Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica

   

Physiological mechanism and transcriptome analysis of sweet potato overgrowth under high-nitrogen conditions

Yu Yong-Chao,Liu Ming,Jin Rong,Zhao Peng,Zhang Qiang-Qiang,Wang Jing,Zhu Xiao-Ya,Tang Zhong-Hou*   

  1. Xuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District / National Agricultural Experimental Station for Soil Quality in Xuzhou, Xuzhou 221131, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2025-09-11 Revised:2025-11-18 Accepted:2025-11-18 Published:2025-12-09
  • Contact: 唐忠厚, E-mail: zhonghoutang@sina.com E-mail:yychaomail@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (Sweet potato, CARS-10) and the Shenyang Agricultural Science Association Open Funding (NXKT2024011121).

Abstract: Sweet potato is an important food and economic crop in China; however, excessive vegetative growth under high nitrogen (N) conditions often leads to reduced yield and quality. In this study, we used two contrasting varieties—Xushu 32 (non-overgrowth) and Xuzishu 8 (prone to overgrowth) to investigate phenotypic responses and changes in carbon and nitrogen content under different nitrogen application levels (0, 80, and 200 kg hm?2). Transcriptome sequencing was performed to identify metabolic pathways and candidate genes associated with stem overgrowth, with subsequent validation by RT-qPCR. The results showed that under high-N conditions, Xuzishu 8 exhibited significantly enhanced shoot growth, a marked reduction in storage root yield, and more severe overgrowth compared to Xushu 32High nitrogen treatment increased nitrogen content and decreased soluble sugar content in stem tips of both varieties, along with significant upregulation of genes involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism pathways. These effects were more pronounced in Xuzishu 8, indicating greater sensitivity to high-N-induced overgrowth. Transcriptomic analysis identified 3852 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal and high-N treatments. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses of 1174 DEGs shared between the two varieties revealed significant enrichment in pathways related to wound response, jasmonic acid signaling, amino acid metabolismand zeatin biosynthesis, suggesting conserved mechanisms under high-N stress. Additionally, 6998 DEGs were identified between the two varieties under the same nitrogen treatments. Enrichment analysis of 1,186 high-N-specific DEGs highlighted pathways associated with isoprenoid metabolism, hormone signaling, cytochrome P450 activity, nitrogen metabolismand zeatin biosynthesis. Six candidate genes (g9506.t1, g14945.t1, g37255.t1, g25587.t1, g7821.t1, and g18076.t1) were further implicated in high-N-induced overgrowth. This study provides theoretical insight into the physiological mechanisms underlying stem overgrowth in sweet potato and offers a foundation for breeding varieties with improved tolerance to high nitrogen.

Key words: sweet potato, overgrowth, carbon-nitrogen metabolism, transcriptome, RT-qPCR

[1] Alam M K. A comprehensive review of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam): Revisiting the associated health benefits. Trends Food Sci Technol, 2021, 115: 512–529. 

[2] 李强, 赵海, 靳艳玲, . 中国甘薯产业助力国家粮食安全的分析与展望. 江苏农业学报, 2022, 38: 14841491.
Li Q, Zhao H, Jin Y L, et al. Analysis and perspectives of sweet potato industry contributing to national food security in China. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2022, 38: 1484–1491 (in Chinese with English abstract). 

[3] Zhang Y L, Tang Y Q, Wang Z H, et al. Optimizing nitrogen and irrigation application for drip irrigated sweet potato with plastic film mulching in Eastern China. Agric Water Manag, 2024, 302: 108997.

[4] Kitaya Y, Hirai H, Endo R, et al. Effects of water contents and CO2 concentrations in soil on growth of sweet potato. Field Crops Res, 2013, 152: 3643.

[5] 李韦柳, 唐秀桦, 韦民政, . 遮阴对淀粉型甘薯生长发育及生理特性的影响. 热带作物学报, 2017, 38:258263.

Li W L, Tang X H, Wei M Z, et al. Effects of shading on growth, development and physiological characteristics of starchy sweet potato. Chin J Trop Crops, 2017, 38: 258263 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[6] Zhang Z, Xu X M, Jin M H, et al. A new curve of critical leaf nitrogen concentration based on the maximum root dry matter for diagnosing nitrogen nutritional status of sweet potato. Eur J Agron, 2024, 156: 127176. 

[7] Taranet P, Harper S, Kirchhof G, et al. Growth and yield response of glasshouse- and field-grown sweet potato to nitrogen supply. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2017, 108: 309–321. 

[8] Shu X, Jin M H, Wang S Y, et al. The effect of nitrogen and potassium interaction on the leaf physiological characteristics, yield, and quality of sweet potato. Agronomy, 2024, 14: 2319. 

[9] Duan W, Wang Q, Zhang H, et al. Comparative study on carbon-nitrogen metabolism and endogenous hormone contents in normal and overgrown sweet potato. S Afr J Bot, 2018, 115: 199207.

[10] Duan W X, Zhang H Y, Wang Q M, et al. Regulation of root development in nitrogen-susceptible and nitrogen-tolerant sweet potato cultivars under different nitrogen and soil moisture conditions. BMC Plant Biol, 2023, 23: 454. 

[11] Duan W X, Zhang H Y, Xie B T, et al. Nitrogen utilization characteristics and early storage root development in nitrogen-tolerant and nitrogen-susceptible sweet potato. Physiol Plant, 2021, 173: 1090–1104. 

[12] 段文学, 张海燕, 解备涛, . 甘薯茎叶徒长对氮肥的响应及其表征指标研究. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(2): 33–37.
Duan W X, Zhang H Y, Xie B T, et al. Response of vine overgrowth in sweet potato to nitrogen fertilizer and its characteristic indexes. Shandong Agric Sci, 2018, 50(2): 33–37 (in Chinese with English abstract). 

[13] Wu X L, Du A Q, Zhang Y F, et al. Potassium phosphite inhibits excessive growth of new shoots in peach trees by regulating the biosynthesis of lignin and gibberellin. Sci Hortic, 2025, 344: 114112. 

[14] 伍若彤. 西双版纳黄瓜优异性状的分子标记辅助选择及CsSH1基因编辑应用. 南京农业大学硕士学位论文, 江苏南京, 2021.
Wu R T. Molecular Marker Assisted Selection for Excellent Traits and CsSH1 Gene Editing Application of Xishuangbanna Cucumber. MS Thesis of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 2021 (in Chinese with English abstract). 

[15] Zhang C L, Wu Y J, Liu X R, et al. Pivotal roles of ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL5 in regulation of plant development and fruit metabolism in tomato. Plant Physiol, 2022, 189: 527–540. 

[16] Arisha M H, Ahmad M Q, Tang W, et al. RNA-sequencing analysis revealed genes associated drought stress responses of different durations in hexaploid sweet potato. Sci Rep, 2020, 10: 12573. 

[17] Arisha M H, Aboelnasr H, Ahmad M Q, et al. Transcriptome sequencing and whole genome expression profiling of hexaploid sweet potato under salt stress. BMC Genomics, 2020, 21: 197. 

[18] Dong T T, Zhu M K, Yu J W, et al. RNA-Seq and iTRAQ reveal multiple pathways involved in storage root formation and development in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). BMC Plant Biol, 2019, 19: 136. 

[19] 刘明, 靳容, 于永超, . 徐紫薯8号优选栽插密度与氮钾施肥方案研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2025(2): 145154.

Liu M, Jin R, Yu Y C, et al. Research on optimal planting density and nitrogen and potassium fertilization scheme of Xuzishu 8. Soil Fert Sci China, 2025(2):145154 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[20] 付宇新, 胡燕, 王莉, . 植物和食品全氮含量测定方法的改进和优化. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(4): 198–200.
Fu Y X, Hu Y, Wang L, et al. Improvement and optimization of the determination method of total nitrogen in plants and food. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2021, 49(4): 198–200 (in Chinese with English abstract). 

[21] Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods, 2001, 25: 402–408. 

[22] Chen C J, Wu Y, Li J W, et al. TBtools-II: A “one for all, all for one” bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining. Mol Plant, 2023, 16: 1733–1742. 

[23] Lyu Z F, He W C, Lin L Z, et al. Development of critical shoot and root N curves for diagnosing sweet potato shoot and root N status. Field Crops Res, 2020, 257: 107927. 

[24] 徐聪, 李欢, 史衍玺. 不同施氮量对甘薯氮素吸收与分配的影响. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(2): 149–153.
Xu C, Li H, Shi Y X. The effects of different nitrogen levels on nitrogen uptake and distribution of sweet potato. J Soil Water Conserv, 2014, 28(2): 149–153 (in Chinese with English abstract). 

[25] Smith M R, Rao I M, Merchant A. Source-sink relationships in crop plants and their influence on yield development and nutritional quality. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 1889. 

[26] Golovko T K, Tabalenkova G N. Source–sink relationships in potato plants. Russ J Plant Physiol, 2019, 66: 664–671. 

[27] Duan W X, Wang Q M, Zhang H Y, et al. Differences between nitrogen-tolerant and nitrogen-susceptible sweet potato cultivars in photosynthate distribution and transport under different nitrogen conditions. PLoS One, 2018, 13: e0194570. 

[28] 柴沙沙. 甘薯不同品种碳氮代谢特性及与产量形成的关系. 山东农业大学硕士学位论文, 山东泰安, 2013.
Chai S S. The Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism Characteristics and Their Relationships to Yield of Different Sweet Potato Cultivars. MS Thesis of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong, China, 2013 (in Chinese with English abstract). 

[29] Zhang Y J, Fernie A R. The role of TCA cycle enzymes in plants. Adv Biol, 2023, 7: e2200238. 

[30] Araújo W L, Martins A O, Fernie A R, et al. 2-Oxoglutarate: linking TCA cycle function with amino acid, glucosinolate, flavonoid, alkaloid, and gibberellin biosynthesis. Front Plant Sci, 2014, 5: 552. 

[31] Wang B, Smith S M, Li J Y. Genetic regulation of shoot architecture. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2018, 69: 437–468. 

[32] 周鑫鹏. 外源独脚金内酯调节弱光胁迫下黄瓜幼苗下胚轴徒长的作用机制. 南京农业大学硕士学位论文, 江苏南京, 2022.
Zhou X P. The Mechanism of Exogenous Strigolactone Regulating Cucumber Leggy Seedlings Under Low Light Stress. MS Thesis of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 2022 (in Chinese with English abstract). 

[33] Colebrook E H, Thomas S G, Phillips A L, et al. The role of gibberellin signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress. J Exp Biol, 2014, 217: 67–75. 

[34] Davière J M, Achard P. Gibberellin signaling in plants. Development, 2013, 140: 1147–1151. 

[35] Illouz-Eliaz N, Ramon U, Shohat H, et al. Multiple gibberellin receptors contribute to phenotypic stability under changing environments. Plant Cell, 2019, 31: 1506–1519. 

[36] Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Nakajima M, Katoh E, et al. Molecular interactions of a soluble gibberellin receptor, GID1, with a rice DELLA protein, SLR1, and gibberellin. Plant Cell, 2007, 19: 2140–2155. 

[37] Harris J C, Hrmova M, Lopato S, et al. Modulation of plant growth by HD-Zip class I and II transcription factors in response to environmental stimuli. New Phytol, 2011, 190: 823–837. 

[38] Tan W R, Han Q, Li Y, et al. A HAT1-DELLA signaling module regulates trichome initiation and leaf growth by achieving gibberellin homeostasis. New Phytol, 2021, 231: 1220–1235. 

[39] Tan W R, Zhang D W, Zhou H P, et al. Transcription factor HAT1 is a substrate of SnRK2.3 kinase and negatively regulates ABA synthesis and signaling in Arabidopsis responding to drought. PLoS Genet, 2018, 14: e1007336. 

[40] Zhang S P, Zheng D Y, Gao Y Q, et al. The TIFY transcription factor ZmJAZ13 enhances plant tolerance to drought and salt stress by interacting with ZmbHLH161 and ZmA0A1D6GLB9. Plant Sci, 2025, 352: 112388. 

[41] Li Y R, Zhang Q, Wang L M, et al. New insights into the TIFY gene family of Brassica napus and its involvement in the regulation of shoot branching. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24: 17114. 

[42] Osakabe Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K, et al. Sensing the environment: key roles of membrane-localized kinases in plant perception and response to abiotic stress. J Exp Bot, 2013, 64: 445–458. 

[43] Zhou X G, Wang J, Peng C F, et al. Four receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases regulate development and immunity in rice. Plant Cell Environ, 2016, 39: 1381–1392. 

[44] He Z, Wang Z Y, Li J, et al. Perception of brassinosteroids by the extracellular domain of the receptor kinase BRI1. Science, 2000, 288: 2360–2363. 

[45] Li J M, Chory J. A putative leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase involved in brassinosteroid signal transduction. Cell, 1997, 90: 929–938. 

[46] Bowles D, Lim E K, Poppenberger B, et al. Glycosyltransferases of lipophilic small molecules. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2006, 57: 567–597. 

[47] Sun Y F, Ji K, Liang B, et al. Suppressing ABA uridine diphosphate glucosyltransferase (SlUGT75C1) alters fruit ripening and the stress response in tomato. Plant J, 2017, 91: 574–589. 

[48] Tezuka D, Matsuura H, Saburi W, et al. A ubiquitously expressed UDP-glucosyltransferase, UGT74J1, controls basal salicylic acid levels in rice. Plants, 2021, 10: 1875. 

[49] Sauer M, Robert S, Kleine-Vehn J. Auxin: simply complicated. J Exp Bot, 2013, 64: 2565–2577. 

[50] Fukui K, Hayashi K I. Manipulation and sensing of auxin metabolism, transport and signaling. Plant Cell Physiol, 2018, 59: 1500–1510. 

[51] Moreno-Piovano G S, Moreno J E, Cabello J V, et al. A role for LAX2 in regulating xylem development and lateral-vein symmetry in the leaf. Ann Bot, 2017, 120: 577–590. 

[1] ZHANG Hai-Yan, XIE Bei-Tao, DONG Shun-Xu, ZHANG Li-Ming, DUAN Wen-Xue. Effects of different types and ratios of water-soluble fertilizers on the yield and quality of table-use sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] under drip irrigation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(9): 2485-2500.
[2] JI Bai-Lu, SUN Yi-Wen, LIU Wan-Feng, QIAN Ya-Xin, JIANG Cai-Hong, GENG Rui-Mei, LIU Dan, CHENG Li-Rui, YANG Ai-Guo, HUANG Li-Yu, LI Xiao-Xu, PU Wen-Xuan, GAO Jun-Ping, ZHANG Qiang, WEN Liu-Ying. Functional verification of the key gene NtLPAT involved in lipid biosynthesis in tobacco [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(9): 2527-2537.
[3] HE Hong-Li, ZHANG Yu-Han, YANG Jing, CHENG Yun-Qing, ZHAO Yang, LI Xing-Nuo, SI Hong-Liang, ZHANG Xing-Zheng, YANG Xiang-Dong. Creation and physiological analysis of an e1-as gene mutant in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[4] YANG Xiao-Hui, YAN Xuan-Jun, YANG Wen-Yan, FU Jun-Jie, YANG Qin, XIE Yu-Xin. Effect evaluation and investigation on molecular mechanism of the ZmKL1 favorable allele in regulating maize kernel size [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(6): 1501-1513.
[5] WANG Xiao-Lin, LIU Zhong-Song, KANG Lei, YANG Liu. Mapping of silique length and seeds per silique and transcriptome profiling of pod walls in Brassica napus L. [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(4): 888-899.
[6] YANG Xin-Yue, XIAO Ren-Hao, ZHANG Lin-Xi, TANG Ming-Jun, SUN Guang-Yan, DU Kang, LYU Chang-Wen, TANG Dao-Bin, WANG Ji-Chun. Effects of waterlogging at different growth stages on the stress-resistance physiological characteristics and yield formation of sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(3): 744-754.
[7] ZHANG Jin-Ze, ZHOU Qing-Guo, YANG Xu, WANG Qian, XIAO Li-Jing, JIN Hai-Run, OU-YANG Qing-Jing, YU Kun-Jiang, TIAN En-Tang. Analysis of genes associated with expression characteristics and high resistance in response to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infection in Brassica juncea [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(3): 621-631.
[8] SUN Cheng-Ming, ZHOU Xiao-Ying, CHEN Feng, ZHANG Wei, WANG Xiao-Dong, PENG Qi, GUO Yue, GAO Jian-Qin, HU Mao-Long, FU San-Xiong, ZHANG Jie-Fu. Functional analysis and prediction of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) in the regulation of branch angle in Brassica napus L. [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(3): 559-567.
[9] ZHU Can-Can, LI Jun-Xia, JING Ya, FU Sen-Jie, QIN Na, WANG Chun-Yi, DAI Shu-Tao, WEI Xin, ZHANG Cheng-Yang. Physiological response and transcriptome analysis of foxtail millet with different shading tolerances under shading stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(12): 3211-3223.
[10] WEI Qi, HE Guan-Hua, ZHANG Deng-Feng, LI Yong-Xiang, LIU Xu-Yang, TANG Huai-Jun, LIU Cheng, WANG Tian-Yu, LI Yu, LU Yun-Cai, LI Chun-Hui. Identifying of excellent drought-tolerant gene resources based on drought- tolerant maize inbred line SL001 [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(12): 3171-3183.
[11] XU Rui, HE Miao-Hua, WANG Hao, LI Wei, REN Jie, XIA Zhi-Qiang. Spatial transcriptomic analysis of soybean embryonic responses to X-ray irradiation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(12): 3121-3132.
[12] JU Jian-Ye, YANG Liu, CHEN Hao, KANG Lei, XIA Shi-Tou, LIU Zhong-Song. Single-nucleus transcriptome analysis reveals the cellular differentiation trajectories and molecular mechanisms underlying yellow seed coat formation in rapeseed [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(11): 2860-2874.
[13] ZHAO Hui-Xia, GUO Yan-Li, ZHENG Yu-Ling, HE Ling, CHEN Rui, WANG Shan-Shan, ZENG Chang-Li, ZOU Jun, SHEN Jin-Xiong, FU Ting-Dong, LIU Xiao-Yun, WAN He-Ping. Differential gene expression analysis of response to alkaline salt stress in Brassica napus L. [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(11): 3105-3118.
[14] WANG Chen, HE Dan, YAO Min, QIU Ping, HE Xin, XIONG Xing-Hua, KANG Lei, LIU Zhong-Song, QIAN Lun-Wen. Transcriptome-based identification of flowering candidate genes and functional characterization of BnaCOR27 in Brassica napus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(10): 2693-2704.
[15] YE Liang, ZHU Ye-Lin, PEI Lin-Jing, ZHANG Si-Ying, ZUO Xue-Qian, LI Zheng-Zhen, LIU Fang, TAN Jing. Screening candidate resistance genes to ear rot caused by Fusarium verticillioides in maize by combined GWAS and transcriptome analysis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2279-2296.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!