欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (7): 1710-1718.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.31060

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

燕麦SNP高密度遗传图谱构建及β-葡聚糖含量QTL定位

韩丽1(), 汤胜胜1, 李佳1, 胡海斌2, 刘龙龙1,*(), 吴斌2,*()   

  1. 1山西农业大学农业基因资源研究中心 / 农业农村部黄土高原作物基因资源与种质创新重点实验室, 山西太原 030031
    2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-24 接受日期:2024-01-31 出版日期:2024-07-12 网络出版日期:2024-03-07
  • 通讯作者: *刘龙龙, E-mail: lllong781211@sina.com;吴斌, E-mail: wubin03@caas.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 3105141954@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    财政部和农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-07-A);国家自然科学基金项目(30800699)

Construction of SNP high-density genetic map and localization of QTL for β-glucan content in oats

HAN Li1(), TANG Sheng-Sheng1, LI Jia1, HU Hai-Bin2, LIU Long-Long1,*(), WU Bin2,*()   

  1. 1Center for Agricultural Genetic, Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Germplasm Enhancement on Loess Plateau, Ministry of Agriclture and Rural Affairs, Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, China
    2Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2023-10-24 Accepted:2024-01-31 Published:2024-07-12 Published online:2024-03-07
  • Contact: *E-mail: lllong781211@sina.com; E-mail: wubin03@caas.cn
  • Supported by:
    China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-07-A);National Natural Science Foundation of China(30800699)

RichHTML

16

PDF

531

摘要：

β-葡聚糖是燕麦发挥保健作用的主要功能因子, 提高其含量对优质燕麦生产有着重要意义。为促进高β-葡聚糖燕麦种质资源的有效利用和相关基因发掘, 本研究以高β-葡聚糖品种夏莜麦和低β-葡聚糖品种赤38组配衍生的219个家系RIL8群体为材料, 利用重测序技术构建了包含21个连锁群, 5032个bin标记的遗传连锁图谱, 图谱总长2045.09 cM, 平均图距0.42 cM。利用标准酶法和近红外法对4个环境的RIL群体家系β-葡聚糖含量进行测定, 结合测定结果, 利用完备区间作图法对β-葡聚糖含量进行QTL定位分析, 结果显示不同环境条件下RIL群体β-葡聚糖含量呈正态分布, 并出现超亲后代家系, 4个环境下群体β-葡聚糖含量变异系数介于9.06%~16.63%之间。QTL定位检测到7个与燕麦β-葡聚糖含量相关的QTL, 分布于2D、3D、4C和4D染色体上, 其中贡献率最高为14.73%, 在2个环境中检测到同一个QTL, 其标记区间为Chr4C_mark8361257-Chr4C_mark8384831。研究结果将为燕麦β-葡聚糖分子标记辅助育种提供重要的理论依据。

关键词: 燕麦, SNP, 遗传图谱, β-葡聚糖, QTL定位

Abstract:

β-glucan is the main functional component of oats for health care, and improving its content is of great significance to the production of high-quality oats. In this study, in order to promote the effective utilization of high β-glucan oat germplasm resources and the discovery of related genes, a genetic linkage map containing 21 linkage groups and 5032 bin markers was constructed by using resequencing technology with the 223 RIL8 populations derived from the high β-glucan variety Xiayoumai and the low β-glucan resource Chi38. The total length of the map was 2045.09 cM, and the average plot distance was 0.42 cM. The β-glucan content of RIL populations in four environments was determined by standard enzyme method and near infrared method. Combined with the determination results, QTL analysis of β-glucan content was performed by complete interval mapping method. The results showed that the β-glucan content of RIL populations was normally distributed under different environmental conditions, and there were superparent descendants. The coefficient of variation of β-glucan content in the four environments ranged from 9.06% to 16.63%. Seven QTLs related to β-glucan content in oat were detected by QTL mapping, distributed on 2D, 3D, 4C, and 4D chromosomes, with the highest contribution rate of 14.73%. The same QTL was detected in two environments with a marker interval of Chr4C_mark8361257-Chr4C_mark8384831. The results of this study provide an important theoretical basis for molecular marker-assisted breeding of oat β-glucan.

Key words: oat, SNP, genetic map, β-glucan, QTL mapping

表1

亲本及RIL群体燕麦β-葡聚糖含量的统计分析"

试点
Location		 亲本 Parents RIL群体 RIL population
赤38
Chi 38 (%)		 夏莜麦
Xiayoumai (%)		 范围
Range		 平均值
Mean (%)		 变异系数
CV (%)		 偏度
Skewness		 峰度
Kurtosis		 遗传力
Heritability
北京Beijing 4.06 6.52 2.92-6.95 5.11 16.63 -0.33 -0.08 0.95
山西Shanxi 4.14 5.68 3.59-5.84 4.83 9.11 -0.07 -0.39 0.90
新疆Xinjiang 5.08 6.01 4.47-6.48 5.49 6.21 0.13 0.41 0.94
河北Hebei 4.84 5.68 4.71-7.29 5.63 9.06 0.89 0.73 0.86

图1

不同环境下RIL群体燕麦β-葡聚糖含量的频率分布图 BJ、SX、XJ和HB分别代表北京、山西、新疆和河北4个环境。"

表2

不同环境下 RIL 群体燕麦β-葡聚糖含量的联合方差分析"

变异来源
Source		 自由度
DF		 离均差平方和
SS		 均方
MS		 F值
F-value		 P值
P-value
基因型 Genotype 218 110.58 0.51 1.94 < 0.010
环境 Environment 3 89.06 29.69 113.57 < 0.010
基因型×环境 GE interaction 654 170.95 0.26 < 0.010
残差 Residual 216 17.76 0.08
总变异 Total 875 370.58

表3

遗传图谱信息"

染色体
Chr.		 SNP数量
Number of
SNP		 Bin标记数量
Number of Bin
marker		 总遗传距离
Total distance
(cM)		 平均遗传距离
Average marker interval
(cM)		 最大
Max. interval
(cM)
1A 6316 304 135.06 0.44 10.26
1C 2076 79 29.91 0.38 2.43
1D 10,517 273 116.85 0.43 3.13
2A 3174 219 84.61 0.39 7.99
2C 8185 206 85.27 0.41 3.21
2D 14,888 425 158.68 0.37 4.40
3A 53,092 137 55.46 0.40 3.85
3C 22,630 231 81.24 0.35 2.65
3D 11,396 354 160.97 0.45 11.72
4A 7407 278 135.66 0.49 12.67
4C 100,146 300 120.65 0.40 12.85
4D 23,126 491 194.12 0.40 8.81
5A 141,190 85 49.91 0.59 7.92
5C 91,777 392 104.23 0.27 1.92
5D 48,610 147 52.51 0.36 1.97
6A 10,996 190 78.26 0.41 4.51
6C 25,948 302 124.40 0.41 5.25
6D 3253 165 77.76 0.47 5.78
7A 6105 161 58.28 0.36 1.98
7C 10,390 182 90.39 0.50 4.95
7D 8264 111 50.87 0.46 3.90
总计 Total 609,486 5032 2045.09 0.42 12.85

表4

4个环境β-葡聚糖含量QTL定位结果"

地点
Location		 数量性状位点
QTL		 染色体
Chr.		 位置
Position (cM)		 标记区间
Marked interval		 加性效应
Additive
effect		 LOD值
Likelihood
of odd		 贡献率
Contribution rate (%)
北京Beijing qBG9-1 3D 73 mark52899524-mark56792010 0.1856 3.5566 7.4766
qBG12-1 4D 131.5 mark359462864-mark359731564 0.1730 2.8829 6.1583
山西Shanxi qBG9-2 3D 103 mark345485656-mark345492373 0.1406 5.0331 10.2452
qBG11-1 4C 0.5 mark8361257-mark8384831 -0.1389 4.9324 9.9790
新疆Xinjiang qBG11-1 4C 0.5 mark8361257-mark8384831 -0.1250 5.6343 14.7268
河北Hebei qBG6-1 2D 37 mark72268394-mark72566672 0.1327 3.6026 6.2789
qBG11-2 4C 115 mark704833011-mark708537606 -0.1439 2.9495 6.9865
qBG12-2 4D 38 mark40330973-mark40622203 0.1172 2.6276 4.6057

图2

燕麦染色体上定位的β-葡聚糖含量QTL 连锁群右边是标记名称, 左边是遗传位置(cM), QTL右边对应LOD值。图中4个颜色代表4个环境, 对应规则如下: 蓝色: 北京; 红色: 河北; 绿色: 新疆; 橙色: 山西。"

[1] 陆大彪. 燕麦. 作物杂志, 1985, (1): 28.
Lu D B. Oats. Crops, 1985, (1): 28 (in Chinese).
[2] Shewry P R, Piironen V, Lampi A M, Nyström L, Li L, Rakszegi M, Fraś A, Boros D, Gebruers K, Courtin C M, Delcour J A, Andersson A A, Dimberg L, Bedo Z, Ward J L. Phytochemical and fiber components in oat varieties in the HEALTHGRAIN diversity screen. J Agric Food Chem, 2008, 56: 9777-9784.
[3] Kendall C W C, Esfahani A, Jenkins D J A. The link between dietary fibre and human health. Food Hydrocoll, 2010, 24: 42-48.
[4] Beer M U, Wood P J, Weisz J, Fillion N. Effect of cooking and storage on the amount and molecular weight of (1→3) (1→4)-β- D-glucan extracted from oat products by an in vitro digestion system. Cereal Chem, 1997, 74: 705-709.
[5] Ballabio C, Uberti F, Manferdelli S, Vacca E G, Boggini G, Redaelli R, Catassi C, Lionetti E, Peñas E, Restani P. Molecular characterization of 36 oat varieties and in vitro assessment of their suitability for coeliacs’ diet. J Cereal Sci, 2011, 54: 110-115.
[6] Fincher G B, Stone B. Cell walls and their components in cereal grain technology. In: Advances in Cereal Science and Technology, USA, 1986, Vol. 8.
[7] Wang Y, Liu J, Chen F, Zhao G. Effects of molecular structure of polyphenols on their noncovalent interactions with oat β-glucan. J Agric Food Chem, 2013, 61: 4533-4538.
[8] Bacic A, Stone B. A (1→3)- and (1→4)-linked β-D-glucan in the endosperm cell-walls of wheat. Carbohydr Res, 1980, 82: 372-377.
[9] Saulnier L, Péneau N, Thibault J F. Variability in grain extract viscosity and water-soluble arabinoxylan content in wheat. J Cereal Sci, 1995, 22: 259-264.
[10] Yun C H, Estrada A, Van Kessel A, Gajadhar A A, Redmond M J, Laarveld B. β-(1→3, 1→4) oat glucan enhances resistance to Eimeria vermiformis infection in immunosuppressed mice. Int J Parasitol, 1997, 27: 329-337.
doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(96)00178-6 pmid: 9138036
[11] 申瑞玲, 王章存, 董吉林, 姚惠源. 燕麦β-葡聚糖对小鼠结肠菌群及其功能的影响. 营养学报, 2006, 28: 430-433.
Shen R L, Wang Z C, Dong J L, Yao H Y. Effect of oat β-glucan on colon flora and its function in mice. Acta Nutr Sin, 2006, 28: 430-433 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] Wood P J, Braaten J T, Scott F W, Riedel K D, Wolynetz M S, Collins M W. Effect of dose and modification of viscous properties of oat gum on plasma glucose and insulin following an oral glucose load. Brit J Nutr, 1994, 72: 731-743.
pmid: 7826996
[13] 张勇, 郝元峰, 张艳, 何心尧, 夏先春, 何中虎. 小麦营养和健康品质研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49: 4284-4298.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.22.003
Zhang Y, Hao Y F, Zhang Y, He X Y, Xia X C, He Z H. Research progress in wheat nutrition and health quality. Chin Agric Sci, 2016, 49: 4284-4298 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] Kianian S, Phillips R, Rines H, Fulcher R, Webster F, Stuthman D. Quantitative trait loci influencing β-glucan content in oat (Avena sativa, 2n = 6x = 42). Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 101: 1039-1048.
[15] Groh S, Kianian S, Phillips R, Rines H, Stuthman D, Wesenberg D, Fulcher R. Analysis of factors influencing milling yield and their association to other traits by QTL analysis in two hexaploid oat populations. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 9-18.
[16] Tanhuanpää P, Manninen O, Beattie A, Eckstein P, Scoles G, Rossnagel B, Kiviharju E. An updated doubled haploid oat linkage map and QTL mapping of agronomic and grain quality traits from Canadian field trials. Genome, 2012, 55: 289-301.
doi: 10.1139/G2012-017 pmid: 22443510
[17] Herrmann M H, Yu J Z, Steffen B, Wilhelm E W. Quantitative trait loci for quality and agronomic traits in two advanced backcross populations in oat (Avena sativa L.). Plant Breed, 2014, 133: 588-601.
[18] 吴斌, 张茜, 宋高原, 陈新, 张宗文. 裸燕麦SSR标记连锁群图谱的构建及β-葡聚糖含量QTL的定位. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 1208-1215.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.06.017
Wu B, Zhang Q, Song G Y, Chen X, Zhang Z W. Construction of SSR marked linkage group map for bare oats and its application β-localization of QTL for glucan content. Sci Agric Sci, 2014, 47: 1208-1215 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] Zimmer C M, McNish I G, Klos K E, Oro T, Arruda K M A, Gutkoski L C, Pacheco M T, Smith K P, Federizzi L C. Genome- wide association for β-glucan content, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium in elite oat germplasm adapted to subtropical environments. Mol Breed: New Strat Plant Improv, 2020, 40: 103.
[20] 吕耀昌, 王强, 赵炜, 邓万和. 燕麦、大麦中β-葡聚糖的酶法测定. 食品科学, 2005, 26: 180-182.
Lyu Y C, Wang Q, Zhao W, Deng W H. Oats and barley β-enzymatic determination of dextran. Food Sci, 2005, 26: 180-182 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] Henry R J. Near-infrared reflectance analysis of carbohydrates and its application to the determination of (1→3), (1→4)-β-D- glucan in barley. Carbohydr Res, 1985, 141: 13-19.
[22] Meng L, Hui H L, Lu Y Z, Jian K W. QTL IciMapping: integrated software for genetic linkage map construction and quantitative trait locus mapping in biparental populations. Crop J, 2015, 3: 269-283.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.01.001
[23] McCouch S, Cho Y G, Yano M, Paul E, Blinstrub M, Morishima H, Kinoshita T. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genet Newsl, 1997, 14: 11-13.
[24] 李慧慧, 张鲁燕, 王建康. 数量性状基因定位研究中若干常见问题的分析与解答. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 918-931.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00918
Li H H, Zhang L Y, Wang J K. Analysis and answers to several common problems in quantitative trait gene mapping research. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 918-931 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] O’Donoughue L S, Sorrells M E, Tanksley S D, Autrique E, Deynze A V, Kianian S F, Phillips R L, Wu B, Rines H W, Rayapati P J, Lee M, Penner G A, Fedak G, Molnar S J, Hoffman D, Salas C A. A molecular linkage map of cultivated oat. Genome, 1995, 38: 368-380.
pmid: 18470176
[26] Chaffin A, Huang Y, Smith S M, Bekele W A, Babiker E M, Gnanesh B N, Foresman B J, Blanchard S G, Jay J J, Reid R W, Wight C P, Chao S, Oliver R E, Islamovic E, Kolb F L, McCartney C A, Mitchell Fetch J W, Beattie A D, Bjornstad Å, Bonman J M, Langdon T, Howarth C J, Brouwer C R, Jellen E N, Klos K E, Poland J A, Hsieh T, Brown R H, Jackson E W, Schlueter J, Tinker N A. A consensus map in cultivated hexaploid oat reveals conserved grass synteny with substantial subgenome rearrangement. Plant Genom, 2016, 9(2): 1-21.
[27] Huang Y F, Poland J A, Wight C P, Jackson E W, Tinker N A. Using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) for genomic discovery in cultivated oat. PLoS One, 2014, 9: e102448.
[28] Bekele W A, Wight C P, Chao S, Howarth C J, Tinker N A. Haplotype-based genotyping-by-sequencing in oat genome research. Plant Biotechnol J, 2018, 16: 1452-1463.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12888 pmid: 29345800
[29] Kono T J, Seth K, Poland J A, Morrell P L. SNPMeta: SNP annotation and SNP metadata collection without a reference genome. Mol Ecol Resour, 2014, 14: 419-425.
doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12183 pmid: 24237904
[30] Du Z, Huang Z, Li J, Bao J, Tu H, Zeng C, Wu Z, Fu H, Xu J, Zhou D, Zhu C, Fu J, He H. qTGW12a, a naturally varying QTL, regulates grain weight in rice. Theor Appl Genet, 2021, 134: 2767-2776.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03857-4 pmid: 34021769
[31] Yu H, Xie W, Wang J, Xing Y, Xu C, Li X, Xiao J, Zhang Q. Gains in QTL detection using an ultra-high density SNP map based on population sequencing relative to traditional RFLP/SSR markers. PLoS One, 2011, 6: e17595.
[32] Fogarty M C, Smith S M, Sheridan J L, Hu G, Islamovic E, Reid R, Jackson E W, Maughan P J, Ames N P, Jellen E N, Hsieh T. Identification of mixed linkage β-glucan quantitative trait loci and evaluation of AsCslF6 homeologs in hexaploid oat. Crop Sci, 2020, 60: 914-933.
[33] Tinker N A, Wight C P, Bekele W A, Yan W, Jellen E N, Renhuldt N T, Sirijovski N, Lux T, Spannagl M, Mascher M. Genome analysis in Avena sativa reveals hidden breeding barriers and opportunities for oat improvement. Commun Biol, 2022, 5: 474.
[34] Burton R A, Wilson S M, Hrmova M, Harvey A J, Shirley N J, Medhurst A, Stone B A, Newbigin E J, Bacic A, Fincher G B. Cellulose synthase-like CslF genes mediate the synthesis of cell wall (1,3;1,4)-beta-D-glucans. Science, 2006, 311: 1940-1942.
doi: 10.1126/science.1122975 pmid: 16574868
[35] Doblin M S, Pettolino F A, Wilson S M, Campbell R, Burton R A, Fincher G B, Newbigin E, Bacic A. A barley cellulose synthase-like CSLH gene mediates (1,3;1,4)-beta-D-glucan synthesis in transgenic Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106: 5996-6001.
[36] Little A, Schwerdt J G, Shirley N J, Khor S F, Neumann K, O’Donovan L A, Lahnstein J, Collins H M, Henderson M, Fincher G B, Burton R A. Revised phylogeny of the cellulose synthase gene superfamily: insights into cell wall evolution. Plant Physiol, 2018, 177: 1124-1141.
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01718 pmid: 29780036
[37] Peng Y, Yan H, Guo L, Deng C, Wang C, Wang Y, Kang L, Zhou P, Yu K, Dong X, Liu X, Sun Z, Peng Y, Zhao J, Deng D, Xu Y, Li Y, Jiang Q, Li Y, Wei L, Wang J, Ma J, Hao M, Li W, Kang H, Peng Z, Liu D, Jia J, Zheng Y, Ma T, Wei Y, Lu F, Ren C. Reference genome assemblies reveal the origin and evolution of allohexaploid oat. Nat Genet, 2022, 54: 1248-1258.
[38] Bernal A J, Jensen J K, Harholt J, Sørensen S, Moller I, Blaukopf C, Johansen B, Lotto R D, Pauly M, Scheller H V, Willats W G. Disruption of ATCSLD5 results in reduced growth, reduced xylan and homogalacturonan synthase activity and altered xylan occurrence in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2007, 52: 791-802.
[1] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[2] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[3] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[4] 刘长友, 王珅, 时会影, 沈颖超, 孙蕾, 王彦, 张志肖, 苏秋竹, 田静, 范保杰. 基于饭豆基因资源的小豆远缘杂交群体抗豆象QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 936-944.
[5] 李赢, 石晓旭, 刘海翠, 石吕, 薛亚光, 魏亚凤. 裸大麦籽粒β-葡聚糖含量近红外预测模型的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 735-745.
[6] 郭颖, 张大效, 陈美霖, 陈冠宇, 刘建民, 杨晓虹, 韩冰. 野生燕麦和栽培燕麦的代谢组学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 945-956.
[7] 李云香, 郭千纤, 侯万伟, 张小娟. 引进ICARDA小麦苗期根系抗旱性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2387-2398.
[8] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[9] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[10] 邵顺伟, 陈卓, 兰振东, 蔡兴奎, 邹华芬, 李晨曦, 唐景华, 朱熙, 张彧, 董建科, 金辉, 宋波涛. 基于BSA-seq技术的块茎芽眼深度QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1725-1735.
[11] 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[12] 孟祥宇, 刁邓超, 刘雅睿, 李云丽, 孙玉晨, 吴玮, 赵雯, 汪妤, 吴建辉, 李春莲, 曾庆东, 韩德俊, 郑炜君. 小麦新品种西农877高产稳产的遗传特性解析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1261-1276.
[13] 张金泽, 周庆国, 肖莉晶, 金海润, 欧阳青静, 龙旭, 晏中彬, 田恩堂. 芥菜型油菜不同组织硫苷含量的QTL定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1166-1177.
[14] 郭淑慧, 潘转霞, 赵战胜, 杨六六, 皇甫张龙, 郭宝生, 胡晓丽, 录亚丹, 丁霄, 吴翠翠, 兰刚, 吕贝贝, 谭逢平, 李朋波. 陆地棉D11染色体一个纤维长度主效位点的遗传解析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 383-394.
[15] 张辰煜, 葛军勇, 褚俊聪, 王星宇, 赵宝平, 杨亚东, 臧华栋, 曾昭海. 燕麦红芸豆带状间作的产量效应及根系形态与土壤酶活性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 459-469.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2