Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 586-595.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.91038

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION · PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of planting density on lodging resistance and straw forage characteristics in two hulless barley varieties

ZHAO Xiao-Hong1,BAI Yi-Xiong1,2,3,*(),WANG Kai1,YAO You-Hua1,2,YAO Xiao-Hua1,2,WU Kun-Lun1,2,*()   

  1. 1 Agriculture and Forestry Academy, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, Qinghai, China
    2 222Qinghai Key Laboratory of Hulless Barley Genetics and Breeding / Hulless Barley Branch of State Wheat Improvement Centre, Xining 810016, Qinghai, China
    3 College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
  • Received:2019-05-20 Accepted:2019-09-26 Online:2020-04-12 Published:2019-10-14
  • Contact: Yi-Xiong BAI,Kun-Lun WU E-mail:yixiongbai@163.com;wklqaaf@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Qinghai Provincial Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Innovation Fund Key Research and Development Project(2019-NKY-01);the China Agriculture Research System (Barley and Hulless Barley)(CAS-05);the Qinghai University Young and Middle-aged Research Fund Project(2017-QNY-2)

RichHTML367

13

PDF

1015

Abstract:

Planting density is an important factor affecting the lodging resistance and straw feeding characteristics of hulless barley. Two varieties the lodging-resistant variety Kunlun 14 and the lodging variety Menyuanlianglan, were used to study the effects of planting density on the growth and development, lodging characteristics and straw feeding characteristics. The effects of planting density on two varieties were not entirely consistent. With the increase of planting density, the traits of root and stem increased firstly and decreased then in Kunlun 14, whereas gradually decreased in Menyuanlianglan; and the relative lodging-resistance indexes of Kunlun 14 were increased firstly and decreased then, without lodging occurred, while these in Menyuanlianglan were significantly declined, resulted in lodging in early stage, lodging rate and degree increased; the chemical constituents neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin in the stem of Kunlun 14 increased firstly and decreased then with the increase of planting density, whereas these of Menyuanlianglan showed a downward trend, with the increased relative feeding value. Based on lodging resistance and straw forage characteristics of two varieties, we concluded that the suitable density of Kunlun 14 should be 3.75×10 6 plants hm -2, and that of Menyuanlianglan for grain and forage should be 3.00×10 6 to 3.75×10 6 plants hm -2.

Key words: hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare L. var. nudum Hook. f.), planting density, growth and development, lodging resistance, forage characteristics

Table 1

Effect of planting density on stem and root characteristics"

品种
Variety		 处理Treatment 株高
Plant height (cm)		 茎粗 Internode external diameter (mm) 壁厚 Internode wall thickness (mm) 根长
Root length (mm)		 体积
Root volume (cm3)		 根干重
Root dry weight (g)		 根数
Root number
基部第2节
2nd node from the base		 基部第3节
3rd node from the base		 基部第4节
4th node from the base		 基部第2节
2nd node from the base		 基部第3节
3rd node from the base		 基部第4节
4th node from the base
2017
昆仑14号
Kunlun 14		 T1 108.78 b 4.29 a 3.84 a 3.99 a 0.48 a 0.47 a 0.39 a 71.75 e 0.16 a 0.32 bc 23.80 d
T2 112.07 a 3.78 ab 3.60 ab 3.78 ab 0.41 ab 0.42 ab 0.31 b 76.08 c 0.17 a 0.33 bc 26.18 c
T3 112.31 a 3.47 b 3.44 ab 3.68 b 0.38 ab 0.40 ab 0.31 b 105.74 a 0.18 a 0.47 a 27.67 b
T4 112.93 a 3.43 b 3.37 ab 3.59 b 0.37 ab 0.38 b 0.28 b 84.52 b 0.17 a 0.39 ab 29.16 a
T5 112.47 a 2.70 c 3.14 b 3.53 b 0.36 b 0.37 b 0.27 b 73.98 d 0.14 a 0.26 c 27.67 b
门源亮蓝
Menyuanlianglan		 T1 114.42 a 3.30 a 2.99 a 2.88 a 0.29 a 0.29 a 0.22 a 98.10 a 0.18 a 0.28 a 26.01 a
T2 112.64 a 2.98 ab 2.72 ab 2.62 ab 0.28 ab 0.29 a 0.22 a 88.82 b 0.17 a 0.19 b 18.06 b
T3 111.51 a 2.83 b 2.57 b 2.57 abc 0.26 ab 0.28 a 0.20 a 62.22 c 0.14 ab 0.12 c 16.53 c
T4 113.61 a 2.79 b 2.52 b 2.42 bc 0.22 ab 0.22 ab 0.18 a 47.08 d 0.10 b 0.11 c 15.00 d
T5 111.84 a 2.38 c 2.52 b 2.32 c 0.20 b 0.20 b 0.18 a 44.70 e 0.08 b 0.08 d 14.38 d
2018
昆仑14号
Kunlun 14		 T1 118.97 b 3.9.0 a 3.50 a 3.50 a 0.41 a 0.40 a 0.32 a 67.69 d 0.16 a 0.25 bc 20.00 b
T2 122.57 a 3.43 b 3.21 ab 3.32 a 0.35 b 0.35 ab 0.26 b 71.77 c 0.15 ab 0.26 bc 22.00 ab
T3 122.83 a 3.15 b 3.07 bc 3.23 a 0.33 b 0.33 ab 0.25 b 99.75 a 0.13 ab 0.37 a 24.75 a
T4 121.30 a 3.12 b 3.01 bc 3.15 a 0.32 b 0.32 b 0.23 b 79.74 b 0.12 bc 0.31 ab 24.50 a
T5 120.68 ab 2.45 c 2.80 c 3.10 a 0.31 b 0.31 b 0.23 b 69.78 cd 0.101 c 0.21 c 23.25 a
门源亮蓝
Menyuanlianglan		 T1 122.87 a 3.03 a 2.67 a 2.69 a 0.21 a 0.21 a 0.16 a 71.72 a 0.12 a 0.18 a 21.25 a
T2 120.96 b 2.74 a 2.45 a 2.45 a 0.20 a 0.20 a 0.16 a 64.94 b 0.10 ab 0.12 b 14.75 b
T3 119.75 b 2.60 a 2.32 a 2.40 a 0.19 a 0.20 a 0.14 a 45.49 c 0.07 bc 0.08 c 13.50 bc
T4 122.00 a 2.56 a 2.27 a 2.26 a 0.16 ab 0.16 a 0.13 a 34.42 d 0.06 c 0.07 cd 12.25 c
T5 120.10 b 2.18 b 2.21 a 2.17 a 0.14 b 0.14 a 0.13 a 32.68 e 0.04 c 0.05 d 11.75 c

Fig. 1

Effect of planting density on grain yield T1: 1.50 ×106 plants hm-2; T2: 2.25×106 plants hm-2; T3: 3.00×106 plants hm-2; T4: 3.75×106 plants hm-2; T5: 4.50 ×106 plants hm-2."

Table 2

Effect of planting density on lodging characteristics"

品种
Variety		 处理
Treatment		 茎长 Stem length (cm) 茎重 Stem weight (g) 茎秆强度 Stem strength 穗重
Panicle weight (g)
基部第2节
2nd node from the base		 基部第3节
3rd node from the base		 基部第4节
4th node from the base		 基部第2节
2nd node from the base		 基部第3节
3rd node from the base		 基部第4节
4th node from the base		 基部第2节
2nd node from the base		 基部第3节
3rd node from the base		 基部第4节
4th node from the base
2017
昆仑14号
Kunlun 14		 T1 10.56 b 13.36 a 22.84 a 0.28 b 0.24 b 0.27 b 10.60 ab 6.57 a 6.28 a 3.26 ab
T2 10.76 b 13.95 a 20.05 a 0.29 b 0.27 b 0.28 b 14.54 ab 7.15 a 6.38 a 3.19 ab
T3 13.07 a 16.30 a 23.31 a 0.35 a 0.40 a 0.36 a 19.34 a 9.11 a 7.10 a 3.47 a
T4 12.50 a 15.00 a 21.36 a 0.25 b 0.23 bc 0.24 b 9.92 b 5.99 a 5.98 a 3.06 b
T5 11.84 ab 14.23 a 20.75 a 0.24 b 0.22 c 0.23 b 9.54 b 4.15 b 5.61 a 3.50 a
门源亮蓝Menyuanlianglan T1 13.65 c 14.99 b 17.94 c 0.14 ab 0.16 ab 0.16 b 4.07 b 1.85 b 1.61 b 0.92 b
T2 13.10 c 14.90 b 17.00 c 0.15 a 0.16 a 0.19 a 4.63 a 2.35 a 2.07 a 1.89 a
T3 14.36 bc 16.06 b 18.49 bc 0.13 b 0.15 abc 0.15 b 2.97 c 1.56 c 1.54 b 0.92 b
T4 16.22 ab 16.27 ac 20.13 ab 0.11 c 0.13 bc 0.14 b 2.10 d 1.48 c 1.33 c 0.66 c
T5 16.96 a 18.51 a 20.55 a 0.10 c 0.12 c 0.14 b 1.77 d 1.413 c 1.30 c 0.62 c
2018
昆仑14号
Kunlun 14		 T1 11.25 d 14.15 d 21.67 c 0.28 a 0.34 a 0.28 a 7.31 c 4.45 b 4.76 a 6.08 a
T2 13.3 b 15.00 cd 22.28 bc 0.23 ab 0.21 b 0.22 a 10.03 b 4.84 b 4.01 cd 6.13 a
T3 13.9 a 17.53 a 25.90 a 0.22 b 0.19 b 0.21 a 13.34 a 6.61 a 4.21 bc 6.73 a
T4 12.6 c 16.13 b 23.73 b 0.20 b 0.19 b 0.19 a 6.84 d 4.06 b 4.23 bc 6.38 a
T5 11.45 d 15.3 bc 22.68 bc 0.19 b 0.17 b 0.18 a 6.58 d 2.81 c 3.76 d 6.20 a
门源亮蓝Menyuanlianglan T1 14.28 d 16.30 c 18.68 c 0.14 a 0.15 a 0.17 a 3.73 a 1.86 a 1.61 a 4.03 b
T2 14.87 d 16.40 c 19.70 bc 0.13 a 0.14 a 0.14 ab 3.28 a 1.49 a 1.25 b 5.60 a
T3 15.65 c 17.57 b 20.30 b 0.12 a 0.13 a 0.13 ab 2.39 b 1.24 a 1.20 b 3.93 b
T4 17.67 b 17.80 b 22.10 a 0.10 a 0.12 a 0.11 bc 1.69 bc 1.17 a 1.03 b 3.78 b
T5 18.48 a 20.25 a 22.93 a 0.09 a 0.11 a 0.08 c 1.43 c 1.21 1.01 b 3.53 b

Table 3

Effect of planting density on lodging in hulless barley field (%)"

年份
Year		 品种
Variety		 处理Treatment 开花期 Anthesis stage 灌浆期 Filling stage 成熟期 Mature stage
LR LD LR LD LR LD
2017 昆仑14号
Kunlun 14		 T1 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0
门源亮蓝
Menyuanlianglan		 T1 0 0 37.95 3 80.87 5
T2 0 0 38.92 3 81.43 5
T3 0 0 51.79 4 83.05 5
T4 0 0 56.50 4 83.09 5
T5 19.38 1 74.50 4 95.09 5
2018 昆仑14号
Kunlun 14		 T1 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0
门源亮蓝
Menyuanlianglan		 T1 0 0 45.67 3 97.33 5
T2 0 0 46.84 3 98.00 5
T3 0 0 62.33 4 99.95 5
T4 0 0 68.00 4 100.00 5
T5 23.33 1 89.67 5 100.00 5

Fig. 2

Effect of planting density on forage yield T1: 1.50 ×106 plants hm-2; T2: 2.25×106 plants hm-2; T3: 3.00×106 plants hm-2; T4: 3.75×106 plants hm-2; T5: 4.50 ×106 plants hm-2."

Table 4

Effect of planting density on the quality of hulless barley forage"

年份
Year		 品种
Variety		 处理Treatment 粗蛋白
Crude protein
(%)		 NDF
(%)		 ADF
(%)		 半纤维素
Hemicellulose (%)		 纤维素
Cellulose (%)		 木质素
Lignin (%)		 RFV
2017 昆仑14号
Kunlun 14		 T1 1.69 ab 75.61 c 53.40 ab 22.56 c 36.44 d 15.17 d 58.20 b
T2 1.70 ab 79.47 b 55.87 ab 23.98 b 37.20 c 18.20 b 53.11 c
T3 1.68 ab 84.81 a 60.11 a 25.09 a 39.62 a 19.99 a 46.14 d
T4 1.91 a 79.07 b 55.31 ab 24.14 b 37.72 b 17.12 c 53.89 c
T5 1.65 b 71.77 d 48.97 b 23.16 c 35.77 e 12.79 e 65.79 a
门源亮蓝
Menyuan
lianglan		 T1 1.79 b 69.67 a 47.97 a 22.03 a 35.19 a 12.38 a 68.81 d
T2 1.94 b 67.14 b 46.06 b 21.42 ab 34.07 b 11.61 ab 73.46 c
T3 2.33 a 64.63 c 43.95 c 21.00 bc 32.50 c 11.09 bc 78.67 b
T4 2.47 a 63.74 c 43.35 c 20.70 bc 32.13 c 10.86 c 80.45 ab
T5 2.70 a 62.51 d 42.68 d 20.14 c 31.97 c 10.36 c 82.81 a
2018 昆仑14号
Kunlun 14		 T1 1.83 ab 71.95 c 50.72 d 21.23 b 34.88 cd 15.84 c 63.85 b
T2 1.84 ab 75.63 b 53.07 bc 22.56 a 35.61 bc 17.46 b 58.50 c
T3 1.81 b 80.71 a 57.10 a 23.61 a 37.92 a 19.18 a 51.19 d
T4 1.78 b 75.25 b 52.54 cd 22.71 a 36.11 b 16.43 c 59.30 c
T5 1.93 a 68.31 d 46.51 e 21.79 a 34.24 d 12.27 d 71.73 a
门源亮蓝
Menyuan
lianglan		 T1 2.10 d 66.30 a 45.56 a 20.73 a 33.68 a 11.88 a 74.94 d
T2 2.20 cd 63.90 b 43.75 b 20.15 ab 32.61 a 11.14 b 79.81 c
T3 2.52 bc 61.51 c 41.75 c 19.76 b 31.11 b 10.64 bc 85.26 b
T4 2.67 ab 60.66 cd 41.18 c 19.48 c 30.76 b 10.42 cd 87.13 b
T5 2.92 a 59.49 d 40.54 c 18.95 c 30.60 b 9.94 d 89.62 a
[1] 吴昆仑, 赵媛, 迟德钊 . 青稞Wx基因多态性与直链淀粉含量的关系. 作物学报, 2012,38:71-79.
Wu K L, Zhao Y, Chi D Z . Relationship polymorphism of Wx gene and amylose content in hulless barley . Acta Agric Sin, 2012,38:71-79 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] Khan S, Anwar S, Kuai J, Ullah S, Fahad S, Zhou G S . Optimization of nitrogen rate and planting density for improving yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and lodging resistance in oilseed rape. Front Plant Sci, 2017,8:532.
[3] 杨吉顺, 高辉远, 刘鹏, 李耕, 董树亭, 张吉旺, 王敬峰 . 种植密度和行距配置对超高产夏玉米群体光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 2010,36:1226-1233.
Yang J S, Gao H Y, Liu P, Li G, Dong S T, Zhang J W, Wang J F . Effects of planting density and row spacing on canopy apparent photosynthesis of high-yield summer corn. Acta Agron Sci, 2010,36:1226-1233 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Xiao Y G, Liu J J, Li H S, Cao X Y, Xia X C, He Z H . Lodging resistance and yield potential of winter wheat: effect of planting density and genotype. Front Agric Sci Engineer, 2015,2:168-178.
[5] Li J C, Yin J, Wei F Z . Effects of planting density on characters of culm and culm lodging resistant index in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2005,31:662-666.
[6] 姚敏娜, 施志国, 薛军, 杨再文, 勾玲, 张旺锋 . 种植密度对玉米茎秆皮层结构及抗倒伏能力的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2013,50:2006-2014.
Yao M N, Shi Z G, Xue J, Yang Z W, Gou L, Zhang W F . The effects of different planting densities on the cortex structure of stem and lodging resistance in maize. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2013,50:2006-2014 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] Lin X Q, Zhu D F, Chen H Z, Cheng S H, Uphoff N . Effect of plant density and nitrogen fertilizer rates on grain yield and nitrogen uptake of hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Agric Biotechnol Sustain Dev, 2009,1:44-53.
[8] Tian B, Liu Y, Zhang L, Zhang L X, Li H J . Stem lodging parameters of the basal three internodes associated with plant population densities and developmental stages in foxtail millet ( Setaria italica) cultivars differing in resistance to lodging. Crop Pasture Sci, 2017,68:349-357.
[9] 石德杨, 李艳红, 夏德军, 张吉旺, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 董树亭 . 种植密度对夏玉米根系特性及氮肥吸收的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50:2006-2017.
Shi D Y, Li Y H, Xia D J, Zhang J W, Liu P, Zhao B, Dong S T . Effects of planting density on root characteristics and nitrogen uptake in summer maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2017,50:2006-2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] Konno Y . Feedback regulation of constant leaf standing crop in Sasa tsuboiana grasslands. Ecol Res, 2001,16:459-469.
[11] 肖继兵, 刘志, 孔凡信, 辛宗绪, 吴宏生 . 种植方式和密度对高粱群体结构和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018,51:4264-4276.
Xiao J B, Liu Z, Kong F X, Xin Z X, Wu H S . Effects of planting pattern and density on population structure and yield of sorghum. Sci Agric Sin, 2018,51:4264-4276 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] Kong E, Liu D C, Guo X L, Yang W L, Sun J Z, Li X, Zhan K H, Cui D Q, Lin J X, Zhang A M . Anatomical and chemical characteristics associated with lodging resistance in wheat. Crop J, 2013,1:43-49.
[13] Tian B, Liu Y, Zhang L, Li H . Stem lodging parameters of the basal three internodes associated with plant population densities and developmental stages in foxtail millet (Setaria italica) cultivars differing in resistance to lodging. Crop Past Sci, 2017,68:349-357.
[14] Ookawa T, Ishihara K . Varietal difference of physical characteristics of the culm related to lodging resistance in paddy rice. Jpn J Crop Sci, 1992,61:419-425.
[15] 白羿雄, 姚晓华, 姚有华, 吴昆仑 . 青稞抗倒伏性状的基因型差异. 中国农业科学, 2019,52:228-238.
Bai Y X, Yao X H, Yao Y H, Wu K L . Difference of traits relating to lodging resistance in hulless barley genotypes. Sci Agric Sin, 2019,52:228-238 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] Cusicanqui J A, Lauer J G . Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality. Agron J, 1999,91:911-915.
[17] 王凯, 赵小红, 姚晓华, 姚有华, 白羿雄, 吴昆仑 . 茎秆特性和木质素合成与青稞抗倒伏关系. 作物学报, 2019,45:632-638.
Wang K, Zhao X H, Yao X H, Yao Y H, Bai Y X, Wu K L . Relationship of stem characteristics and lignin synthesis with lodging resistance of hulless barley. Acta Agron Sin, 2019,45:632-638 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 池宁琳 . 植物纤维中不溶性碳水化合物的测定. 上海: 复旦大学, 2012. pp 27-28.
Chi N L . Determination of Insoluble Carbohydrates in Plant Fibers. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2012. pp 27-28 (in Chinese ).
[19] GB/6432-94. 饲料粗蛋白质的测定方法. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
GB/6432-94. Method for the Determination of Crude Protein in feedstuffs. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2000.
[20] 王彦华, 王成章, 李德锋, 郑爱荣, 齐胜利, 李冠真 . 播种量和品种对紫花苜蓿植株动态变化、产量及品质的影响. 草业学报, 2017,26:123-135.
Wang Y H, Wang C Z, Li D F, Zheng A R, Qi S L, Li G Z . Effects of seeding rate on plant number, production performance, and quality of alfalfa. Acta Pratac Sin, 2017,26:123-135 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 梁烜赫, 徐晨, 赵鑫, 陈宝玉, 胡宇, 曹铁华 . 干旱对不同种植密度玉米生长发育及产量的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2018,37(11):15-19.
Liang X H, Xu C, Zhao X, Chen B Y, Hu Y, Cao T H . The impact of drought and planting density on growth and yield of maize. J Irrig Drain, 2018,37(11):15-19 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] Lashkari M, Madani H, Ardakani M R, Golzardi F, Zargari K . Effect of plant density on yield and yield components of different corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids. Am-Euras J Agric Environ Sci, 2011,10:450-457.
[23] Sangoi L, Gracietti M A, Rampazzo C, Bianchetti P . Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant density. Field Crops Res, 2002,79:39-51.
[24] 邵庆勤, 周琴, 王笑, 蔡剑, 黄梅, 戴廷波, 姜东 . 种植密度对不同小麦品种茎秆形态特征、化学成分及抗倒性能的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2018,41:808-816.
Shao Q Q, Zhou Q, Wang X, Cai J, Huang M, Dai T B, Jiang D . Effects of planting density on stem morphological characteristics, chemical composition and lodging resistance of different wheat varieties. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2018,41:808-816 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] Chen B, Zhang Z, Yan L, Hou X, Zhang W, Zhang G . Effects of different row spacing and planting density on the main agronomic characters and yield of a maize variety Xianyu 335. Agric Sci Technol, 2017,18:801-804.
[26] Tollenaar M, Lee E A . Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Res, 2002,75:161-169.
[27] Duncan W G . Leaf angles, leaf area, and canopy photosynthesis. Crop Sci, 1971,11:482-485.
[28] Hammer G L, Dong Z, McLean G, Doherty A, Messina C, Schussler J, Cooper M . Can changes in canopy and/or root system architecture explain historical maize yield trends in the US corn belt? Crop Sci, 2009,49:299-312.
[29] Franklin K A . Shade avoidance. New Phytol, 2008,179:930-944.
[30] 张晓阳, 杜凤光, 常春, 王林风 . 纤维素生物质水解与应用. 郑州: 郑州大学出版社, 2012. pp 3-17.
Zhang X Y, Du F G, Chang C, Wang L F. Hydrolysis and Application of Cellulose Biomass. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University Press, 2012. pp 3-17(in Chinese).
[31] Chabannes M, Ruel K, Yoshinaga A, Chabber B, Jauneau A, Joseleau J P, Boudet A M . In situ analysis of lignins in transgenic tobacco reveals a differential impact of individual transformations on the spatial patterns of lignin deposition at the cellular and subcellular levels. Plant J, 2001,28:271-282.
[32] Moura J C, Bonine C A, Dornelas M C, Mazzafera P . Abiotic and biotic stresses and changes in the lignin content and composition in plants. J Integr Plant Biol, 2010,52:360-376.
[33] Setter T L, Laureles E V, Mazaredo A M . Lodging reduces yield of rice by self-shading and reductions in canopy photosynthesis. Field Crops Res, 1997,49:95-106.
[34] 于德花, 陈小芳, 毕云霞, 邵秋玲 . 种植密度对不同株型青贮玉米产量及相关特性的影响. 草业科学, 2018,35:1465-1471.
Yu D H, Chen X F, Bi Y X, Shao Q L . Effect of planting density on yield and related traits of silage maize with different plant types. Pratac Sci, 2018,35:1465-1471 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] Ma Hai-Hui, Zhang Guo-Ping, Yang Si-Cun, Wang Hong-Li. Effects of nitrogen application at different densities on carbon and nitrogen accumulation and translocation characteristics in forage maize in semi-arid regions [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1193-1207.
[2] LI Hui-Min, XING Zhi-Peng, ZHANG Hai-Peng, WEI Hai-Yan, ZHANG Hong-Cheng, LI Guang-Yan. Application of chemical regulators and other cultivation measures in lodging resistance and high-yield cultivation of wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(4): 847-862.
[3] GUO Bing, QIN Jia-Fan, LI Na, SONG Meng-Yao, WANG Li-Ming, LI Jun-Xia, MA Xiao-Qian. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of SHMT gene family in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(3): 586-5897.
[4] QIN Meng-Qian, HUANG Wei, CHEN Min, NING Ning, HE De-Zhi, HU Bing, XIA Qi-Xin, JIANG Bo, CHENG Tai, CHANG Hai-Bin, WANG Jing, ZHAO Jie, WANG Bo, KUAI Jie, XU Zheng-Hua, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer management on yield and resistance of late-seeded rapeseed [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(2): 432-446.
[5] DING Jun-Feng, XU Ying-Fei, ZHANG Xiang, CHEN Yuan, CHEN De-Hua. Effects of the plant growth regulator IBA on the survival and growth of substrate- grown transplanted cotton seedlings [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(12): 3331-3341.
[6] CUI Dong, WANG Tong-Chao, YANG Song-Lin, REN Bai-Zhao, GAO Ying-Bo, YU Ning-Ning, ZHANG Ji-Wang. Optimization of irrigation methods and planting density synergistically increases yield and water use efficiency in summer maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(11): 3026-3037.
[7] CHEN Hao-Xiang, WAN Xin-Jie, CHEN Qing, WANG Jin-Song, DONG Er-Wei, WANG Yuan, HUANG Xiao-Lei, LIU Qiu-Xia, JIAO Xiao-Yan. Comparison of low-fertility tolerance and response of sorghum and maize to soil fertility based on a long-term experiment on calcareous cinnamon soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(10): 2775-2787.
[8] XU Lin-Shan, GAO Geng-Dong, WANG Yu, WANG Jia-Xing, YANG Ji-Zhao, WU Ya-Rui, ZHANG Xiao-Han, CHANG Ying, LI Zhen, XIE Xiong-Ze, GONG De-Ping, WANG Jing, GE Xian-Hong. Analysis of expression patterns of laccase gene family members in Brassica napus and their association with stem fracture resistance [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(1): 134-148.
[9] ZHANG Qi-Qi, CHEN Jie-Chang, KUAI Jie, WANG Bo, WANG Jing, XU Zheng-Hua, ZHAO Jie, ZHAO Si-Ming, JIA Cai-Hua, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Effect of high density planting on the quality of cold pressed rapeseed oil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2358-2370.
[10] PENG Jie, XIE Xiao-Qi, ZHANG Zhao, YAO Xiao-Fen, QIU Shen, CHEN Dan-Dan, GU Xiao-Na, WANG Yu-Jie, WANG Chen-Chen, YANG Guo-Zheng. Relationship between cotton yield and canopy microenvironment under summer direct seeding [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2371-2382.
[11] GUO Si-Yu, ZHAO Ke-Yong, DAI Zheng-Gang, ZOU Hua-Wen, WU Zhong-Yi, ZHANG Chun. Functional analysis of maize N-acetyltransferase ZmNAT1 gene in response to abiotic stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(8): 2001-2013.
[12] LOU Hong-Xiang, HUANG Xiao-Yu, JIANG Meng, NING Ning, BIAN Meng-Lei, ZHANG Lei, LUO Dong-Xu, QIN Meng-Qian, KUAI Jie, WANG Bo, WANG Jing, ZHAO Jie, XU Zheng-Hua, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Optimal allocation of sowing date and sowing rate of late-sowing rapeseed in the Yangtze River Basin [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(8): 2091-2105.
[13] XU Ze, WU Xin-Ling, LIU Zhen-Yu, LI Han-Jia, LENG Xin-Hua, WU Tian-Fan, CHEN Yuan, ZHANG Xiang, CHEN De-Hua. Effects of planting density with nitrogen rate on regulation of nitrogen utilization in summer direct seeded cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(6): 1584-1596.
[14] ZHU Zhong-Lin, WEN Yue, ZHOU Qi, WU Yan-Fei, DU Xue-Zhu, SHENG Feng. Mechanism of loding residence and drought tolerance of OsCNGC10 gene in rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(5): 1351-1360.
[15] NIE Xiao-Yu, LI Zhen, WANG Tian-Yao, ZHOU Yuan-Wei, XU Zheng-Hua, WANG Jing, WANG Bo, KUAI Jie, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Effect of planting density and weak light stress at pod-filling stage on seed oil accumulation in rapeseed [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(2): 493-505.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd