欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 432-446.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.44094

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

氮肥运筹对迟播油菜产量及抗倒性的影响

秦梦倩1(), 黄威2, 陈敏1, 宁宁1, 何德志3, 胡兵4, 夏起昕5, 蒋博6, 程泰6, 常海滨2, 王晶1, 赵杰1, 汪波1, 蒯婕1, 徐正华1,*(), 周广生1   

  1. 1华中农业大学植物科学技术学院 / 农业农村部长江中游作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430070
    2黄冈市农业科学院, 湖北黄冈 438000
    3武穴市大金镇农技推广服务中心, 湖北武穴 435408
    4武穴市大法寺镇农技推广服务中心, 湖北武穴 435404
    5武穴市农业农村局, 湖北武穴 435401
    6湖北省油菜办公室, 湖北武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-08 接受日期:2024-10-25 出版日期:2025-02-12 网络出版日期:2024-11-13
  • 通讯作者: 徐正华, E-mail: xzh@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 2606844018@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省重点研发计划项目(2023BBB028);湖北省揭榜挂帅项目(HBZY2023B001-01)

Effect of nitrogen fertilizer management on yield and resistance of late-seeded rapeseed

QIN Meng-Qian1(), HUANG Wei2, CHEN Min1, NING Ning1, HE De-Zhi3, HU Bing4, XIA Qi-Xin5, JIANG Bo6, CHENG Tai6, CHANG Hai-Bin2, WANG Jing1, ZHAO Jie1, WANG Bo1, KUAI Jie1, XU Zheng-Hua1,*(), ZHOU Guang-Sheng1   

  1. 1College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System for the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
    2Huanggang Academy of Agriculture Science, Huanggang 438000, Hubei, China
    3Dajin Agricultural Extension Services Centre, Wuxue 435408, Hubei, China
    4Dafa Agricultural Extension Services Centre, Wuxue 435404, Hubei, China
    5Wuxue Agriculture and Rural Bureau, Wuxue 435401, Hubei, China
    6Hubei Department of Rape Production Management, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
  • Received:2024-06-08 Accepted:2024-10-25 Published:2025-02-12 Published online:2024-11-13
  • Contact: E-mail: xzh@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province(2023BBB028);Open Competition Program of Hubei Province(HBZY2023B001-01)

RichHTML

13

PDF

123

摘要： 长江流域稻油、稻稻油轮作茬口矛盾突出, 油菜播种期推迟导致生长发育缓慢、产量偏低, 合理的氮肥运筹是促进迟播油菜冬前生长、提高迟播油菜产量的重要措施。本试验以品种华油杂137为材料, 在湖北武汉、黄冈进行大田裂区试验, 设置N0: 0 kg hm-2, N1: 150 kg hm-2, N2: 225 kg hm-2, N3: 300 kg hm-2 4个施肥水平; S1: 基施, S2: 基施∶3叶期追施(5∶5), S3: 基施∶5叶期追施(5∶5) 3个施肥方式, 研究不同施氮量及施肥方式对迟播油菜生长发育、产量及抗倒性的影响。结果表明, 随施氮量增加, 武汉试点和黄冈试点油菜的产量呈先升后稳定的趋势, 在N2和N3处理间籽粒产量差异不显著, 武汉试点和黄冈试点在N2处理下分别比N1增加了20.76%和15.02%; 根颈粗、绿叶数、干物重及产量构成因子也表现为先增加后趋于稳定; 基部抗折力和上部抗折力呈先升后降的趋势, 但基部倒伏指数和上部倒伏指数随施氮量增加而增加, 表明增施氮肥后加剧倒伏风险, 降低抗倒伏能力; 氮肥利用率也随施氮量增加表现先增后降的趋势, 在N2处理下, 相较于N1处理武汉和黄冈试点的增幅为24.60%和42.20%, 相较于N3处理武汉和黄冈试点的增幅分别为11.58%和9.04%。随施肥方式的变化, 油菜产量呈先升后降的趋势, 武汉试点、黄冈试点产量在S2条件下比S1增加了11.72%、11.92%, 比S3增加了6.16%、6.66%; 武汉试点和黄冈试点的根颈粗、绿叶数、干物重及产量构成因子均在S2处理下达到最大值; 武汉试点和黄冈试点的基部抗折力、上部抗折力均呈先升后降的趋势, 且均在N2S2处理下达到最大; 武汉试点和黄冈试点的基部倒伏指数、上部倒伏指数呈上升趋势, 均在N3S3处理下达到最大, 这表明在N3S3条件下其抗倒伏能力较差, 倒伏风险较大; 氮肥偏生产力、氮肥贡献率、氮肥农学利用率及氮肥利用率均在S2处理下达到最大值。本试验中氮肥用量及施用方式处理间的产量差异较小, 氮肥用量与施肥方式之间的互作效应未达到显著效果。综上所述, 从产量、抗倒伏性等因素考虑, N2S2 (基施112.5 kg hm-2 + 3叶期追施112.5 kg hm-2)是迟播油菜最佳氮肥施用方式。本研究结果可为长江流域迟播油菜氮肥施用提供理论依据与技术支撑。

关键词: 油菜, 迟播, 产量, 氮肥运筹, 抗倒性

Abstract:

The conflict between rice cultivation and rice-rapeseed rotation stubble is a significant issue in the Yangtze River Basin, with delayed sowing of rapeseed often resulting in slow growth, poor development, and reduced yields. Therefore, optimizing nitrogen management is critical for promoting pre-winter growth and improving the yield of late-sown rapeseed. In this study, we used the variety “Huayouza 137” and conducted large-scale split-plot experiments in Wuhan and Huanggang, Hubei province. Four nitrogen application rates were tested: N0 (0 kg hm-2), N1 (150 kg hm-2), N2 (225 kg hm-2), and N3 (300 kg hm-2). Additionally, three fertilization methods were employed: S1 (basal application), S2 (basal application: topdressing at the 3-leaf stage in a 5:5 ratio), and S3 (basal application: topdressing at the 3-leaf stage in a 5:5 ratio). The study investigated the effects of different nitrogen rates and fertilization methods on growth, lodging resistance, and yield of late-sown rapeseed. The results showed that as nitrogen application increased, rapeseed yields in both Wuhan and Huanggang followed a pattern of initial increase and then stabilization. The difference in seed yield between N2 and N3 treatments was not significant, with N2 treatment increasing yields by 20.76% in Wuhan and 15.02% in Huanggang compared to N1. Root neck thickness, number of green leaves, dry matter weight, and yield components followed a similar trend of initial increase and then stabilization. However, Basal and upper stem strengths increased initially and decreased later, while the basal and upper lodging indices increased with higher nitrogen application rates, indicating a greater risk of lodging and reduced resistance to lodging at higher nitrogen levels. Nitrogen use efficiency also followed a pattern of initial increase and then decrease, with the N2 treatment achieving 24.60% and 42.20% increases in nitrogen utilization efficiency compared to N1, and 11.58% and 9.04% increases compared to N3 in Wuhan and Huanggang, respectively. With changes in fertilization methods, rapeseed yield exhibited a trend of increasing and then decreasing. Under S2, yields in Wuhan and Huanggang increased by 11.72% and 11.92% compared to S1, and by 6.16% and 6.66% compared to S3. Root neck thickness, number of green leaves, dry matter weight, and yield components all reached their maximum under the S2 treatment. The basal and upper stem bending forces in both Wuhan and Huanggang first increased and then decreased, reaching their maximum under the N2S2 treatment. Conversely, the basal and upper lodging indices were highest under the N3S3 treatment, indicating poor lodging resistance and a higher risk of lodging under these conditions. Nitrogen partial productivity, nitrogen contribution rate, agronomic nitrogen use efficiency, and overall nitrogen use efficiency were all highest in the S2 treatment. There were no significantly different yield effects between N fertiliser rate and application method in this experiment, and the interaction effect between N fertiliser rate and application method was not significant. In conclusion, the N2S2 treatment (112.5 kg hm-2 applied at the base and 112.5 kg hm-2 applied at the 3-leaf stage) was the optimal nitrogen application strategy for late-sown rapeseed, balancing yield and lodging resistance. The findings from this study provide a theoretical basis and technical support for nitrogen management in late-sown rapeseed cultivation in the Yangtze River Basin.

Key words: rapeseed, late-seeded, yield, nitrogen management mode, lodging resistance

表1

两个试验点原始土壤状况"

试验点
Site		 有机质
Organic matter
(g kg-1)		 碱解氮
Alkaline nitrogen
(mg kg-1)		 速效磷
Available phosphorus
(mg kg-1)		 速效钾
Available potassium
(mg kg-1)		 pH
武汉Wuhan 20.61 112.82 16.12 153.00 7.33
黄冈Huanggang 22.88 120.23 18.55 151.00 6.98

图1

2个生长季的主要气象因子"

图2

氮肥运筹对迟播油菜产量的影响 N0: 0 kg hm-2; N1: 150 kg hm-2; N2: 225 kg hm-2; N3: 300 kg hm-2; S1: 基施; S2: 基施∶3叶期追施(5∶5); S3: 基施∶5叶期追施(5∶5)。不同小写字母表示同一试验点中10个处理间差异达显著水平(P < 0.05)。*表示差异性在0.05水平显著, **表示差异性在0.01水平显著, NS表示差异性不显著。"

表2

氮肥运筹对迟播油菜产量构成的影响"

试点
Site		 施氮量
Nitrogen application		 施肥方式Fertilization method 单株角果数Pod number 每角粒数
Number of seeds per silique		 千粒重
1000-seed weight (g)		 成株率Survival rate (%) 单株产量
Seed weight
(g plant-1)
武汉(W) Wuhan N0 78.33 d 16.31 b 3.28 b 48.00 c 4.18 d
N1 S1 91.93 c 18.76 a 3.55 a 60.67 ab 6.10 c
S2 94.33 c 18.68 a 3.54 a 64.33 a 6.22 ab
S3 94.20 c 18.69 a 3.55 a 60.67 ab 6.24 a
N2 S1 104.20 b 18.99 a 3.62 a 56.33 b 7.12 bc
S2 114.60 a 18.66 a 3.58 a 59.33 ab 7.64 a
S3 110.00 ab 18.98 a 3.63 a 61.67 ab 7.57 a
N3 S1 107.40 ab 18.68 a 3.65 a 57.33 b 7.31 bc
S2 112.80 ab 18.72 a 3.67 a 59.00 ab 7.75 a
S3 111.93 ab 18.62 a 3.66 a 62.00 ab 7.62 a
方差分析
Analysis of variance		 N ** NS NS NS NS
S NS NS NS NS **
N×S NS NS NS NS NS
黄冈(H) Huanggang N0 80.80 d 16.51 b 3.42 b 50.33 a 4.58 e
N1 S1 93.87 c 18.11 a 3.69 a 48.00 a 6.27 d
S2 98.93 bc 18.07 a 3.64 a 52.00 a 6.47 cd
S3 97.80 bc 18.52 a 3.66 a 49.00 a 6.56 bcd
N2 S1 106.27 abc 18.62 a 3.62 a 50.00 a 7.12 abcd
S2 119.53 a 18.02 a 3.62 a 50.67 a 7.77 a
S3 114.87 a 18.14 a 3.63 a 49.00 a 7.56 ab
N3 S1 111.93 ab 18.20 a 3.62 a 51.67 a 7.36 abc
S2 120.93 a 18.04 a 3.63 a 51.00 a 7.87 a
S3 118.90 a 18.01 a 3.64 a 50.67 a 7.79 a
方差分析
Analysis of variance		 N ** NS NS NS **
S NS NS NS NS NS
N×S NS NS NS NS NS
W×H * NS NS ** NS

表3

氮肥运筹对迟播油菜成熟期农艺性状的影响"

试点
Site		 施氮量
Nitrogen application		 施肥方式
Fertilization
method		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 根颈粗
Root crown
Diameter (mm)		 角果层厚度
Silique thickness (cm)		 有效分枝数
Effective
number of branches
武汉(W)
Wuhan		 N0 112.73 e 7.37 e 29.73 e 2.89 e
N1 S1 123.40 d 7.75 d 34.93 d 3.05 d
S2 127.00 bcd 7.95 cd 36.10 cd 3.42 cd
S3 126.73 bcd 7.91 cd 36.07 cd 3.35 cd
N2 S1 125.67 cd 8.02 bcd 36.33 bcd 3.35 cd
S2 133.67 a 8.36 ab 40.33 a 4.15 a
S3 131.33 ab 8.31 abc 39.90 abc 4.07 ab
N3 S1 129.27 abc 8.25 abc 37.73 abcd 3.68 bc
S2 134.07 a 8.46 a 40.93 a 4.18 a
S3 133.87 a 8.42 ab 40.07 ab 4.11 ab
方差分析
Analysis of variance		 N ** ** ** **
S ** NS * **
N×S NS NS NS NS
黄冈(H)
Huanggang		 N0 115.53 e 7.54 c 30.57 d 2.90 d
N1 S1 124.20 d 7.81 b 35.60 c 3.26 c
S2 128.20 bcd 7.98 ab 36.57 bc 3.50 bc
S3 128.13 bcd 7.95 ab 36.50 bc 3.38 bc
N2 S1 126.73 cd 8.03 ab 37.60 abc 3.43 bc
S2 136.80 a 8.45 ab 40.90 ab 4.20 a
S3 134.77 ab 8.33 ab 40.03 abc 4.03 a
N3 S1 132.10 abc 8.35 ab 38.73 abc 3.76 ab
S2 136.43 a 8.50 a 41.43 a 4.16 a
S3 135.50 ab 8.45 ab 40.83 ab 4.06 a
方差分析
Analysis of variance		 N ** * ** **
S * NS NS **
N×S NS NS NS NS
W×H * NS NS NS

图3

氮肥运筹对迟播油菜干物重的影响 处理同图2。不同小写字母表示同一试验点中10个处理间差异达显著水平(P < 0.05)。*表示差异性在0.05水平显著, **表示差异性在0.01水平显著, NS表示差异性不显著。"

图4

氮肥运筹对迟播油菜越冬期关键农艺性状的影响 处理同图2。不同小写字母表示同一试验点中10个处理间差异达显著水平(P < 0.05)。*表示差异性在0.05水平显著, **表示差异性在0.01水平显著, NS表示差异性不显著。"

图5

氮肥运筹对迟播油菜抗折力、倒伏指数的影响 处理同图2。不同小写字母表示同一试验点中10个处理间差异达显著水平(P < 0.05)。*表示差异性在0.05水平显著, **表示差异性在0.01水平显著, NS表示差异性不显著。"

表4

氮肥运筹对迟播油菜氮素利用的影响"

试点
Site		 施氮量
Nitrogen application		 施肥方式
Fertilization method		 氮肥贡献率
Nitrogen
contribution rate
(%)		 氮肥偏生产力
Nitrogen partial
factor productivity
(kg kg-1)		 氮肥农学利用率
Nitrogen agronomic
efficiency
(kg kg-1)		 氮肥利用率
Nitrogen fertilizer utilization rate
(%)
武汉(W) N1 S1 38.78 d 13.23 b 5.14 bc 24.27 d
Wuhan S2 43.11 c 14.22 a 6.14 a 27.59 cd
S3 41.93 cd 13.93 ab 5.85 ab 27.86 cd
N2 S1 47.52 b 10.27 d 4.88 cd 25.22 d
S2 52.61 a 11.40 c 6.01 a 39.48 a
S3 51.68 a 11.15 c 5.76 ab 34.63 ab
N3 S1 49.34 ab 7.99 e 3.95 d 24.88 d
S2 53.06 a 8.61 e 4.57 cd 33.03 bc
S3 52.34 a 8.48 e 4.44 cd 31.11 bc
方差分析
Analysis of variance		 N ** ** ** **
S ** ** ** **
N×S NS NS NS NS
黄冈(H) N1 S1 23.68 e 13.32 b 3.15 c 19.53 c
Huanggang S2 33.87 cd 15.38 a 5.21 a 23.11 c
S3 32.27 d 15.01 a 4.84 a 23.40 c
N2 S1 34.71 c 10.39 d 3.61 b 22.78 c
S2 43.04 a 11.90 c 5.13 a 38.18 a
S3 41.49 a 11.59 c 4.81 a 32.94 b
N3 S1 38.11 b 8.22 f 3.14 c 23.53 c
S2 42.29 a 8.81 e 3.73 b 32.32 b
S3 42.01 a 8.77 e 3.68 b 30.26 b
方差分析
Analysis of variance		 N ** ** ** **
S ** ** ** **
N×S ** ** ** NS
W×H ** ** ** **

图6

产量与根颈粗、绿叶数及冬前地上部干物重的相关性分析 ***表示在P < 0.001水平相关性显著。"

[1] Kuai J, Sun Y Y, Zhou M, Zhang P P, Zuo Q S, Wu J S, Zhou G S. The effect of nitrogen application and planting density on the radiation use efficiency and the stem lignin metabolism in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Field Crops Res, 2016, 199: 89-98.
[2] 刘成, 冯中朝, 肖唐华, 马晓敏, 周广生, 黄凤洪, 李加纳, 王汉中. 我国油菜产业发展现状、潜力及对策. 中国油料作物学报, 2019, 41: 485-489.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2019.04.001
Liu C, Feng Z C, Xiao T H, Ma X M, Zhou G S, Huang F H, Li J N, Wang H Z. Development, potential and adaptation of Chinese rapeseed industry. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2019, 41: 485-489 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 宁宁, 余新颖, 秦梦倩, 娄洪祥, 王宗铠, 王春云, 贾才华, 徐正华, 王晶, 蒯婕, 汪波, 赵杰, 周广生. 关键栽培措施对菜籽油综合品质的影响. 作物学报, 2024, 50: 1554-1567.
Ning N, Yu X Y, Qin M Q, Lou H X, Wang Z K, Wang C Y, Jia C H, Xu Z H, Wang J, Kuai J, Wang B, Zhao J, Zhou G S. Effect of key cultivated measures on rapeseed oil comprehensive quality. Acta Agron Sin, 2024, 50: 1554-1567 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.34135
[4] 王汉中. 以新需求为导向的油菜产业发展战略. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40: 613-617.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2018.05.001
Wang H Z. New-demand oriented oilseed rape industry developing strategy. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2018, 40: 613-617 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Wang Y, Liu T, Li X K, Ren T, Cong R H, Lu J W. Nutrient deficiency limits population development, yield formation, and nutrient uptake of direct sown winter oilseed rape. J Integr Agric, 2015, 14: 670-680.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60798-X
[6] Sun X C, Chen F J, Yuan L X, Mi G H. The physiological mechanism underlying root elongation in response to nitrogen deficiency in crop plants. Planta, 2020, 251: 84.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03376-4 pmid: 32189077
[7] 鲁剑巍, 任涛, 李小坤, 丛日环, 陆志峰, 张洋洋, 刘诗诗, 廖世鹏, 朱俊. 我国冬油菜养分精准调控策略与高效施肥技术体系. 华中农业大学学报, 2023, 42(6): 18-25.
Lu J W, Ren T, Li X K, Cong R H, Lu Z F, Zhang Y Y, Liu S S, Liao S P, Zhu J. Strategy of precisely controlling nutrient and system of efficient fertilization technology for winter rapeseed in China. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2023, 42(6): 18-25 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] Rathke G W, Behrens T, Diepenbrock W. Integrated nitrogen management strategies to improve seed yield, oil content and nitrogen efficiency of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2006, 117: 80-108.
[9] Khan S, Anwar S, Kuai J, Ullah S, Fahad S, Zhou G S. Optimization of nitrogen rate and planting density for improving yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and lodging resistance in oilseed rape. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 532.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00532 pmid: 28536581
[10] Tauseef M, Iqbal S, Saleem M, Farooq U, Rehman K, MZ N. Evaluation of canola genotypes to different nitrogen regimes for yield and yield components. Int J Agric Environ Res, 2017, 3: 182-187.
[11] 鲁剑巍, 任涛, 丛日环, 李小坤, 张洋洋. 我国油菜施肥状况及施肥技术研究展望. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40: 712-720.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2018.05.014
Lu J W, Ren T, Cong R H, Li X K, Zhang Y Y. Prospects of research on fertilization status and technology of rapeseed in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2018, 40: 712-720 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] Li P F, Lu J W, Wang Y, Wang S, Hussain S, Ren T, Cong R H, Li X K. Nitrogen losses, use efficiency, and productivity of early rice under controlled-release urea. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2018, 251: 78-87.
[13] Sieling K, Böttcher U, Kage H N. Effect of sowing method and N application on seed yield and N use efficiency of winter oilseed rape. Agronomy, 2017, 7: 21.
[14] 张翯, 施佳炜, 王蓉, 金成兵. 金华地区油菜越优1203的迟播适宜施氮量和播种量研究. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(24): 35-37.
Zhang H, Shi J W, Wang R, Jin C B. Suitable sowing amount and nitrogen application of Yueyou 1203 for late sowing in Jinhua area. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2023, 51(24): 35-37 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] Li X Y, Zuo Q S, Chang H B, Bai G P, Kuai J, Zhou G S. Higher density planting benefits mechanical harvesting of rapeseed in the Yangtze River Basin of China. Field Crops Res, 2018, 218: 97-105.
[16] 刘宝林, 邹小云, 宋来强, 官春云. 氮肥用量对迟直播早熟油菜产量及氮素利用效率的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2015, 37: 852-861.
Liu B L, Zou X Y, Song L Q, Guan C Y. Effects of nitrogen application rate on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of early- mature rapeseed under delayed sowing condition. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2015, 37: 852-861 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 李小勇, 顾炽明, 刘康, 廖星, 黄威, 杨志远, 秦璐. 施氮量对迟播油菜氮素利用和产量品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 3726-3736.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.17.014
Li X Y, Gu C M, Liu K, Liao X, Huang W, Yang Z Y, Qin L. Effects of nitrogen application rate on nitrogen use efficiency, yield and quality of late sowing rapeseed. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 3726-3736 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.17.014
[18] 彭少兵, 黄见良, 钟旭华, 杨建昌, 王光火, 邹应斌, 张福锁, 朱庆森, Roland Buresh, Christian Witt. 提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35: 1095-1103.
Peng S B, Huang J L, Zhong X H, Yang J C, Wang G H, Zou Y B, Zhang F S, Zhu Q S, Buresh R, Witt C. Research strategy in improving fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in China. Sci Agric Sin, 2002, 35: 1095-1103 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] Butkevičienė L M, Kriaučiūnienė Z, Pupalienė R, Velička R, Kosteckienė S, Kosteckas R, Klimas E. Influence of sowing time on yield and yield components of spring rapeseed in Lithuania. Agronomy, 2021, 11: 2170.
[20] 王杰, 周雨, 黄晓芳, 唐斌林, 杨锐, 罗志勇, 寻杰. 不同播期、 密度与施氮水平对直播油菜生长及产量的影响. 作物研究, 2021, 35: 330-335.
Wang J, Zhou Y, Huang X F, Tang B L, Yang R, Luo Z Y, Xun J. Effects of different seeding date, density and nitrogen application level on growth and yield of direct-seeding rape. Crop Res, 2021, 35: 330-335 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] Wang Z K, Song L J, Wang C Y, Guo M C, El-Badri A M, Batool M, Kuai J, Wang J, Wang B, Zhou G S. Rapeseed-maize double-cropping with high biomass and high economic benefits is a soil environment-friendly forage production mode in the Yangtze River Basin. Eur J Agron, 2023, 142: 126675.
[22] Ozer H. Sowing date and nitrogen rate effects on growth, yield and yield components of two summer rapeseed cultivars. Eur J Agron, 2003, 19: 453-463.
[23] Rathke G W, Christen O, Diepenbrock W. Effects of nitrogen source and rate on productivity and quality of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grown in different crop rotations. Field Crops Res, 2005, 94: 103-113.
[24] 刘秋霞. 氮肥施用调控直播冬油菜产量构成因子的机制研究. 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2020.
Liu Q X. Study on the Mechanism of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Regulating Yield Components of Direct Seeded Winter Rape. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2020 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] Zheng M, Zhang L, Tang M, Liu J L, Liu H F, Yang H L, Fan S H, Terzaghi W, Wang H Z, Hua W. Knockout of two BnaMAX1 homologs by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis improves plant architecture and increases yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Plant Biotechnol J, 2020, 18: 644-654.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.13228 pmid: 31373135
[26] 王玉浩. 氮肥运筹对不同品种和播期油菜生长发育及产量的影响. 华中农业大学硕士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2017.
Wang Y H. Effects of Nitrogen Application on the Growth and Yield of Different Varieties and Sowing Dates of Rape. MS Thesis of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 田效琴, 李卓, 刘永红. 密度和施氮量对油菜生长发育及产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018, (3): 26-35.
Tian X Q, Li Z, Liu Y H. Effects of densities and nitrogen fertilizer rates on growth and yield of rapeseed. Soil Fert Sci China, 2018, (3): 26-35 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 何俊平, 张书芬, 朱家成, 曹金华, 文雁成, 蔡东芳, 赵磊, 王东国, 王建平. 氮肥运筹方式对不同肥力土壤油菜产量与经济性状的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56: 4489-4492.
He J P, Zhang S F, Zhu J C, Cao J H, Wen Y C, Cai D F, Zhao L, Wang D G, Wang J P. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application modes on seed yield and economical characters of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) planted in different fertility soil. Hubei Agric Sci, 2017, 56: 4489-4492 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 杨旭燕, 何文寿, 何玲. 油菜基追氮肥比例研究. 广东农业科学, 2019, 46(3): 64-70.
Yang X Y, He W S, He L. Study on the basal/topdressing ratio of nitrogen fertilizer for rapeseed. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2019, 46(3): 64-70 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 蒯婕, 杜雪竹, 胡曼, 曾讲学, 左青松, 吴江生, 周广生. 共生期与种植密度对棉田套播油菜生长及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42: 591-599.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00591
Kuai J, Du X Z, Hu M, Zeng J X, Zuo Q S, Wu J S, Zhou G S. Effect of symbiotic periods and plant densities on growth and yield of rapeseed intercropping cotton. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42: 591-599 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 巩若琳, 宋波, 杨志叶, 路丽静, 董军刚. 迟播和密度对不同油菜品种抗倒伏及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 2777-2792.
Gong R L, Song B, Yang Z Y, Lu L J, Dong J G. Effects of sowing date and density on lodging resistance and yield of different rapeseed cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 2777-2792 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24248
[32] 吴莲蓉. 油菜茎秆生化成分和倒伏相关性研究. 华中农业大学硕士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2015.
Wu L R. Study on the Correlation Between Biochemical Components and Lodging of Rape Stalk. MS Thesis of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2015 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] Zhang J, Li G H, Song Y P, Liu Z H, Yang C D, Tang S, Zheng C Y, Wang S H, Ding Y F. Lodging resistance characteristics of high-yielding rice populations. Field Crops Res, 2014, 161: 64-74.
[34] 蒯婕, 左青松, 陈爱武, 程雨贵, 梅少华, 吴江生, 周广生. 不同栽培模式对油菜产量和倒伏相关性状的影响. 作物学报, 2017, 43: 875-884.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.00875
Kuai J, Zuo Q S, Chen A W, Cheng Y G, Mei S H, Wu J S, Zhou G S. Effects of different cultivation modes on canola yield and lodging related indices. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43: 875-884 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.00875
[35] 张培培. 氮磷钾肥互作协调油菜产量与抗倒性机理研究. 华中农业大学硕士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2017.
Zhang P P. Study on the Mechanism of Coordination Between Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer on Rape Yield and Lodging Resistance. MS Thesis of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36] Wu W, Ma B L. Understanding the trade-off between lodging resistance and seed yield, and developing some non-destructive methods for predicting crop lodging risk in canola production. Field Crops Res, 2022, 288: 108691.
[37] 蒯婕, 王积军, 左青松, 陈红琳, 高建芹, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 长江流域直播油菜密植效应及其机理研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51: 4625-4632.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.24.004
Kuai J, Wang J J, Zuo Q S, Chen H L, Gao J Q, Wang B, Zhou G S, Fu T D. Effects and mechanism of higher plant density on directly-sown rapeseed in the Yangtze River Basin of China. Sci Agric Sin, 2018, 51: 4625-4632 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.24.004
[38] 朱珊, 李银水, 余常兵, 谢立华, 胡小加, 张树杰, 廖星, 廖祥生, 车志. 密度和氮肥用量对油菜产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2013, 35: 179-184.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2013.02.011
Zhu S, Li Y S, Yu C B, Xie L H, Hu X J, Zhang S J, Liao X, Liao X S, Che Z. Effects of planting density and nitrogen application rate on rapeseed yield and nitrogen efficiency. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2013, 35: 179-184 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39] 郭子琪, 王慧, 韩上, 李敏, 雷之萌, 张军, 程文龙, 卜容燕, 武际, 朱林. 氮肥用量对直播油菜产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020, (5): 40-44.
Guo Z Q, Wang H, Han S, Li M, Lei Z M, Zhang J, Cheng W L, Bu R Y, Wu J, Zhu L. Effect of nitrogen application rate on yield and nitrogen uptake and utilization of direct seeding rape. Soil Fert Sci China, 2020, (5): 40-44 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[40] 苏伟, 鲁剑巍, 李云春, 李小坤, 马常宝, 高祥照. 氮肥运筹方式对油菜产量、氮肥利用率及氮素淋失的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32: 558-562.
Su W, Lu J W, Li Y C, Li X K, Ma C B, Gao X Z. Effect of nitrogen management mode on yield, nitrogen using efficiency and nitrogen leaching of rapeseed. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2010, 32: 558-562 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[41] Liu B, Zou X, Song L, Chen L, Li S, Guan C. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and application of nitrogen fertilizer as base fertilizer on rapeseed yield and nitrogen absorption. Agric Sci Technol, 2013, 14: 116-121.
[42] Ma B L, Herath A W. Timing and rates of nitrogen fertilizer application on seed yield, quality and nitrogen-use efficiency of canola. Crop Pasture Sci, 2016, 67: 167.
[1] 杨翠华, 李诗豪, 易徐徐, 郑飞雄, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 聚-γ-谷氨酸对水稻产量、品质和养分吸收的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 785-796.
[2] 刘亚龙, 王鹏飞, 于爱忠, 王玉珑, 尚永盼, 杨学慧, 尹波, 张冬玲, 王凤. 绿肥还田条件下减氮对河西绿洲灌区玉米产量及N2O排放的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 771-784.
[3] 王岩, 白春生, 李波, 范虹, 何蔚, 杨莉莉, 曹悦, 赵财. 覆膜免耕和灌水量对西北绿洲灌区玉米产量及光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 755-770.
[4] 阳新月, 肖人滈, 张林茜, 唐铭均, 孙光燕, 杜康, 吕长文, 唐道彬, 王季春. 不同生育期涝渍对甘薯抗逆生理特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 744-754.
[5] 熊强强, 孙长辉, 顾雯霏, 陆彦尧, 周年兵, 郭保卫, 刘国栋, 魏海燕, 朱金燕, 张洪程. 基于生育期、产量和品质对70份粳糯品种(系)的综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 728-743.
[6] 苏明, 吴佳瑞, 洪自强, 李翻过, 周甜, 吴宏亮, 康建宏. 西北半干旱区马铃薯块茎淀粉形成及产量对磷肥减量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 713-727.
[7] 李翔宇, 季欣杰, 王雪莲, 龙安燃, 王峥宇, 杨子慧, 宫香伟, 姜英, 齐华. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对春玉米产量和籽粒品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 696-712.
[8] 张琴, 戴成, 马朝芝. 生长素响应报告基因转化甘蓝型油菜及各组织GUS动态信号分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 667-675.
[9] 张金泽, 周庆国, 杨旭, 王倩, 肖莉晶, 金海润, 欧阳青静, 余坤江, 田恩堂. 芥菜型油菜响应菌核病侵染表达特性与高抗性关联基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 621-631.
[10] 孙程明, 周晓婴, 陈锋, 张维, 王晓东, 彭琦, 郭月, 高建芹, 胡茂龙, 付三雄, 张洁夫. 长链非编码RNA (lncRNA)在甘蓝型油菜分枝角度调控中的功能分析与预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 559-567.
[11] 谢伶俐, 李永铃, 许本波, 张学昆. 油菜耐渍机理解析及遗传改良研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 287-300.
[12] 苏晴芳, 孙小钊, 林杨, 付艳苹, 程家森, 谢甲涛, 姜道宏, 陈桃. 嗜线虫沙雷氏菌Serratia nematodiphila TG10增强油菜耐盐碱能力[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 358-369.
[13] 胡雅杰, 郭靖豪, 丛舒敏, 蔡沁, 徐益, 孙亮, 郭保卫, 邢志鹏, 杨文飞, 张洪程. 灌浆前期低温弱光复合处理对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 405-417.
[14] 王崇铭, 陆志峰, 闫金垚, 宋毅, 王昆昆, 方娅婷, 李小坤, 任涛, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 磷肥用量对油稻轮作系统作物产量与磷素吸收量及其稳定性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 447-458.
[15] 张辰煜, 葛军勇, 褚俊聪, 王星宇, 赵宝平, 杨亚东, 臧华栋, 曾昭海. 燕麦红芸豆带状间作的产量效应及根系形态与土壤酶活性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 459-469.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李绍清, 李阳生, 吴福顺, 廖江林, 李达模. 水稻孕穗期在淹涝胁迫下施肥的优化选择及其作用机理[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(01): 115 -120 .
[2] 王兰珍;米国华;陈范骏;张福锁. 不同产量结构小麦品种对缺磷反应的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 867 -870 .
[3] 杨建昌;张亚洁;张建华;王志琴;朱庆森. 水分胁迫下水稻剑叶中多胺含量的变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[4] 袁美;杨光圣;傅廷栋;严红艳. 甘蓝型油菜生态型细胞质雄性不育两用系的研究Ⅲ. 8-8112AB的温度敏感性及其遗传[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[5] 王永胜;王景;段静雅;王金发;刘良式. 水稻极度分蘖突变体的分离和遗传学初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[6] 王丽燕;赵可夫. 玉米幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[7] 田孟良;黄玉碧;谭功燮;刘永建;荣廷昭. 西南糯玉米地方品种waxy基因序列多态性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[8] 胡希远;李建平;宋喜芳. 空间统计分析在作物育种品系选择中的效果[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 412 -417 .
[9] 王艳;邱立明;谢文娟;黄薇;叶锋;张富春;马纪. 昆虫抗冻蛋白基因转化烟草的抗寒性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 397 -402 .
[10] 郑希;吴建国;楼向阳;徐海明;石春海. 不同环境条件下稻米组氨酸和精氨酸的胚乳和母体植株QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 369 -375 .
京ICP备15008789号-2