欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (09): 1468-1475.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01468

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆杂种产量的主-微位点组遗传分析

杨加银1,2,贺建波1,**,管荣展1,杨守萍1,盖钧镒1,*   

  1. 1 南京农业大学大豆研究所 / 国家大豆改良中心 / 作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室，南京 210095；2 江苏徐淮地区淮阴农业科学研究所 / 江苏省环洪泽湖生态农业生物技术重点实验室，江苏淮安 223001
  • 收稿日期:2010-02-03 修回日期:2010-04-20 出版日期:2010-09-12 网络出版日期:2010-07-05
  • 通讯作者: 盖钧镒, E-mail: sri@njau.edu.cn; Tel: 025-84395405
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展规划(973计划)项目(2006CB1017, 2009CB1184, 2010CB1259), 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2006AA1001, 2009AA1011), 国家自然科学基金项目(30671266), 国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD13B05-7)和高等学校学科创新引智计划项目(B08025)资助。

Genetic Analysis in Terms of Major-Minor Locus Group Constitutions of Yield in Hybrid Soybean

YANG Jia-Yin1,2,HE Jian-Bo1,GUAN Rong-Zhan1,YANG Shou-Ping1,GAI Jun-Yi1,*   

  1. 1 Soybean Research Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University / National Center for Soybean Improvement / National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Huaiyin Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Xuhuai Region / Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Eco-Agricultural Biotechnology around Hongze Lake, Huaian 223001, China
  • Received:2010-02-03 Revised:2010-04-20 Published:2010-09-12 Published online:2010-07-05
  • Contact: GAI Jun-Yi,E-mail:sri@njau.edu.cn; Tel: 025-84395405

PDF

1268

被引次数

6

摘要： 选用来源于中国黄淮和美国的熟期组II~IV的8个大豆品种，按Griffing方法II设计，配成36个双列杂交组合(28个杂种组合+8个亲本)于2003—2005年进行田间试验。应用基于数量性状主基因+多基因遗传模型的主-微位点组分析法，解析8个大豆亲本产量的主、微位点组遗传构成及其效应，估计主、微位点组对产量杂种优势的贡献。结果表明，8个大豆亲本间产量由6个主位点组加微位点组控制，主位点组、微位点组分别解释表型变异的75.98%和10.81%。6个主位点组加性效应(aJ)分别为140.10、259.65、1.95、151.35、–32.70和45.00 kg hm–2，显性效应(dJ)分别为177.15、314.25、105.75、75.90、242.85和171.00 kg hm–2。杂种遗传构成包括主位点组杂合显性效应、主位点组纯合加性效应、微位点组杂合显性效应和微位点组纯合加性效应4部分，相对重要性依次递减，以显性效应为主，加性效应为辅。亲本间主、微位点组及其遗传效应的解析阐释了各杂种组合的遗传特点，还提供了进一步挖掘遗传潜力进行优势改良的基础。

关键词: 大豆, 产量, 杂种优势, 主-微位点组, 加性效应, 显性效应

Abstract: The analysis of major-minor locus groups of diallel crosses based on major gene plus polygene mixed inheritance model provides a way to explore the genetic structure of hybrids among a group of materials. Eight soybean parental materials, seven from Huang-Huai region in China and one from the US with maturity group II–IV were used to develop a set of 36 diallel crosses (including 28 F1 crosses and eight parents) according to the Griffing II pattern. The materials were tested in 2003-2005. From the analysis of major-minor locus groups of the 36 materials, the results showed that six major locus groups plus minor locus groups were detected to explain 75.98% and 10.81% of the phenotypic yield variation, respectively. Which indicated that major locus groups were the major source of genetic variation among the materials with their additive effects (aJ) of 140.10, 259.65, 1.95, 151.35, –32.70, and 45.00 kg ha–1 and dominance effects (dJ) of 177.15, 314.25, 105.75, 75.90, 242.85, and 171.00 kg ha–1, respectively, while the minor locus groups were a supplement source in the genetic system. The genetic constitutions of the hybrids were composed of heterozygous dominance effects of major locus groups, homozygous additive effects of major locus groups, heterozygous dominance effects of minor locus groups and homozygous additive effects of minor locus groups, with their relative importance in a descending order. The dissection of the relative importance of the genetic effects of major-minor locus groups helps to explain the genetic characteristics of the hybrids among the parents and provides the genetic basis for further mining the genetic potential of parental materials in the improvement of hybrids.

Key words: Soybean, Yield, Heterosis, Major-minor locus groups, Additive effects, Dominance effects

[1] Leffel R C, Weiss M G. Analysis of diallel crosses among ten varieties of soybean
[J].Agron J.1958, 50:528-534  
[2] Brim C A, Cockerham C C. Inheritance of quantitative characters in soybeans
[J].Crop Sci.1961, 1:187-190 
[3] Ma Y-H(马育华), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Hu Y-Z(胡蕴珠). Studies on genetic variation of successive generations after hybridization in soybeans: II. Combining ability and related genetic parameters. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1983, 9(4): 249-258 (in Chinese with English abstract)   
[4] Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Ma Y-H(马育华), Hu Y-Z(胡蕴珠). Heterosis and combining ability performed in F1 and F3 hybrids between soybean cultivars from the PRC and US. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1984, 3(3): 183-191 (in Chinese with English abstract) 
[5] Johnson H W, Robison H F, Comstock R E. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean
[J].Agron J.1955, 47:314-318  
[6] Pathan M S, Sleper D A. Advances in Soybean Breeding. In: Stacey G ed. Genet Genom Soybean, 2008. pp 117-122 
[7] Zhou R(周蓉), Chen H-F(陈海峰), Wang X-Z(王贤智), Zhang X-J(张晓娟), Shan Z-H(单志慧), Wu X-J(吴学军), Cai S-P(蔡淑平), Qiu D-Z(邱德珍), Zhou X-A(周新安), Wu J-S(吴江生). QTL analysis of yield, yield components and lodging in soybean
[J].Acta Agron Sin (作物学报.2009, 35(5):821-830  
[8] Gai J Y. Segregation analysis on genetic system of quantitative traits in plants
[J].Front Biol China.2006, 1:85-92   
[9] Guan R-Z(管荣展), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Detection of differential QTLs among a group of parents under additive-dominance model by use of diallel design. J Biomath (生物数学学报), 2001, 16(5): 545-552 (in Chinese with English abstract)  
[10] Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Guan R-Z(管荣展), Wang J-K(王建康). Methods of genetic experiments for the detection of QTL system in plants
[J].World Sci-Tech R&D (世界科技研究与发展.1999, 21(1):34-40  
[11] Qi C-K(戚存扣), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Analysis of genotype difference and gene effects of flowering time of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) from various ecological origins. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(4): 455-460 (in Chinese with English abstract) 
[12] Yang Q-L(杨庆利), Wang J-F(王建飞), Ding J-J(丁俊杰), Zhang H-S(张红生). Inheritance of salt tolerance in some rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars at the seedling stage. J Nanjing Agric Univ (南京农业大学学报), 2004, 27(4): 6-10 (in Chinese with English abstract)  
[13] He J-B(贺建波), Guan R-Z(管荣展), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). A study on method of genetic analysis in terms of major-minor locus groups in diallel cross design. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(8): 1248-1257  
[14] Yang J-Y(杨加银), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Heterosis, combining abi- lity and their genetic basis of yield among key parental materials of soybean in Huang-Huai Valleys
[J].Acta Agron Sin (作物学报.2009, 35(4):620-630  
[15] Orf J H, Chase K, Jarvik T, Mansur L M, Cregan P B, Adler F R, Lark K G. Genetics of soybean agronomic traits: I. Comparison of three related recombinant inbred populations. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1642-1651  
[16] Yuan J, Njiti V N, Meksem K, Iqbal M J, Triwitayakorn K, Kassem M A, Davis G T, Schmidt M E, Lightfoot D A. Quantitative trait loci in two soybean recombinant inbred line populations segregating for yield and disease resistance
[J].Crop Sci.2002, 42:271-277  
[17] Chapman A, Pantalone V R, Ustun A, Allen F L, Landau-Ellis D, Trigiano R N, Gresshoff P M. Quantitative trait loci for agronomic and seed quality traits in an F2 and F4:6 soybean population
[J].Euphytica.2003, 129:387-393  
[18] Wang D, Graef G L, Procopiuk A M, Diers B W. Identification of putative QTL that underlie yield in interspecific soybean backcross populations
[J].Theor Appl Genet.2004, 108:458-467  
[19] Li D, Pfeiffer T W, Cornelius P L. Soybean QTL for yield and yield components associated with Glycine soja alleles
[J].Crop Sci.2008, 48:571-581
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[3] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[4] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[5] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[6] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[9] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[10] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[11] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[12] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[13] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[14] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[15] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2