欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1691-1697.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01691

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

植物生长物质对大豆叶片形态解剖结构及光合特性的影响

冯乃杰1，郑殿峰1,*，赵玖香1，祖伟2，杜吉到1，张玉先1，梁喜龙1   

  1. 1黑龙江八一农垦大学农学院作物化控研究室，黑龙江大庆163319；2东北农业大学农学院，黑龙江哈尔滨150031
  • 收稿日期:2008-12-24 修回日期:2009-04-16 出版日期:2009-09-12 网络出版日期:2009-07-04
  • 通讯作者: 郑殿峰, E-mail: zdffnj@263.net; Tel: 0459-6819175
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国际科技支撑计划项目（2006BAD21B01），黑龙江省“十一五”科技攻关项目（GA06B101-1-1），国家教育部博士点基金联合资助项目（20070223002 ）资助。

Effect of Plant Growth Substances on Morphological and Anatomical Structure of Leaf and Photosynthetic Characteristics in Soybean

FENG Nai-Jie1,ZHENG Dian-Feng1,*,ZHAO Jiu-Xiang1,ZU Wei2,DU Ji-Dao1,ZHANG Yu-Xian1,LIANG Xi-Long1   

  1. 1 Crop Growth and Development Regulation Laboratory, College of Agronomy, Heilongjiang August First Land Reclamation University, Daqing 163319, China; 2 College of Agronomy, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150031, China
  • Received:2008-12-24 Revised:2009-04-16 Published:2009-09-12 Published online:2009-07-04
  • Contact: ZHENG Dian-Feng, E-mail: zdffnj@263.net; Tel: 0459-6819175

PDF

5241

被引次数

26

摘要：

2006年度在黑龙江八一农垦大学实验农场大田栽培条件下，以大豆垦农4号为试材，选用植物生长物质为2-N,N-二乙氨基乙基己酸酯(DTA)、氯化胆碱(CC)和SOD模拟物(SODM)，于开花始期叶面喷施，对大豆叶片形态解剖结构和光合指标进行了研究。结果表明，各处理的叶片栅栏组织厚度及栅海比增加，栅栏组织细胞排列的紧密程度为SODM＞DTA ＞CC＞CK；各处理不同程度地增加了单个细胞的叶绿体数、单个叶绿体中的基粒片层数和淀粉粒数，降低了叶绿体中的嗜锇体数；SODM、DTA分别显著、极显著增加了叶绿体的基粒数；各处理普遍提高了生育后期叶片Chl a、Chl b和Chl(a+b)含量，增加了Chl b/a比值；在较干旱条件下，与对照相比，各处理能使叶面积指数和光合势达到最大值时间提前，增加了籽粒干物质积累时期的总光合势，提高了净光合速率。

关键词: 大豆, 植物生长物质, 形态解剖, 光合特性

Abstract:

Many soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] morphological and physiological regulations responding to plant growth substances have been reported. Related researches showed that plant growth substances could effectively control lodging, increase leaf area index, promote photosynthesis, reduce productive abscission and improve yield and quality in soybean production. Plant growth substances thorough adjusting inner hormone control soybean’s whole process of growth and development, at the same time possibly affect the structure of soybean organs, including root, stem, leaf, and productive organs, on which there are a little report. Microtechnique and ultramicrotechnique have triumphantly applied in the researches on the changes of fibre texture and ultrastructure in plant caused by nutrient elements and environment factors, which provides availibity to research the effects of plant growth substances on the structure of soybean organs. The present study was carried out in an attempt to compare anatomical structure and photosynthetic characteristics of cultivar Kennong 4, Treated with three plant growth substances In the field of experiments on trail farm of Heilongjiang August-First Land Reclamation University in 2006. The selected secure plant growth substances Diethyl anlinoethyl (DTA), Ckolirte chloride (Cc), and SOD simulation material (SODM), were applied by leaf-spraying at the beginning of blossom stage (R1). 30 days later, at the beginning seed stage (R5), the functional leaves were sampled to compare fibre texture and ultrastructure by microtechnique and ultramicrotechnique. Photosynthetic characteristics, such as leaf index, photosynthetic pigment content, photosynthetic potential and photosynthetic rate, were measured every 10 days after the treatments.The results indicated that the plant growth substances caused the changes of both anatomical structure of leaf and photosynthetic characteristics. Under light microscope, we found that, compared with control, DTA, CC, and SODM increased palisade tissue thickness and ratio of palisade/spongy of leaf. The tight degree of palisade tissue arrangement,was different in treatment showing the order of SODM> DTA> CC> CK. DTA, CC, and SODM increased the number of chloroplast single cell, granule lamella and starch grains in chloroplast, while reduced the number of osmophilic globuli in the chloroplast. SODM, DTA increased granule number in chloroplast significantly. In the investigation of photosynthetic characteristics, we found that, compared with control, DTA, SODM, and CC increased the contents of Chl a, Chl b, Chl(a+b) in leaf and the ratio of Chl b/a. DTA, SODM, and CC advanced the time to maximum leaf area index and leaf area duration (LAD), increased total LAD and photosynthetic rate during grain filling period under water stress. From above, we drew a conclusion that plant growth substances could at least partially regulate the structure of soybean organs, fibre texture and ultrastructure of soybean leaf, which is helpful to promote photosynthesis, showing the consistency between anatomical structure and physiological function.

Key words: Soybean, Plant growth substances, Morphological and anatomical, Photosynthetic characteristic

[1] Davies D D. The Biochemistry of Plants. New York: Academic Press Inc, 1980. pp 86-96

[2] Hatch M D, Boardman N K. The Biochemistry of Plants. New York: Academic Press Tnc, 1981. pp 37-46

[3] Hall D O, Rao K K. Photosynthesis, 4th edn. London: Edwa Atnold Limited, 1988. pp 15-21

[4] Salisbury F B, Ross C W. Plant Physiology. California: California Wadsworth Publishing Company Inc. 1991. pp 87-111

[5]Pan R-Z(潘瑞炽). Plant Physiology (植物生理学). Beijing: Higher Education Press,1995. pp 87-117 (in Chinese)

[6] Li P-Q(李培庆), Chen S-K(陈善坤).Studies on effects of PP-(333) on the dynamic change of C-N metabolism in soybean at different development stages and it s relation to the yield formation of soybean. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis (江西农业大学学报), 1992, 14(4): 366-370(in Chinese with English abstract)

[7] Wang M(王敏), Yao W-C(姚维传), Zhang C-Y(张从宇). Effects of plant growth regulator on seedling growth under drought stress in soybean.J Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 2005, 19(4): 190-193(in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] Zhang M-C(张明才), He Z-P(何钟佩), Tian X-L(田晓莉), Duan L-S(段留生), Wang B-M(王保民), Zhai Z-X(翟志席), Dong X-H(董学会), Li Z-H(李召虎). Effects of plant growth regulator SHK-6 on physiological function of soybean leaves under water deficiency.Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(9): 1215-1220 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9] Yu H-Q(于海秋), Peng X-X(彭新湘), Yan X-L(严小龙), Cao M-J(曹敏建). Effect of phosphorus deficiency on microstructure and photosynthesis in soybean leaves. J Jilin Agric Univ (吉林农业大学学报), 2006, 28(2): 127-132 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10] Zhang G-R(张桂茹), Du W-G(杜维广), Man W-Q(满为群), Li G-Q(李桂芹), Gui M-Z(桂明珠), Wang X-D(王学东), Ge Q-Y(戈巧英), Hao N-B(郝乃斌). Study on leaf comparative anatomy of different genotypes of soybean. Chin Bull Bot (植物学通报), 2002, 19(2): 208-214 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11] Yu Y(于颖), Liu Y-Y(刘元英), Luo S-G(罗盛国), Peng X-L(彭显龙). Effects of selenium on soybean chloroplast ultra-structure and microelement content of soybean leaves under continuous cropping stress. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2003, 14(4): 573-576 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12] Liu J(刘杰), Liu L-J(刘丽君), Wu J-J(吴俊江), Chen Y-L(陈伊里). Progress and prospect of research on soybean ultrastructures. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2004, 23(3): 228-231 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13] Tian X-L(田晓莉), Tan W-M(谭伟明), Li Z-H(李召虎), Wang B-M(王保民), He Z-P(何钟佩), Duan L-S(段留生). The effects of mixture of DPC and DTA-6 on seedlings of insect-resistant transgenic cotton. Cotton Sci (棉花学报), 2006, 18(1): 3-7 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14] Lin J-H(林加涵), Wei W-L(魏文铃), Peng X-X(彭宣宪). Modern BiologyExperiments (现代生物学实验). Higher Education Press, 2002. pp 70-82 (in Chinese)

[15] Wang X-D(王学东), Cang J(苍晶), Zhang P(张鹏), Cui L(崔琳). Observation of soybean funiculus of transfer tissue.J Chin Electron Microscopy Soc (电子显微学报), 2004, 23(4): 354-354 (in Chinese)

[16] Zhao H-J(赵会杰), Zou Q(邹琦), Zhang X-Y(张秀英). Comparison between two wheat varieties with different spike type in carbohydrate metabolism during late growth period. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(5): 654-659 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] Zhang X-Z(张宪政). Research Method for Crop Physiology (作物生理研究法). Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1992. p 68 (in Chinese)

[18] Chaves M M. Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. J Exp Bot, 1991, 42: 1-16

[19] Ma G-Y(马国英), Wu Y-Y(吴源英), Xu X-Z(徐锡忠). Comparative studies on leaf blade photosynthetic characteristic and chloroplast ultramicrostructure of different wheat cultivars. Plant Physiol Commun (植物生理学通讯), 1991, 27(4): 255-259 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20] Fan Y-P(范燕萍), Li H-L(李慧玲), Li H-J(李浩健). Pigment composition and ultrastructural difference of chloroplast in three kinds of variegation leaf of cymbidium sinense. J South China Agric Univ (华南农业大学学报), 2006, 27(2): 8-12 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21] Grover A, Mohanty P. Leaf Senescence-induced alterations in structure and function of higher plant chloroplasts. In: Abrol Y P, Mohany P, eds. Photosynthesis: Photoreactions to Plant Productivity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992. pp 225-255

[22] Tong Z-Y(童朝阳), Han L-M(韩丽梅), Zou Y-J(邹永久). Effect of soybean Specificy complex fertilizer of ultrastructre of chloroplast under different cropping systems. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1998, 17(4): 369-371 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Zhang H-S(张恒善), Cheng Y-X(程砚喜), Wang D-Q(王大秋), Xiang S-H(项淑华), Gao M(高敏), Wang X-F(王雪飞), Niu J-G(牛建光).Correlation analysis of variation in chlorophyll content and yield in pod period of soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2001, 20(4): 276-278(in Chinese with English abstract)

[24] Demming-Adams B, Adams W W III. The role of xanthophylls cycle carotenoids in the protenction of photosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci, 1996, 1: 21-26

[25] Liu Z-Q(刘贞琦), Liu Z-Y(刘振业), Ma D-P(马达鹏), Zeng S-F(曾淑芬).A study on the relation between chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate of rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1984, 10(1): 57-62 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[26] Dong Z(董钻). Soybean Yield Physiology (大豆产量生理). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999. pp 138-141 (in Chinese)
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[3] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[4] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[5] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[6] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[7] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[8] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[9] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[10] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[11] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[12] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[13] 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[14] 殷丛丛, 李睿琦, 岳霈尧, 李晨, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 基于闭合哑铃介导等温扩增可视化检测大豆花叶病毒SC15方法的建立及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1248-1260.
[15] 李培华, 李杰, 孟祥宇, 孙玉晨, 冯永佳, 李云丽, 刁邓超, 赵雯, 吴玮, 韩德俊, 张嵩午, 郑炜君. 高温胁迫下冷型小麦的抗逆性评估及其生理响应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1118-1130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2