Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 740-754.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.82030

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of different soil tillage systems on physiological characteristics and yield of double-cropping rice

Hai-Ming TANG(),Xiao-Ping XIAO,Chao LI,Wen-Guang TANG,Li-Jun GUO,Ke WANG,Kai-Kai CHENG,Xiao-Chen PAN,Gen SUN   

  1. Hunan Soil and Fertilizer Institute, Changsha 410125, Hunan, China
  • Received:2018-05-26 Accepted:2019-01-12 Online:2019-05-12 Published:2019-02-26
  • Contact: Hai-Ming TANG E-mail:tanghaiming66@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(2017JJ1018);the Public Research Funds Projects of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture of the China(201503123);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31872851);the National Key Research and Development Project(2018YFD0301004)

RichHTML348

23

PDF

923

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of different soil tillage systems on physiological characteristics, dry matter accumulation and grain yield, a fixed location field experiment was conducted using early and late double-cropping rice and Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) system with four soil tillage treatments including conventional tillage with residue incorporation (CT), rotary tillage with residue incorporation (RT), no-tillage with residue retention (NT), and rotary tillage with residue removed as control (RTO) from 2016 to 2017. The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) in leaves of CT, RT treatments were increased as compared with those of RTO treatment at different main growth stages of early and late rice. Meanwhile, malondialdehyde (MDA) contents in leaves of CT and RT treatments were decreased. At different main growth stages of early and late rice, the activities of SOD, POD, and CAT in leaves of CT and RT treatments were significantly higher than those of RTO treatment (P<0.05), while MDA contents of CT and RT treatments were significantly lower than those of RTO treatment (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) in leaves of CT treatment were significantly higher than those of RTO treatment (P < 0.05), showing an order of CT > RT > NT > RTO. The results also indicated that the total dry matter accumulation of early and late rice were increased, and its reasonable distribution of rice plant in CT and RT treatments. In 2016 and 2017, the grain yield of early and late rice in CT treatment was significantly higher than that in RTO treatment (P<0.05), with an increase of 731.1-733.3 kg ha -1 and 582.5-717.6 kg ha -1, respectively. As a result, it is an effective way for improving protective enzyme activities and photosynthetic characteristics in leaves, dry matter accumulation of rice by conventional tillage and rotational tillage combined with residue incorporation practices, which results in higher grain yield of rice.

Key words: rice, soil tillage, physiological characteristics, protective enzyme, rice yield

Fig. 1

Effects of different soil tillage treatments on SPAD of rice leaves CT: conventional tillage with residue incorporation; RT: rotary tillage with residue incorporation; NT: no tillage with residue retention; RTO: rotary tillage with residue removed. SS: seedling stage; TS: tillering stage; BS: booting stage; HS: heading stage; MS: maturity stage. Bars superscripted by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level."

Fig. 2

Effects of different soil tillage treatments on MDA content of rice leaves Abbreviations of treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1. Bars superscripted by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level."

Fig. 3

Effects of different soil tillage treatments on SOD activity of rice leaves Abbreviations of treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1. Bars superscripted by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level."

Fig. 4

Effects of different soil tillage treatments on POD activity of rice leaves Abbreviations of treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1. Bars superscripted by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level."

Fig. 5

Effects of different soil tillage treatments on CAT activity of rice leaves Abbreviations of treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1. Bars superscripted by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level."

Fig. 6

Dynamic changes of net photosynthetic rate of rice leaves under different soil tillage treatment conditions Abbreviations of treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1. Bars superscripted by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level."

Fig. 7

Dynamic changes of stomatal conductance of rice leaves under different soil tillage treatment conditions Abbreviations of treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1. Bars superscripted by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level."

Fig. 8

Dynamic changes of transpiration rate of rice leaves under different soil tillage treatment conditions Abbreviations of treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1. Bars superscripted by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level."

Fig. 9

Characteristics of leaf area index of rice under different soil tillage treatment conditions Abbreviations of treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1. Bars superscripted by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level."

Table 1

Characteristics of dry matter weight of population at different main growth stages of rice with different soil tillage managements"

Table 2

Characteristics of stem,leaf and panicle dry weight of population at different main growth stages of rice with different soil tillage managements(kg hm-2)"

Table 3

Effects of different soil tillage treatments on yield and yield component of rice"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 有效穗
Effective panicle
(×104 hm-2)		 每穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle		 结实率
Seed setting rate (%)		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 产量
Yield (kg hm-2)		 收获指数Harvest index
早稻 Early rice
2016 CT 366.8±9.2a 105.1±3.0a 78.56±2.27a 24.65±0.68a 6469.5±230.4a 0.50±0.01a
RT 360.6±10.6a 102.8±2.9a 75.82±2.10ab 24.54±0.71a 6270.3±230.4ab 0.51±0.01a
NT 351.3±10.1a 100.3±2.8a 72.64±2.24ab 24.23±0.70a 6036.7±162.9ab 0.52±0.02a
RTO 346.9±7.6a 100.5±2.9a 70.25±2.03b 24.16±0.70a 5736.2±163.8b 0.52±0.02a
2017 CT 367.9±11.1a 103.2±2.6a 78.86±2.24a 24.73±0.62a 6543.6±166.5a 0.48±0.01a
RT 362.1±11.4a 100.9±2.4a 76.14±2.14ab 24.65±0.64a 6369.4±171.9ab 0.49±0.01a
NT 353.3±10.7a 98.4±2.8a 72.96±2.16ab 24.32±0.66a 6088.7±160.2ab 0.50±0.01a
RTO 348.5±12.5a 98.6±2.2a 70.53±2.12b 24.24±0.60a 5812.5±163.8b 0.50±0.01a
晚稻 Late rice
2016 CT 369.8±10.6a 103.5±2.8a 83.15±2.39a 25.31±0.71a 6970.2±144.9a 0.49±0.01a
RT 362.0±10.3a 101.8±2.8a 82.83±2.39ab 25.33±0.73a 6787.5±100.8ab 0.50±0.01a
NT 356.4±10.2a 100.3±2.8a 82.16±2.37ab 25.15±0.70a 6670.6±144.9ab 0.52±0.02a
RTO 355.7±10.2a 98.6±2.7a 80.27±2.32b 25.04±0.71a 6387.7±169.2b 0.53±0.02a
2017 CT 366.5±10.6a 102.1±2.7a 84.24±2.35a 25.42±0.71a 6919.1±103.5a 0.47±0.01a
RT 358.9±10.3a 100.4±2.8a 83.92±2.37ab 25.44±0.74a 6760.4±137.7ab 0.48±0.01a
NT 353.3±10.8a 98.9±2.6a 83.66±2.38ab 25.27±0.75a 6546.6±115.2ab 0.49±0.01a
RTO 352.9±10.7a 97.2±2.7a 81.37±2.31b 25.13±0.70a 6201.5±111.6b 0.50±0.01a
[1] Huang M, Zou Y, Jiang P, Xia B, Feng Y, Cheng Z, Mo Y . Effect of tillage on soil and crop properties of wet-seeded flooded rice. Field Crops Res, 2012,129:28-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.01.013
[2] Roger-Estrade J, Anger C, Bertrand M, Richard G . Tillage and soil ecology: partners for sustainable agriculture. Soil Tillage Res, 2010,111:33-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2010.08.010
[3] An V D P, Govers G, Diels J, Gillijns K, Demuzere M . Assessing the effect of soil tillage on crop growth: a meta-regression analysis on European crop yields under conservation agriculture. Eur J Agron, 2010,33:231-241.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2010.05.008
[4] Huang S, Sun Y N, Rui W Y, Liu W R, Zhang W J . Long-term effect of no-tillage on soil organic carbon fractions in a continuous maize cropping system of northeast China. Pedosphere, 2010,20:285-292.
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60016-1
[5] 石彦琴, 高旺盛, 陈源泉, 隋鹏, 杨斌, 汪洪焦, 聂紫瑾 . 耕层厚度对华北高产灌溉农田土壤有机碳储量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2010,26(11):85-90.
Shi Y Q, Gao W S, Chen Y Q, Sui P, Yang B, Wang H J, Nie Z J . Effect of topsoil thickness on soil organic carbon in high-yield and irrigated farmland in North China. Trans CSAE, 2010,26(11):85-90 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 汤军, 黄山, 谭雪明, 石庆华, 潘晓华 . 不同耕作方式对机插双季水稻产量的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2014,36:996-1001.
Tang J, Huang S, Tan X M, Shi Q H, Pan X H . Effect of different tillage regimes on rice yield under mechanical transplanting in a double rice cropping system. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2014,36:996-1001 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 姚秀娟 . 翻耕与旋耕作业对水稻生产的影响. 现代化农业, 2007, ( 7):27-28.
Yao S J . Effects of tillage and rotary tillage on rice production. Modern Agric, 2007, ( 7):27-28 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 徐尚起, 张明园, 孙国峰, 汤文光, 陈阜, 张海林 . 应用耕作指数评价耕作措施对双季稻田土壤质量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011,44:3999-4006.
Xu S Q, Zhang M Y, Sun G F, Tang W G, Chen F, Zhang H L . Assessment of tillage effects on soil quality for double-rice paddy with tilth index. Sci Agric Sin, 2011,44:3999-4006 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 全妙华, 胡爱生, 欧立军, 胡冬炎, 李必湖 . 耕作方式对水稻光合及根系生理特性的影响. 杂交水稻, 2012,27(3) : 71-75.
Quan M H, Hu A S, Ou L J, Hu D Y, Li B H . Effects of tillage mode on characteristics of photosynthesis and root growth of rice. Hybrid Rice, 2012,27(3):71-75 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 刘金花, 秦江涛, 张斌, 夏桂龙, 陆金贵, 甘三芽, 余瑞新 . 赣东北双季水稻轻型种植和耕作模式评价. 土壤, 2012,44:482-491.
Liu J H, Qin J T, Zhang B, Xia G L, Lu J G, Gan S Y, Yu R X . Effects of different light cultivation on rice growth, yields and economic benefits in northeast area of Jiangxi province. Soils, 2012,44:482-491 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 朱利群, 张大伟, 卞新民 . 连续秸秆还田与耕作方式轮换对稻麦轮作田土壤理化性状变化及水稻产量构成的影响. 土壤通报, 2011,42:81-85.
Zhu L Q, Zhang D W, Bian X M . Effects of continuous returning straws to field and shifting different tillage methods on changes of physical-chemical properties of soil and yield components of rice. Chin J Soil Sci, 2011,42:81-85 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 李华兴, 卢维盛, 刘远金, 张新明, 陈喜崇, 李永锋, 霍锦添 . 不同耕作方法对水稻生长和土壤生态的影响. 应用生态学报, 2001,12:553-556.
Li H X, Lu W S, Liu Y J, Zhang X M, Chen X C, Li Y F, Huo J T . Effect of different tillage methods on rice growth and soil ecology. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2001,12:553-556 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 陈达刚, 周新桥, 李丽君, 刘传光, 张旭, 陈友订 . 华南主栽高产籼稻根系形态特征及其与产量构成的关系. 作物学报, 2013,39:1899-1908.
Chen D G, Zhou X Q, Li L J, Liu C G, Zhang X, Chen Y D . Relationship between root morphological characteristics and yield components of major commercial indica rice in South China. Acta Agron Sin, 2013,39:1899-1908 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 谷子寒, 王元元, 帅泽宇, 陈平平, 敖和军, 屠乃美, 易镇邪, 周文新 . 土壤耕作方式对水稻产量形成特性的影响初探. 作物研究, 2017,31:103-109.
Gu Z H, Wang Y Y, Shuai Z Y, Chen P P, Ao H J, Tu N M, Yi Z X, Zhou W X . Preliminary study about the effects of soil tillage ways on the yield formation characteristics of rice. Crop Res, 2017,31:103-109 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 李合生 . 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. pp 164-260.
Li H S. Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Experiments. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. pp 164-260(in Chinese).
[16] 吴建富, 曾研华, 赵新帆, 范呈根, 潘晓华, 石庆华 . 耕作方式对双季机插水稻产量和土壤理化性质的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,43:581-585.
Wu J F, Zeng Y H, Zhao X H, Fan C G, Pan X H, Shi Q H . Effects of tillage methods on yield of double cropping rice with machine-transplanted and soil physical-chemical properties. J Hunan Agric Univ ( Nat Sci), 2017,43:581-585 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] Xu Y, Nie L, Buresh R J, Huang J L, Cui K H . Agronomic performance of late-season rice under different tillage, straw, and nitrogen management. Field Crops Res, 2010,115:79-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.005
[18] 黄小洋, 漆映雪, 黄国勤, 张兆飞, 刘隆旺, 章秀福, 高旺盛 . 稻田保护性耕作研究I: 免耕对水稻产量、生长动态及害虫数量的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2005,27:530-534.
Huang X Y, Qi Y X, Huang G Q, Zhang Z F, Liu L W, Zhang X F, Gao W S . Studies on paddy field conservation tillage: I. Effects of paddy field conservation tillage on rice yield, growth dynamics and pest quantity. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2005,27:530-534 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 李继明, 黄庆海, 袁天佑, 曹金华, 余喜初 . 长期施用绿肥对红壤稻田水稻产量和土壤养分的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011,17:563-570.
Li J M, Huang Q H, Yuan T Y, Cao J H, Yu X C . Effects of long-term green manure application on rice yield and soil nutrients in paddy soil. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2011,17:563-570 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 黄国勤, 杨滨娟, 王淑彬, 黄小洋, 张兆飞, 姚珍, 黄禄星, 赵其国 . 稻田实行保护性耕作对水稻产量、土壤理化及生物学性状的影响. 生态学报, 2015,35:1225-1234.
Huang G Q, Yang B J, Wang S B, Huang X Y, Zhang Z F, Yao Z, Huang L X, Zhao Q G . Effects of 8 years of conservational tillage on rice yield and soil physical, chemical and biological properties. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015,35:1225-1234 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 关欣, 陈温福, 殷红, 李振兴, 吕香玲 . 不同年代水稻品种齐穗后叶片保护酶活性及膜脂过氧化作用比较分析. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003,34:351-354.
Guan X, Chen W F, Yin H, Li Z X, Lyu X L . Comparison on the protective enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation after full heading stage among rice varieties developed in different years. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2003,34:351-354 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] Baily C, Benamar A, Corbineau F, Come D . Changes in malondialdehyde content and in superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione reductase activities in sunflower seeds as related to deterioration during accelerated aging. Physiol Plant, 1996,97:104-110.
doi: 10.1111/ppl.1996.97.issue-1
[23] 兰全美, 张锡洲, 李廷轩 . 水旱轮作条件下免耕土壤主要理化特性研究. 水土保持学报, 2009,23(1):145-149.
Lan Q M, Zhang X Z, Li T X . Study on main physicochemical properties in no-tillage soil under paddy-upland rotation. J Soil Water Conserv, 2009,23(1):145-149 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 刘武仁, 陈砚, 郑金玉, 罗洋, 郑洪兵, 李伟堂 . 不同耕作方式对玉米产量及叶片某些生理机制的影响. 玉米科学, 2009,17(2):112-115.
Liu W R, Chen Y, Zheng J Y, Luo Y, Zheng H B, Li W T . Studies on comparison of yield and some physiological traits of maize leaves under different tillage methods. J Maize Sci, 2009,17(2):112-115 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 孟庆阳, 王永华, 靳海洋, 晁岳恩, 段剑钊, 郭天财 . 耕作方式与秸秆还田对沙姜黑土土壤酶活性及冬小麦产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2016,36:341-346.
Meng Q Y, Wang Y H, Jin H Y, Chao Y E, Duan J Z, Guo T C . Effect of tillage and straw returning on soil enzyme activity and yield of winter wheat in lime concretion black soil. J Triticeae Crops, 2016,36:341-346 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] TIAN Tian, CHEN Li-Juan, HE Hua-Qin. Identification of rice blast resistance candidate genes based on integrating Meta-QTL and RNA-seq analysis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] ZHENG Chong-Ke, ZHOU Guan-Hua, NIU Shu-Lin, HE Ya-Nan, SUN wei, XIE Xian-Zhi. Phenotypic characterization and gene mapping of an early senescence leaf H5(esl-H5) mutant in rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] ZHOU Wen-Qi, QIANG Xiao-Xia, WANG Sen, JIANG Jing-Wen, WEI Wan-Rong. Mechanism of drought and salt tolerance of OsLPL2/PIR gene in rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] ZHENG Xiao-Long, ZHOU Jing-Qing, BAI Yang, SHAO Ya-Fang, ZHANG Lin-Ping, HU Pei-Song, WEI Xiang-Jin. Difference and molecular mechanism of soluble sugar metabolism and quality of different rice panicle in japonica rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] YAN Jia-Qian, GU Yi-Biao, XUE Zhang-Yi, ZHOU Tian-Yang, GE Qian-Qian, ZHANG Hao, LIU Li-Jun, WANG Zhi-Qin, GU Jun-Fei, YANG Jian-Chang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, XU Da-Yong. Different responses of rice cultivars to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] YANG Jian-Chang, LI Chao-Qing, JIANG Yi. Contents and compositions of amino acids in rice grains and their regulation: a review [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] DENG Zhao, JIANG Nan, FU Chen-Jian, YAN Tian-Zhe, FU Xing-Xue, HU Xiao-Chun, QIN Peng, LIU Shan-Shan, WANG Kai, YANG Yuan-Zhu. Analysis of blast resistance genes in Longliangyou and Jingliangyou hybrid rice varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1071-1080.
[8] YANG De-Wei, WANG Xun, ZHENG Xing-Xing, XIANG Xin-Quan, CUI Hai-Tao, LI Sheng-Ping, TANG Ding-Zhong. Functional studies of rice blast resistance related gene OsSAMS1 [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[9] ZHU Zheng, WANG Tian-Xing-Zi, CHEN Yue, LIU Yu-Qing, YAN Gao-Wei, XU Shan, MA Jin-Jiao, DOU Shi-Juan, LI Li-Yun, LIU Guo-Zhen. Rice transcription factor WRKY68 plays a positive role in Xa21-mediated resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[10] WANG Xiao-Lei, LI Wei-Xing, OU-YANG Lin-Juan, XU Jie, CHEN Xiao-Rong, BIAN Jian-Min, HU Li-Fang, PENG Xiao-Song, HE Xiao-Peng, FU Jun-Ru, ZHOU Da-Hu, HE Hao-Hua, SUN Xiao-Tang, ZHU Chang-Lan. QTL mapping for plant architecture in rice based on chromosome segment substitution lines [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[11] WANG Ze, ZHOU Qin-Yang, LIU Cong, MU Yue, GUO Wei, DING Yan-Feng, NINOMIYA Seishi. Estimation and evaluation of paddy rice canopy characteristics based on images from UAV and ground camera [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[12] KE Jian, CHEN Ting-Ting, WU Zhou, ZHU Tie-Zhong, SUN Jie, HE Hai-Bing, YOU Cui-Cui, ZHU De-Quan, WU Li-Quan. Suitable varieties and high-yielding population characteristics of late season rice in the northern margin area of double-cropping rice along the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[13] CHEN Yue, SUN Ming-Zhe, JIA Bo-Wei, LENG Yue, SUN Xiao-Li. Research progress regarding the function and mechanism of rice AP2/ERF transcription factor in stress response [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[14] WANG Lyu, CUI Yue-Zhen, WU Yu-Hong, HAO Xing-Shun, ZHANG Chun-Hui, WANG Jun-Yi, LIU Yi-Xin, LI Xiao-Gang, QIN Yu-Hang. Effects of rice stalks mulching combined with green manure (Astragalus smicus L.) incorporated into soil and reducing nitrogen fertilizer rate on rice yield and soil fertility [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[15] QIN Qin, TAO You-Feng, HUANG Bang-Chao, LI Hui, GAO Yun-Tian, ZHONG Xiao-Yuan, ZHOU Zhong-Lin, ZHU Li, LEI Xiao-Long, FENG Sheng-Qiang, WANG Xu, REN Wan-Jun. Characteristics of panicle stem growth and flowering period of the parents of hybrid rice in machine-transplanted seed production [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 988-1004.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd