欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (07): 1266-1273.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01266

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆不同器官Na+含量与苗期耐盐性的相关分析

刘光宇,关荣霞**,常汝镇,邱丽娟*   

  1. 农作物基因资源与遗传改良国家重大科学工程 / 农业部作物种质资源利用重点开放实验室 / 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所，北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-14 修回日期:2011-04-12 出版日期:2011-07-12 网络出版日期:2011-05-11
  • 通讯作者: 邱丽娟, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30671310，30971801)，国家转基因生物新品种培育科技重大专项(2009ZX08009-088B)和国家重点基础研究发展计划(2009CB118400)资助。

Correlation between Na+ Contents in Different Organs of Soybean and Salt Tolerance at the Seedling Stage

LIU Guang-Yu,GUAN Rong-Xia**,CHANG Ru-Zhen,QIU Li-Juan*   

  1. National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Key Laboratory of Germplasm Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2011-01-14 Revised:2011-04-12 Published:2011-07-12 Published online:2011-05-11
  • Contact: 邱丽娟, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net

PDF

2016

被引次数

10

摘要： 29个大豆品种用1/2 Hoagland营养液培养，待真叶完全展开后加入100 mmol L–1 NaCl胁迫处理。叶片盐害症状明显时(第8天)，根据盐害症状划分大豆苗期耐盐级别，并分别取根、茎、叶和子叶，用原子吸收光谱仪测定其Na+含量。结果表明，大豆茎、叶和子叶Na+含量与耐盐级别呈极显著正相关。利用不同器官Na+含量聚类，发现I级和II级苗期耐盐品种聚为一类，而III~V级苗期盐敏感品种聚为一类。耐盐品种叶片和子叶的Na+平均含量极显著(P≤0.01)低于盐敏感品种，茎Na+平均含量差异达显著水平(P≤0.05)，而根Na+平均含量差异不显著。因此，叶片和子叶Na+含量能有效区分苗期耐盐和盐敏感大豆品种。水培条件下，以叶片或子叶Na+含量作为生理指标鉴定大豆苗期耐盐性的方法，为大豆苗期耐盐种质鉴定、耐盐基因挖掘和品种培育创造了条件。

关键词: 大豆, 品种资源, 苗期, 耐盐性, Na+含量

Abstract: Salinity is recognized as one of the abiotic stresses negetively affecting crop productivity worldwide, which is mainly introduced by the consequence of Na+ toxicity. Great advances have been made in screening methodologies for salt tolerant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in recent years. But few studies have focused on the evaluation of the relationship of soybean salt tolerance with Na+ content in different organs. The objective of our study was to develop a steady, measurable and effective method for salt tolerance evaluation of soybean germplasm based on measuring Na+ content in soybean. Twenty nine cultivars were grown in 1/2 Haogland nutrient solution, in which 100 mmol L–1 NaCl was added when the second pair of simple primary leaves fully expanded. The visual foliar symptom was used to evaluate the scale of the salt tolerance. Roots, stems, leaves, and cotyledons were sampled at eight days after salt treatment. Different parts of the plant were measured by the atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Na+ content was extremly correlated with the scale of salt tolerance content in stem, leaf and cotyledon but not in root. Clustering for salt tolerant (including scale of 1 and 2) and salt sensitive (including scale of 3, 4, and 5) soybean cultivars at seedling stage based on Na+ contents in stem, leaf and cotyledon. The average Na+ contents of leaf and cotyledon from the tolerant cultivars were significantly lower than those from the sensitive culitvars. There was significant difference of Na+ contents in roots but there was not in stem between tolerant and sensitive soybean. Therefore, Na+ content in leaf and cotyledon can be used for evaluation of salt tolerance in cultivated soybean at the seedling stage. The results indicated that the possibility evaluating salt tolerant soybean cultivars at the seedling stage by Na+ content of leaf and cotyledon in hydroponics provides a method for germplasm identification, gene cloning and cultivar development of salt tolerance in soybean.

Key words: Soybean, Germplasm, Seedling stage, Salt tolerance, Na+ content

[1]Munns R, Cramer G, Ball M. Interactions between rising CO2, soil salinity and plant growth. In: Luo Y, Mooney H, eds. Carbon Dioxide and Environmental Stress. London: Academic Press, 1999
[2]Yang J-S(杨劲松). Development and prospect of the research on salt-affected soils in China. Acta Pedol Sin (土壤学报), 2008, 45(5): 837–845 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Yao Y-J(姚荣江), Yang J-S(杨劲松), Liu G-M(刘广明). Characteristics and agro-biological management of saline-alkalized land in northeast China. Soils (土壤), 2006, 38(3): 256–262 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Jiang D-H(姜德华). The utilization and transformation of north China plain. Geographical Res (地理研究), 1983, 2(1): 1–11 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Lin H-M(林汉明), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Shao G-H(邵桂花), Liu Z-T(刘忠堂). Research on Tolerance to Stresses in Chinese Soybean (中国大豆耐逆研究). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009 (in Chinese)
[6]Shao G-H(邵桂花), Song J-Z(宋景芝), Liu H-L(刘惠令). Preliminary studies on the evaluation of salt tolerance in soybean varieties. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1986, (6): 30–35 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Shao G-H(邵桂花). Relationship between the distribution of salt-tolerance soybean and salinity. Crops (作物杂志), 1988, (2): 34, 36 (in Chinese)
[8]Ma S-S(马淑时), Wang W(王伟). Research on the saline-alkalized tolerance of soybean germplasm. J Jilin Agric Sci (吉林农业科学), 1994, 4: 69–71 (in Chinese)
[9]Li X-H(李星华), Chen W-M(陈宛妹), Li Z-L(李增禄). Appraisal of salt tolerance of soybean germplasm in Shandong province. Shandong Agric Sci (山东农业科学), 1996, (4): 11–13
[10]Essa T. Effect of salinity stress on growth and nutrient composition of three soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) cultivars. J Agron Crop Sci, 2002, 188: 86–93
[11]An P, Inanaga S, Cohen Y, Kafkafi U, Sugimoto Y. Salt tolerance in two soybean cultivars. J Plant Nutr, 2002, 25: 407–423
[12]Luo Q-Y(罗庆云), Yu B-J(於丙军), Liu Y-L(刘有良). Effect of NaCl on the growth, K+, Na+ and Cl– distribution in seedlings of six soybean cultivars (Glycine max L. Merrill). Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2001, 20(3): 177–182 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Durand M, Lacan D. Sodium partitioning within the shoot of soybean. Physiol Plant, 1994, 91: 65–71
[14]Li X, An P, Inanaga S, Eneji E, Tanabe K. Salinity and defoliation effects on soybean growth. J Plant Nutr, 2006, 29: 1499–1508
[15]Gao J P, Chao D Y, Lin H X. Understanding abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms: recent studies on stress response in rice. J Integr Plant Biol, 2007, 49: 742–745
[16]Li W Y F, Wong F L, Tsai S N, Phang T H, Shao G H, Lam H M. Tonoplast-located GmCLC1 and GmNHX1 from soybean enhance NaCl tolerance in transgenic bright yellow (BY)-2 cells. Plant Cell Environ, 2006, 29: 1122–1137
[17]Tester M, Davenport R. Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann Bot, 2003, 91: 503–527
[18]Umezawa T, Shimizu K, Kato M, Ueda T. Enhancement of salt tolerance in soybean with NaCl pretreatment. Physiol Plant, 2000, 110: 59–63
[19]Valencia R, Chen P Y, Ishibashi T, Matthew C. A rapid and effective method for screening salt tolerance in soybean. Crop Sci, 2008, 48: 1773–1779
[20]Lee G J, Boerma H, Villagarcia M, Zhou X, Carter T, Li J Z, Gibbs M. A major QTL conditioning salt tolerance in S-100 soybean and descendent cultivars. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 1610–1619
[21]Lin H X, Zhu M Z, Yano M, Gao J P, Liang Z W, Su W A. QTLs for Na+ and K+ uptake of the shoots and roots controlling rice salt tolerance. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 108: 253–260
[22]Luo Q Y, Yu B J, Liu Y L. Differential sensitivity to chloride and sodium ions in seedlings of Glycine max and Glycine soja under NaCl stress. J Plant Physiol, 2005, 162: 1003–1012
[23]Shao G H. Screening for salt tolerance to soybean cultivars of the United States. Soybean Genet Newslett, 1995, 22: 32–42
[24]Aladdin H, Xu D H. Conserved salt tolerance quantitative trait locus (QTL) in wild and cultivated soybeans. Breed Sci, 2008, 58: 355–359
[25]Ren Z H, Gao J P, Li L G, Cai X L, Huang W, Chao D Y, Zhu M Z, Wang Z Y, Luan S, Lin H X. A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat Genet, 2005, 37: 1141–1146
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[3] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[4] 汪玲, 胡好, 宋家凤, 程洁蓝, 陈颖, 郑婷婷, 吕钊彦, 朱晓彪, 侯华兰. 马铃薯UDP-糖基转移酶基因StUGT52的克隆及功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 665-676.
[5] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[6] 亓青松, 牛翔雨, 刘冰可, 康禄, 王琛, 封德顺. 小偃麦辐射诱变种质芽期和苗期耐盐鉴定、筛选及耐盐指标评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 389-404.
[7] 鲁雅妮, 丁超杰, 张煜, 杜习军, 齐学礼, 胡琳, 许为钢. 河南省200份小麦品种苗期茎基腐病抗性鉴定与全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 363-375.
[8] 李诗晴, 王茜, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及相关基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 376-388.
[9] 黄丽霞, 张卫卫, 甄一越, 王秋宝, 田洪岭, 李国栋, 刘龙龙, 张丽君. 盐胁迫下苦荞萌发期耐盐碱性评价及种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 459-479.
[10] 王菲菲, 张胜忠, 杨贵华, 苗华荣, 胡晓辉, 张则林, 刘莎莎, 乔利仙, 单世华, 陈静. 331份花生种质苗期耐盐性综合评价和强耐盐种质鉴选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 279-294.
[11] 胡润慧, 汪军成, 司二静, 张宏, 李兴茂, 马小乐, 孟亚雄, 王化俊, 刘青, 姚立蓉, 李葆春. 小麦苗期耐旱耐盐种质筛选及抗旱耐盐综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2371-2386.
[12] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[13] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[14] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[15] 高梦娟, 赵贺莹, 陈家辉, 陈晓倩, 牛萌康, 钱琪润, 崔陆飞, 邢江敏, 银庆淼, 郭雯, 张宁, 孙丛苇, 阳霞, 裴丹, 贾奥琳, 陈锋, 余晓东, 任妍. 小麦抗纹枯病新位点Qse.hnau-5AS的定位及其候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2240-2250.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2