欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (09): 1568-1577.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01568

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

保持系稻株对孕穗期干旱胁迫伤害与补水修复的育性响应

陶龙兴,符冠富,宋建,熊杰,乐明凯,王熹*   

  1. 中国水稻研究所 / 水稻生物学国家重点实验室, 浙江杭州310006
  • 收稿日期:2010-02-02 修回日期:2010-04-21 出版日期:2010-09-12 网络出版日期:2010-07-05
  • 通讯作者: 王熹，E-mail: wangxi359@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目（30623006，30871473），国家公益性行业（农业）科研专项经费项目（nyhyzx07-001)，国家科技支撑计划项目（2009BAK43B12），浙江省重点项目（2008C22073，2009C32048）和浙江省三农五方项目（SN200806）资助。

Fertility Responses to Drought Injury at Booting Stage of Rice Maintainers and Remedy Effects of Water Complement

TAO Long-Xin,FU Guan-Fu,SONG Jian,XIONG Jie,LE Ming-Kai,WANG Xi*   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China
  • Received:2010-02-02 Revised:2010-04-21 Published:2010-09-12 Published online:2010-07-05
  • Contact: WANG Xi，E-mail:wangxi359@sina.com

PDF

1287

被引次数

16

摘要： 以负压式土壤湿度计和取土烘干法双重监控盆栽试验的土壤水势变化, 观测我国14个常用水稻保持系的孕穗期耐旱性，并以干旱胁迫指数人为划分钝感、耐旱、不耐旱与敏感等4个耐旱等级，其中K22-B、金23-B为孕穗期干旱胁迫钝感材料，珍汕97-B、中9-B为孕穗期干旱胁迫敏感材料，比较研究它们对干旱胁迫伤害的育性响应与补水修复的特征。结果表明，钝感或敏感保持系稻株主穗耐旱性均强于分蘖穗，粒位间强势粒耐旱性均高于弱势粒。这一生物学现象似“植物顶端优势”的逆境生理学表现。比较孕穗期中花粉母细胞减数分裂期、花粉粒形成期与花粉粒充实期的耐旱性，花粉粒充实期耐旱性最弱，花粉母细胞减数分裂期耐旱性较强。孕穗期干旱后补水对结实伤害的恢复效果明显，尤其对耐旱性强的保持系稻株修复更明显，主要途径是降低秕谷率而不降低空壳率，似表明干旱胁迫育性损伤是不可逆的。

关键词: 水稻保持系, 干旱胁迫, 胁迫指数, 孕穗期, 育性顶端优势

Abstract: Drought tolerance traits of 14 widely used Chinese rice maintainers were evaluated at booting stage by using both soil moisture meter and drying soil methods. According to drought stress index, the maintainers were classified as four classes, i.e. drought-insensitive, drought-resistant, drought-friability and drought-sensitive. Typical drought-insensitive maintainers K22-B, Jin 23-B and typical drought-sensitive maintainers Zhenshan 97-B, Zhong9-B were selected to suffer drought treatments. The results indicated that secondary panicles were more sensitive than primary panicles, and inferior grains were more sensitive than superior grains to drought stress in both drought-insensitive and drought-sensitive maintainers. These drought-tolerant varieties showed an apical dominance in rice panicles. Drought tolerances at three growth stages corresponding to pollen-mother-cell-meiosis, pollen-forming and pollen-filling stages were also compared, showing that pollen-filling stage was most sensitive to drought stress while pollen-mother-cell-meiosis stage was most insensitive to drought stress. Drought-injury at booting stage was ameliorated obviously with water supplement remedy, especially in the inferior grains of drought-insensitive maintainers. Percentage of partially filled grains other than that of abortive grains decreased obviously. It indicates that drought-caused abortion to rice grains is irreversible.

Key words: Rice maintainer, Drought stress, Stress index, Booting stage, Fertility apical dominance

[1] He F(何方). Applied Ecology (应用生态学). Beijing: Science Press, 2003 (in Chinese)   
[2] Wang Y-F(王一凡), Zhou Y-Y(周毓珩). Water Saving Rice Culture in Northern China (北方节水稻作). Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Press, 2000 (in Chinese) 
[3] Liang Y-C(梁永超), Hu F(胡锋), Yang M-C(杨茂成), Zhu X-L(朱遐亮), Wang G-P(王广平), Wang Y-L(王永乐). Mechanisms of high yield and irrigation water use efficiency of rice in plastic film mulched dryland. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1999, 32(1): 26-32 (in Chinese with English abstract) 
[4] Huang Y-D(黄义德), Zhang Z-L(张自立), Wei F-Z(魏凤珍). Eco-physiological effects of dry-cultivated and plastic film-mulched rice planting. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 1999, 10(3): 305-308 (in Chinese with English abstract)  
[5] Xu F-X(徐富贤), Zheng J-K(郑家奎), Zhu Y-C(朱永川), Ding G-X(丁国祥), Wang G-X(王贵雄). Relationship between rooting ability and drought resistance at full-heading in mid-season hybrids rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(2): 188-193 (in Chinese with English abstract)  
[6] Wang X(王熹), Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Huang X-L(黄效林), Min S-K(闵绍楷), Cheng S-H(程式华). Study on non-flooding farming technique in paddy field: technique specification and formation of yield components. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2004, 37(4): 502-509 (in Chinese with English abstract)  
[7] Wang X(王熹), Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Huang X-L(黄效林), Min S-K(闵绍楷), Cheng S-H(程式华). Study on non-flooding farming technique in irrigated paddy field—Physiological and developmental characteristics of rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2004, 37(9): 1274-1281 (in Chinese with English abstract) 
[8] Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Fu G-F(符冠富), Song J(宋建), Le M-K(乐明凯), Xiong J(熊杰), Wang X(王熹). Evaluation of drought tolerance and fertility traits for rice maintainer lines extensively used in China
[J].Acta Agron Sin (作物学报.2009, 35(12):2296-2303  
[9] Zhang R-Z(张瑞珍), Shao X-W(邵玺文), Tong S-Y(童淑媛), Du Z-Y(杜震宇), Yang M(杨沫), Sun C-Z(孙长占). Effects of water stress on yield composition and yield of rice in booming stage. J Jilin Agric Univ (吉林农业大学学报), 2006, 28(17): 1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract) 
[10] Zhu Q-S(朱庆森), Qiu Z-S(邱泽森), Jiang C-J(姜长鉴), Yang J-C(杨建昌), Jin Z-S(金兆森), Liu J-G(刘建国). Effect of low soil water potential on rice yield. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1994, 27(6): 15-22 (in Chinese with English abstract) 
[11] Yang J-C(杨建昌), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). Drought resistance and its physiological characteristics in rice varieties. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1995, 28(5): 65-72 (in Chinese with English abstract) 
[12] Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Tan H-J(谈惠娟), Wang X(王熹), Cao L-Y(曹立勇), Song J(宋建), Cheng S-H(程式华). Physiological effects of high temperature stress on grain-setting for Guodao 6 during flowering and filling stage
[J].Acta Agron Sin (作物学报.2009, 35(1):110- 
[13] Wang X(王熹), Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Xu R-S(徐仁胜), Tian S-L(田淑兰). Apical-grain superiority in hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(6): 980- 985(in Chinese with English abstract)  
[14] Yang J-C(杨建昌), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Liu L-J(刘立军). Growth and development characteristics and yield formation of dry-cultivated rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报),2002, 28(1): 11-17 (in Chinese with English abstract) 
[15] Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Tan H-J(谈惠娟), Wang X(王熹), Cao L-Y(曹立勇), Cheng S-H(程式华). Effects of high temperature stress on super hybrid rice Guodao 6 during flowering and filling phases. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 21(5): 518-524 (in Chinese with English abstract) 
[16] Xu M-L(徐孟亮), Chen L-B(陈良碧). Comparative study on the drought tolerance between 4 high yield paddy rice varieties and Brazil upland rice variety. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(6): 903-907 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王霞, 尹晓雨, 于晓明, 刘晓丹. 干旱锻炼对B73自交后代当代干旱胁迫记忆基因表达及其启动子区DNA甲基化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1191-1198.
[2] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
[3] 张明聪, 何松榆, 秦彬, 王孟雪, 金喜军, 任春元, 吴耀坤, 张玉先. 外源褪黑素对干旱胁迫下春大豆品种绥农26形态、光合生理及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1791-1805.
[4] 李洁, 付惠, 姚晓华, 吴昆仑. 不同耐旱性青稞叶片差异蛋白分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1248-1258.
[5] 李鹏程, 毕真真, 孙超, 秦天元, 梁文君, 王一好, 许德蓉, 刘玉汇, 张俊莲, 白江平. DNA甲基化参与调控马铃薯响应干旱胁迫的关键基因挖掘[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 599-612.
[6] 秦天元, 刘玉汇, 孙超, 毕真真, 李安一, 许德蓉, 王一好, 张俊莲, 白江平. 马铃薯StIgt基因家族的鉴定及其对干旱胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 780-786.
[7] 周练, 刘朝显, 熊雨涵, 周京, 蔡一林. 质膜内在蛋白ZmPIP1;1参与玉米耐旱性和光合作用的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 472-480.
[8] 刘亚文, 张红燕, 曹丹, 李兰芝. 基于多平台基因表达数据的水稻干旱和盐胁迫相关基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2423-2439.
[9] 秦天元, 孙超, 毕真真, 梁文君, 李鹏程, 张俊莲, 白江平. 基于WGCNA的马铃薯根系抗旱相关共表达模块鉴定和核心基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(7): 1033-1051.
[10] 张海燕, 汪宝卿, 冯向阳, 李广亮, 解备涛, 董顺旭, 段文学, 张立明. 不同时期干旱胁迫对甘薯生长和渗透调节能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(11): 1760-1770.
[11] 李旭凯,李任建,张宝俊. 利用WGCNA鉴定非生物胁迫相关基因共表达网络[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1349-1364.
[12] 袁溢,朱双,方婷婷,蒋金金,王幼平. 人工合成甘蓝型油菜抗旱性及DNA甲基化水平分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(5): 693-704.
[13] 李萍,侯万伟,刘玉皎. 青海高原耐旱蚕豆品种青海13号响应干旱胁迫蛋白质组学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(2): 267-275.
[14] 李鹏程,毕真真,梁文君,孙超,张俊莲,白江平. DNA甲基化参与调控马铃薯干旱胁迫响应[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1595-1603.
[15] 米超,赵艳宁,刘自刚,陈其鲜,孙万仓,方彦,李学才,武军艳. 白菜型冬油菜RuBisCo蛋白亚基基因rbcL和rbcS的克隆及其在干旱胁迫下的表达[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(12): 1882-1890.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2