Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 118-123.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00118

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Normal Urea and Release-Controlled Urea on Root and Shoot Growth and Yield of Maize in Different Water Conditions

SHAO Guo-Qing,LI Zeng-Jia,NING Tang-Yuan,ZHANG Min,JIANG Xiao-Dong,WANG Yun,ZHAO Jian-Bo,HU Mei-Rong,ZHAO Jie   

  1. 1College of Agronomy/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology,Shandong Agricultural University,Tai'271018,China;2College of Resource and Environment,Shandong Agricultural University,Tai'an 271018,China;3Agriculture Bureau of Longkou City,Longkiu 265701,China
  • Received:2008-04-28 Revised:2008-09-12 Online:2009-01-12 Published:2008-11-18
  • Contact: NING Tang-Yuan E-mail:ningty@163.com

Abstract:

As a prosperous fertilizer in crop production, release-controlled urea (CU) promotes the yield of maize (Zea mays L.) and nitrogen use efficiency with less environmental pollution than normal fertilizers. However, the interaction effects of CU and soil water content on the growth and development of maize have been rarely reported. In this study, the maize cultivar Zhengdan 958 was used to compare the differences of root activity, root and shoot growth, and yield between treatments with normal urea and CU under two water soil moisture conditions. The experiments were carried out in pools (10 m in length, 60 cm in width, and 1.2 m in depth) under a mobile water-proof shelter in 2006–2007. The normal urea was applied with basal (100% applied before sowing, NU) and split (40% applied before sowing and 60% applied at pretasselling stage, NS) dressing methods, whereas, the CU was totally applied before sowing. No urea applied was taken as the control. The results showed that the shoot dry weight and leaf area index of CU treatments were higher after anthesis and lower before anthesis than those of NU and NS treatments. As a result, the grain yield of CU treatment was significantly higher than those of NU and NS treatments, and the biomass of CU treatment was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those of NU treatment and control. Under the condition of soil moisture at 50% of field capacity (W1), the grain yield of CU treatment was higher than those of NU and NS treatments by 27.3% and 12.1%, respectively. Under the condition of soil moisture at 75% of field capacity (W2), the grain yield of CU treatment was higher than those of NU and NS treatments by 17.4% and 8.1%, respectively. In the same urea treatment, the average values of grain yield and biomass were higher by 20.6% and 17.0% under W2 than those under W1, respectively. Root weight, root activity, and root/shoot ratio were lower before anthesis in CU treatment than in NU and NS treatments, but higher after anthesis in CU treatment than in NU treatment. The results suggest that the CU could have a remarkable early-decrease-and-late-increase effect on maize growth, and its coupling effect with soil moisture was higher than that of normal urea. The positive coupling effect of CU might be caused by the higher root activity and root/shoot ratio after anthesis, which could increase the accumulation and transportation of dry matters in the aboveground organs.

Key words: Field water capacity, Normal urea, Controlled release urea, Maize, Root/shoot ratio, Yield

[1]Wang S-F(王淑芬), Zhang X-Y(张喜英), Pei D(裴冬). Impacts of different water supplied conditions on root distribution, yield and water utilization efficiency of winter wheat. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2006, 22(2): 27–32 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Thornley J H M. Modeling shoot: root relations: the only way forwards. Annals Bot, 1998, 81: 165–171
[3]Zhang S-Q(张岁岐), Shan L(山仑). Effects of nitrogen nutrition on the drought adaptation and water use of spring wheat. Res Soil & Water Conserv (水土保持研究), 1995, 2(1):31–36 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Ren S-J(任书杰), Zhang L-M(张雷明), Zhang S-Q(张岁岐), Shang-Guan Z-P(上官周平). The effect of nitrogen nutrition on coordinate growth of root and shoot of winter wheat. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident (西北植物学报), 2003, 23(3):395–400 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Zhang F-X(张凤翔), Zhou M-Y(周明耀), Zhou C-L(周春林), Qian X-Q(钱晓晴). Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on root morphological characteristics and activities of rice. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2006, 22(5):197–200 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Sabata R J, Mason S C. Corn hybrid interactions with soil nitrogen level and water regime. J Prod Agric, 1992, 5: 137–142
[7]Ogola J B O, Wheeler T R, Harris P M. Effects of nitrogen and irrigation on water use of maize crops. Field Crops Res, 2002, 78: 105–117
[8]Zand-Parsa S, Sepaskhah A R, Ronaghi A. Development and evaluation of integrated water and nitrogen model for maize. Agric Water Manag, 2006, 81: 227–256
[9]Kirda C, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ulger A C, Yazici A, Cetin M, Derici M R. Grain yield response and N-fertilizer recovery of maize under deficit irrigation. Field Crops Res, 2005, 93: 132–141
[10]Zhang W-X(张卫星), Zhao Z(赵致), Bai G-X(柏光晓), Fu F-J(付芳婧), Cao S-S(曹绍书). Response on water stress and low nitrogen in different maize hybrid varieties and evaluation for their adversity-resistance. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(7): 1361–1370 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Sun K-J(孙克君), Mao X-Y(毛小云), Lu Q-M(卢其明), Liao Z-W(廖宗文). Manurial effect of several controlled-release N fertilizers (CRNFs) on forage maize and its physiological effects. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2005, 11(3): 345–351 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Wang Y(王艳), Wang X-B(王小波), Wang X-J(王小晶), Zhang Y(张渊), Su X-J(苏霄倩). Research on increase yield mechanisms of coated slow-release fertilizers and N utilization ratio by tracing. J Soil & Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 2006, 20(5): 109–111 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Diez J A, Roman R, Cartagena M C, Vallejo A, Bustos A, Caballero R. Controlling nitrate pollution of aquifers by using different nitrogenous controlled release fertilizers in maize crop. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 1994, 48: 49–56
[14]Shoji S, Gandeza A T, Kimura K. Simulation of crop response to polyolefin-coated urea: II. Nitrogen uptake by corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1991, 55: 1468–1473
[15]Gao J-F(高俊凤). Laboratory Techniques for Plant Physiology(植物生理学实验技术). Xi’an: World Books Publishing Company, 2000. pp 92–93 (in Chinese)
[16]Zhang M(张民), Shi Y-X(史衍玺), Yang S-X(杨守祥), Yang Y-C(杨越超). Status quo of study of controlled-release and slow-release fertilizers and progress made in this respect. J Chem Fert Ind (化肥工业), 2001, 28(5): 27–30, 63 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]Shoji S. Innovative use of controlled availability fertilizers with high performance for intensive agriculture and environmental conservation. Sci China (Ser C: Life Sci), 2005, 48(z2): 912–920
[18]Gao Y-J(高亚军), Li S-X(李生秀), Tian X-H(田霄鸿), Li S-Q(李世清), Wang Z-H(王朝辉), Du J-J(杜建军). Effects of water supply levels in different growth stages on maize yield under different fertilizer levels. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(3): 415–422 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] WANG Dan, ZHOU Bao-Yuan, MA Wei, GE Jun-Zhu, DING Zai-Song, LI Cong-Feng, ZHAO Ming. Characteristics of the annual distribution and utilization of climate resource for double maize cropping system in the middle reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] WANG Wang-Nian, GE Jun-Zhu, YANG Hai-Chang, YIN Fa-Ting, HUANG Tai-Li, KUAI Jie, WANG Jing, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong. Adaptation of feed crops to saline-alkali soil stress and effect of improving saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] YAN Jia-Qian, GU Yi-Biao, XUE Zhang-Yi, ZHOU Tian-Yang, GE Qian-Qian, ZHANG Hao, LIU Li-Jun, WANG Zhi-Qin, GU Jun-Fei, YANG Jian-Chang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, XU Da-Yong. Different responses of rice cultivars to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] CHEN Jing, REN Bai-Zhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-Wang. Regulation of leaf-spraying glycine betaine on yield formation and antioxidation of summer maize sowed in different dates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] LI Yi-Jun, LYU Hou-Quan. Effect of agricultural meteorological disasters on the production corn in the Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] SHAN Lu-Ying, LI Jun, LI Liang, ZHANG Li, WANG Hao-Qian, GAO Jia-Qi, WU Gang, WU Yu-Hua, ZHANG Xiu-Jie. Development of genetically modified maize (Zea mays L.) NK603 matrix reference materials [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1059-1070.
[8] SHI Yan-Yan, MA Zhi-Hua, WU Chun-Hua, ZHOU Yong-Jin, LI Rong. Effects of ridge tillage with film mulching in furrow on photosynthetic characteristics of potato and yield formation in dryland farming [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[9] YAN Xiao-Yu, GUO Wen-Jun, QIN Du-Lin, WANG Shuang-Lei, NIE Jun-Jun, ZHAO Na, QI Jie, SONG Xian-Liang, MAO Li-Li, SUN Xue-Zhen. Effects of cotton stubble return and subsoiling on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, and yield of cotton in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[10] KE Jian, CHEN Ting-Ting, WU Zhou, ZHU Tie-Zhong, SUN Jie, HE Hai-Bing, YOU Cui-Cui, ZHU De-Quan, WU Li-Quan. Suitable varieties and high-yielding population characteristics of late season rice in the northern margin area of double-cropping rice along the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[11] XU Jing, GAO Jing-Yang, LI Cheng-Cheng, SONG Yun-Xia, DONG Chao-Pei, WANG Zhao, LI Yun-Meng, LUAN Yi-Fan, CHEN Jia-Fa, ZHOU Zi-Jian, WU Jian-Yu. Overexpression of ZmCIPKHT enhances heat tolerance in plant [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 851-859.
[12] LIU Lei, ZHAN Wei-Min, DING Wu-Si, LIU Tong, CUI Lian-Hua, JIANG Liang-Liang, ZHANG Yan-Pei, YANG Jian-Ping. Genetic analysis and molecular characterization of dwarf mutant gad39 in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 886-895.
[13] LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[14] WANG Lyu, CUI Yue-Zhen, WU Yu-Hong, HAO Xing-Shun, ZHANG Chun-Hui, WANG Jun-Yi, LIU Yi-Xin, LI Xiao-Gang, QIN Yu-Hang. Effects of rice stalks mulching combined with green manure (Astragalus smicus L.) incorporated into soil and reducing nitrogen fertilizer rate on rice yield and soil fertility [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[15] YAN Yu-Ting, SONG Qiu-Lai, YAN Chao, LIU Shuang, ZHANG Yu-Hui, TIAN Jing-Fen, DENG Yu-Xuan, MA Chun-Mei. Nitrogen accumulation and nitrogen substitution effect of maize under straw returning with continuous cropping [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!