欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 1043-1052.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.34118

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

长期秸秆还田下施氮量对棉花产量和氮素利用的影响

刘成敏1(), 门雅琦1, 秦都林1,2, 闫晓宇1,3, 张乐1, 孟浩1, 苏寻雅1, 孙学振1, 宋宪亮1, 毛丽丽1,*()   

  1. 1山东农业大学农学院 / 作物生物学国家重点实验室, 山东泰安 271018
    2山东省农业技术推广中心, 山东济南 250013
    3青岛市崂山区农业农村局, 山东青岛 266000
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-12 接受日期:2023-10-23 出版日期:2024-04-12 网络出版日期:2023-11-15
  • 通讯作者: * 毛丽丽, E-mail: maolili6666@163.com
  • 作者简介:E-mail: chengminliu2022@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2022MC085);山东省农业良种工程项目(2023LZGC002);山东省棉花产业技术研究体系项目(SDAIT-03)

Effects of nitrogen application rate on cotton yield and nitrogen utilization under long-term straw return to the field

LIU Cheng-Min1(), MEN Ya-Qi1, QIN Du-Lin1,2, YAN Xiao-Yu1,3, ZHANG Le1, MENG Hao1, SU Xun-Ya1, SUN Xue-Zhen1, SONG Xian-Liang1, MAO Li-Li1,*()   

  1. 1Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University / State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
    2Shandong Agricultural Technology Promotion Center, Jinan 250013, Shandong, China
    3Agriculture and Rural Bureau of Laoshan District, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2023-07-12 Accepted:2023-10-23 Published:2024-04-12 Published online:2023-11-15
  • Contact: * E-mail: maolili6666@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province(ZR2022MC085);Shandong Province Agricultural Variety Engineering Project(2023LZGC002);Shandong Cotton Industry Technology Research System(SDAIT-03)

RichHTML

29

PDF

646

摘要：

施氮能够增加土壤中氮的有效性, 提高植株光合作用, 促进植株对氮的吸收和干物质的积累, 最终增加作物产量。但是在长期高氮秸秆还田条件下, 是否应调整施氮量尚不清楚。为探究长期秸秆还田条件下施氮量对棉花光合速率、干物质和养分积累分配、产量、氮素利用和土壤氮素变化的影响, 本研究设置0 (N0)、150 (N150)、180 (N180)、210 (N210)、240 (N240)、270 (N270)和300 (N300) kg hm-2共7个施氮量处理。与常规施氮量(N300)相比, 2020—2021年, 减氮30% (N210)处理2年均获得了较高产量, 分别为1853.62 kg hm-2和1872.43 kg hm-2, 减氮40% (N180)仅在第1年保持了较高产量, 为1743.68 kg hm-2。2021年, N210的净光合速率、干物质和养分积累量均高于N180, 两者间生殖器官的干物质和养分分配系数、氮肥利用效率未有显著差异, 但N180的土壤表观氮盈余量显著降低了39.15%。综上, 长期秸秆还田条件下, 鲁西北棉区应适量减少施氮量。

关键词: 棉花, 施氮量, 秸秆还田, 产量, 氮素利用, 光合速率

Abstract:

Nitrogen application can increase the availability of nitrogen in the soil, thereby improving plant photosynthesis and promoting the absorption of nitrogen and the accumulation of dry matter, ultimately leading to an increase in crop yield. However, it is unclear whether the nitrogen application rate should be adjusted under long-term high nitrogen straw returning conditions. To investigate the effects of nitrogen application rate on cotton photosynthesis rate, dry matter and nutrient accumulation and distribution, yield, nitrogen utilization, and soil nitrogen changes under long-term straw return conditions, we set up seven nitrogen application rates of pure nitrogen 0 (N0), 150 (N150), 180 (N180), 210 (N210), 240 (N240), 270 (N270), and 300 (N300) kg hm-2. Compared with the commonly used nitrogen application rate (N300) in field agriculture, from 2020 to 2021, a 30% reduction in nitrogen (N210) achieved higher yields, 1853.62 kg hm-2 and 1872.43 kg hm-2 respectively, while a 40% reduction in nitrogen (N180) only maintained a high yield of 1743.68 kg hm-2 in the first year. In 2021, the net photosynthetic rate, dry matter and nutrient accumulation of N210 were higher than that of N180, and there was no significant difference between them in the dry matter and nutrient partition coefficient of reproductive organs and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency, but the apparent nitrogen surplus of N180 soil was significantly reduced by 39.15%. In summary, under long-term stubble returning conditions, applying 210 kg hm-2 of nitrogen is more suitable for achieving the goal of reducing weight and promoting yield in the northwest cotton region of Shandong.

Key words: cotton, nitrogen application rate, straw returning, yield, nitrogen utilization, photosynthetic rate

图1

2020年和2021年棉花生长季内每月平均温度和降水量"

图2

施氮量对棉花功能叶净光合速率的影响 不同小写字母表示同一年份处理间在0.05概率水平差异显著。N0: 施氮量0 kg hm-2; N150: 施氮量150 kg hm-2; N180: 施氮量180 kg hm-2; N210: 施氮量210 kg hm-2; N240: 施氮量240 kg hm-2; N270: 施氮量270 kg hm-2; N300: 施氮量300 kg hm-2。"

图3

施氮量对棉花地上部干物质积累的影响 处理同图2。"

表1

施氮量对棉花地上部干物质分配的影响(播后150 d)"

处理
Treatment		 2020 2021
营养器官分配系数
Proportion of vegetative organs		 生殖器官分配系数
Proportion of reproductive organs		 营养器官分配系数
Proportion of vegetative organs		 生殖器官分配系数
Proportion of reproductive organs
N0 50.69 ab 49.31 ab 47.89 b 52.11 a
N150 50.01 ab 49.99 ab 49.22 ab 50.78 ab
N180 49.74 b 50.26 a 49.34 ab 50.66 ab
N210 49.81 b 50.19 a 48.36 ab 51.64 a
N240 51.10 ab 48.90 ab 50.73 ab 49.27 ab
N270 53.25 a 46.75 b 51.22 a 48.78 b
N300 54.92 a 45.08 b 51.02 a 48.98 b

图4

施氮量对棉花地上部氮素积累的影响 处理同图2。"

表2

施氮量对棉花地上部氮素分配的影响(播后150 d)"

处理
Treatment		 2020 2021
营养器官分配系数
Proportion of vegetative organs		 生殖器官分配系数
Proportion of reproductive organs		 营养器官分配系数
Proportion of vegetative organs		 生殖器官分配系数
Proportion of reproductive organs
N0 44.25 bc 55.75 ab 43.81 a 56.19 a
N150 44.30 bc 55.70 ab 43.87 a 56.13 a
N180 44.15 bc 55.85 ab 44.98 a 55.02 a
N210 43.39 c 56.61 a 45.18 a 54.82 a
N240 44.52 abc 55.48 abc 44.62 a 55.38 a
N270 45.28 ab 54.72 bc 45.19 a 54.81 a
N300 46.11 a 53.89 c 45.14 a 54.86 a

表3

施氮量对棉花产量的影响"

处理
Treatment		 2020 2021
单位面积铃数
Boll density
(boll m-2)		 单铃重
Boll weight
(g boll-1)		 衣分
Lint
percentage
(%)		 产量
Lint yield
(kg hm-2)		 单位面积铃数
Boll density
(boll m-2)		 单铃重
Boll weight
(g boll-1)		 衣分
Lint
percentage
(%)		 产量
Lint yield
(kg hm-2)
N0 53.54 c 5.63 b 40.25 a 1214.40 b 52.58 d 5.52 c 41.02 a 1191.42 c
N150 57.28 c 5.74 b 40.81 a 1342.14 b 58.53 d 5.78 b 40.31 a 1362.68 c
N180 74.73 b 5.82 ab 40.10 a 1743.68 a 64.65 c 5.88 b 40.03 a 1521.29 bc
N210 76.29 a 5.99 a 40.54 a 1853.62 a 77.04 a 5.96 a 40.78 a 1872.43 a
N240 74.68 b 5.83 ab 40.22 a 1751.14 a 72.69 b 5.90 ab 40.80 a 1743.96 ab
N270 72.23 b 5.83 ab 41.10 a 1731.42 a 70.85 b 5.93 a 40.37 a 1704.44 ab
N300 71.88 b 5.89 ab 40.57 a 1716.45 a 70.07 b 5.92 a 40.02 a 1659.54 ab

表4

施氮量对棉花氮肥利用效率的影响"

处理
Treatment		 2020 2021
氮肥农学利用率
Nitrogen
agronomic efficiency
(kg kg-1)		 氮肥偏生产力
Nitrogen partial factor productivity
(kg kg-1)		 氮肥贡献率
Nitrogen
contribution rate
(%)		 氮肥农学利用率
Nitrogen
agronomic efficiency
(kg kg-1)		 氮肥偏生产力
Nitrogen partial factor productivity
(kg kg-1)		 氮肥贡献率
Nitrogen
contribution rate
(%)
N150 0.85 d 7.46 c 9.52 b 1.14 b 9.08 a 12.57 b
N180 2.94 a 8.30 a 30.35 a 1.69 ab 8.31 a 20.37 ab
N210 3.04 ab 8.10 b 34.48 a 3.24 a 8.92 a 36.37 a
N240 2.24 bc 7.72 c 30.65 a 2.30 ab 7.27 b 31.68 a
N270 1.91 cd 6.49 c 29.86 a 1.90 ab 6.31 b 30.10 a
N300 1.67 cd 5.77 c 29.25 a 1.56 ab 5.53 b 28.21 a

图5

施氮量对土壤表观N平衡的影响 不同小写字母表示不同一年份同一处理间在0.05概率水平差异显著。处理同图2。"

[1] Jonas K, Matin Q. Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: 11652-11656.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203647109 pmid: 22753493
[2] Gui Y Y, Wei J J, Mao L Y, Li H B, Zhang R H, Zhou H, Yang R Z, Liu X H. Application of 15N stable isotope labeling technology in sugarcane nitrogen research. Agric Biotechnol, 2020, 9: 104-107.
[3] Zhu Z L, Chen D L. Nitrogen fertilizer use in China-Contributions to food production, impacts on the environment and best management strategies. Nutr Cycl Agroecosy, 2002, 63: 117-127.
doi: 10.1023/A:1021107026067
[4] Wang S H, Mao L L, Shi J L, Nie J J, Song X L, Sun X Z. Effects of plant density and nitrogen rate on cotton yield and nitrogen use in cotton stubble retaining fields. J Integr Agric, 2021, 20: 2090-2099.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63323-8
[5] Zhang L, Mao L L, Yan X Y, Liu C M, Song X L, Sun X Z. Long-term cotton stubble return and subsoiling increases cotton yield through improving root growth and properties of coastal saline soil. Ind Crops Prod, 2022, 177: 114472.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114472
[6] Mo R X, Jiang L G, Guo L, Hu J M, Liu K Q, Zhou J M, Liang T F, Zeng K, Ding C Q. Effect of nitrogen application on contents of different forms of nitrogen in rice plants. Agric Sci Technol, 2011, 12: 1484-1489.
[7] 宋兴虎. 氮肥用量对夏直播棉花产量形成和养分利用的影响. 华中农业大学硕士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2017.
Song X H. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Yield Formation and Nutrient Utilization of Summer Direct Seeding Cotton. MS Thesis of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Shang-Guan Z P, Shao M A, Dyckmans J. Nitrogen nutrition and water stress effects on leaf photosynthetic gas exchange and water use efficiency in winter wheat. Environ Exp Bot, 2000, 44: 141-149.
pmid: 10996367
[9] Cai R G, Zhang M, Yin Y Q, Wang P, Zhang T B, Gu F, Dai Z M, Liang T B, Wu Y H, Wang Z L. Photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidative metabolism of flag leaves in responses to nitrogen application during grain filling of field-grown wheat. Agric Sci China, 2008, 7: 157-167.
doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60035-8
[10] Li J P, Zhang Z, Yao C S, Liu Y, Wang Z M, Fang B T, Zhang Y H. Improving winter wheat grain yield and water-/nitrogen-use efficiency by optimizing the micro-sprinkling irrigation amount and nitrogen application rate. J Integr Agric, 2021, 20: 606-621.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63407-4
[11] Li J, Hu W S, Lu Z F, Meng F J, Cong R H, Li X K, Ren T, Lu J W. Imbalance between nitrogen and potassium fertilization influences potassium deficiency symptoms in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) leaves. Crop J, 2022, 10: 565-576.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2021.06.001
[12] Zhu K Y, Yan J Q, Shen Y, Zhang W Y, Xu Y J, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. Deciphering the morpho-physiological traits for high yield potential in nitrogen efficient varieties (NEVs): a japonica rice case study. J Integr Agric, 2022, 21: 947-963.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63600-0
[13] Wang R, An J W, Jie Z J, Hua L M, Liu Y. Effects of different nitrogen application methods on enzyme activities in leaves at late growth stage of spring maize. Agric Sci Technol, 2011, 12: 1605-1607.
[14] Zhang M, Pan G F, Huang Y Q, He J O, Fang X D, Liu Z H, Zhan M. Effects of increased planting density with reduced nitrogen application on yield formation and nitrogen utilization of autumn maize. Agric Sci Technol, 2019, 20: 1-13.
[15] Cui Z J, Yan B, Gao Y H, Wu B, Wang Y F, Wang H D, Xu P, Zhao B Q, Cao Z, Zhang Y, Xie Y P, Hu Y P, Ma X B, Niu J Y. Agronomic cultivation measures on productivity of oilseed flax: a review. Oil Crop Sci, 2022, 7: 53-62.
doi: 10.1016/j.ocsci.2022.02.006
[16] Read J J, Reddy K R, Jenkins J N. Yield and fiber quality of upland cotton as influenced by nitrogen and potassium nutrition. Eur J Agron, 2006, 24: 282-290.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2005.10.004
[17] Nie Y P, Chen H S, Wang K L, Ding Y L. Rooting characteristics of two widely distributed woody plant species growing in different karst habitats of southwest China. Plant Ecol, 2014, 215: 1099-1109.
doi: 10.1007/s11258-014-0369-0
[18] Xue H Y, Han Y C, Li Y B, Wang G P, Feng L, Fan Z Y, Du W L, Yang B F, Cao C G, Mao S C. Spatial distribution of light interception by different plant population densities and its relationship with yield. Field Crops Res, 2015, 184: 17-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.09.004
[19] Yao H S, Zhang Y L, Yi X P, Hu Y Y, Luo H H, Gou L, Zhang W F. Plant density alters nitrogen partitioning among photosynthetic components, leaf photosynthetic capacity and photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency in field-grown cotton. Field Crops Res, 2015, 184: 39-49.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.09.005
[20] Dordas C A, Sioulas C. Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, partitioning, and retranslocation in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) as affected by nitrogen fertilization. Field Crops Res, 2009, 110: 35-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2008.06.011
[21] Chen L, Qiao Z, Wang J J, Wang H G, Cao X N, Dong J L. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the accumulation and distribution of dry matter in broomcorn millet. Agric Sci Technol, 2015, 16: 1425-1428.
[22] Ye J Q, Yuan R X, Wang Z H, Liu J S. Dynamic changes of nitrogenin saline-alkaline paddy field and its potential environmental impacts. Agric Sci Technol, 2011, 12: 443-446.
[23] Dai J J, Liu L Z, Wang X C, Fang Q N, Cheng Y R, Wang D N, Peng X L. Effects of carbon and nitrogen additions on soil microbial biomass carbon and enzyme activities under rice straw returning. J Northeast Agric Univ, 2021, 28: 21-30.
[24] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005. pp 42-106.
Bao S D. Soil and Agro-chemistry Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005. pp 42-106. (in Chinese)
[25] Sun C X, Qi H, Hao J J, Miao L, Wang J, Wang Y, Liu M, Chen L J. Single leaves photosynthetic characteristics of two insect-resistant transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties in response to light. Photosynthetica, 2009, 47: 399-408.
doi: 10.1007/s11099-009-0061-0
[26] Nakaji T, Fukami M, Dokiya Y, Izuta T. Effects of high nitrogen load on growth, photosynthesis and nutrient status of Cryptomeria japonica and Pinus densiflora seedlings. Trees, 2001, 15: 453-461.
doi: 10.1007/s00468-001-0130-x
[27] Zhang J H, Liu J L, Zhang J B, Zhao F T, Cheng Y N, Wang W P. Effects of nitrogen application rates on translocation of dry matter and nitrogen uilization in rice and wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 1736-1742.
doi: 10.1016/S1875-2780(09)60079-1
[28] Zhou G Y, Wang B, Xia H. Effects of density and nitrogen application rate on population structure and yield of early-maturing late japonica Tongjing 981. Agric Biotechnol, 2020, 9: 92-98.
[29] Peng J Y, Qu H P, Huang J S, Zhou L Q, Xie R L, Zhu X H, Zeng Y, Tan H W. Effects of different nitrogen levels on growth and nitrogen utilization of sugarcane. Asian Agric Res, 2022, 14: 26-29.
[30] Wang Q, Li F R, Zhao L, Zhang E H, Shi S L, Zhao W Z, Song W X, Vance M M. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen application rates on nitrate nitrogen distribution and fertilizer nitrogen loss, wheat yield and nitrogen uptake on a recently reclaimed sandy farmland. Plant Soil, 2010, 337: 325-339.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0530-z
[31] Zhang Q X, Gao Y H, Yan B, Cui Z J, Wu B, Yang K, Ma J. Perspective on oil flax yield and dry biomass with reduced nitrogen supply. Oil Crop Sci, 2020, 5: 69-73.
[32] Niu X K, Xie R Z, Liu X, Zhang F L, Li S K, Gao S J. Maize yield gains in northeast China in the last six decades. J Integr Agric, 2013, 12: 630-637.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60281-6
[33] Lin E, Liu H G, Li X X, Li L, Sumera A. Promoting the production of salinized cotton field by optimizing water and nitrogen use efficiency under drip irrigation. J Arid Land, 2021, 13: 699-716.
doi: 10.1007/s40333-021-0012-6
[34] Liu Z L, Tao L Y, Liu T T, Zhang X H, Wang W, Song J M, Yu C L, Peng X L. Nitrogen application after low-temperature exposure alleviates tiller decrease in rice. Environ Exp Bot, 2018, 158: 205-214.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.11.001
[35] Wen B B, Li C, Fu X L, Li D M, Li L, Chen X D, Wu H Y, Cui X W, Zhang X H, Shen H Y, Zhang W Q, Xiao W, Gao D S. Effects of nitrate deficiency on nitrate assimilation and chlorophyll synthesis of detached apple leaves. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2019, 142: 363-371.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.07.007
[36] Lin D X, Fan X H, Hu F, Zhao H T, Luo J F. Ammonia volatilization and nitrogen utilization efficiency in response to urea application in rice fields of the Taihu Lake Region, China. Pedosphere, 2007, 17: 639-645.
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(07)60076-9
[37] Sakariyawo O S, Oyeledun K O, Adeyemi N O, Atayese M O. Nitrogen use efficiency and performance of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars as influenced by calcium carbide and inorganic nitrogen application rates in a derived savanna. J Plant Nutr, 2020, 43: 784-797.
doi: 10.1080/01904167.2020.1711947
[38] Neugschwandtner R W, Kaul H P. Nitrogen uptake, use and utilization efficiency by oat-pea intercrops. Field Crops Res, 2015, 179: 113-119.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.04.018
[39] Shi Z L, Li D D, Jing Q, Cai J, Jiang D, Cao W X, Dai T B. Effects of nitrogen applications on soil nitrogen balance and nitrogen utilization of winter wheat in a rice-wheat rotation. Field Crops Res, 2012, 127: 241-247.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.025
[40] Li Y, Chen Y, Wu C Y, Tang X, Ji X J. Determination of optimum nitrogen application rates in Zhejiang province, China, based on rice yields and ecological security. J Integr Agric, 2015, 14: 2426-2433.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61168-6
[41] Li P C, Dong H L, Liu A Z, Liu J R, Sun M, Li Y B, Liu S D, Zhao X H, Mao S C. Effects of nitrogen rate and split application ratio on nitrogen use and soil nitrogen balance in cotton fields. Pedosphere, 2017, 27: 769-777.
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60303-5
[42] Qiao J, Yang L Z, Yan T M, Xue F, Zhao D. Rice dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, soil mineral N around root and N leaching, with increasing application rates of fertilizer. Eur J Agron, 2013, 49: 93-103.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.03.008
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[3] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[4] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[5] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[7] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[8] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[9] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[10] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[14] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[15] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2