Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (10): 2663-2670.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.11084

• RESEARCH NOTES • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Synergistic effect of moisture and foliar-applied humic acid on oat grain yield and β-glucan content

LI Ying-Hao(), WANG Qi(), ZHAO Bao-Ping(), LIU Yan-Di, MI Jun-Zhen, WU Jun-Ying, LIU Jing-Hui   

  1. Agricultural College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University / Inner Mongolia Coarse Grain Engineering Research Center, Hohhot 010019, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2021-09-23 Accepted:2022-01-06 Online:2022-10-12 Published:2022-07-20
  • Contact: ZHAO Bao-Ping E-mail:2466528827@qq.com;512774967@qq.com;zhaobaoping82@163.com
  • About author:First author contact:

    ** Contributed equally to this work

  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31560373);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31960378);China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-07);International Cooperation Key Special Project of the National Key Research and Development Program(2018YFE0107900)

RichHTML403

13

PDF

541

Abstract:

In order to clarify the synergistic effect of water and humic acid on the yield and quality improvement of oats, we set two water treatments of dry farming and limited irrigation, respectively, and analyzed the effects of humic acid spraying on photosynthetic characteristics of oat leaves, grain yield, and β-glucan content using the oat varieties Mengnong Dayan 1 and Neiyan 5 as the research materials. The results showed that the application of humic acid at the booting and flowering stages could significantly improve the photosynthetic characteristics of oat leaves. Compared with irrigation, the photosynthetic rate of Mengnong Dayan 1 leaves increased by 31.78%-123.72% in dry farming, while the increased rate of Neiyan 5 leaves was basically the same as that in dry farming and irrigation. The grain yield and β-glucan content of the two varieties were significantly increased by spraying humic acid in dry farming, especially Neiyan 5, which increased by 5.60%-74.68% and 11.24%-19.56%, respectively. Compared with dry treatment, the content of β-glucan increased by 11.30%-33.29% and 7.76%-43.81%, respectively, when HA was sprayed under irrigation. Through the analysis of the correlation between the indexes, the photosynthetic rate, β-glucan content, spike height, spikelet number per spike, grain weight per plant, thousand-grain weight, and grain yield were significantly positive correlation of Mengnong Dayan 1, the grain yield, spike height, spikelet number per spike, grain weight per plant, and thousand-grain weight were significantly positive correlation, and there was a significant positive correlation between β-glucan content, spikelet number per spike, thousand-grain weight, and grain yield (P < 0.05). While there was a positive correlation between β-glucan content and grain yield components of Neiyan 5, but it did not reach a significant level. In conclusion, the synergistic effect of water and humic acid can effectively improve the photosynthetic performance of oat leaves, and synergistically increase grain yield and β-glucan content.

Key words: water, humic acid, oat, yield, β-glucan

Fig. 1

Precipitation distribution of oat during the growing period"

Table 1

Photosynthetic parameters of oat leaves at heading stage under different water and humic acid spraying treatments"

年份
Year		 品种
Variety		 水分
Water		 处理
Treatment		 胞间CO2浓度
Ci
(mmol mol-1)		 光合速率
Pn
(μmol m-2 s-1)		 气孔导度
Gs
(mmol mol-1)		 蒸腾速率
Tr
(mmol m-2 s-1)
2019 蒙农大燕1号
Mengnong Dayan 1		 DS HA 298.0±12.9 a 13.2±1.5 c 170.2±24.3 d 5.2±0.1 c
WT 248.6±40.7 b 5.9±0.7 f 79.2±30.2 e 3.1±0.8 e
WW HA 277.8±34.2 ab 22.5±0.2 a 592.4±39.9 a 8.3±0.7 a
WT 237.8±22.1 b 19.5±1.3 b 588.8±15.6 a 7.0±0.2 b
内燕5号
Neiyan 5		 DS HA 278.9±36.9 ab 10.4±0.2 d 174.7±35.1 d 4.7±0.7 cd
WT 271.2±31.0 ab 7.7±0.2 e 138.1±18.2 d 3.7±0.3 de
WW HA 265.2±15.2 ab 21.7±0.4 a 419.9±28.4 b 7.8±1.0 ab
WT 260.8±10.0 ab 21.6±0.7 a 365.8±29.4 c 7.5±0.7 ab
2020 蒙农大燕1号
Mengnong Dayan 1		 DS HA 266.0±25.5 a 14.1±1.6 bc 164.7±19.3 c 5.3±0.6 ab
WT 193.3±32.5 c 10.7±0.8 c 143.0±11.5 c 3.7±0.2 bc
WW HA 268.0±27.2 a 25.9±4.0 a 405.7±22.1 a 7.3±0.9 a
WT 199.5±14.5 c 20.5±2.1 ab 359.0±17.3 a 5.6±0.4 ab
内燕5号
Neiyan 5		 DS HA 256.3±37.2 ab 12.0±2.1 c 167.7±6.7 c 3.5±0.7 bc
WT 227.3±14.2 abc 11.6±1.7 c 121.3±7.6 c 1.8±0.1 c
WW HA 254.3±34.5 ab 23.4±2.2 a 369.7±21.4 a 6.2±0.7 ab
WT 210.3±14.6 bc 19.1±1.8 ab 247.7±35.6 b 5.8±0.1 ab
水分 Water (W) ns *** *** ***
喷施 Spray (S) *** *** *** ***
W×S ns ns ns *

Fig. 2

SPAD value of oat leaves under different water and humic acid treatments DS: dry farming; WW: irrigation; HA: humic acid; WT: water. Different lowercase letters in the picture indicate significant differences at P < 0.05."

Fig. 3

Changes of β-glucan content in oat grains under different water and humic acid treatments DS: dry farming; WW: irrigation; HA: humic acid; WT: water."

Table 2

Changes in the yield components of oats under different water and humic acid treatments"

年份
Year		 品种
Variety		 水分
Water		 处理
Treatment		 单位面积穗数
Panicle number
(×104 hm-2)		 穗长
Panicle height
(cm)		 单穗小穗数
Spikelet number
per spike		 单穗粒重
Grain weight per
plant (g)		 千粒重
1000-kernel weight (g)
2019 蒙农大燕1号
Mengnong Dayan 1		 DS HA 200.7±11.4 cde 18.3±3.5 ab 23.9±6.5 bcd 0.98±0.10 ab 21.6±0.7 c
WT 184.2±12.4 e 16.1±3.7 ab 21.5±3.4 bcd 0.85±0.13 ab 20.2±0.5 de
WW HA 246.8±6.3 a 20.7±5.3 a 38.7±3.4 a 1.59±0.07 a 25.9±1.2 a
WT 225.7±28.0 abc 17.9±1.5 ab 30.6±2.4 ab 1.02±0.07 ab 24.8±0.3 ab
内燕5号
Neiyan 5		 DS HA 197.0±7.5 de 14.6±3.5 b 18.8±3.6 cd 0.62±0.09 b 20.6±0.3 cd
WT 179.3±21.1 e 14.1±3.0 b 13.6±2.3 d 0.62±0.09 b 19.3±0.2 e
WW HA 237.3±6.7 ab 17.5±1.3 ab 30.3±12.9 ab 1.37±0.07 ab 24.8±1.2 ab
WT 213.0±15.3 bcd 17.1±1.0 ab 28.7±5.3 abc 1.05±0.07 ab 24.2±0.9 b
2020 蒙农大燕1号
Mengnong Dayan 1		 DS HA 196.7±19.3 b 19.7±1.9 d 33.8±2.1 ab 1.58±0.05 ab 20.9±0.7 b
WT 184.0±13.1 b 17.2±1.2 d 29.7±3.5 bc 1.24±0.09 ab 19.7±1.5 b
WW HA 258.7±19.0 a 44.2±3.7 a 43.4±6.5 a 2.38±0.10 a 25.1±0.6 a
WT 254.7±4.6 a 39.9±5.4 ab 42.5±7.7 a 2.27±0.14 ab 24.1±1.7 a
内燕
5号
Neiyan 5		 DS HA 190.3±7.5 b 18.3±2.5 d 24.8±3.3 c 1.29±0.10 ab 19.9±1.7 b
WT 181.0±18.2 b 17.7±1.8 d 23.1±0.9 c 1.05±0.08 b 19.6±1.3 b
WW HA 246.3±22.5 a 34.8±3.3 bc 44.2±3.7 a 2.04±0.09 ab 25.1±0.3 a
WT 245.3±27.0 a 33.1±0.9 c 39.9±5.4 a 1.86±0.13 ab 23.7±1.8 a

Fig. 4

Changes of oat grain yield under different water and humic acid treatments DS: dry farming; WW: irrigation; HA: humic acid; WT: water. Different lowercase letters in the picture indicate significant differences at P < 0.05."

Fig. 5

Correlation analysis between indicators A: Mengnong Dayan 1; B: Neiyan 5."

[1] 任长忠, 崔林, 何峰, 欧阳韶晖, 胡新中, 李再贵, 陕方. 我国燕麦荞麦产业技术体系建设与发展. 吉林农业大学学报, 2018, 40: 524-532.
Ren C Z, Cui L, He F, Ou-Yang S H, Hu X Z, Li Z G, Shan F. Construction and development of China oat and buckwheat industrial technology system. J Jilin Agric Univ, 2018, 40: 524-532. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Wood P J. Cereal beta-glucans in diet and health. J Cereal Sci, 2007, 45: 230-238.
[3] Nazare J-A, Normand S, Triantafyllou A O, Desage M, Laville M. Modulation of the postprandial phase by β-glucan in overweight subjects: effects on glucose and insulin kinetics. Mol Nutr Food Res, 2009, 53: 361-369.
doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200800023
[4] Marshall A, Cowan S, Edwards S, Griffiths I, Howarth C, Langdon T, White E. Crops that feed the world 9. Oats-a cereal crop for human and livestock feed with industrial applications. Food Secur, 2013, 5: 13-33.
doi: 10.1007/s12571-012-0232-x
[5] Bodner G, Nakhforoosh A, Kaul H P. Management of crop water under drought: a review. Agron Sustain Dev, 2015, 35: 401-442.
doi: 10.1007/s13593-015-0283-4
[6] Kadam N N, Xiao G, Melgar R J. Chapter 3: agronomic and physiological responses to high temperature, drought, and elevated CO2 interactions in cereals. Adv Agron, 2014, 127: 111-156.
[7] 任长忠, 胡跃高. 中国燕麦学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013.
Ren C Z, Hu Y G. Chinese Oatology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2013 (in Chinese)
[8] Liu D Q, Wan F, Guo R, Li F M, Cao H H, Sun G J. GIS-based modeling of potential yield distributions for different oat varieties in China. Math Comput Mod, 2011, 54: 869.
[9] 苏日娜. 中国燕麦产业发展研究. 内蒙古农业大学博士学位论文, 内蒙古呼和浩特, 2013.
Su R N. Research on the Development of China’s Oat Industry. PhD Dissertation of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Humphreys D G, Mather D E. Heritability of β-glucan, groat- percentage, and crown rust resistance in two oat crosses. Euphytica, 1996, 91: 359-364.
doi: 10.1007/BF00033098
[11] Doehlert D C, McMullen M S, Hammond J J. Genotypic and environmental effects on grain yield and quality of oat grown in North Dakota. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 1066-1072.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.4141066x
[12] Brunner B R, Freed R D. Oat grain β-glucan content as affected by nitrogen level, location and year. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 473-476.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400020031x
[13] Peterson D M, Wesenberg D M, Burrup D E. β-glucan content and its relationship to agronomic characteristics in elite oat germplasm. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 965-970.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500040005x
[14] Guler M. Nitrogen and irrigation effects on grain beta-glucan content of oats (Avena sativa L.). Austr J Crop Sci, 2011, 5: 239-244.
[15] Chernyshova A A, White P J, Scott M P. Selection for nutritional function and agronomic performance in oat. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 2330-2339.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.12.0759
[16] Cervantes-Martinez C T, Frey K J, White P J. Correlated responses to selection for greater β-glucan content in two oat populations. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 730-738.
[17] 程亮, 张保林, 王杰, 史亚龙, 陈可可. 腐植酸肥料的研究进展. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011, (5): 1-6.
Cheng L, Zhang B L, Wang J, Shi Y L, Chen K K. Research progress of humic acid fertilizers. Soils Fert China, 2011, (5): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] Lotfi R, Kalaji H M, Valizadeh G R, Khalilvand Behrozyar E, Hemati A, Gharavi-Kochebagh P, Ghassemi A. Effects of humic acid on photosynthetic efficiency of rapeseed plants growing under different watering conditions. Photosynthetica, 2018, 56: 962-970.
doi: 10.1007/s11099-017-0745-9
[19] 刘伟, 刘景辉, 萨如拉. 腐植酸水溶肥料对燕麦叶片保护酶活性和渗透物质的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2014, 33(1): 107-109.
Liu W, Liu J H, Sarula. Effects of humic acid water-soluble fertilizers on protective enzyme activities and osmotic substances in oat leaves. J Irrig Drain, 2014, 33(1): 107-109. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] Robredo A, Pérez-lópez U, Lacuesta M, Mena-Petite A, Munoz- Rueda A. Influence of water stress on photosynthetic characteristics in barley plants under ambient and elevated CO2 concentrations. Biol Plant, 2010, 54: 285-292.
doi: 10.1007/s10535-010-0050-y
[21] Liu B H, Liang J, Tang G M, Wang X F, Liu F C, Zhao D C. Drought stress affects on growth, water use efficiency, gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of Juglans rootstocks. Sci Hortic, 2019, 250: 230-235.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.02.056
[22] Janani P, Kumar N, Jegadeeswari V. Dynamics of gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of cocoa genotypes in response to water deficit. J Pharm Phytochem, 2019, 8: 415-419.
[23] Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev, 2009, 29: 185-212.
doi: 10.1051/agro:2008021
[24] 邓万和, 王强, 吕耀昌, 周素梅. 品种和环境效应对燕麦β-葡聚糖含量的影响. 中国粮油学报, 2005, 20(2): 30-32.
Deng W H, Wang Q, Lyu Y C, Zhou S M. Effects of variety and environmental effects on the content of oat β-glucan. J Chin Cereals Oils Assoc, 2005, 20(2): 30-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 王冰, 朱莉, 李茂玮, 詹晓北. 适应性驯化生产低分子质量β-葡聚糖及其抗氧化活性研究. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(17): 27-33.
Wang B, Zhu L, Li M W, Zhan X B. Adaptive domestication to produce low molecular weight β-glucan and its antioxidant activity. Food Ferment Ind Sin, 2021, 47(17): 27-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 张俊峰, 段娜, 刘兵兵, 刘龙龙, 赵文千. 灌浆期干旱胁迫对燕麦籽粒β-葡聚糖含量的影响. 山西农业科学, 2020, 48: 884-888.
Zhang J F, Duan N, Liu B B, Liu L L, Zhao W Q. Effects of drought stress during grain filling period on β-glucan content in oat grains. Shanxi Agric Sci, 2020, 48: 884-888. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] Zhang X, Huang G, Bian X, Zhao Q G. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and root interaction on the agronomic traits of intercropped maize, and the quantity of microorganisms and activity of enzymes in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil, 2013, 368: 407-417.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1528-5
[28] 韩文元. 水分与腐植酸对燕麦抗旱性、产量形成和品质的影响. 内蒙古农业大学博士学位论文, 内蒙古呼和浩特, 2016.
Han W Y. Effects of Moisture and Humic Acid on Drought Resistance, Yield Formation and Quality of Oats. PhD Dissertation of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] 孙雯. 水分和腐植酸对燕麦光合、糖代谢及产量和β-葡聚糖形成的影响. 内蒙古农业大学博士学位论文, 内蒙古呼和浩特, 2018.
Sun W. Effects of Water and Humic Acid on Oat Photosynthesis, Sugar Metabolism, Yield and β-glucan Formation. PhD Dissertation of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] Dong C C, Yong I J, Nam J H, Chung G C, Ji H C, Su J K, Hong S Y. Early drought effect on canopy development and tuber growth of potato cultivars with different maturities. Field Crops Res, 2018, 215: 156-162.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.008
[31] Moghadam H R T, Khamene M K, Zahedi H. Effect of humic acid foliar application on growth and quantity of corn in irrigation withholding at different growth stages. Maydica, 2014, 59: 125-129.
[32] Hartz T K, Bottoms T G. Humic substances generally ineffective in improving vegetable crop nutrient uptake or productivity. Hortic Sci, 2010, 45: 906-910.
[33] Ahmad W, Shah Z, Khan F, Ali S, Malik W. Maize yield and soil properties as influenced by integrated use of organic, inorganic and bio-fertilizers in a low fertility soil. Soil Environ, 2013, 32: 121-129.
[34] 李英浩, 刘景辉, 朱珊珊. 干旱胁迫下腐植酸对燕麦叶片光合性能的调控效应. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39: 1385-1391.
Li Y H, Liu J H, Zhu S S. Regulation effects of humic acid on photosynthetic performance of oat leaves under drought stress. J Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39: 1385-1391. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] Hu Chuan, Zhao Kai-Nan, Huang Xiu-Li, Wu Jin-Zhi, Ren Kai-Ming, Wang He-Zheng, Fu Guo-Zhan, Huang Ming, Li You-Jun. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen rates on yield and quality of dryland wheat under one-off irrigation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] Ma Sheng-Qian, Wang Zhi-Ping, Chen Hao-Tian, Dou Shu-Xian, Zhang Yan, Deng Ai-Xing, Zhang Wei-Jian, Yuan Xiang-Yang, Song Zhen-Wei. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen application rate on maize yield and soil aggregates in northeastern China under straw returning [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] Zhang Si-Si, Zhao Xiang-Hui, Zhou Yang, Yao Yun-Feng, Zhu Rong-Yu, Dong Yuan-Jie, Hu Guo-Qing, Xu Tong, Liu Zhao-Xin. Effects of plowing and green manure returning in winter fallow period on soil physicochemical properties and yield in continuously cropped peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] Zhang Ning-Ning, Teng Yu-Fei, Ren Na-Na, Wei Xing-Zhuo, Yan Shu-Hao, Fan Ke-Xin, Wang Yong-Hong, Chen Wen-Kang, Zhang Xing-Hua, Zhu Wan-Chao, Xu Shu-Tu, Xue Ji-Quan. Phenotypic evaluation and plasticity analysis of drought resistance in 201 maize inbred lines [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] Wang Yu-Cheng, Zhang Lu, Liu A-Kang, Huang Jian-Liang, Peng Shao-Bing, Yuan Shen. Strategies and prospects for large-scale crop yield improvement based on yield gap [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[6] Zhang Zhen, Feng Lian-Jie, Shi Yu, Yu Zhen-Wen, Zhang Yong-Li. Yield formation of wheat with different ear types under water-saving supplementary irrigation conditions [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[7] Yan An, Jiang Kun-Wei, Wang Rong-Yuan, Tian Lin, Zhang Lu, Wang Yun, Xu Jian-Long. Identification and cloning of SVN7 controlling small vascular bundle number in the rice flag leaf [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[8] Liu Xin-Meng, Ren Hao, Zhang Ji-Bo, Zhang Ji-Wang, Zhao Bin, Ren Bai-Zhao, Liu Peng, Wang Hong-Zhang. Physiological mechanisms of methyl jasmonate (MeJA) alleviating the effects of heat stress on ear differentiation in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[9] Wang Zhuang-Zhuang, Wu Zi-Jun, Zhang Yong-Xin, Zhang Xin-Yuan, Yuan Li-Xue, Chen Ru-Xue, Liu Shi-Ju, Duan Jian-Zhao, Feng Wei, Wang Tong-Chao, Wang Yong-Hua. Optimized water-nitrogen synergy enhances winter wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency in clay-loam fluvo-aquic soils of southeastern Henan, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] Zhang Hong-Rong, Wang Fei-Er, Li Pan, Qiu Hai-Long, Zhu Jing, Zhao Lian-Hao, Nan Yun-You, He Wei, Fan Zhi-Long, Hu Fa-Long, Chai Qiang, Yin Wen. Photosynthetic characteristics of 20% reduced irrigation combined with 25% organic substitution for chemical fertilizer in increasing silage maize yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[11] Zhao Jia-Xue, Zhou Long-Hao, Guo Qi-Yuan, Shang Lun-Xiao, Wang Han, Liu Zhi-Tao, Chen Xi, Zhang Xiao-Pei, Song Xian-Liang, Ahmedov Miraziz Baltaevich, Mao Li-Li. Long-term stubble return and subsoiling enhance cotton yields in coastal saline-alkali soils by improving soil conditions and photosynthetic characteristics [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[12] Guo Xing-Yu, Hu Dan, Lin Su-Qi, Wang Meng-Kai, Tan Wen-Feng, Huang Chuan-Qin. Biochar combined with chemical fertilizer increases maize yield and soil ecosystem multifunctionality in an intercropped maize-soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[13] Cai Hong-Wei, Yu Ai-Zhong, Jiang Ke-Qiang, Wang Peng-Fei, Wang Yu-Long, Huo Jian-Zhe, Pang Xiao-Neng, Yin Bo, Shang Yong-Pan. Key mechanisms underlying the enhancement of sweet maize yield through partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with organic manure in arid irrigation districts [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] Cui Xue-Mei, Liu Yan-Di, Liu Jing-Hui, Mi Jun-Zhen, Wu Jun-Ying, Zhao Bao-Ping. Study on the relationship between physiological characteristics of superior and inferior grains with yield in different oat genotypes [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] Yang Rui, Chen Jing-Dong, Huang Ying, Zhang Xue-Kun, Zhou Deng-Wen, Liu Qing-Yun, Xu Jin-Song, Xie Ling-Li, Xu Ben-Bo. Study on breeding and cultivation strategies for winter rapeseed to cope with climate change in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd