欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 1797-1804.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01797

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

茶树品种光合与水分利用特性比较及聚类分析

郭春芳1,2;孙云3;陈常颂4;陈荣冰4;张木清1,*   

  1. 1 福建农林大学农业部甘蔗生理生态与遗传改良重点开放实验室, 福建福州350002; 2 福建教育学院, 福建福州350025; 3 福建农林大学园艺学院, 福建福州350002; 4 福建省农业科学院茶叶研究所, 福建福安355015
  • 收稿日期:2008-02-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-10-12 网络出版日期:2008-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 张木清

Comparison and Cluster Analysis of Photosynthetic Characters and Water Use Efficiency in Tea (Camellia sinensis) Cultivars

GUO Chun-Fang12,SUN Yun3,CHEN Chang-Song4,CHEN Rong-Bing4,ZHANG Mu-Qing1*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Eco-physiology and Genetic Improvement for Sugarcane, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian; 2 Fujian Institute of Education, Fuzhou 350025, Fujian; 3 College of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian; 4 Tea Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fu’an 355015, Fujian, China
  • Received:2008-02-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-10-12 Published online:2008-10-12
  • Contact: ZHANG Mu-Qing

摘要: 在自然条件下测定52个茶树品种叶片的光合与生理参数并对其进行数值分类以及主成分、聚类和判别分析。结果表明, 叶片净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)、气孔导度(Gs)、胞间CO2浓度(Ci)及水分利用效率(WUE)的品种间差异达极显著水平(P<0.01); 选出3个主成分分析, 方差累计贡献率达到96.98%, Pn、Tr、Gs为第一主成分的主导因子, WUECi均为第二主成分和第三主成分的主导因子; 根据Pn、Tr、Gs和WUE 4个指标聚类, 52个茶树品种聚为5类, 其中I类的15个品种为高光合速率、中等蒸腾速率、低气孔阻力、高水分利用效率类型, 可用于茶树的品种改良; 在聚类分析基础上用判别分析选出对茶树光合与生理性状数值分类有显著影响的4个参数, 建立了5个判别能力较高的判别模型。

关键词: 茶树, 光合特性, 数值分类, 聚类分析

Abstract: The importance of carbon input in tea productivity can be appreciated from the fact that 95% of the dry weight of the plant is derived from photosynthesis. Therefore, an increase in net photosynthesis and more efficient partitioning are logical steps for increasing productivity, which was subject to the tea genotypes. The photosynthetic parameters in leaves of 52 tea cultivars were determined under field conditions, and studied by using phenetic classification, principal component, cluster, discrimination analyses. The results showed that there were significant differences (P<0.01) in net photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), water use efficiency (WUE) among the tested cultivars. The first three principal components were analyzed and their cumulative contribution of variance accounted for 96.98%. Pn, Tr, and Gs were the main factors in the first principal component. WUE and Ci were the main factors in the second and third principal com-ponents respectively. Fifty two tea cultivars were clustered into five groups based on Pn, Tr, Gs, and WUE. The group I including 15 tea cultivars with high photosynthesis rate, medium transpiration rate, lower stomatal resistance and high water use efficiency could be used for improvement of tea cultivars. Then, with discrimination analysis, the parameters of Pn, Tr, Gs, and WUE greatly affecting the classification were selected, and five discrimination models with better distinguishing ability were set up.

Key words: Tea (Camellia sinensis), Photosynthetic characters, Phenetic classification, Cluster analysis

[1] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[2] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[3] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[4] 徐苗苗, 邸太妹, 王洁, 吴叶蝶, 刘恩贝, 王玉春, 王新超, 王璐. 外源槲皮素增强茶树抗寒性的分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1418-1429.
[5] 杨影, 郝豫皖, 张学宁, 方佳璐, 马月华, 杨伟龙, 孙文清, 王新超, 王玉春, 黄建燕. 乙烯响应因子CsERF9调控茶树炭疽病抗性的分子机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1103-1115.
[6] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[7] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[8] 张力岚, 杨军, 王让剑. 基于WGCNA发掘茶树糖苷类香气前体含量性状相关的候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 494-513.
[9] 黄丽霞, 张卫卫, 甄一越, 王秋宝, 田洪岭, 李国栋, 刘龙龙, 张丽君. 盐胁迫下苦荞萌发期耐盐碱性评价及种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 459-479.
[10] 梅飘, 刘丁丁, 叶圆圆, 张晨禹, 丁诗琦, 李亚奇, 王培鑫, 梅菊芬, 马春雷. 基于茶树液相功能芯片的白化茶树资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2358-2370.
[11] 文璇, 钟秀丽, 王尚文, 金涛, 彭君, 刘恩科. 基于耐性指数的青稞苗期耐低氮种质筛选及不同氮效率类型综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1949-1958.
[12] 李培华, 李杰, 孟祥宇, 孙玉晨, 冯永佳, 李云丽, 刁邓超, 赵雯, 吴玮, 韩德俊, 张嵩午, 郑炜君. 高温胁迫下冷型小麦的抗逆性评估及其生理响应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1118-1130.
[13] 李乔, 叶杨春, 常旭虹, 王德梅, 王艳杰, 杨玉双, 马瑞琦, 赵广才, 蔡瑞国, 张敏, 刘希伟. 花后高温干旱逆境对冬小麦光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1077-1090.
[14] 蒋优, 马雪融, 张博, 李陈建. 苏丹草种子萌发期耐盐性评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 835-844.
[15] 王岩, 白春生, 李波, 范虹, 何蔚, 杨莉莉, 曹悦, 赵财. 覆膜免耕和灌水量对西北绿洲灌区玉米产量及光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 755-770.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!