欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 256-263.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00256

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆叶片性状QTL的定位及Meta分析

仕相林1，孙亚男1，王家麟1，刘春燕1,2，陈庆山1,*，胡国华2,3,*   

  1. 1 东北农业大学研究生学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150030; 2黑龙江省农垦科研育种中心, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150090; 3国家大豆工程技术研究中心, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150050
  • 收稿日期:2011-04-25 修回日期:2011-10-12 出版日期:2012-02-12 网络出版日期:2011-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 胡国华, E-mail: Hugh757@vip.163.com, 0451-55199475; 陈庆山, E-mail: qshchen@126.com, 0451-55191945
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业产业体系(CARS-04-02A)，国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200903003)，黑龙江省重大科技攻关项目(GA09B103)和黑龙江省高校青年学术骨干支持计划项目(1152G007)资助。

Mapping and Meta-Analysis of QTLs for Leaf Traits in Soybean

SHI Xiang-Lin1,SUN Ya-Nan1,WANG Jia-Lin1,LIU Chun-Yan1,2,CHEN Qing-Shan1,*,HU Guo-Hua2,3,*   

  1. 1 Graduate College of Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China; 2 The Crop Research and Breeding Center of Land-Reclamation, Harbin 150090, China; 3 The National Research Center of Soybean Engineering and Technology, Harbin 150050, China
  • Received:2011-04-25 Revised:2011-10-12 Published:2012-02-12 Published online:2011-12-01
  • Contact: 胡国华, E-mail: Hugh757@vip.163.com, 0451-55199475; 陈庆山, E-mail: qshchen@126.com, 0451-55191945

PDF

1904

被引次数

15

摘要： 利用Charleston×东农594重组自交系构建SSR遗传图谱，采用WinQTLCartographer Ver. 2.5软件的CIM和MIM分析方法对2006—2010年(F2:14~F2:18)连续5年的大豆叶长、叶宽以及叶柄长数据进行QTL定位，检测到8个与叶长有关的QTL，位于染色体Gm01、02、05、11和18上；9个与叶宽有关的QTL，位于染色体Gm01、03、05、06、11、12和16上；8个与有关叶柄长的QTL，位于染色体Gm01、03、05、06、11、17和18上。2年以上均检测到的叶长QTL为qLL5a、qLL5b、qLL1a和qLL18；叶宽QTL为qLW5a、qLW11a、qLW11b和qLW12；叶柄长QTL为qLSL11b。另外，利用BioMercator2.1的映射功能将国内外常用的大豆图谱上的叶长、叶宽QTL通过公共标记映射整合到大豆公共遗传连锁图谱Soymap2上，将搜集到的35个叶长QTL、37个叶宽QTL和本研究得到的QTL整合分析，最终得到5个大豆叶长的“通用”QTL，位于Gm09、18和19，其置信区间最小可达5.66 cM；4个大豆叶宽的“通用”QTL，位于Gm07、Gm18和Gm19，其置信区间最小可达5.67 cM，为今后对大豆叶片性状QTL精细定位, 提供了有利科学信息。

关键词: 大豆, 叶片性状, QTL定位, 整合分析

Abstract: Leaf length, width and leafstalk length affect the photosynthetic capability of plant and so increasing photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area may improve seed yield in soybean. In this study, we analyzed QTLs data of soybean leaf length, width and leafstalk length from 2006 to 2010with a F2:14–F2:18 of recombination inbred lines (RIL) population derived from a cross between Charleston and Dongnong 594 by mixed linear model approach. Eight QTLs for leaf length(LL) were mapped on the chromosomes Gm01, Gm02, Gm05, Gm11, Gm18 by software WinQTLCartographer Ver. 2.5, nine QTLs were identi?ed for leaf width (LW) on the chromosomes Gm01, Gm03, Gm05, Gm06, Gm11, Gm12, Gm16; eight QTLs were identi?ed for leafstalk length (LSL) on Gm01, Gm03, Gm05, Gm06, Gm11, Gm17, Gm18. qLL5a, qLL5b, qLL1a, and qLL18 for LL, qLW5a, qLW11a, qLW11b, and qLW12 for LW, and qLSL11b for LSL were identi?ed in more than two years. Furthermore, not only 72 QTLs of leaf traits that have been mapped in many different populations and environments were collected but also QTL mapped by WinQTLCartographer Ver. 2.5 were projected and integrated in the reference map with the software BioMercator2.1. In total, the consensus QTLs of five for leaf length and four for leaf width were obtained in soybean, respectively. The minimum confidence interval of leaf length was shrunk to 5.66 cM. These results would provide a basis for fine mapping QTL and cloning genes in soybean.

Key words: Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], Leaf traits, QTL mapping, Meta-analysis

[1]Kokubun M. Soybean cultivar difference in leaf photo-synthetic rate and its relation to seed yield. Jpn J Crop Sci, 1988, 57(4): 743–748

[2]Hu M-X(胡明祥), Li K-M(李开明), Tian P-Z(田佩占), Yu D-Y(于德洋). Breeding for high yield and plant type of soybean. J Jilin Agric Sci (吉林农业科学), 1980, (3): 1–14 (in Chinese)

[3]Fu Y-H(傅艳华), Sun S-X(孙淑贤), Peng B(彭宝). Effect of soybean yield and nitrogen uptake by cutting leaves. Crops (作物杂志), 1997, (2): 27–28 (in Chinese)

[4]Thompson J A, R L Nelson, Schweitzer L E. Relationships among speci?c leaf weight, photosynthetic rate, and seed yield in soybean. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 1575–1581

[5]Ellis R H, Asumada H, Qi A, Summer?eld R J. Effects of photoperiod and maturity genes on plant growth, partitioning radiation use efficiency, and yield in soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] ‘Clark’. Ann Bot, 2000, 85: 335–343

[6]Mansur L M, K G Lark, H Kross, Oliveira A. Interval mapping of quantitative trait loci for reproductive, morphological, and seed traits of soybean (Glycine max L.). Theor Appl Genet, 1993, 86: 907–913

[7]Mansur L M, Orf J H, Chase K, Jarvik T, Cregan P B, Lark K G. Genetic mapping of agronomic traits using recombinant inbred lines of soybean. Crop Sci, 1996, 36: 1327–1336

[8]Keim P, Diers B W, Olson T C, Shoemaker R C. RFLP mapping in soybean: association between marker loci and variation in quantitative traits. Genetics, 1990, 126: 735–742

[9]Kim H K, Kang S T, Suh D Y. Analysis of quantitative trait loci associated with leaflet types in two recombinant inbred lines of soybean. Plant Breed, 2005, 124: 582–589

[10]Song Q J, Marek L F, Shoemaker R C, Lark K G, Concibido V C, Delannay X, Specht J E, Cregan P B. A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 122−128

[11]Glass G V. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educatl Res, 1976, 5: 3−8

[12]Goffinet B, Gerber S. Quantitative trait loci: a meta-analysis. Genetics, 2000, 155: 463−473

[13]Etzel C J, Guerra R. Meta-analysis of genetic-linkage analysis of quantitative-trait loci. Am J Human Genet, 2002, 71: 56−65

[14]Chardon F, Virlon B, Moreau L, Falque M, Joets J, Decousset L, Murigneux A, Charcosset A. Genetic architecture of flowering time in maize as inferred from quantitative trait loci meta-analysis and synteny conservation with the rice genome. Genetics, 2004, 168: 2169−2185

[15]Truntzler M, Barriere Y, Sawkins M C, Lespinasse D, Betran J, Charcosset A, Moreau L. Meta-analysis of QTL involved in silage quality of maize and comparison with the position of candidate genes. Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 121: 1465−1482

[16]Guo B, Sleper D A, Lu P, Shannon J G, Nguyen H T, Arelli P R. QTLs associated with resistance to soybean cyst nematode in soybean: meta-analysis of QTL location. Crop Sci, 2006, 46: 595−602

[17]Sun Y-N(孙亚男), Qi Z-M(齐照明), Shan D-P(单大鹏), Liu C-Y(刘春燕), Hu G-H(胡国华), Chen Q-S(陈庆山). Mapping and meta-analysis of height QTLs in soybean. Mol Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 2010, 4(8): 687−693 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Wang X-Z(王贤智), Zhang X-J(张晓娟), Zhou R(周蓉), Sha A-H(沙爱华), Wu X-J(吴学军), Cai S-P(蔡淑平), Qiu D-Z(邱德珍), Zhou X-A(周新安). QTL analysis of seed and pod traits in soybean RIL population. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(3): 441−448 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Chen Q-S(陈庆山), Zhang Z-C(张忠臣), Liu C-Y(刘春燕), Wang W-Q(王伟权), Li W-B(李文滨). Construction and analysis of soybean genetic map using recombinant inbred line of Charleston×Dongnong 594. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2005, 38(7): 1312−1316 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]Darvasi A, Weinreb A, Minke V, Weller J I, Soller M. Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. Genetics, 1993, 134: 943−951

[21]Darvasi A, Soller M. A simple method to calculate resolving power and confidence interval of QTL map location. Behavior Genet, 1997, 27: 125−132

[22]Orf J H, Chase K, Jarvik T, Mansur L M, Cregan P B, Adler F R, Lark K G. Genetics of soybean agronomic traits: I. Comparison of three related recombinant inbred populations. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1642−1651

[23]Wang Z(王珍). Construction of Soybean SSR Based Map and QTL Analysis Important Agronomic Traits. MS Dissertation of Guangxi University, 2004. pp 66−72 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[24]Zeng Z B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 1994, 136: 1457−1468

[25]Kao C H, Zeng Z B, Robert D. T. Multiple interval mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 1999, 152: 1203−1216

[26]Jansen R C, Van Ooijien J M, Stam P, Lister C, Dean C. Genotype-by-environment interaction in genetic mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Theor Appl Genet, 1995, 91: 33−37
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[3] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[4] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[5] 刘长友, 王珅, 时会影, 沈颖超, 孙蕾, 王彦, 张志肖, 苏秋竹, 田静, 范保杰. 基于饭豆基因资源的小豆远缘杂交群体抗豆象QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 936-944.
[6] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[7] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[8] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[9] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[10] 邵顺伟, 陈卓, 兰振东, 蔡兴奎, 邹华芬, 李晨曦, 唐景华, 朱熙, 张彧, 董建科, 金辉, 宋波涛. 基于BSA-seq技术的块茎芽眼深度QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1725-1735.
[11] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[12] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[13] 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[14] 殷丛丛, 李睿琦, 岳霈尧, 李晨, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 基于闭合哑铃介导等温扩增可视化检测大豆花叶病毒SC15方法的建立及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1248-1260.
[15] 张金泽, 周庆国, 肖莉晶, 金海润, 欧阳青静, 龙旭, 晏中彬, 田恩堂. 芥菜型油菜不同组织硫苷含量的QTL定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1166-1177.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2