欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1590-1596.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01590

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

优良大豆品种合丰25的遗传组成

关荣霞1,秦君2,胡静深3,陈为秀3,常汝镇1,刘章雄1,邱丽娟1,*   

  1. 1中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/高家农作物基因资源与基因改良重大科学工程/农业部作物种质资源利用重点开放实验室，北京100081；2河北农林科学院粮油作物研究所，河北石家庄050031；3东北农业大学，黑龙江哈尔滨 150030
  • 收稿日期:2009-01-08 修回日期:2009-04-26 出版日期:2009-09-12 网络出版日期:2009-07-03
  • 通讯作者: 邱丽娟, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net; Tel: 010-82105843
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家高科技研究发展计划（863计划）项目（2006AA100104，2006AA10B1Z3，2006AA10Z1F1），国家自然科学基金项目（30490251，30671310），国家科技攻关项目（2006BAB13B05），国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）项目（2009CB118400）资助。

Genetic Composition of Elite Soybean Dultivar Hefeng 25

GUAN Rong-Xia1,QIN Jun2,HU Jing-Shen3,CHEN Wei-Xiu3,CHANG Ru-Zhen1,LIU Zhang-Xiong,QIU Li-Juan1   

  1. 1 National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Key Laboratory of Germplasm Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture / Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2 Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Science, Shijiazhuang 050031, China; 3 Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
  • Received:2009-01-08 Revised:2009-04-26 Published:2009-09-12 Published online:2009-07-03
  • Contact: QIU Li-Juan, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net; Tel: 010-82105843

PDF

3660

被引次数

9

摘要：

合丰25由合丰23和克4430-20杂交选育而成，是我国大豆生产上累计种植面积最大的品种。本研究利用463个SSR标记对合丰25及其亲本进行检测，并分析其遗传组成及其与亲本的遗传关系。463个SSR位点中有177个位点在合丰25的两个亲本间无多态性，合丰23和克4430-20对合丰25的遗传贡献率分别为39.4%和48.3%。在G和E两个连锁群发现克4430-20有大片段传递给合丰25，特别是G连锁群没有发现来自合丰23的片段，而合丰23在L连锁群传递给合丰25的位点是克4430-20的2.3倍。不同连锁群亲本染色体片段的组成不同，可能与产量、抗病性等重要性状相关QTL的分布有关，从而使合丰25通过重组集合了两个亲本的优点。合丰25在57个位点出现新等位变异。为分析位点突变对合丰25纯度的影响，用包括57个位点在内的207个SSR标记对12个不同销售点的合丰25种子进行检测，207对SSR引物中有13对在4个大豆样本中检测到杂合条带，而8个样本的纯度均为100%。说明大部分突变位点已在品种利用过程中纯合，合丰25的优异基因型及其在推广20多年后仍保持的高纯度，是其在生产上利用经久不衰的主要原因之一。

关键词: 大豆, 合丰25, 系谱, SSR, 遗传组成

Abstract:

Elite soybean cultivar Hefeng 25, derived from a cross of Hefeng 23×Ke 4430-20, has an accumulated planting area of 13 million hectares and the longest planting history of soybean cultivars. The objective of this study is to evaluate the genetic composition of Hefeng 25 and the relationship of Hefeng 25 with the parents. Four hundred and sixty-three SSR markers were used to screen Hefeng 25 and its parents Hefeng 23 and Ke 4430-20. Of the 463 SSR markers 177 were monomorphic between Hefeng 23 and Ke 4430-20 and 57 loci were detected in Hefeng 25 with new alleles mutated not from the parents. The genetic contribution of Hefeng 23 and Ke 4430-20 to Hefeng 25 was 39.4% and 48.3%, respectively based on molecular information. Analysis of each linkage group revealed that large portions of loci on linkage groups G, E, and L were inherited entirely from one parent. Especially on linkage group G, all loci were inherited from Ke4430-20. The loci on linkage group L inherited from Hefeng 23 were 2.3 fold of that from Ke4430-20. Detailed analysis showed that QTLs for yield and disease resistance may relate to these loci. These analyses suggested that breeders may select recombination events with agronomic favorable alleles of two parents. In order to evaluate the effect of SSR mutation on soybean seed purity, we screened Hefeng 25 seed samples from 12 different seed companies at 207 SSR loci including 57 mutated loci. Hybrid alleles were observed only in 4 seed samples at 13 SSR loci. The result indicated that most of the mutated loci were purified during the breeding process. The elite genotype and high seed purity of Hefeng25 may be the most important factors for its long-term utilization in soybean production.

Key words: Soybean(Glycine max), Hefeng 25, Pedigree, SSR, Genetic composition

[1] Guo T(郭泰), Liu Z-T(刘忠堂), Qi N(齐宁), Zhang R-C(张荣昌), Hu X-P(胡喜平). Breeding and utilization of high-yield soybean Hefeng 25. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1997, 16(1): 85-87 (in Chinese)

[2] Guo T(郭泰), Liu Z-T(刘忠堂), Qi N(齐宁), Zhang R-C(张荣昌), Hu X-P(胡喜平), Wang Z-X(王志新). Utilization of Hefeng25 in soybean breeding. Crop Germplasm Resour (作物品种资源), 1998, (2): 19-20 (in Chinese)

[3] Liu C-H(刘长海), Yu X-C(于晓春), Qiu C-J(邱长久), Zhang A-H(张安宏), Cheng H-Y(成华玉), Hu S-Y(胡淑艳). Utilization of Hefeng 25 as parental material. Soybean Bull (大豆通报), 2001, (3): 22 (in Chinese)

[4] Qiu L-J(邱丽娟), Wang S-M(王曙明). Chinese soybean breeding lines (1993-2004), Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2008 (in Chinese)

[5] Qiu F-L(邱福林), Shao G-J(邵国军), Li Y-D(李跃东), Han Y(韩勇). Parent selection and pedigree analysis of Liaojing 326. Reclaim Rice Cult (垦殖与稻作), 2001, (3): 3-5 (in Chinese)

[6] Qin J(秦君), Jiang C-X(姜成喜), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Fu Y-S(付亚书), Guan R-X(关荣霞), Chen W-Y(陈维元), Li Y-H(李英惠), Zhang M-C(张孟臣), Jing Y-L(景玉良), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Genetic diversity and recombination of soybean cultivar Suinong 14 and its pedigree. Hereditas (遗传), 2006, 28(11): 1421-1427 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7] Qin J(秦君), Chen W-Y(陈维元), Guan R-Y(关荣霞), Jiang C-X(姜成喜), Li Y-H(李英慧), Fu Y-S(付亚书), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Zhang M-C(张孟臣), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Genetic contribution of foreign germplasm to elite Chinese soybean (Glycine max) cultivars revealed by SSR markers. Chin Sci Bull (科学通报), 2006, 51(6): 686-692(in Chinese)

[8] Guan R-X(关荣霞), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Rapid isolation of soybean DNA used for SSR analysis. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2003, 22(1): 73-74 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9] Tasma I M, Lorenzen L L, Green D E, Shoemaker R C. Mapping genetic loci for flowering time, maturity, and photoperiod insensitivity in soybean. Mol Breed, 2001, 8: 25-35

[10] Funatsuki H, Kawaguchi K, Matsuba S,Sato Y, Ishimoto M. Mapping of QTL associated with chilling tolerance during reproductive growth in soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 142: 137-142

[11] Mansur L M, Orf J H, Chase K, Jarvik T, Cregan P B, Lark K G. Genetic mapping of agronomic traits using recombinant inbred lines of soybean. Crop Sci, 1996, 36: 1327-1336

[12] Lorenzen L L, Lin S F, Shoemaker R C. Soybean pedigree analysis using map-based molecular markers: Recombination during cultivar development. Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 93: 1251-1260

[13] Kimura M. A model of a genetic system which leads to closer linkage by natural selection. Evolution, 1956, 10: 278-287

[14] Nei M. Modification of linkage intensity by natural selection. Genetics, 1967, 57: 625-641

[15] Nei M. Evolutionary change of linkage intensity. Nature, 1968, 218: 1160-1161

[16] Song Q J, Marek L F, Shoemaker R C, Lark K G, Concibido V C, Delannay X, Specht J E, Cregan P B. A new genetic linkage map for soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 122-128

[17] Ha B K, Bennett J B, Hussey R S, Finnerty S L, Boerma H R. Pedigree analysis of a major QTL conditioning soybean resistance to southern root-knot nematode. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 758-763

[18] Ha B K, Hussey R S, Boerma H R. Development of SNP assays for marker-assisted selection of two southern root-knot nematode resistance QTL in soybean. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 573-582

[19] Guo B, Sleper D A, Arrelli P R, Shannon J G, Nguyen H T. Identification of QTLs associated with resistance to soybean cyst nematode races 2, 3 and 5 in soybean PI 90763. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 103: 1167-1173

[20] Cregan P B, Mudge J, Fickus E W, Danesh D, Denny R, Young N D. Two simple sequence repeat markers to select for soybean cyst nematode resistance conditioned by the rhg1 locus. Theor Appl Genet, 1999, 99: 811-818


[21] Mudge J, Cregan P B, Kenworthy J P, Kenworthy W J,

Orf J H, Young N D. Two microsatellite markers that flank the major soybean cyst nematode resistance locus. Crop Sci, 1997, 37: 1611-1615

[22] Yue P, Arrelli P R, Sleper D A. Molecular characterization of resistance to Heterodera glycines in soybean PI 438489B. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 102: 921-928

[23] Li Z, Jakkula L, Hussey R S, Tamulonis J P, Boerma H R. SSR mapping and confirmation of the QTL from PI96354 conditioning soybean resistance to southern root-knot nematode. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 1167-1173

[24] Panthee D R, Pantalone V R, Sams C E, Saxton A M, West D R, Rayford W E. Genomic regions governing soybean seed nitrogen accumulation. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 2004, 81: 77-81

[25] Specht J E, Chase K, Macrander M, Graef G L, Chung J, Markwell J P, Germann M, Orf J H, Lark K G. Soybean response to water: A QTL analysis of drought tolerance. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 493-509

[26] Liu G-Y(刘广阳). Utilization of elite germplasm Ke4430-20 in soybean breeding in Heilongjiang province. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2005, 6(3): 326-329 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[27] Wang D, Graef G L, Procopiuk A M,Diers B W. Identification of putative QTL that underlie yield in interspecific soybean backcross populations. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 108: 458-467

[28] Arahana V S, Graef G L, Specht G E, Steadman J R, Eskridge K M. Identification of QTLs for resistance to sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 180-188

[29] Naoki Y, Seishi N, Masako N, Yasutaka T, Masahiro Y, Yashiaki N, Takuji S, Kyuya H. An informative linkage map of soybean reveals QTLs for flowering time, leaflet morphology and regions of segregation distortion. DNA Res, 2001, 8: 61-72

[30] Pahthee D R, Kwanyuen P, Sams C E, West D R, Saxton A M,Pantalone V R.Quantitative trait loci for β-Conglycinin (7S) and glycinin (11S) fractions of soybean storage protein. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 2004, 81: 1005-1012

[31] Orf G H, Chase K, Jarvik T, Mansur L M, Cregan P B, Adler F R, Lark K G. Genetics of soybean agronomic traits: I. Comparison of three related recombinant inbred populations. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1642-1651

[32] Romero-Severson J, Smith J S C, Ziegle J, Hauser J, Joe L, Hookstra G. Pedigree analysis and haplotype sharing within diverse groups of Zea mays L. inbreds. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 567-574

[33] Guan R-X(关荣霞), Liu Y(刘燕), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Purity identification of soybean varieties with SSR technique. Mole Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 2003, 1(3): 357-360 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[34] Meesang N. Ranamukhaarachchi S L, Petersen M J, Andersen S B. Soybean cultivar identification and genetic purity analysis using microsatellite DNA markers. Seed Sci Technol, 2001, 29: 637-645
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[3] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[4] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[5] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[6] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[7] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[8] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[9] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[10] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[11] 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[12] 殷丛丛, 李睿琦, 岳霈尧, 李晨, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 基于闭合哑铃介导等温扩增可视化检测大豆花叶病毒SC15方法的建立及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1248-1260.
[13] 许睿, 何妙华, 王昊, 李卫, 任杰, 夏志强. 基于空间转录组技术解析大豆种胚对X射线辐射的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3121-3132.
[14] 林洋, 史晓蕾, 陈强, 刘兵强, 杨庆, 于慧娟, 闫龙, 武小霞, 杨春燕. 大豆蛋白质脂肪及脂肪酸组分相关QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2899-2910.
[15] 王浩辰, 王克晶, 韩娟, 李向华. 东南沿海短绒野大豆两种代表性生境自然种群的空间遗传结构特征:种群内取样策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2875-2885.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2