欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (03): 542-549.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00542

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

耐低钾和钾高效型甘薯品种(系)的筛选及评价指标

唐忠厚1,2,张允刚1,魏猛1,陈晓光1,史新敏1,张爱君1,李洪民1,丁艳锋2   

  1. 江苏徐州 221131; 2南京农业大学农学院, 江苏南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-06 修回日期:2013-12-14 出版日期:2014-03-12 网络出版日期:2014-01-16
  • 通讯作者: 唐忠厚, E-mail: zhonghoutang@sina.com, Tel: 0516-82028152
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由江苏省科技支撑计划项目(SBE2012336)，国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2012AA101204)和国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-11-B-13)资助。

Screening and Evaluation Indicators for Low Potassium-Tolerant and Potassium Efficient Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.) Varieties (Lines)

TANG Zhong-Hou1,2,*,ZHANG Yun-Gang1,WEI Meng1,CHEN Xiao-Guang1,SHI Xin-Min1,ZHANG Ai-Jun1,LI Hong-Min1,DING Yan-Feng2   

  1. 1 Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Xuzhou Sweetpotato Research Center, Jiangsu / Key Laboratory of Sweetpotato Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Xuzhou 221121, China; 2 College of Agronomy, Nanjing agricultural university, Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2013-08-06 Revised:2013-12-14 Published:2014-03-12 Published online:2014-01-16
  • Contact: 唐忠厚, E-mail: zhonghoutang@sina.com, Tel: 0516-82028152

RichHTML

PDF

1375

被引次数

12

摘要：

甘薯植株生长和块根形成与钾营养吸收利用密切相关。本研究以31份不同类型优质甘薯品种(系)为材料, 利用长期肥料定位试验田2个钾肥水平处理(氮磷处理与氮磷钾处理), 探讨耐低钾与钾高效型甘薯材料的筛选及评价指标。结果表明, 该试验条件下, 不同甘薯品种(系)块根产量差异达显著水平(P<0.05); 供试材料的钾敏感指数变幅在0.40~0.98之间, 差异达显著水平(P<0.05), 经聚类分析, 可分为低敏感型、适度敏感型、敏感型和高度敏感型; 品种(系)两处理下钾累计量与钾浓度差异均达显著或极显著水平; 氮磷钾处理下, 块根钾利用效率与整株钾利用效率变幅分别为58.92~384.9 g g–1和42.03~ 165.52 g g–1, 品种(系)差异均达显著水平(P<0.05); 相关性分析显示, 不同甘薯材料间整株总钾累积量、钾浓度、产量性状指标、钾利用效率与钾敏感性间均有一定相关性。长期肥料定位试验田可用于不同钾营养效率甘薯品种(系)的筛选, 块根钾利用效率与钾敏感性可作为筛选耐低钾与钾高效利用型甘薯材料的2个主要指标。

关键词: 甘薯品种(系), 耐低钾, 钾高效, 筛选

Abstract:

Potassium (K) uptake and utilization are closely related to plant growth and storage root formation of sweetpotato. In this paper, 31 good quality sweetpotato varieties (lines), NP plot (treatment of nitrogen and phosphorus) and NPK plot (treatment of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) were used to screen low K-tolerant and K efficient sweetpotato varieties (lines) in a long-term fertilization plots. The results showed that there was a significant difference (P<0.05) among storage root yield of sweetpotato varieties (lines). The variation of K sensitivity index (relative root weigh, RRW) was from 0.40 to 0.98, with a significant difference (P<0.05). Varieties (lines) were divided into four types (low sensitive, moderately sensitive, sensitive and highly sensitive) by cluster analysis. There were significant differences of total K accumulation amount (TKAA) and K concentration under two treatments of varieties (lines). Under NPK treatment, K utilization efficiencies (KUE) of root and whole plant were from 58.92 to 384.9 g g–1 and from 42.03 to 165.52 g g–1 with significant difference between these materials (P<0.05), respectively. Correlation analysis showed that there were some correlations of TKAA, K concentration, root yield, KUE, and RRW among varieties (lines). It is a feasible method for screening different fertilization efficiency sweetpotato varieties (lines) through long-term fertilization experiment. KUE and RRW as two major indicators can be used for screening low potassium (K)-tolerant and K efficient sweetpotato materials.

Key words: Sweetpotato varieties (lines), Low potassium-tolerant, Potassium efficient, Screening

[1]Xie J C, Zhou J M. Advance in soil K research and K fertilizer application in China. Soils, 1999, 31: 244–254



[2]刘国栋, 刘更另. 籼稻耐低钾基因型的筛选. 作物学报, 2002, 28: 161–166



Liu G D, Liu G L. Screening indica rice for K-efficient genotypes. Acta Agron Sin, 2002, 28: 161–166 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Pettersson S, Jensen P. Variation among species and varieties in uptake and utilization of potassium. Plant Soil, 1983, 72: 231–237



[4]Wang Y, He L, Li H D, Xu J, Wu W H. Potassium channel a-subunit AtKC1 negatively regulates AKT1-mediated K+ uptake in Arabidopsis roots under low-K+ stress. Cell Res, 2010, 20: 826–837



[5]Yang X E, Liu J X, Wang W M, Li H, Luo A C, Ye Z Q, Yang Y. Genotypic differences and some associated plant traits in potassium internal use efficiency of lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst, 2003, 67: 273−282



[6]杨振明, 李秋梅, 王波, 鲍士旦, 史瑞和. 耐低钾冬小麦基因型筛选方法的研究. 土壤学报, 1998, 35: 376–383



Yang Z M, Li Q M, Wang B, Bo S D, Shi R H. Study on method for screening winter wheat genotypes tolerant to low potassium level. Acta Pedol Sin, 1998, 35: 376–383 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]赵学强, 介晓磊, 谭金芳, 许仙菊, 李有田. 钾高效小麦基因型的筛选指标和筛选环境研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12: 277–281



Zhao X Q, Jie X L, Tan J F, Xu X J, Li Y T. Studies in screening indices and screening environments for efficient potassium wheat genotypes. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2006, 12: 277–281 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]田晓莉, 王刚卫, 朱睿, 杨培珠, 段留生, 李召虎. 棉花耐低钾基因型筛选条件和指标的研究.作物学报, 2008, 34: 1434–1443



Tian X L, Wang G W, Zhu R, Yang P Z, Duan L S, Li Z H. Conditions and indicators for screening cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) genotypes tolerant to low-potassium. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 1435−1443 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Brouder S M, Cassman K G. Root development of two cotton cultivars in relation to potassium uptake and plant growth in a vermiculitic soil. Field Crops Res, 1990, 23: 187−203



[10]Wu J T, Zhang X Z, Li T X, Yu H Y, Huang P. Differences in the efficiency of potassium (K) uptake and use in barley varieties. Agric Sci China, 2011, 10: 101–108



[11]Glass A D M, Perley J E. Varietal differences in potassium uptake by barley. Plant Physiol, 1980, 65: 160−164



[12]马代夫, 李强, 曹清河, 钮福祥, 谢逸萍, 唐君, 李洪民. 中国甘薯产业及产业技术的发展与展望. 江苏农业学报, 2012, 28: 969–973



Ma D F, Li Q, Cao Q H, Niu F X, Xie Y P, Tang J, Li H M. Development and prospect of sweetpotato industry and its technologies in China. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2012, 28: 969–973 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Constantin R J, Jones L G, Hernandez T P. Effect of potassium and phosphorous fertilization on quality of sweetpotato. J Am Soc Hort Sci, 1977, 102: 779–781



[14]Zhu L D, Shao X H, Zhang Y C, Zhang H, Hou M M. Effects of potassium fertilizer application on photosynthesis and seedling growth of sweetpotato under drought stress. J Food Agric Environ, 2012, 10: 487–491



[15]史春余, 王振林, 赵秉强, 郭风法, 余松烈. 钾营养对甘薯某些生理特性和产量形成的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8: 81–85



Shi C Y, Wang Z L, Zhao B Q, Guo F F, Yu S L. Effect of potassium nutrition on some physiological characteristics and yield formation of sweetpotato. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2002, 8: 81–85 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]宁运旺, 马洪波, 许仙菊, 汪吉东, 张辉, 许建平, 陈杰, 张永春. 氮磷钾缺乏对甘薯前期生长和养分吸收的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46: 486–495



Ning Y W, Ma H B, Xu X J, Wang J D, Zhang H, Xu J P, Chen J, Zhang Y C. Effects of deficiency of N, P, or K on growth traits and nutrient uptakes of sweetpotato at early growing stage. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46: 486–495 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Scott L E. Potassium uptake by the sweet potato plant. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci, 1950, 56: 248–252



[18]陆国权, 丁守仁. 甘薯钾素利用效率的基因型差异研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001, 7: 357–360



Lu G Q, Ding S R. Variation of potassium utilization efficiency among sweetpotato genotypes. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2001, 7: 357–360 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]Melvin S G, Lu G Q, Zhou W J. Genotypic variation for potassium uptake and utilization efficiency in sweetpotato. Field Crop Res, 2002, 77: 7–15



[20]王汝娟, 王振林, 梁太波, 张晓冬, 刘兰兰, 史春余. 腐植酸钾对食用甘薯品种钾吸收、利用和块根产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14: 520–526



Wang R J, Wang Z L, Liang T B, Zhang X D, Liu L L, Shi C Y. Effects of HA-K fertilizers on the absorption and utilization of potassium and the storage root yield in sweetpotato for table use. P1ant Nutr Fert Sci, 2008, 14: 520–526 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]徐明岗, 梁国庆, 张夫道. 中国土壤肥力演变. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2006. pp 171–189



Xu M G, Liang G Q, Zhang F D. The Evolution of China's Soil Fertility. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2006. pp 171–189 (in Chinese)



[22]王姣爱, 张定一, 贾文兰, 梁青燕. 不同冬小麦基因型对钾肥敏感性差异的研究. 麦类作物学报, 2000, 20: 35–39



Wang J A, Zhang D Y, Jia W L, Liang Q Y. Variation in response of wheat genotypes to potassium. J Triticeae Crops, 2000, 20: 35–39 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]姜存仓, 王运华, 鲁剑巍, 徐芳森, 高祥照. 植物钾效率基因型差异机理的研究进展. 华中农业大学学报, 2004, 23: 483–487



Jiang C C, Wang Y H, Lu J W, Xu F S, Gao X Z. Advances of study on the K-efficiency in different plant genotypes. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2004, 23: 483–487 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]Rengel Z, Damon P M. Crops and genotypes differ in efficiency of potassium uptake and use. Physiol Plant, 2008, 133: 624–636



[25]席承藩. 中国土壤. 北京：中国农业出版社, 1998. pp 843–941



Xi C F. China Soil. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998. pp 843–941 (in Chinese)
[1] 李赢, 石晓旭, 刘海翠, 石吕, 薛亚光, 魏亚凤. 裸大麦籽粒β-葡聚糖含量近红外预测模型的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 735-745.
[2] 朱锦程, 杨秋华, 程李香, 李文丽, 石明明, 李惠霞, 张峰. 马铃薯抗南方根结线虫种质资源筛选及相关生理反应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2307-2317.
[3] 胡润慧, 汪军成, 司二静, 张宏, 李兴茂, 马小乐, 孟亚雄, 王化俊, 刘青, 姚立蓉, 李葆春. 小麦苗期耐旱耐盐种质筛选及抗旱耐盐综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2371-2386.
[4] 文璇, 钟秀丽, 王尚文, 金涛, 彭君, 刘恩科. 基于耐性指数的青稞苗期耐低氮种质筛选及不同氮效率类型综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1949-1958.
[5] 孙现军, 于太飞, 胡正, 申鑫萍, 戈文艺, 姜雪敏, 王世佳, 于思佳, 武书羽, 韩龙植, 张辉, 姜奇彦. 基于“标准差系数加权法”的水稻全生育期耐盐碱鉴定与资源筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3369-3376.
[6] 马群, 王志昊, 闫磊, 李瑜娇, 王佳琪, 李钊, 刘巍, 艾鑫, 马迁驰, 王晓光, 钟超, 任婧瑶, 刘喜波, 赵姝丽, 张鹤, 赵新华, 蒋春姬, 王婧, 于海秋. 高油酸和普通花生萌发期抗旱筛选评价体系的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3266-3280.
[7] 马骏, 陈锋, 殷贵鸿, 胡海燕, 魏学宁, 解超杰, 孔令让. 小麦抗茎基腐病遗传育种研究的现状与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2559-2569.
[8] 胡志康, 舒雨, 王会, 杨莹莹, 廖俊宇, 刘佳, 成洪涛, 郭晨, 张园园, 刘胜毅, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 甘蓝型油菜苗期耐碱性种质综合鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2681-2692.
[9] 杨雅文, 朱东杰, 潘弘, 张云涛, 夏梦吟, 韩宝柱, 金敏亮, 李梦娇, 董鲁朋, 杨宁, 周英, 许洁婷, 严建兵. 玉米无基因型限制遗传转化体系建立和应用[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2674-2683.
[10] 刘明, 范文静, 赵鹏, 靳容, 张强强, 朱晓亚, 王静, 李强. 甘薯耐低钾基因型苗期筛选及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 926-937.
[11] 徐子寅, 于晓玲, 邹良平, 赵平娟, 李文彬, 耿梦婷, 阮孟斌. 木薯MYB转录因子基因MeMYB60表达特征分析及其互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 955-965.
[12] 祝令晓, 宋世佳, 李浩然, 孙红春, 张永江, 白志英, 张科, 李安昌, 刘连涛, 李存东. 基于耐低氮综合指数的棉花苗期耐低氮品种筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(7): 1800-1812.
[13] 秦璐, 韩配配, 常海滨, 顾炽明, 黄威, 李银水, 廖祥生, 谢立华, 廖星. 甘蓝型油菜耐低氮种质筛选及绿肥应用潜力评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1488-1501.
[14] 吴家怡, 袁芳, 孟丽姣, 李晨阳, 史红松, 白岩松, 武晓如, 李加纳, 周清元, 崔翠. 铝胁迫下甘蓝型油菜苗期光合相关性状的QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(11): 2749-2764.
[15] 张鹤, 蒋春姬, 殷冬梅, 董佳乐, 任婧瑶, 赵新华, 钟超, 王晓光, 于海秋. 花生耐冷综合评价体系构建及耐冷种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1753-1767.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2