欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (05): 810-817.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00810

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于图像分析方法的水稻根系形态特征指标的定量分析

顾东祥,汤亮,曹卫星,朱艳*   

  1. 南京农业大学/江苏省信息农业高技术研究重点实验室,江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2009-10-26 修回日期:2010-02-06 出版日期:2010-05-12 网络出版日期:2010-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 朱艳, E-mail: yanzhu@njau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2007AA10Z225,2007AA10Z219)和国家重点基础研究发展(973计划)项目(2009CB118608)资助.

Quantitative Analysis on Root Morphological Characteristics Based on Image Analysis Method in Rice

GU Dong-Xiang,TANG Liang,CAO Wei-Xing,ZHU Yan*   

  1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture/Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095,China
  • Received:2009-10-26 Revised:2010-02-06 Published:2010-05-12 Published online:2010-03-15
  • Contact: ZHU Yang,E-mail:yanzhu@njau.edu.cn

摘要:

利用图像分析方法定量研究水稻根系形态特征指标的变化规律。通过实施不同水氮处理和不同品种的水稻桶栽试验,选用WinRhizo (WR)软件的不同模式(LM和T200)分析根系图像,分别提取根直径范围0~0.30 mm和0.25~1.80 mm的根系形态数据,并与基于Image-Pro Plus 6.0软件(IP)的根直径和不定根长的测量结果进行比较分析;确定了3种水稻品种不同类型根直径的范围;对不同生育时期水稻根长、根体积、根表面积、根系干重和不定根数量等水稻根系形态特征指标变化差异,以及分枝特征进行了分析。结果表明:(1)基于WR软件LM和T200模式下的根直径测量结果与基于IP软件的测量结果之间NRMSE分别为5.44%和10.95%。(2)界定细分枝根直径范围为0.03~0.10 mm,扬稻6号(V3)粗分枝根和不定根分别为0.10~0.30 mm和0.30~1.65 mm,而日本晴(V1)和武香粳14(V2)分别为0.10~0.25 mm和0.25~1.40 mm,不定根长与IP测量结果进行比较,其NRMSE为10.78%~12.01%。(3)各指标抽穗前增长迅速,之后增长减缓或衰老下降;不同氮肥处理间各指标分蘖至成熟均差异显著,增施氮肥可促进根系生长,明显提高不定根比例;适当控水可促进根系生长,明显提高分枝根比例;品种V3自分蘖期到成熟期各指标均显著高于V1和V2,V1与V2间差异不显著。本研究表明,本方法具有较好的精度和可行性,为推进水稻或其他作物根系的定量研究提供了参考。

关键词: 水稻, 根系形态, 定量分析, WinRhizo, 图像分析

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to quantitatively analyze the change patterns of rice root morphological characteristics based on image analysis method in pot experiments with different nitrogen rates, water regimes, and rice cultivars in different years. WinRhizo software (WR) was used as the root image analysis tool, and two modes of LM and T200 were used to measure the root diameter and adventitious root length under two ranges of root diameter as 0–0.30 mm and 0.25–1.80 mm, respectively. The measurement results from WR were compared with those from Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (IP). Then, the diameter ranges of different types of root were determined. On the basis of the dataset from WR, the statistical analysis were performed on rice root morphological characteristic indices, including dry weight, total volume, total surface area, total adventitious root length and number per plant at different growth stages. The results were as follows: (1) The average NRMSEs between WR (LM and T200) and IP for root diameters were 5.44% and 10.95%. (2) The diameter range of fine lateral root was circumscribed within 0.03–0.10 mm for all the experiments, coarse lateral and adventitious root were circumscribed within 0.10-0.30 and 0.30-1.40 mm for V1 (Nipponbare) and V2 (Wuxiangjing 14), but 0.10–0.25 and 0.25–1.65 mm for V3 (Yangdao 6). Following this method, the NRMSEs for adventitious root length measured by WR and IP were 10.78%–12.01%. (3) All indices increased rapidly in the growth process and reached or approached the maximum at heading, then increased slowly or decreased after heading. There were significant differences between treatments with different nitrogen rates from tillering to maturing on all indices. Increasing nitrogen rate accelerated the growth of roots, and especially enhanced the proportion of adventitious roots. Properly control of irrigation could promote the growth of roots and increase the proportion of lateral roots. All indices of V3 were significantly higher than these of other cultivars, and there were no significant differences between V1 and V2. The results indicated that it was feasible to measure morphological indices of different types of rice root by WR with different modes, and the methods used in this paper have a good accuracy and reliability. These results could provide a support for the quantitative analysis on root morphology of rice or other crops.

Key words: Rice, Root morphology, Quantitative analysis, WinRhizo, Image analysis



[15] Fan X-L(樊小林), Shi Z-J(史正军), Wu P(吴平). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on parameters of rice (Oryza sativa L.) root architecture and their genotypic difference. J Northwest Sci-Tech Univ Agric & For (Nat Sci Edn)(西北农林科技大学学报·自然科学版), 2002, 30(2): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[4] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[5] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[6] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[7] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[8] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[9] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[10] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[11] 蔡金珊, 李超男, 王景一, 李宁, 柳玉平, 景蕊莲, 李龙, 孙黛珍. 小麦幼苗根系性状全基因组关联分析及TaSRL-3B优异等位基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2020-2032.
[12] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[13] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
[14] 李福媛, 杨奕, 马继琼, 许明辉, 林良斌, 孙一丁. 水稻OsPUB4基因克隆、激素诱导表达分析与互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1690-1700.
[15] 王梦宁, 谢可冉, 高逖, 王飞, 任孝俭, 熊栋梁, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 崔克辉. 水稻幼穗分化期至抽穗期高温对籽粒形态和充实的影响及其与粒重的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1347-1362.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!