Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 1388-1397.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.94196

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A method of defoliant application based on fiber damage and boll growth period of machine-harvested cotton

TIAN Jing-Shan(), ZHANG Xu-Yi, WANG Wen-Min, YANG Yan-Long, SUI Long-Long, ZHANG Peng-Peng, ZHANG Ya-Li, ZHANG Wang-Feng*(), GOU Ling*()   

  1. College of Agronomy, Shihezi University / Key Laboratory of Oasis Eco-Agriculture, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2019-12-13 Accepted:2020-04-15 Online:2020-09-12 Published:2020-05-14
  • Contact: Wang-Feng ZHANG,Ling GOU E-mail:tjshan1983@sina.com;zhwf_agr@shzu.edu.cn;glxj8162@sina.com.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31560366);Program of Introducing International Super Agricultural Science and Technology(2016-X25);Xinjiang Postgraduate Education Reform and Innovation Program(XJGRI2016030)

Abstract:

Defoliation technology is an essential prerequisite for machine-harvested cotton, and to apply defoliant to achieve better defoliation and improve fiber quality is an important method. The objective of this study was to analyze the quantitative relationship between fiber damage amount and boll growth period by defoliant. The results showed that defoliant had not significantly an effect on fiber length, which showed that all reduced by from 0.2% to 1.2% compared with the control, 46%-69% cotton varieties decreased or equal, whereas 31%-54% cotton varieties increased in fiber length compared with control. Fiber strength was affected significantly by defoliation, and the amplitude of fiber damage was concentrated between -4 cN tex-1 and 0 cN tex-1. The amount of fiber damage by defoliant was correlated to the spraying time in cotton boll growth, and the high damage at 30 days, whereas the lowest damage at 37 days. More than 61% cotton varieties showed an increased by average 1.1 cN tex-1 on fiber strength compared with the control. Fiber strength damage because of defoliant increased with the increasing boll growth period. It was an indicator for determining the time of spraying defoliation based on the boll growth period and fiber damage (Rd/b) on fiber strength. Furthermore, cotton boll growth period and boll volume. Fiber strength and boll volume, boll volume and boll growth period, both showed significant positive correlation. If fiber strength of more than 31 cN tex-1was produced in field, a cotton cultivar should be selected with boll volume of more than 31.8 cm3, boll growth period of more than 60.0 d and Rd/b more than 0.68. Defoliant used after 40.9 post-anthesis days could ensure fiber strength of less than 0.5 cN tex-1.

Key words: machine-harvested cotton, fiber quality, defoliation, boll growth period, fiber damage

Table 1

Cotton cultivars, sowing dates, tagged dates and defoliation times in the defoliation experiment"

年份
Year
试验地点
Experiment plot
‘新陆早’系列品种序号
No. of ‘Xinluzao’ cotton
cultivars
播种日期
Sowing dates
(month/day)
挂花时期
Tagged dates
(month/day)
脱叶催熟剂
喷施时间
Defoliation times (d)
2016 石河子大学农学试验站
Shihezi University Experiment Station
1, 6, 7, 13, 33, 45 4/21 7/20 30, 37
46, 47, 58, 60, 62, 63, 64 4/21 7/20 37, 44
新疆乌兰乌苏农业气象试验站
Wulanwusu Agrometeorological Experiment Station
33 4/15 7/15 30, 37, 44
33 4/15 7/22 30, 37
59 4/8, 4/15, 4/22 7/15, 7/15, 7/22 30, 37, 44
2017 石河子大学农学试验站
Shihezi University Experiment Station
45, 46, 47, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 4/22 7/12 30, 37
33, 59 4/22 7/12 30, 37, 44

Table 2

Cotton cultivars, sowing dates, tagged dates and sampling dates in the variety experiment"

年份
Year
‘新陆早’系列品种序号
No. of ‘Xinluzao’ cotton cultivars
播种日期
Sowing dates
(month/day)
挂花时期
Tagged dates
(month/day)
取样时间
Sampling dates
(d)
2014 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 13, 24, 36, 45, 52, 53 5/1 7/15 46
2015 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 24, 36, 52, 53 4/20 7/9 53
2016 1, 6, 7, 13, 33, 45, 46, 47, 58, 60, 62, 63, 64 4/21 7/20 43
2017 45, 46, 47, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 4/22 7/12 50

Fig. 1

Effects on fiber length and fiber strength of different defoliant application time Samples number of defoliation times on the 30th, 37th, and 44th days post-anthesis were 21, 28, and 13, respectively. In the figure, the thick solid line represents the average value of the defoliant treatment. ** indicates statistically significant difference at P < 0.01."

Fig. 2

Effects on distribution of fiber length damage amount of different defoliant application times The bar graphs represent the distribution of fiber length damage among all samples, the X-axis is the percentage of fiber length damage grades and the Y-axis is the grades of fiber length damage amount. In the scatter graphs, the values are means ± standard deviation. Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

Fig. 3

Effects on distribution of fiber strength damage amount of different defoliant application time The bar graphs represent the distribution of fiber strength damage among all samples, the X-axis is the percentage of fiber strength damage grades and the Y-axis is the grades of fiber strength damage amount. In the scatter graphs, the values are means ± standard deviation. Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

Fig. 4

Relationships between fiber length and strength damage amounts and boll growth period of the control treatments on different defoliant application time Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

Fig. 5

Quantitative relationship between fiber length and strength damage amounts and the ratio of boll growth period with on defoliant application time (Rd/b)"

Fig. 6

Quantitative relationship of boll growth period with boll characters including boll diameter, length, and volume"

Fig. 7

Quantitative relationship between boll characters (diameter, length, and volume) and fiber quality (fiber length and fiber strength)"

Fig. 8

Quantitative relationship between boll volume and boll diameter and length"

Table 3

Description of boll volume, boll length, boll diameter, boll growth period, the ratio divided defoliation time by boll growth period and fiber damage (Rd/b) and defoliant application times for producing >30 and 31 cN tex-1 fiber strength"

性状
Trait
生产纤维比强度>31 cN tex-1
要求的参数
Values for producing >30 cN tex-1
fiber strength
生产纤维比强度>30 cN tex-1
要求的参数
Values for producing >30 cN tex-1
fiber strength
铃体积Boll volume (cm3) 31.8 28.7
铃长度Boll length (mm) 49.7 47.4
铃直径Boll diameter (mm) 36.6 35.6
铃期Boll growth period (d) 60.0 56.8
比强度损伤
Fiber strength damage amount < 0.5 cN tex-1
脱叶催熟剂喷施时的棉铃铃龄与铃期的比值(Rd/b)
Ratio divided defoliation time by boll growth period (d/b)
0.68 0.68
脱叶催熟剂喷施时间
Defoliant application time (d)
40.9 38.7
比强度损伤
Fiber strength damage amount <
0 cN tex-1
脱叶催熟剂喷施时的棉铃铃龄与铃期的比值(Rd/b)
Ratio divided defoliation time by boll growth period (d/b)
0.72 0.68
脱叶催熟剂喷施时间
Defoliant application time (d)
43.3 41.0
[1] Brar Z R, Sekhon K S, Deol J S. Effect of defoliants on growth and yield of timely and late sown cotton (Gossypium hirustum L.). J Cotton Res Dev, 1995,9:227-230.
[2] Gormus O, Kurt F, Sabagh A E L. Impact of defoliation timings and leaf pubescence on yield and fiber quality of cotton. J Agric Sci Technol, 2017,19:903-915.
[3] Snipes C E, Baskin C C. Influence of early defoliation on cotton yield, seed quality, and fiber properties. Field Crops Res, 1994,37:137-143.
[4] Bednarz C W, Shurley W D, Anthony W S. Losses in yield, quality, and profitability of cotton from improper harvest timing. Agron J, 2002,94:1004-1011.
[5] Faircloth J C, Edmisten K L, Wells R, Stewart A M. The influence of defoliation timing on yields and quality of two cotton cultivars. Crop Sci, 2004,44:165-172.
[6] Banger M P, Long R T, Constable G A, Gordon S G. Minimizing immature fiber and neps in upland cotton. Agron J, 2010,102:781-789.
[7] Faircloth J C, Edmisten K L, Wells R, Stewart A M. Timing defoliation applications for maximum yield and optimum quality in cotton containing a fruiting gap. Crop Sci, 2004,44:158-164.
[8] Cathey G W, Luckett K E, Rayburn Jr S T. Accelerated cotton boll dehiscence with growth regulator and desiccant chemicals. Field Crops Res, 1982,5:113-120.
[9] Banger M P, Long R T. Optimizing timing of chemical harvest aid application in cotton by predicting its influence on fiber quality. Agron J, 2011,103:390-395.
[10] Larson J A, Gwathmey C O, Hayes R M. Cotton defoliation and harvest timing effects on yields, quality, and net revenues. J Cotton Sci, 2002,6:13-27.
[11] 王林, 赵冰梅, 丁志欣, 刘晨, 高海明, 张强, 张虎, 李峰, 蒋智超, 雷振华. 机采棉脱叶剂喷施技术规范. 新疆维吾尔自治区地方标准, DB65T 3980-2017, 2017. 03. 20.
Wang L, Zhao B M, Ding Z X, Liu C, Gao H M, Zhang Q, Zhang H, Li F, Jiang Z C, Lei Z H. Technical specification of spraying defoliant mechanical harvesting of cotton field. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Standard, DB65T 3980-2017, 2017. 3. 20 (in Chinese).
[12] 过兴先, 曾伟. 新疆棉区的气温和棉铃发育关系的研究. 作物学报, 1989,15:202-212.
Guo X X, Zeng W. A study on relationship between temperature and cotton boll development in Xinjiang. Acta Agron Sin, 1989,15:202-212 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] Brown L C, Hyer A H. Chemical defoliation of cotton: V. Effects of premature defoliant and desiccant treatments on boll components, fiber properties, germination, and yield of cotton. Agron J, 1956,48:50-55.
[14] Long R L, Bange M P. Consequences of immature fiber on the processing performance of upland cotton. Field Crops Res, 2011,121:401-407.
[15] Miller D, Stephenson D, Fromme D. Cotton harvest aid guidelines for Louisiana, LA: the LSU AgCenter, 2014 [2014-09-14]. https://www.lsuagcenter.com/topics/crops/cotton/agronomy
[16] 曹新川, 胡守林, 韩秀锋, 何良荣, 郭伟锋. 海岛棉棉铃阶段性发育与产量品质的关系. 作物学报, 2020,46:300-306
Cao X C, Hu S L, Han X F, He L R, Guo W F. Relationship of stage development of cotton bolls with yield and quality in island cotton. Acta Agron Sin, 2020,46:300-306 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 陈源, 王永慧, 杨朝华, 肖健, 栾娜, 张祥, 陈德华. 氮肥运筹对高品质棉棉铃形成及纤维品质的影响. 作物学报, 2009,35:2266-2272.
Chen Y, Wang Y H, Yang Z H, Xiao J, Luan N, Zhang X, Chen D H. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on development of boll and fiber quality in high fiber quality cotton. Acta Agron Sin, 2009,35:2266-2272 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 陈源, 王永慧, 肖健, 栾娜, 张祥, 陈德华. 高品质陆地棉棉铃发育特点. 作物学报, 2010,36:1371-1376.
Chen Y, Wang Y H, Xiao J, Luan N, Zhang X, Chen D H. Boll development characteristics for high-quality upland cotton cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2010,36:1371-1376 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 由宝昌, 刘键萍, 梅拥军, 董安春, 孔向东. 海岛棉铃形与铃重纤维品质关系的研究. 西北农业学报, 1995,2(1):27-33.
You B C, Liu J P, Mei Y J, Dong A C, Kong X D. A study of the relations between boll form and boll weight and fibre quality of sea-island cotton. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 1993,2(1):27-33 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 李雪源. 新疆棉花生产中的几个热门项目. 中国棉花, 1995,23(9):38-39.
Li X Y. Several high-demand events of cotton production in Xinjiang. China Cotton, 1995,23(9):38-39 (in Chinese).
[21] 李蒙春, 洪启华, 苏守智, 李生军. 新疆机采棉的研究及应用. 新疆农垦经济, 2001, (5):32-33.
Li M C, Hong Q H, Su S Z, Li S J. Research and application of machine—harvested cotton in Xinjiang. Xinjiang State Farm Econ, 2001, (5):32-33 (in Chinese).
[22] 李雪源, 王俊铎, 梁亚军, 郑巨云, 龚照龙, 艾先涛, 莫明. 新疆棉花质量效益规模分析与发展适度规模下的质量效益型棉业. 中国棉麻产业经济研究, 2016, (6):26-40.
Li X Y, Wang J D, Liang Y J, Zheng J Y, Gong Z L, Ai X T, Mo M. Analysis of quality and benefit of cotton in Xinjiang and Quality-efficient cotton industry under moderate development. Chin Cotton Linen Ind Econ Res J, 2016, (6):26-40 (in Chinese).
[23] Stewart J M. Fiber initiation on the cotton ovule (Gossypium hirsutum). Am J Bot, 1975,62:723-730.
[24] Jasdanwala R T, Sing Y D, Chinoy J J. Auxin metabolism in developing cotton hairs. J Exp Bot, 1977,28:1111-1116.
[25] 沈岳清, 方炳初, 盛敏智. 乙烯利对棉叶光合能力和物质运输等方面的影响. 植物学报, 1980,22:136-140.
Shen Y Q, Fang B C, Sheng M Z. The effect of photosynthesis and translocation in cotton leaf. Acta Bot Sin, 1980,22:136-140 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] Wardlaw I F. The control of carbon partitioning in plants. New Phytol, 1990,116:341-381.
[27] 段留生, 何钟佩. 源库关系改变对棉叶内源激素的影响. 西北植物学报, 1999,19(6):116-121.
Duan L S, He Z P. Effect of alteration of source-sink relationship on endogenous hormones in cotton leaves. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin, 1999,19(6):116-121 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 刘刚. 目前登记的棉花脱叶剂产品. 农药市场信息, 2017, (25):34.
Liu G. Cotton defoliant products registered. Pestic Mark News, 2017, (25):34 (in Chinese).
[29] Snipes C E, Cathey G W. Evaluation of defoliant mixtures in cotton. Field Crops Res, 1992,28:327-334.
[30] 田晓莉, 段留生, 李召虎, 王保民, 何钟佩. 棉花化学催熟与脱叶的生理基础. 植物生理学通讯, 2004,40:758-762.
Tian X L, Duan L S, Li Z H, Wang B M, He Z P. Physiological bases of chemical accelerated boll maturation and defoliation in cotton. Plant Physiol J, 2004,40:758-762 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] Snipes C E, Wills G D. Influence of temperature and adjuvants on thidiazuron activity in cotton leaves. Weed Sci, 1994,42:13-17.
[32] 田景山, 张煦怡, 张丽娜, 徐守振, 祁炳琴, 随龙龙, 张鹏鹏, 杨延龙, 张旺锋, 勾玲. 新疆机采棉花实现叶片快速脱落需要的温度条件. 作物学报, 2019,45:613-620.
Tian J S, Zhang X Y, Zhang L N, Xu S Z, Qi B Q, Sui L L, Zhang P P, Yang Y L, Zhang W F, Gou L. Temperatures of promoting rapid leaf abscission of cotton in Xinjiang region. Acta Agron Sin, 2019,45:613-620 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 高丽丽, 李淦, 康正华, 李健伟, 王蜜蜂, 马云珍, 张巨松. 脱叶剂对棉花抗氧化酶及内源激素的影响. 农药学学报, 2016,18:439-446.
Gao L L, Li G, Kang Z H, Li J W, Wang M F, Ma Y Z, Zhang J S. Effect of defoliants on antioxidative enzyme activity and endogenous hormone contents of cotton. Chin J Pestic Sci, 2016,18:439-446 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] Xu J, Chen L, Sun H, Wusiman N, Sun W N, Li B Q, Gao Y, Kong J, Zhang D W, Zhang X L, Xu H J, Yang X Y. Crosstalk between cytokinin and ethylene signaling pathways regulates leaf abscission in cotton in response to chemical defoliants. J Exp Bot, 2019,70:1525-1538.
pmid: 30715415
[35] Mishra A, Khare S, Trivedi P K, Nath P. Effect of ethylene, 1-MCP, ABA and IAA on break strength, cellulase and polygalacturonase activities during cotton leaf abscission. South Afr J Bot, 2008,74:282-287.
doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2007.12.001
[36] Mishra A, Khare S, Trivedi P K, Nath P. Ethylene induced cotton leaf abscission is associated with higher expression of cellulase (GhCel1) and increased activities of ethylene biosynthesis enzymes in abscission zone. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2008,46:54-63.
pmid: 17964177
[37] 高丽丽, 李淦, 康正华, 李健伟, 王蜜蜂, 马云珍, 张巨松. 脱叶剂对棉花叶片叶绿素荧光动力学参数的影响. 棉花学报, 2016,28:345-352.
doi: 10.11963/issn.1002-7807.201604005
Gao L L, Li G, Kang Z H, Li J W, Wang M F, Ma Y Z, Zhang J S. Effect of defoliants on chlorophyll fluorescence of cotton leaves. Cotton Sci, 2016,28:345-352 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38] Meinert M C, Delmer D P. Change in biochemical composition of the cell wall of the cotton fiber during development. Plant Physiol, 1977,59:1088-1097.
doi: 10.1104/pp.59.6.1088 pmid: 16660000
[39] Tokumoto H, Wakabayashi K, Kamisaka S, Hoson T. Changes in the sugar composition and molecular mass distribution of matrix polysaccharides during cotton fiber development. Plant Cell Physiol, 2002,43:411-418.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcf048 pmid: 11978869
[40] Gokani S J, Thaker V S. Physiological and biochemical changes associated with cotton fiber development: IX. Role of IAA and PAA. Field Crops Res, 2002,77:127-136.
[41] Lipe J A, Morgan P W. Ethylene: role in fruit abscission and dehiscence processes. Plant Physiol, 1972,50:759-764.
[42] Chen Y, Cothren J T, Chen D H, Ibrahim A M H, Lombardini L. Effect of 1-MCP on boll development and subtending leaves of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants. Am J Plant Sci, 2014,5:3345-3353.
[43] Tang F Y, Xiao W J. Genetic association of within‐boll yield components and boll morphological traits with fibre properties in upland cotton. Plant Breed, 2014,133:521-529.
[44] 狄佳春, 肖松华, 刘剑光, 许乃银, 陈旭升. 不同铃形的陆地棉棉铃性状研究. 中国棉花, 2002,29(5):12-14.
Di J C, Xiao S H, Liu J G, Xu N Y, Chen X S. Different boll shapes affected boll traits of upland cotton. China Cotton, 2002,29(5):12-14 (in Chinese).
[45] 李雪源. 把吐絮快而集中作为新疆棉花育种的一项重要指标. 新疆农业科学, 1993, (4):179-180.
Li X Y. Quickness and concentration were an important indicator of cotton breeding in Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 1993, (4):179-180 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[46] 李雪源. 机采棉育种机采性状选择效果初报. 中国棉花, 1997,24(9):14-15.
Li X Y. Preliminary report on cotton breeding of machine- harvested cotton. China Cotton, 1997,24(9):14-15 (in Chinese).
[47] Craig C. W075—Cotton defoliation timing. TN: The University of Tennessee Agriculture Extension Service, 2010. http://trace. tennessee.edu/utk_agexcrop/88.
[48] Wright D L, Marois J J, Sprenkel R K. Production of ultra-narrow row cotton. University of Florida UF/ IFAS Extension, 2000. pp 1-3.
[49] Logan J, Gwathmey O. Effects of weather on cotton responses to harvest-aid chemicals. J Cotton Sci, 2002,6:1-12.
[1] ER Chen, LIN Tao, XIA Wen, ZHANG Hao, XU Gao-Yu, TANG Qiu-Xiang. Coupling effects of irrigation and nitrogen levels on yield, water distribution and nitrate nitrogen residue of machine-harvested cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 497-510.
[2] WANG Ye, LIU Zhao, XIAO Shuang, LI Fang-Jun, WU Xia, WANG Bao-Min, TIAN Xiao-Li. Effects of PSAG12-IPT gene expression on leaf senescence, yield, and fiber quality in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(11): 2111-2120.
[3] TIAN Jing-Shan,ZHANG Xu-Yi,ZHANG Li-Na,XU Shou-Zhen,QI Bing-Qin,SUI Long-Long,ZHANG Peng-Peng,YANG Yan-Long,ZHANG Wang-Feng,GOU Ling. Temperatures of promoting rapid leaf abscission of cotton in Xinjiang region [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(4): 613-620.
[4] Chao LI,Zhi-Kun LI,Qi-Shen GU,Jun YANG,Hui-Feng KE,Li-Qiang WU,Guo-Ning WANG,Yan ZHANG,Jin-Hua WU,Gui-Yin ZHANG,Yuan-Yuan YAN,Zhi-Ying MA,Xing-Fen WANG. Molecular Evaluation for Chromosome Segment Substitution Lines of Gossypium barbadense and QTL Mapping for Fiber Quality and Yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(8): 1114-1126.
[5] SHEN Chao,LI Ding-Guo,NIE Yi-Chun,LIN Zhong-Xu. QTL Mapping for Yield and Fiber Quality Traits Using Gossypium mustelinum Chromosome Segment Introgression Lines [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43(12): 1733-1745.
[6] XU Nai-Yin,LI Jian. Ecological Regionalization of Cotton Fiber Quality Based on GGE Biplot in Yangtze River Valley [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(05): 891-898.
[7] LI Xue-Gang, SONG Xian-Liang, SUN Hua-Zhen, CHEN Er-Ying, ZHANG Mei-Ling, ZHAO Qiang-Long. Effects of Controlled-release N Fertilizer on Fiber Quality, Yield and N Use Efficiency [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(10): 1910-1915.
[8] ZHANG Xiang, LIU Xiao-Fei, LV Chun-Hua, DONG Shao-Di, CHEN Yuan, CHEN De-Hua. Physiological Characteristics Associated with Fiber Development in Two Different Types of Natural Colored-Cotton Cultivars [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(03): 489-495.
[9] CHEN Yuan, WANG Yong-Hui, XIAO Jian, LUAN Na, ZHANG Xiang, CHEN De-Hua. Boll Development Characteristics for High-Quality Upland Cotton Cultivars [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36(08): 1371-1376.
[10] ZHANG Mei-Ling, SONG Xian-Liang, SUN Xue-Zhen, CHEN Er-Ying, DIAO Qing-Long, LI Zong-Tai. Relationship between Super-Molecular Structure Changes and Fiber Quality in Fiber Development Process of Colored Cotton Cultivars [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36(08): 1386-1392.
[11] KONG Guang-Chao, QIN Li, XU Hai-Ming,ZHU Shui-Jin. Construction of IF2 Population and Its Application in Studies on Genetic Effects and Heterosis for Fiber Quality in Upland Cotton (G. hirsutum L.) [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36(06): 940-944.
[12] JU Ming, WANG Hai-Tang, WANG Li-Ke, LI Fei-Fei, WU Shen-Jie, ZHU Hua-Yu, et al.. Associated Analysis between Temporal and Spatial Expression of Fiber Development Genes and Fiber Quality [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(7): 1217-1228.
[13] ZHANG Xiang,XIAO Jian,LUAN Na,WANG Yong-Hui,YANG Zhao-Hua,CHEN Yuan, et al.. Characteristics of Fiber Quality in Cotton Development and Its Regulation by Hormone in Two Natural Colored-Cotton Cultivars [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35(5): 907-913.
[14] YANG Xin-Lei,WANG Zhi-Wei,ZHANG Gui-Yin,PAN Yu-Xin,WU Li-Qiang,LI Zhi-Kun,. Construction of Molecular Genetic Map and QTL Analysis of Fiber Quality in Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35(12): 2159-2166.
[15] CHEN Yuan,WANG Yong-Hui,YANG Zhao-Hua,XIAO Jian,LUAN Na,ZHANG Xiang, CHEN De-Hua. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Development of Boll and Fiber Quality in High Fiber Quality Cotton [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35(12): 2266-2272.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!