Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 215-225.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.02091

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis on the plant growth and yield formation of double cropping late season hybrid rice in machine transplanting with long seedling age by precision drill sowing

WANG Ya-Liang1(), ZHU De-Feng1,*(), ZHANG Yu-Ping1, CHEN Ruo-Xia2, XIANG Jing1, CHEN Hui-Zhe1, CHEN Jiang-Hua2, WANG Feng2   

  1. 1China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang, China
    2Ningbo Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2020-12-25 Accepted:2021-03-19 Online:2022-01-12 Published:2021-04-13
  • Contact: ZHU De-Feng E-mail:wangyaliang@caas.cn;cnrice@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2019B10003);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2019B10003);Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of China National Rice Research Institute(CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202117);China Agri-culture Research System(CARS-01-03A)

RichHTML392

14

PDF

276

Abstract:

In order to ascertain the beneficial effects of precision drill sowing (PS) in machine transplanting with long seedling age of double cropping late season hybrid rice. In this study, seed of Yongyou 1540 (YY1540) was subjected to precision drill sowing of 16 rows (PS-16, 45.7 g tray-1), precision drill sowing of 18 rows (PS-18, 60.5 g tray-1) and traditional broadcast sowing (BS, 60.5 g tray-1) in standard seedling tray at the same day. Seedling ages of 20, 25, 30, and 35 days were set for machine transplanting to analyze the rice seedling quality, machine transplanting characters, rice population growth, and yield formation between PS-16, PS-18, and BS. The results were as follows: (1) PS improved the light transmittance of seedling population, compared to BS, PS enhanced the seedling quality and increased the percentage of seedlings with tillering buds, among the treatments, PS-16 got the best seedling quality and highest percentage of seedling with tillering buds. (2) Compared to BS, PS significantly reduced the missing hill percent and increased the ratio of hills with 2-3 seedlings transplanted, and there was no significant difference between PS-16 and PS-18. Seedling age prolonging increased the root injury degree and seedling injury rate, and decreased the seedling survival rate after machine-transplanting, in which, PS-16 had the minimal increasing in root injury degree and seedling injury rate, meanwhile PS-16 got the highest survival rate of seedling machine-transplanted. (3) The seedling age prolonging postponed the rice growth duration by increasing the duration of seedling rejuvenation period. Among the seedling age treatments, the shortest period of rejuvenation period was observed in PS-16, and then the growth period minimal delayed in PS-16 with the seedling age prolonging. (4) PS effectively promoted plant tillering, and PS-16 got the best effect. The number of tillers at 10 d after machine transplanting of PS-16 machine was 16.4% and 20.8% higher than that of PS-18 and BS, in average. Seedling age prolonging decreased the tiller number at tillering peak stage, and the tiller number at tillering peak stage was PS-16>PS-18>BS at different seedling age treatments. The productive tiller percentage presented no difference among the sowing methods and seedling ages. (5) Seedling age prolonging decreased the leaf area index and dry matter accumulation by the degree of PS-16<PS-18<BS. (6) PS contributed to yield enhancing by increasing the number of productive tillers, and effectively reduced the yield loss caused by the prolonging of seedling age, and rice yield was PS-16>PS-18>BS under different seedling age treatments, in average. In conclusion, compared to BS, PS could improve the seedling quality, reduce the missing hill percentage in machine transplanting, improve the machine transplanting quality, shorten the seedling rejuvenation period, promote plant tillering, and increase the leaf area index and dry matter accumulation, and then effectively reduce the yield loss of double late season hybrid rice with long seedling age in machine transplanting, and the benefits of PS-16 were better than that of PS-18.

Key words: late season rice of double cropping, hybrid rice, precision drill sowing, long seedling age, machine transplanting, yield.

Fig. 1

Air temperature and solar radiation across growth duration of rice A: air temperature; B: solar radiation and day length."

Table 1

Effects of different seedling ages and seed sowing methods on seedling quality of rice"

机插秧龄
Seedling age (d)		 播种方式
Sowing method		 叶龄
Leaf age		 苗高
Seedling height
(cm)		 黄叶数
The number of yellow leaves		 茎基宽
Basal stem
width (cm)		 根长
Root length
(cm)		 茎叶干重
Dry weight of stem and leaves (mg)		 根干重
Dry weight
of root
(mg)
20 PS-16 4.40±0.17 a 14.40±1.30 a 0.27±0.04 b 0.35±0.01 a 9.48±1.35 a 51.27±1.62 a 18.40±0.66 a
PS-18 4.33±0.15 a 14.94±0.18 a 0.40±0.05 a 0.33±0.02 a 7.98±0.48 b 46.60±1.25 b 15.23±0.90 b
BS 4.43±0.23 a 15.48±0.51 a 0.33±0.05 a 0.33±0.02 a 7.73±0.22 b 46.20±1.15 b 15.16±0.91 b
25 PS-16 5.37±0.31 a 19.17±0.63 a 0.67±0.10 b 0.40±0.01 a 11.89±0.28 a 94.60±7.29 a 38.53±2.86 a
PS-18 5.29±0.02 a 19.94±0.18 a 1.25±0.10 a 0.36±0.01 b 9.65±0.12 b 76.60±1.25 b 29.77±3.06 b
BS 5.23±0.12 a 19.80±0.82 a 1.27±0.07 a 0.36±0.01 b 9.43±0.46 b 80.20±4.42 b 30.83±2.91 b
30 PS-16 5.77±0.11 a 21.70±0.53 a 0.81±0.10 b 0.45±0.03 ab 12.13±0.76 a 132.33±10.97 ab 59.20±2.59 b
PS-18 5.63±0.12 a 21.69±0.13 a 1.22±0.10 a 0.40±0.01 bc 11.05±0.48 ab 117.67±4.62 b 51.17±5.01 c
BS 5.50±0.20 a 21.61±0.64 a 1.18±0.06 a 0.38±0.01 c 10.18±0.25 b 119.00±13.53 b 51.17±2.90 c
35 PS-16 6.37±0.12 a 23.43±0.90 a 1.40±0.11 bc 0.47±0.00 a 14.67±0.71 a 149.00±8.19 a 69.20±2.59 a
PS-18 6.03±0.12 b 23.83±0.42 a 2.21±0.13 a 0.42±0.01 b 11.83±0.31 b 122.33±4.47 b 58.23±6.60 b
BS 5.97±0.12 b 23.95±0.08 a 1.91±0.51 ab 0.40±0.01 b 10.10±0.17 c 129.00±13.53 b 58.17±3.15 b
机插秧龄
Seedling age (A)		 167.39** 314.73** 123.23** 55.76** 74.43** 247.82** 349.38**
播种方法
Sowing method (M)		 5.36** 2.33 25.69** 21.19** 55.94** 17.45** 20.02**
机插秧龄×播种方法A × M 1.05 0.53 2.43 1.7 4.46** 1.17 0.98

Fig. 2

Effects of different seedling ages and seed sowing methods on the percentage of seedlings with tillering buds in seedling population Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1. Values are mean±SD (n = 3). Bars superscripted by different lowercase letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level among treatments."

Fig. 3

Effects of different seedling ages and seed sowing methods on absolute visible light radiation intensity of seedling population Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1. A: 20 d seedling age; B: 25 d seedling age; C: 30 d seedling age; D: 35 d seedling age."

Table 2

Effects of different seedling ages and seed sowing methods on machine transplanting characters in rice"

机插秧龄 Seedling age (d) 播种方法
Sowing method		 机插每穴苗数
Number of
seedling transplanted per hill		 漏秧率Missing hill percent (%) 2~3株苗比率
Ratio of hills with 2-3 seedling
transplanted (%)		 伤根程度
Degree of root injury (%)		 伤苗率
Ratio of seedling injury (%)		 秧苗存活率 Seedling
survival rate
(%)
20 PS-16 2.47±0.14 a 3.11±1.95 b 78.89±3.85 a 24.19±2.75 b 6.20±1.55 a 97.92±3.61 a
PS-18 2.43±0.03 a 4.78±2.50 b 76.67±8.82 a 36.09±4.20 a 9.63±3.39 a 92.16±2.24 a
BS 2.45±0.14 a 13.33±3.33 a 36.67±6.67 b 38.01±4.39 a 7.44±0.83 a 85.52±2.09 b
25 PS-16 2.51±0.08 a 3.89±2.55 b 77.78±5.09 a 25.99±3.05 b 13.70±1.95 ab 93.27±6.31 a
PS-18 2.54±0.02 a 4.86±1.46 b 73.33±3.33 a 46.13±4.28 a 15.56±1.92 a 88.09±4.24 ab
BS 2.56±0.05 a 16.67±3.33 a 44.44±11.71 b 48.30±4.59 a 10.19±2.08 b 83.68±1.88 b
30 PS-16 2.43±0.15 a 3.67±0.58 b 74.44±9.18 a 39.87±3.42 b 12.75±2.53 c 94.76±9.07 a
PS-18 2.48±0.13 a 3.39±3.25 b 73.89±2.55 a 56.13±4.28 a 26.72±3.04 b 70.88±7.70 b
BS 2.43±0.12 a 16.79±6.16 a 57.22±8.39 b 51.38±2.85 a 36.82±7.76 a 69.39±7.23 b
35 PS-16 2.28±0.13 a 3.89±1.92 b 76.11±5.09 a 49.32±8.32 a 12.91±1.73 b 94.76±5.02 a
PS-18 2.32±0.05 a 4.17±2.20 b 74.44±4.19 a 49.47±6.83 a 34.62±6.29 a 74.21±4.48 b
BS 2.28±0.10 a 15.97±2.51 a 52.78±6.94 b 51.63±5.23 a 41.62±11.26 a 72.72±5.92 b
机插秧龄Seedling age (A) 8.51** 0.35 0.85 26.42** 41.99** 12.28**
播种方法Sowing method (M) 0.14 63.14** 66.66** 26.48** 23.86** 33.87**
机插秧龄×播种方法A × M 0.16 0.37 2.41 3.37 8.86** 2.66*

Fig. 4

Effects of different seedling ages and seed sowing methods on growth duration of rice Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1. A: duration days from sowing to heading; B: duration of rejuvenation period; C: duration days from rejuvenation to heading. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Bars superscripted by different lowercase letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level among treatments."

Fig. 5

Effects of different seedling ages and seed sowing methods on the number of tillers at 10 days after machine transplanting, the number of tillers at tillering peak stage, and productive tiller percentage Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1. A: the tiller number of rice population at 10 days after machine transplanting; B: the tiller number of rice population at tillering peak stage; C: the productive tiller percentage of rice population. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Bars superscripted by different lowercase letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level among treatments."

Fig. 6

Effects of different seedling ages and seed sowing methods on leaf area index, plant height, and dry matter accumulation Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1. A: leaf area index at heading stage; B: plant height; C: dry matter accumulation at heading stage; D: dry matter accumulation at maturing stage. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Bars superscripted by different lowercase letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level among treatments."

Table 3

Effects of different seedling ages and seed sowing methods on yield and yield component of rice"

秧龄
Seedling age (d)		 播种方式
Sowing method		 有效穗数
Number of
productive tillers
(×105 hm-2)		 穗粒数
Number of spikelet
per panicle		 结实率
Filled grain rate (%)		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 产量
Yield
(t hm-2)
20 PS-16 23.61±2.00 a 242.02±3.88 a 85.30±1.39 a 22.98±0.51 a 11.20±0.99 a
PS-18 23.57±1.42 a 241.91±1.41 a 84.16±1.31 a 22.79±0.28 a 10.94±0.68 a
BS 21.18±0.81 a 237.03±7.28 a 84.95±1.56 a 22.63±0.14 a 9.66±0.76 a
25 PS-16 23.51±1.59 a 244.03±10.00 a 84.66±4.64 a 22.25±0.68 a 10.82±1.21 a
PS-18 23.16±0.37 a 242.04±8.27 a 82.40±1.73 a 22.90±0.28 a 10.58±0.21 a
BS 21.81±1.68 a 238.10±6.20 a 82.76±2.18 a 22.66±0.40 a 9.75±1.02 a
30 PS-16 22.53±0.47 a 247.10±5.20 a 82.34±1.98 ab 22.43±0.33 b 10.29±0.61 a
PS-18 21.70±0.67 a 243.47±1.63 a 82.93±1.91 a 22.73±0.30 ab 9.83±0.46 a
BS 20.21±0.68 b 239.48±5.95 a 78.91±1.21 b 23.09±0.21 a 8.83±0.33 b
35 PS-16 22.15±1.23 a 239.91±1.81 a 79.89±1.23 a 22.91±0.18 ab 9.72±0.33 a
PS-18 21.07±0.51 ab 237.54±6.17 a 81.47±5.23 a 22.61±0.08 b 9.22±0.57 ab
BS 19.69±0.63 b 237.74±1.24 a 78.61±3.61 a 23.18±0.16 a 8.54±0.65 b
机插秧龄Seedling age (A) 6.10** 1.30 5.57** 3.18* 7.81**
播种方法Sowing method (M) 12.47** 2.46 1.43 2.28 10.80**
机插秧龄×播种方法A × M 0.23 0.18 0.72 1.56 0.13
[1] 中国农业年鉴编辑委员会. 中国农业年鉴(2019). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2020. pp 246-256.
Editorial Committee of China Agricultural Yearbook. China Agricultural Yearbook(2019). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2020. pp 246-256(in Chinese).
[2] 黄玛兰, 李晓云, 曾琳琳. 农村劳动力价格上涨与劳动力转移对作物种植结构的区域性影响差异. 农业现代化研究, 2019, 40(1):98-108.
Huang M L, Li X Y, Zeng L L. Different reginal impacts of rural labor price increase and rural labor mitigation on crop structure. Res Agric Modern, 2019, 40(1):98-108 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 王飞, 彭少兵. 水稻绿色高产栽培技术研究进展. 生命科学, 2018, 30:1129-1136.
Wang F, Peng S B. Research progress in rice green and high-yield management practices. Chin Bull Life Sci, 2018, 30:1129-1136 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 艾治勇, 郭夏宇, 刘文祥, 马国辉, 青先国. 长江中游地区双季稻安全生产日期的变化. 作物学报, 2014, 40:1320-1329.
Ai Z Y, Guo X Y, Liu W X, Ma G H, Qing X G. Changes of safe production dates of double-season rice in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40:1320-1329 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] 朱德峰, 张玉屏, 陈惠哲, 向镜, 张义凯. 中国水稻高产栽培技术创新与实践. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48:3404-3414.
Zhu D F, Zhang Y P, Chen H Z, Xiang J, Zhang Y K. Innovation and practice of high-yield rice cultivation technology in China. Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48:3404-3414 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 王强盛, 管永祥, 章泳, 杨洪建, 何松银, 荣曼, 吴琼. 水稻大苗机插存在问题及技术途径. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(4):24-26.
Wang Q S, Guan Y X, Zhang Y, Yang H J, He S Y, Rong M, Wu Q. Problems and technical approaches of raising big seedlings for machine-transplanted rice. China Rice, 2018, 24(4):24-26 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] Wang Z, Ye T, Wang J, Cheng Z, Shi P J. Contribution of climatic and technological factors to crop yield: empirical evidence from late paddy rice in Hunan province, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 2016, 30:2019-2030.
[8] 姚雄, 任万军, 胡剑锋, 卢庭启, 杨文钰. 稻油两熟区机插水稻的适宜秧龄与品种鉴选研究. 杂交水稻, 2009, 24(5):43-47.
Yao X, Ren W J, Hu J F, Lu T Q, Yang W Y. Studies on suitable seedling age and variety for mechanized transplanting rice in rapeseed-rice planting area. Hybrid Rice, 2009, 24(5):43-47 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 贾现文, 朱起超, 杨志远, 孙永健, 郭翔, 石勇, 马均. 移栽秧龄对机插杂交稻产量及群体质量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(12):18-25.
Jia X W, Zhu Q C, Yang Z Y, Sun Y J, Guo X, Shi Y, Ma J. Effect of seedling age on yield and population quality of mechanized transplanted hybrid rice. Trans CSAE, 2014, 30(12):18-25 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] Li Y X, Liu Y, Wang Y H, Ding Y F, Wang S H, Liu Z H, Li G H. Effects of seedling age on the growth stage and yield formation of hydroponically grown long-mat rice seedlings. J Integr Agric, 2020, 19:1755-1767.
[11] 吕腾飞, 周伟, 李应洪, 张绍文, 李玥, 孙永健, 马均. 杂交中籼稻长秧龄移栽的分蘖成穗特性. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41:659-672.
Lyu T F, Zhou W, Li Y H, Zhang S W, Li Y, Sun Y J, Ma J. Tillering and earing characteristics of middle-season indica hybrid rice under long-age seedlings. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric Life Sci Edn), 2015, 41:659-672 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 宋云生, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 朱聪聪, 孙圳, 杨大柳, 王惟清, 刘俊, 吴爱国. 水稻钵苗机插秧苗素质的调控. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(22):11-22.
Song Y S, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Zhu C C, Sun Z, Yang D L, Wang W Q, Liu J, Wu A G. Seedling quality regulation of rice potted-seedling in mechanical transplanting. Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(22):11-22 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 张均华, 林育炯, 黄洁, 白志刚, Sajid H, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 金千瑜. 基质类型及烯效唑对不同秧龄晚稻机插质量和产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(1):44-52.
Zhang J H, Lin Y J, Huang J, Bai Z G, Sajid H, Zhu L F, Cao X C, Jin Q Y. Effects of substrate types and uniconazole on mechanized transplanting qualities and grain yield for late rice with different seedling ages. Trans CSAE, 2018, 34(1):44-52 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 成臣, 雷凯, 程慧煌, 王盛亮, 朱博, 卢占军, 高冰可, 王斌强, 石庆华, 曾勇军. 苗期不同浓度多效唑对南方晚粳稻秧苗素质、茎蘖动态及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34:150-158.
Cheng C, Lei K, Cheng H H, Wang S L, Zhu B, Lu Z J, Gao B K, Wang B Q, Zeng Y J. Effects of different concentrations of paclobutrazol in seedling stage on seedling quality, tillering dynamics and grain yield of japonica rice during late cropping season in southern China. Chin J Rice Sci, 2020, 34:150-158 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 张祖建, 王君, 郎有忠, 于林惠, 薛艳凤, 朱庆森. 机插稻超秧龄秧苗生长特点研究. 作物学报, 2008, 34:297-304.
Zhang Z J, Wang J, Lang Y Z, Yu L H, Xue Y F, Zhu Q S. Growing characteristics of rice seedlings of over-optimum age for mechanical transplanting. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34:297-304 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] Huang M, Tang Q Y, Ao H J, Zou Y B. Yield potential and stability in super hybrid rice and its production strategies. J Integr Agric, 2017, 16:1009-1017.
[17] 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 徐一成, 张义凯. 杂交稻低播量精量播种育秧及机插取秧特性. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34:332-338.
Wang Y L, Zhu D F, Xiang J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y P, Xu Y C, Zhang Y K. Characteristics of seedling raising and mechanizaed transplanting of hybrid rice with a low seedling rate by precise seeding method. Chin J Rice Sci, 2020, 34:332-338 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 曾永跃, 唐国荣, 江立庚, 韦杰权, 宋红, 阮春芳. 机插水稻缓苗期生长特点及生理机制研究. 中国农机化学报, 2016, 37:205-209.
Zeng Y Y, Tang G R, Jiang L G, Wei J Q, Song H, Ruan C F. Study on growth characteristics and physiological mechanism of machine-transplanted rice during recovering period. J Chin Agric Mech, 2016, 37:205-209 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 徐一成, 张义凯. 杂交稻精量条播育秧机插漏秧率与均匀度分析. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(3):66-68.
Wang Y L, Zhu D F, Xiang J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y P. Xu Y C, Zhang Y K. Analysis of missing hill rate and uniformity of seedling transplanted by machine in precious drilling sowing of hybrid rice. China Rice, 2020, 26(3):66-68 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] Hu Q, Jiang W Q, Qiu S, Xing Z P, Guo B W, Liu G D, Gao H, Zhang H C, Wei H Y. Effect of wide-narrow row arrangement in mechanical pot-seedling transplanting and plant density on yield formation and grain quality of japonica rice. J Integr Agric, 2020, 19:1197-1214.
[21] Huang M, Fang S L, Cao F B, Chen J N. Prolonging seedling age does not reduce grain yields in machine-transplanted early-season rice under precision sowing. Ann Appl Biol, 2020, 176, 308-313.
[22] Lampayan R M, Faronilo J E, Tuong T P, Espiritu A J, de Dios J L, Bayot R S, Bueno C S, Hosen Y. Effects of seedbed management and delayed transplanting of rice seedlings on crop performance, grain yield, and water productivity. Field Crops Res, 2015, 183:303-314.
[23] 汪建军, 曾勇军, 易艳红, 章起明, 胡启星, 谭雪明, 黄山, 商庆银, 曾研华, 石庆华. 基于不同播种量的双季机插早稻均匀度对产量形成的影响. 作物杂志, 2018, (2):141-147.
Wang J J, Zeng Y J, Yi Y H, Zhang Q M, Hu Q X, Tan X M, Huang S, Shang Q Y, Zeng Y H, Shi Q H. The uniformity of mechanical-transplanted early-season rice under different seedling rates and its effects on the formation of grain yield. Crops, 2018, (2):141-147 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 易子豪, 朱德峰, 王亚梁, 张玉屏, 向镜, 张义凯, 陈惠哲. 流水灌溉减轻晚稻秧苗高温伤害的研究. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(4):5-7.
Yi Z H, Zhu D F, Wang Y L, Zhang Y P, Xiang J, Zhang Y K, Chen H Z. Study on flowing water irrigation to alleviate high temperature damage on late rice seedlings. China Rice, 2019, 25(4):5-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 曾研华. 低温诱导籼粳杂交稻灌浆结实障碍特性研究. 南京农业大学博士学位论文,江苏南京, 2015.
Zeng Y H. Study on Mechanism of Grain Filling Obstacle Induced Low Temperature of Indica-Japonica Hybrid Rice. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu,China, 2015 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] Huang M, Fang S L, Shan S L, Zou Y B. Delayed transplanting reduced grain yield due to low temperature stress at anthesis in machine-transplanted late-season rice. Exp Agric, 2019, 55:843-848.
[27] 吴文革, 杨剑波, 张健美, 周永进, 蔡海涛, 许有尊, 吴然然, 陈刚. 穴基本苗对机插杂交中籼稻群体构建及产量的影响. 安徽农业大学学报, 2014, 41:401-405.
Wu W G, Yang J B, Zhang J M, Zhou Y J, Cai H T, Xu Y Z, Wu R R, Chen G. Effects of seedling number per hole on population qualioty and yield of mechanical transplanting middle-season Indica hybrid rice. J Anhui Agric Univ, 2014, 41:401-405 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 彭斌, 李潘林, 周楠, 赖上坤, 朱建国, 杨连新, 王余龙. 不同秧苗素质和移栽密度条件下臭氧胁迫对水稻光合作用、物质生产和产量的影响. 生态学报, 2013, 33:3668-3675.
Peng B, Li P L, Zhou N, Lai S K, Zhu J G, Yang L X, Wang Y L. Effects of ozone stress on photosynthesis, dry matter production and yield of rice under different seedling quality and plant density. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33:3668-3675 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] Wang Y L, Wang L, Chen H Z, Xiang J, Zhang Y K, Shi Q H, Zhu D F, Zhang Y P. Sowing dates have different effects on spikelet formation among different photoperiod-sensitive rice genotypes. Agron J, 2019, 111:2263-2275.
[30] 滕飞, 陈惠哲, 曾研华, 蔡雪青, 朱德峰. 不同秧龄对双季机插晚稻生长特性与产量形成的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(30):95-100.
Teng F, Chen H Z, Zeng Y H, Cai X Q, Zhu D F. Effect of different seedling age on the growth and yield of double cropping of late rice. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2014, 30(30):95-100 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] DENG Zhao, JIANG Nan, FU Chen-Jian, YAN Tian-Zhe, FU Xing-Xue, HU Xiao-Chun, QIN Peng, LIU Shan-Shan, WANG Kai, YANG Yuan-Zhu. Analysis of blast resistance genes in Longliangyou and Jingliangyou hybrid rice varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1071-1080.
[2] QIN Qin, TAO You-Feng, HUANG Bang-Chao, LI Hui, GAO Yun-Tian, ZHONG Xiao-Yuan, ZHOU Zhong-Lin, ZHU Li, LEI Xiao-Long, FENG Sheng-Qiang, WANG Xu, REN Wan-Jun. Characteristics of panicle stem growth and flowering period of the parents of hybrid rice in machine-transplanted seed production [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 988-1004.
[3] CHEN Yun, LIU Kun, ZHANG Hong-Lu, LI Si-Yu, ZHANG Ya-Jun, WEI Jia-Li, ZHANG Hao, GU Jun-Fei, LIU Li-Jun, YANG Jian-Chang. Effects of machine transplanting density and panicle nitrogen fertilizer reduction on grains starch synthesis in good taste rice cultivars [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(8): 1540-1550.
[4] YANG Zhi-Yuan, SHU Chuan-Hai, ZHANG Rong-Ping, YANG Guo-Tao, WANG Ming-Tian, QIN Jian, SUN Yong-Jian, MA Jun, LI Na. Comparison of tolerances to nitrogen fertilizer between compact and loose hybrid indica rice varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(8): 1593-1602.
[5] KE Jian, CHEN Ting-Ting, XU Hao-Cong, ZHU Tie-Zhong, WU Han, HE Hai-Bing, YOU Cui-Cui, ZHU De-Quan, WU Li-Quan. Effects of different application methods of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield and nitrogen utilization of indica-japonica hybrid rice in pot-seedling mechanically transplanted [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(7): 1372-1382.
[6] Lei ZHOU,Qiu-Yuan LIU,Jin-Yu TIAN,Meng-Hua ZHU,Shuang CHENG,Yang CHE,Zhi-Jie WANG,Zhi-Peng XING,Ya-Jie HU,Guo-Dong LIU,Hai-Yan WEI,Hong-Cheng ZHANG. Differences in yield and nitrogen absorption and utilization of indica-japonica hybrid rice varieties of Yongyou series [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(5): 772-786.
[7] XIANG Li-Yuan,XU Kai,SU Jing,WU Chao,YUAN Xiong,ZHENG Xing-Fei,DIAO Ying,HU Zhong-Li,LI Lan-Zhi. Genetic dissection of combining ability and heterosis of rice agronomic traits based on pathway analysis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(9): 1319-1326.
[8] Wei-Sheng LYU,Yong-Jun ZENG,Qing-Hua SHI,Xiao-Hua PAN,Shan HUANG,Qing-Yin SHANG,Xue-Ming TAN,Mu-Ying LI,Shui-Xiu HU,Yan-Hua ZENG. Leaf-age-model Parameters and Characteristics of High-yield Cultivars of Machine-transplanted Double Cropping Rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(12): 1844-1857.
[9] Dong XU, Ying ZHU, Lei ZHOU, Chao HAN, Lei-Ming ZHENG, Hong-Cheng ZHANG, Hai-Yan WEI, Yu WANG, An-Ye LIAO, Shi-Bo CAI. Differences in Yield and Grain Quality among Various Types of Indica/japonica Hybrid Rice and Correlation between Quality and Climatic Factors during Grain Filling Period [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(10): 1548-1559.
[10] Fu-Xian XU, Xing-Bing ZHOU, Lin ZHANG, Peng JIANG, Mao LIU, Yong-Chuan ZHU, Xiao-Yi GUO, Hong XIONG. Effects of Climatic Factors in the Southeast of Sichuan Basin on Grain Yield of Mid-season Hybrid Rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(04): 601-613.
[11] ZHANG Zheng,ZHANG Xue-Li,MO Bo-Cheng,Dai Zhi-Jun,HU Zhong-Li,LI Lan-Zhi,ZHENG Xing-Fei. Combining Ability Analysis ofAgronomic Trait in Indica × IndicaHybrid Rice [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43(10): 1448-1457.
[12] SHEN Hang-Qi,HU Wei-Min,LIN Cheng,GUAN Ya-Jing,LIU Hong-You,AN Jian-Yu,HU Jin. Effects of Different Dehydrating Agents on Seed Quality and Gene Expression inHybrid Rice Seed Production [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43(09): 1308-1318.
[13] LUO De-Qiang,WANG Shao-Hua,JIANG Xue-Hai,LI Gang-Hua,ZHOU Wei-Jia,LI Min,JI Guang-Mei,DING Yan-Feng,LING Qi-Hong,LIU Zheng-Hui. Characterization of Populations with Different Yield Levels in Indica Hybrid Rice in Plateau Area of Guizhou Province [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(12): 1817-1826.
[14] ZENG Yan-Hua,ZHANG Yu-Ping,PAN Xiao-Hua,ZHU De-Feng,XIANG Jing,CHEN Hui-Zhe,ZHANG Yi-Kai. Effect of Low Temperature after Flowering on Grain Filling and Plant Hormones Contents in Rice [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(10): 1551-1559.
[15] XU Fu-Xian, ZHANG Lin, XIONG Hong, ZHOU Xing-Bing, ZHU Yong-Chuan, LIU Mao,JIANG Peng, GUO Xiao-Yi. Relationship between Yield Loss and Flooding during Middle and Later Growth Periods in Hybrid Rice [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(09): 1381-1390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd