h 9029 j
N1 P1 66,700 ab 432.0 e 350.3 f 11,738 h
N2 P1 66,978 a 440.8 c 366.9 bc 12,595 c
N3 P1 66,978 a 453.4 b 370.7 a 13,091 a
N4 P1 67,117 a 433.9 de 368.3 ab 12,471 d
N0 P3 65,866 abc 383.3 f 323.1 i 9485 i
N1 P3 65,449 abc 439.5 cd 360.6 e 12,060 f
N2 P3 65,241 abc 459.3 a 366.4 bc 12,766 b
N3 P3 65,033 abc 440.4 c 364.9 cd 12,151 e
N4 P3 64,847 abc 435.9 cde 363.2 d 11,939 g
年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 公顷穗数
Harvest ear number
(ears hm-2)		 穗粒数
Grains
per ear		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)		 公顷产量
Yield
(kg hm-2)
2021 N0 P0 63,365 c 388.5 g 298.9 ab 8558 j
N1 P0 66,367 ab 450.3 f 276.8 ef 9618 h
N2 P0 65,700 abc 467.5 e 286.5 d 10,232 fg
N3 P0 65,366 abc 492.7 ab 286.5 d 10,729 cd
N4 P0 67,034 a 480.4 cd 276.3 f 10,345 efg
N0 P1 64,699 abc 444.9 f 278.5 ef 9322 i
N1 P1 66,700 a 467.2 e 280.1 e 10,149 fg
N2 P1 65,700 abc 473.8 de 295.3 bc 10,689 cd
N3 P1 66,367 ab 496.7 ab 300.6 a 11,519 a
N4 P1 66,700 a 476.1 cde 285.0 d 10,526 de
N0 P2 63,699 bc 441.4 f 293.4 c 9592 h
N1 P2 64,366 abc 474.1 de 285.2 d 10,117 g
N2 P2 65,033 abc 498.0 a 295.7 bc 11,138 b
N3 P2 65,449 abc 486.4 bc 295.4 bc 10,936 bc
N4 P2 66,283 abc 473.1 d 285.1 d 10,396 ef
F值
F-value		 年份Year (Y) 0.87 ns 336.19** 7368.11** 824.96**
施氮水平Nitrogen (N) 3.57 ** 428.39** 269.17** 1155.26**
施磷水平Phosphorus (P) 2.62 ns 25.10** 23.21** 66.97**
Y×N 0.42 ns 15.14** 65.29** 102.32**
Y×P 0.03 ns 51.72** 26.01** 16.26**
N×P 1.03 ns 20.87** 33.24** 24.87**

图1

氮磷配施对夏玉米叶面积指数的影响(2020-2021) N0: 不施氮; N1: 施氮量为60 kg hm-2; N2: 施氮量为120 kg hm-2; N3: 施氮量为180 kg hm-2; N4: 施氮量为240 kg hm-2; P0: 不施磷; P1: 施磷量为60 kg hm-2; P2: 施磷量为120 kg hm-2; P3: 施磷量为180 kg hm-2; VT、R3和R6分别代表抽雄期、乳熟期、和成熟期; 不同小写字母的值在5%概率水平差异显著。"

表2

氮磷配施对夏玉米叶面积指数影响的方差分析"

变异来源
Variance source		 抽雄期
Tassel stage		 乳熟期
Milk stage		 成熟期
Maturity stage
年份Year (Y) 4.14* 8.94** 403.71**
施氮水平Nitrogen (N) 81.40** 128.95** 75.18**
施磷水平Phosphorus (P) 1.63ns 4.29** 2.56ns
Y×N 3.40* 15.21** 4.27**
N×P 1.46ns 3.70** 3.64**

图2

氮磷配施对夏玉米SPAD值的影响(2020-2021) 处理同图1; SPAD代表叶绿素相对含量。"

表3

氮磷配施对夏玉米SPAD值影响的方差分析"

变异来源Variance source 抽雄期Tassel stage 乳熟期Milk stage 成熟期Maturity stage
年份Year (Y) 130.09** 21.97** 220.01**
施氮水平Nitrogen (N) 71.82** 18.03** 46.29**
施磷水平Phosphorus (P) 17.42** 16.75** 29.22ns
Y×N 3.75** 1.20ns 3.05*
N×P 2.28** 0.97ns 4.25**

图3

氮磷配施对夏玉米SOD活性的影响(2020-2021) 处理同图1; SOD代表超氧化物歧化酶。"

表4

氮磷配施对夏玉米SOD活性影响的方差分析"

变异来源
Variance source		 抽雄期
Tassel stage		 乳熟期
Milk stage		 成熟期
Maturity stage
年份Year (Y) 515.52** 1.27ns 50.68**
施氮水平Nitrogen (N) 85.85** 165.75** 103.20**
施磷水平Phosphorus (P) 12.43** 10.43** 12.19**
Y×N 6.41** 2.75ns 1.70ns
N×P 4.63** 6.54** 13.28**

图4

氮磷配施对夏玉米POD活性的影响(2020-2021) 处理同图1; POD代表过氧化物酶。"

表5

氮磷配施对夏玉米POD活性影响的方差分析"

变异来源
Variance source		 抽雄期
Tassel stage		 乳熟期
Milk stage		 成熟期
Maturity stage
年份Year (Y) 74.66** 1159.05** 49.30**
施氮水平Nitrogen (N) 396.41** 480.10** 204.84**
施磷水平Phosphorus (P) 23.56** 29.81** 20.43**
Y×N 19.88** 4.10* 9.04**
N×P 4.82** 33.11** 21.53**

图5

氮磷配施对夏玉米CAT活性的影响(2020-2021) 处理同图1; CAT代表过氧化氢酶。"

表6

氮磷配施对夏玉米CAT活性影响的方差分析"

变异来源
Variance source		 抽雄期
Tassel stage		 乳熟期
Milk stage		 成熟期
Maturity stage
年份Year (Y) 0.01ns 5.93* 1.04ns
施氮水平Nitrogen (N) 139.81** 155.78** 185.45**
施磷水平Phosphorus (P) 12.95** 7.40** 13.62**
Y×N 2.04 ns 1.64ns 1.06ns
N×P 2.71* 7.44** 8.35**

图6

氮磷配施对夏玉米MDA含量的影响(2020-2021) 处理同图1; MDA代表丙二醛。"

表7

氮磷配施对夏玉米MDA含量影响的方差分析"

变异来源
Variance source		 抽雄期
Tassel stage		 乳熟期
Milk stage		 成熟期
Maturity stage
年份Year (Y) 10.90** 11.86** 120.18**
施氮水平Nitrogen (N) 93.17** 31.29** 146.00**
施磷水平Phosphorus (P) 36.60** 33.95** 16.72**
Y×N 7.30** 0.31ns 0.19ns
N×P 8.83** 5.33** 11.61**

表8

产量及产量构成因素、叶面积指数、SPAD值与衰老特性的相关性分析"

相关性
Correlation		 产量
Yield		 公顷穗数
Harvest ear number		 穗粒数
Grains per ear		 千粒重
1000-grain weight		 叶面积指数
Leaf area index		 SPAD值
SPAD value		 SOD活性
SOD
activity		 POD活性
POD
activity		 CAT活性
CAT
activity		 MDA含量
MDA
content
产量
Yield		 1
公顷穗数
Harvest ear number		 0.56** 1
穗粒数
Grains per ear		 0.39 0.50** 1
千粒重
1000-grain weight		 0.68** 0.06 -0.40* 1
叶面积指数
Leaf area index		 0.97** 0.53** 0.30 0.72** 1
SPAD值
SPAD value		 0.88** 0.51** 0.51** 0.49* 0.84** 1
SOD活性
SOD activity		 0.59** 0.55* 0.87** -0.05 0.61** 0.75** 1
POD活性
POD activity		 0.43 0.51* 0.92** -0.25 0.47* 0.66** 0.95** 1
CAT活性
CAT activity		 0.84** 0.70** 0.67** 0.36 0.87** 0.88** 0.89** 0.79** 1
MDA含量
MDA content		 -0.52* -0.58* -0.91** 0.16 -0.49* -0.76** -0.92** -0.91** -0.79** 1
[1] 乔远, 杨欢, 雒金麟, 汪思娴, 梁蓝月, 陈新平, 张务帅. 西北地区玉米生产投入及生态环境风险评价. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55: 962-976.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.010
Qiao Y, Yang H, Luo J L, Wang S X, Liang L Y, Chen X P, Zhang W S. Inputs and ecological environment risks assessment of maize production in northwest China. Sci Agric Sin, 2022, 55: 962-976. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.010
[2] Tollenaar M, Lee E A. Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Res, 2002, 75: 161-169.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00024-2
[3] Tollenaar M, Lee E A. Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica, 2006, 51: 399-408.
[4] 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 45: 915-924.
Zhang F S, Wang J Q, Zhang W F, Cui Z L, Ma W Q, Chen X P, Jiang R F. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measuers for improvement. Acta Pedol Sin, 2008, 45: 915-924. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] Liu X J, Zhang Y, Han W X, Tang A, Shen J L, Cui Z L, Vitousek P, Erisman J W, Goulding K, Christie P, Fangmeier A, Zhang F S. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature, 2013, 494: 459-462.
doi: 10.1038/nature11917
[6] Zhang X, Davidson E A, Mauzerall D L, Searchinger T D, Dumas P, Shen Y. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature, 2015, 528: 51-59.
doi: 10.1038/nature15743
[7] 苏文楠, 解君, 韩娟, 刘铁宁, 韩清芳. 夏玉米不同部位干物质临界氮浓度稀释曲线的构建及对产量的估计. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 530-545.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.03021
Su W N, Xie J, Han J, Liu T N, Han Q F. Construction of critical nitrogen dilution curve based on dry matter in different organs of summer maize and estimation of grain yield. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 530-545. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.03021
[8] 金书秦, 张惠, 张哲晰, 刘洋. “十三五”化肥使用量零增长行动评估及政策展望. 环境保护, 2022, 50(5): 31-36.
Jin S Q, Zhang H, Zhang Z X, Liu Y. Evaluation and policy prospect of zero growth action of chemical fertilizer in the 13th five-year plan. Environ Prot, 2022, 50(5): 31-36. (in Chinese)
[9] 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 年度数据. (2022-03-31) https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01.
National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. Annual data. (2022-03-31) https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01. (in Chinese)
[10] 薛晓辉, 郝明德. 小麦氮磷肥长期配施对土壤硝态氮淋溶的影响. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 918-925.
Xue X H, Hao M D. Nitrate-N leaching in 23-year winter wheat field combined with application of nitrogen and phosphorus. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 918-925. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 焦亚鹏, 齐鹏, 王晓娇, 姚一铭, 武均, 蔡立群, 张仁陟. 氮磷配施对黄土高原旱作农业区典型农田土壤无机磷形态的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26: 1459-1472.
Jiao Y P, Qi P, Wang X J, Yao Y M, Wu J, Cai L Q, Zhang R Z. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on inorganic phosphorus forms of typical farmland soil in the dry farming area of the Loess Plateau. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2020, 26: 1459-1472. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 张鑫, 邢玥, 刘照霞, 吕明露, 朱占玲, 姜远茂, 葛顺峰. 氮磷配施对苹果幼苗生长、土壤无机磷形态和磷素利用的影响. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(4): 237-242.
Zhang X, Xing Y, Liu Z X, Lyu M L, Zhu Z L, Jiang Y M, Ge S F. Effects of combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on apple rootstock seeding growth, soil inorganic phosphorus forms and phosphorus utilization. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2021, 35(4): 237-242. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] Schleuss P M, Widdig M, Heintz-Buschart A, Kirkman K, Spohn M. Interactions of nitrogen and phosphorus cycling promote P acquisition and explain synergistic plant-growth responses. Ecology, 2020, 101: e03003.
[14] 刘苗, 刘朋召, 师祖姣, 王小利, 王瑞, 李军. 氮磷配施下夏玉米临界氮浓度稀释曲线的构建与氮营养诊断. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55: 932-947.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.008
Liu M, Liu P Z, Shi Z J, Wang X L, Wang R, Li J. Critical nitrogen dilution curve and nitrogen nutrition diagnosis of summer maize under different nitrogen and phosphorus application rates. Sci Agric Sin, 2022, 55: 932-947. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.008
[15] 李萍, 谢圣杰, 李明明, 贾亚涛, 冯万军, 邢国芳. 氮磷配施对玉米‘良玉188’光合特性及产量的影响. 农学学报, 2020, 10(4): 14-20.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas19020012
Li P, Xie S J, Li M M, Jia Y T, Feng W J, Xing G F. Effects of combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of maize variety ‘Liangyu 188’. J Agric, 2020, 10(4): 14-20. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas19020012
[16] Daniel P, Gilles L. Relationships between dynamics of nitrogen uptake and dry matter accumulation in maize crops. Determination of critical N concentration. Plant Soil, 1999, 216: 65-82.
doi: 10.1023/A:1004783431055
[17] Tollenaar M, Daynard T B. Leaf senescence in short-season maize hybrids. Can J Plant Sci, 1978, 58: 869-874.
doi: 10.4141/cjps78-126
[18] 朱昆仑, 靳立斌, 董树亭, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 综合农艺管理对夏玉米叶片衰老特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 2949-2959.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.15.005
Zhu K L, Jin L B, Dong S T, Zhao B, Liu P, Zhang J W. Effects of integrated agronomic practices on leaf senescence physiological characteristics of summer maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 2949-2959. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] Foyer C H, Noctor G. Stress-triggered redox signalling: what’s in pROSpect? Plant Cell Environ, 2016, 39: 951-964.
doi: 10.1111/pce.12621
[20] 仇琳, 赵林姝, 谢永盾, 熊宏春, 古佳玉, 毕秀丽, 刘录祥, 郭会君. 植物早衰研究进展. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23: 346-357.
Qiu L, Zhao L S, Xie Y D, Xiong H C, Gu J Y, Bi X L, Liu L X, Guo H J. Advances in research on premature senescence in plants. J Plant Genet Resour, 2022, 23: 346-357. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] Yordanova R Y, Christov K N, Popova L P. Antioxidative enzymes in barley plants subjected to soil flooding. Environ Exp Bot, 2004, 51: 93-101.
doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(03)00063-7
[22] 魏婧, 徐畅, 李可欣, 贺洪军, 徐启江. 超氧化物歧化酶的研究进展与植物抗逆性. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56: 2571-2584.
Wei J, Xu C, Li K X, He H J, Xu Q J. Progress on superoxide dismutase and plant stress resistance. Acta Phytophys Sin, 2020, 56: 2571-2584. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 魏海燕, 张洪程, 马群, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 张庆, 黄丽芬. 不同氮肥吸收利用效率水稻基因型叶片衰老特性. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 645-654.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00645
Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Ma Q, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Zhang Q, Huang L F. Characteristics of leaf senescence in rice genotypes with different nitrogen use efficiencies. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 645-654. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00645
[24] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 1502-1515.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.13021
Chen J, Ren B Z, Zhao B, Liu P, Zhang J W. Regulation of leaf-spraying glycine betaine on yield formation and antioxidation of summer maize sowed in different dates. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 1502-1515. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.13021
[25] 侯鹏飞, 马俊青, 赵鹏飞, 张欢玲, 赵会杰, 刘华山, 赵一丹, 汪月霞. 外源甜菜碱对干旱胁迫下小麦幼苗叶绿体抗氧化酶及psbA基因表达的调节. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 1319-1324.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01319
Hou P F, Ma J Q, Zhao P F, Zhang H L, Zhao H J, Liu H S, Zhao Y D, Wang Y X. Effects of betaine on chloroplast protective enzymes and psbA gene expression in wheat seedlings under drought stress. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 1319-1324. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01319
[26] 李广浩, 刘平平, 赵斌, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 田翠霞, 何在菊. 不同水分条件下控释尿素对夏玉米产量和叶片衰老特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28: 571-580.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201702.007
Li G H, Liu P P, Zhao B, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhang J W, Tian C X, He Z J. Effects of water conditions and controlled release urea on yield and leaf senescence physiological characteristics in summer maize. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2017, 28: 571-580. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 刘光明, 赵灿, 蒋岩, 赵凌天, 廖平强, 王维领, 霍中洋. 施氮量对水稻源库协同衰老特征的影响. 植物生理学报, 2022, 58: 173-185.
Liu G M, Zhao C, Jiang Y, Zhao L T, Liao P Q, Wang W L, Huo Z Y. Effects of nitrogen application on the synergistic senescence of rice source and sink. Acta Phytophys Sin, 2022, 58: 173-185. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] Giannopolitis C N, Ries S K. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol, 1977, 59: 309-314.
doi: 10.1104/pp.59.2.309 pmid: 16659839
[29] Durner J, Klessing D F. Salicylic acid is a modulator of tobacco and mammalian catalases. J Biol Chem, 1996, 271: 28492-28502.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.45.28492 pmid: 8910477
[30] Hammerschmidt R, Nuckles E M, Kuc J. Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrchum lagenarium. Physiol Plant Pathol, 1982, 20: 73-82.
doi: 10.1016/0048-4059(82)90025-X
[31] Heuer S, Gaxiola R, Schilling R, Herrera-Estrella L, López- Arredondo D, Wissuwa M, Emmanuel D, Rouached H. Improving phosphorus use efficiency: a complex trait with emerging opportunities. Plant J, 2017, 90: 868-885.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.2017.90.issue-5
[32] Torres-Rodríguez J V, Salazar-Vidal M N, Montes R A C, Massange-Sánchez J A, Sawers R J H. Low nitrogen availability inhibits the phosphorus starvation response in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays L.). BMC Plant Biol, 2021, 21: 259.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-02997-5 pmid: 34090337
[33] 刘朋召, 王旭敏, 宁芳, 雒文鹤, 张琦, 张元红, 李军. 减量施氮对渭北旱地春玉米产量、氮素利用及土壤硝态氮含量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31: 2621-2629.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202008.025
Liu P Z, Wang X M, Ning F, Luo W H, Zhang Q, Zhang Y H, Li J. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on yield, nitrogen utilization of spring maize and soil nitrate content in Weibei dryland, Northwest China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31: 2621-2629. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 吉庆凯, 王栋, 杨文宝, 韩彦茹, 马文奇, 魏静. 长期施磷对玉米-小麦轮作系统作物产量和磷素吸收及土壤磷积累的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32: 2469-2476.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.026
Ji Q K, Wang D, Yang W B, Han Y R, Ma W Q, Wei J. Effects of long-term phosphorus application on crop yield, phosphorus absorption, and soil phosphorus accumulation in maize-wheat rotation system. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2021, 32: 2469-2476. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] 张建军, 党翼, 赵刚, 王磊, 樊廷录, 李尚中. 覆膜时期和施氮量对陇东旱塬玉米产量和水氮利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55: 479-490.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.03.005
Zhang J J, Dang Y, Zhao G, Wang L, Fan T L, Li S Z. Influences of mulching periods and nitrogen application rates on maize yield as well as water and nitrogen use efficiencies in loess plateau of Eastern Gansu Province. Sci Agric Sin, 2022, 55: 479-490. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.03.005
[36] 刘德平, 杨树青, 史海滨, 杜晓峰, 孙玲玉, 常春龙, 李祯. 氮磷配施条件下作物产量及水肥利用效率. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33: 902-909.
Liu D P, Yang S Q, Shi H B, Du X F, Sun L Y, Chang C L, Li Z. Crop yield and water-fertilizer utilization efficiency under combined application of nitrogen and phosphorous. J Ecol, 2014, 33: 902-909. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37] 谢圣杰, 邢国芳, 贾亚涛, 苑乂川, 陈小雨. 氮磷配施对玉米叶片生长及光合特性的影响. 山西农业科学, 2018, 46: 387-391.
Xie S J, Xing G F, Jia Y T, Yuan Y C, Chen X Y. Effects of nitrogen combined with phosphorus fertilizer application on the leaf growth and photosynthetic characteristics of maize. J Shanxi Agric Sci, 2018, 46: 387-391. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38] 柴颖, 赵靓, 黄婷, 毛家双, 张扬, 侯振安. 不同氮、磷配施对春玉米养分吸收和产量的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52: 444-449.
Chai Y, Zhao J, Huang T, Mao J S, Zhang Y, Hou Z A. Effects of different combination ratios of N, P fertilizer on nutrient uptake of maize and yield. J Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2015, 52: 444-449. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39] 曾瑾汐, 文熙宸, Muhammad A R, 陈国鹏, 陈诚, 彭霄, 马艳玮, 李丽, 官思成, 杨文钰, 王小春. 氮磷配施对玉米-大豆套作模式下种间作用、玉米产量及干物质积累与转运的影响. 草业学报, 2017, 26(7): 166-176.
Zeng J X, Wen X C, Muhammad A R, Chen G P, Chen C, Peng X, Ma Y W, Li L, Guan S C, Yang W Y, Wang X C. Effects of combined applications of nitrogen and phosphorus on interspecies interaction, yield, and dry matter accumulation and translocation in maize in a maize-soybean relay intercropping system. Acta Pratac Sin, 2017, 26(7): 166-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40] 张丽光, 李丹, 刘磊, 王蕾, 孙志梅, 彭正萍, 薛世川. 不同施肥种植模式对玉米光合特性、养分效率及产量性状的影响. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(2): 115-119.
Zhang L G, Li D, Liu L, Wang L, Sun Z M, Peng Z P, Xue S C. Effects of different fertilization and planting patterns on photosynthetic characters, nutrients efficiency and yield traits of maize. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2013, 27(2): 115-119. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41] 孙雪芳, 丁在松, 侯海鹏, 葛均筑, 唐丽媛, 赵明. 不同春玉米品种花后光合物质生产特点及碳氮含量变化. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 1284-1292.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01284
Sun X F, Ding Z S, Hou H P, Ge J Z, Tang L Y, Zhao M. Post-Anthesis photosynthetic assimilation and the changes of carbon and nitrogen in different varieties of spring maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 1284-1292. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01284
[42] 赵伟, 徐铮, 高大鹏, 安振, 高辉远, 张子山, 宁堂原, 李耕. 定向种植对夏玉米群体内光环境及叶片光合性能的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30: 2707-2716.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201908.023
Zhao W, Xu Z, Gao D P, An Z, Gao H Y, Zhang Z S, Ning T Y, Li G. Effects of directional planting on light environment and leaf photosynthesis of summer maize population. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019, 30: 2707-2716. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43] 于宁宁, 张吉旺, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏. 综合农艺管理对夏玉米叶片生长发育及内源激素含量的影响. 作物学报, 2020, 46: 960-967.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.93050
Yu N N, Zhang J W, Ren B Z, Zhao B, Liu P. Effect of integrated agronomic managements on leaf growth and endogenous hormone content of summer maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46: 960-967. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.93050
[44] 靳立斌, 张吉旺, 李波, 崔海岩, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌. 高产高效夏玉米的冠层结构及其光合特性. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46: 2430-2439.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.12.004
Jin L B, Zhang J W, Li B, Cui H Y, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhao B. Canopy structure and photosynthetic characteristics of high yield and high nitrogen efficiency summer maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46: 2430-2439. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.12.004
[45] 王进斌, 谢军红, 李玲玲, Eunice E, 彭正凯, 邓超超, 沈吉成, 颉健辉. 氮肥运筹对陇中旱农区玉米光合特性及产量的影响. 草业学报, 2019, 28(1): 60-69.
Wang J B, Xie J H, Li L L, Eunice E, Peng Z K, Deng C C, Shen J C, Xie J H. Effects of nitrogen management on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of maize in arid areas of central Gansu, China. Acta Pratac Sin., 2019, 28(1): 60-69. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[46] 楚光红, 章建新. 施氮量对滴灌超高产春玉米光合特性、产量及氮肥利用效率的影响. 玉米科学, 2016, 24(1): 130-136.
Chu G H, Zhang J X. Effects of nitrogen application on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and nitrogen use efficiency in drip irrigation of super high-yield spring maize. J Maize Sci, 2016, 24(1): 130-136. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[47] 潘晓华, 石庆华, 郭进耀, 王永锐. 无机磷对植物叶片光合作用的影响及其机理的研究进展. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1997, 3: 201-208.
Pan X H, Shi Q H, Guo J Y, Wang Y R. Advance in the study of effects of inorganic phosphate on plant leaf photosynthesis and its mechanism. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 1997, 3: 201-208. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[48] 刘冲, 贾永红, 张金汕, 孙鹏, 罗四维, 王欢, 李鹏, 石书兵. 播种方式和施磷对冬小麦群体结构、光合特性和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31: 919-928.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202003.009
Liu C, Jia Y H, Zhang J S, Sun P, Luo S W, Wang H, Li P, Shi S B. Effects of seeding pattern and phosphorus application on population structure, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31: 919-928. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[49] 杨乔乔, 康建宏, 王佳. 氮磷钾肥配施对春玉米迪卡517光合特性的影响. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62: 1057-1062.
Yang Q Q, Kang J H, Wang J. Different ratios of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer influenced photosynthetic characteristics of spring maize Deca 517. J Zhejiang Agric Sci, 2021, 62: 1057-1062. (in Chinese)
[50] 麻雪艳, 周广胜. 基于光合产物动态分配的玉米生物量模拟. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27: 2292-2300.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.026
Ma X Y, Zhou G S. Maize biomass simulation based on dynamic photosynthate allocation. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016, 27: 2292-2300. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[51] 黄鑫慧, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 植酶Q9对大田遮阴夏玉米产量和衰老特性的调控作用. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31: 3433-3444.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202010.024
Huang X H, Ren B Z, Zhao B, Liu P, Zhang J W. Effects of phytase Q9 on the yield and senescence characteristics of summer maize shaded in the field. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31: 3433-3444. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[52] 蒯本科. 植物衰老关乎器官发育和作物产量与品质性状的形成. 植物生理学报, 2014, 50: 1265-1266.
Kuai B K. Associations of green organ senescence with nascent organ development in plants and yield and quality component formations in crops. Acta Phytophys Sin, 2014, 50: 1265-1266. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[53] Dhindsa R S, Dhindsa P P, Reid D M. Leaf senescence and lipid peroxidation: Effects of some phytohormones, and scavengers of free radicals and singlet oxygen. Physiol Plant, 1982, 56: 453-457.
doi: 10.1111/ppl.1982.56.issue-4
[54] 尹永强, 胡建斌, 邓明军. 植物叶片抗氧化系统及其对逆境胁迫的响应研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(1): 105-110.
Yin Y Q, Hu J B, Deng M J. Latest development of antioxidant system and responses to stress in plant leaves. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2007, 23(1): 105-110. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.0701105
[55] 吕艳艳, 金岩, 付三雄, 戚存扣. 不同耐淹油菜品种的耐淹性生理差异. 植物生理学报, 2013, 49: 959-967.
Lyu Y Y, Jin Y, Fu S X, Qi C K. Physiological differences of different waterlogging-resistant Brassica napus L. under waterlogging stress. Acta Phytophys Sin, 2013, 49: 959-967. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[56] 左进华, 陈安均, 孙爱东, 罗云波, 朱本忠. 番茄果实成熟衰老相关因子研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43: 2724-2734.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.13.012
Zuo J H, Chen A J, Sun A D, Luo Y B, Zhu B Z. Research progress on the factors related to tomato fruit ripening and senescence. Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43: 2724-2734. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[57] 刘艳, 汪仁, 华利民, 解占军. 施氮量对玉米生育后期叶片衰老与保护酶系统的影响. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(2): 124-127.
Liu Y, Wang R, Hua L M, Xie Z J. Effect of N application rates on leaf senescence and protective enzyme system at later stage of maize. J Maize Sci, 2012, 20(2): 124-127. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[58] Low P S, Merida J R. The oxidative burst in plant defense: Function and signal transduction. Physiol Plant, 2006, 96: 533-542.
doi: 10.1111/ppl.1996.96.issue-3
[59] 曹高燚, 王晶, 杜锦, 牛巧龙, 苏东伟, 田秀平. 施磷量对玉米产量及叶片部分酶活性的影响. 玉米科学, 2017, 25(3): 117-122.
Cao G Y, Wang J, Du J, Niu Q L, Su D W, Tian X P. Effects of phosphate fertilizer on yield and enzyme efficiency of leaves in spring maize. J Maize Sci, 2017, 25(3): 117-122. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[60] 战秀梅, 韩晓日, 杨劲峰, 王帅, 高鸣, 赵立勇. 不同施肥处理对玉米生育后期叶片保护酶活性及膜脂过氧化作用的影响. 玉米科学, 2007, 15(1): 123-127.
Zhan X M, Han X R, Yang J F, Wang S, Gao M, Zhao L Y. Effect of different fertilizer supply of maize on protective enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation of leaves in latter stage. J Maize Sci, 2007, 15(1): 123-127. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[61] 王帅. 长期不同施肥对玉米叶片光合作用及光系统功能的影响. 沈阳农业大学博士学位论文, 辽宁沈阳, 2014.
Wang S. Effects of Long-Term Different Fertilization on Photosynthesis and Photosystem Function in Maize Leaves. PhD Dissertation of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 韦金贵, 郭瑶, 柴强, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙. 水氮减量密植玉米的产量及产量构成[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1919-1929.
[2] 张振, 石玉, 张永丽, 于振文, 王西芝. 土壤水分含量对小麦耗水特性和旗叶/根系衰老特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1895-1905.
[3] 张露露, 张学美, 牟文燕, 黄宁, 郭子糠, 罗一诺, 魏蕾, 孙利谦, 王星舒, 石美, 王朝辉. 我国主要麦区小麦籽粒锰含量: 品种与土壤因素的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1906-1918.
[4] 董志强, 吕丽华, 姚艳荣, 张经廷, 张丽华, 姚海坡, 申海平, 贾秀领. 水氮互作下强筋小麦师栾02-1产量和品质[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1942-1953.
[5] 邓艾兴, 李歌星, 吕玉平, 刘猷红, 孟英, 张俊, 张卫建. 齐穗后遮阴时长对西北稻区粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1930-1941.
[6] 宋毅, 李静, 谷贺贺, 陆志峰, 廖世鹏, 李小坤, 丛日环, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 氮肥用量对冬油菜籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 2002-2011.
[7] 李荣, 勉有明, 侯贤清, 李培富, 王西娜. 施氮对还田秸秆腐解及养分释放、土壤肥力与玉米产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 2012-2022.
[8] 闫金垚, 宋毅, 陆志峰, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 磷肥用量对油菜籽产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1668-1677.
[9] 徐冉, 陈松, 徐春梅, 刘元辉, 章秀福, 王丹英, 褚光. 施氮量对籼粳杂交稻甬优1540产量和氮肥利用效率的影响及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1630-1642.
[10] 雷新慧, 冷佳俊, 陶金才, 万晨茜, 吴怡欣, 王家乐, 王鹏科, 冯佰利, 王孟, 高金锋. 叶面喷施亚硒酸钠对甜荞光合特性、产量及硒积累效应的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1678-1689.
[11] 陶玥玥, 盛雪雯, 徐坚, 沈园, 王海候, 陆长婴, 沈明星. 长三角水稻-油菜周年两熟温光资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1327-1338.
[12] 韦海敏, 陶伟科, 周燕, 闫飞宇, 李伟玮, 丁艳锋, 刘正辉, 李刚华. 硅素穗肥优化滨海盐碱地水稻矿质元素吸收分配提高耐盐性[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1339-1349.
[13] 李慧, 王旭敏, 刘苗, 刘朋召, 李巧丽, 王小利, 王瑞, 李军. 基于夏玉米产量和氮素利用的水氮减量方案优选[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1292-1304.
[14] 张俊杰, 陈金平, 汤钰镂, 张锐, 曹红章, 王丽娟, 马梦金, 王浩, 王泳超, 郭家萌, KRISHNA SV Jagadish, 杨青华, 邵瑞鑫. 花期前后干旱胁迫对复水后夏玉米光合特性与产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1397-1409.
[15] 岳海旺, 韩轩, 魏建伟, 郑书宏, 谢俊良, 陈淑萍, 彭海成, 卜俊周. 基于GYT双标图分析对黄淮海夏玉米区域试验品种综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1231-1248.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李绍清, 李阳生, 吴福顺, 廖江林, 李达模. 水稻孕穗期在淹涝胁迫下施肥的优化选择及其作用机理[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(01): 115 -120 .
[2] 王兰珍;米国华;陈范骏;张福锁. 不同产量结构小麦品种对缺磷反应的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 867 -870 .
[3] 杨建昌;张亚洁;张建华;王志琴;朱庆森. 水分胁迫下水稻剑叶中多胺含量的变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[4] 袁美;杨光圣;傅廷栋;严红艳. 甘蓝型油菜生态型细胞质雄性不育两用系的研究Ⅲ. 8-8112AB的温度敏感性及其遗传[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[5] 王永胜;王景;段静雅;王金发;刘良式. 水稻极度分蘖突变体的分离和遗传学初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[6] 王丽燕;赵可夫. 玉米幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[7] 田孟良;黄玉碧;谭功燮;刘永建;荣廷昭. 西南糯玉米地方品种waxy基因序列多态性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[8] 胡希远;李建平;宋喜芳. 空间统计分析在作物育种品系选择中的效果[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 412 -417 .
[9] 王艳;邱立明;谢文娟;黄薇;叶锋;张富春;马纪. 昆虫抗冻蛋白基因转化烟草的抗寒性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 397 -402 .
[10] 郑希;吴建国;楼向阳;徐海明;石春海. 不同环境条件下稻米组氨酸和精氨酸的胚乳和母体植株QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 369 -375 .
京ICP备15008789号-2