欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 1791-1798.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01791

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

甘蓝型油菜裂角相关性状的遗传与相关分析

崔嘉成1,2,刘佳1,梅德圣1,李云昌1,付丽1,彭鹏飞1,2,王军1,2,3,胡琼1,*   

  1. 1 中国农业科学院油料作物研究所 / 国家油料作物改良中心 / 农业部油料作物生物学与遗传育种重点开放实验室, 湖北武汉 430062；2 中国农业科学院研究生院, 北京100081；3 贵州省油料研究所, 贵州贵阳550006
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-16 修回日期:2013-06-01 出版日期:2013-10-12 网络出版日期:2013-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 胡琼, E-mail: huqiong01@caas.cn, Tel: 027-86711556
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2011CB109302), 国家高技术研究发展(863计划)项目(2012AA101107)，国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-13), 国家科技支撑计划项目(2010BAD01B02)和湖北农业创新中心项目资助。

Genetic and Correlation Analysis on Pod Shattering Traits in Brassica napus L.

CUI Jia-Cheng1,2,LIU Jia1,MEI De-Sheng1,LI Yun-Chang1,FU Li1,PENG Peng-Fei1,2,WANG Jun1,2,3,HU Qiong1,*   

  1. 1 Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Center for Oil Crops Improvement / Key Laboratory for Biological Sciences and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan 430062, China; 2Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3 Oil Crops Research Institute of Guizhou Province, 550006 Guiyang, China
  • Received:2013-01-16 Revised:2013-06-01 Published:2013-10-12 Published online:2013-08-01
  • Contact: 胡琼, E-mail: huqiong01@caas.cn, Tel: 027-86711556

RichHTML

PDF

1605

被引次数

17

摘要：

抗裂角性是非常重要的油菜性状, 但相关研究报道较少。本研究对11个甘蓝型油菜骨干亲本品系及由其配制的30个不完全双列杂交组合在2个环境下的抗裂角指数及其他7个角果相关性状进行了遗传分析。结果表明, 抗裂角指数遗传变异显著, 遗传上受少数主效基因控制, 效应以加性为主, 显性效应和环境效应影响较小。大部分杂交组合的抗裂角指数杂种优势不显著。抗裂角指数与角果长、果皮重、千粒重和种子直径呈极显著正相关, 与结角密度和角粒数呈极显著负相关。抗裂角性相关性状中, 角果长、千粒重、结角密度和种子直径变异主要由加性方差解释；果皮重和每角粒数主要由显性方差解释。亲本评价分析指出, 作为波里马细胞质雄性不育系统保持系的ZS11B和恢复系的R11其抗裂角性的一般配合力高, 是培育抗裂角杂交油菜品种的首选直接亲本。

关键词: 油菜, 遗传效应, 抗裂角指数, 相关分析

Abstract:

Pod shattering resistance is a very important trait of oilseed rape, and the genetic research has been extremely weak. In this study, pod shattering resistance index (SRI) and other seven pod traits were analyzed based on data collected from a 6×5 incomplete diallel design at two environments. The results demonstrated that obvious genetic variation existed among elite breeding lines and their crosses for pod SRI. Pod shattering resistance was likely controlled by few genes with mainly additive effects, and dominant effects were much less important, whereas the environments played only minor role for pod SRI. There was no significant heterosis in most of the crosses. Pod SRI was detected to be significantly positively correlated with pod length, pod wall weight, 1000-seed weight and seed diameter, but negatively correlated with pod density and number of seeds per pod. The genetic variations of pod length, 1000-seed weight, pod density and seed diameter were mainly explained by additive effects, whereas those of pod wall weight and number of seeds per pod were mainly affected by dominant effects. Among the 11 elite breeding lines, ZS11B and R11 were recommended for using as direct parental lines for making pod shattering resistant cross varieties as maintainer and restorer of lines for Polima cytoplasmic male sterility system, respectively, due to their higher general combining ability on pod SRI and other yield component traits.

Key words: Oilseed rape, Genetic effect, Pod shattering resistance index, Correlation analysis

[1]Østergaard L, Kempin S A, Bies D, Klee H J, Yanofsky M F. Pod shatter-resistant Brassica fruit produced by ectopic expression of the FRUITFULL gene. Plant Biotechnol J, 2006, 4: 45–51



[2]Morgan C L, Bruce D M, Child R, Ladbrooke Z L, Arthur A E. Genetic variation for pod shatter resistance among lines of oilseed rape developed from synthetic B. napus. Field Crop Res, 1998, 58: 153–165



[3]Wang R, Ripley V L, Rakow G. Pod shatter resistance evaluation in cultivars and breeding lines of Brassica napus, B. juncea and Sinapis alba. Plant Breed, 2007, 126: 588–595



[4]Peng P-F(彭鹏飞), Li Y-C(李云昌), Hu Q(胡琼), Liu F-L(刘凤兰), Li Y-D(李英德), Xu Y-S(徐育松), Mei D-S(梅德圣). Screen of varieties suitable for machine harvesting from new breeding hybrids or lines in Brassica napus. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报), 2009, 24(6): 223–226 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Price J S, Hobson R N, Neale M A, Bruce D M. Seed losses in commercial harvesting of oilseed rape. J Agr Eng Res, 1996, 65: 183–191



[6]Kadkol G P, Macmillan R H, Burrow R P, Halloran G M. Evaluation of Brassica genotypes for resistance to shatter: I. Development of a laboratory test. Euphytica, 1984, 33: 63–73



[7]Child R D, Evans D E. Improvements of recoverable yields in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) with growth retardants. Aspects Appl Biol, 1989, 23: 135–143



[8]Szot B, Tys T. The influence of the Spodnam Dc preparation on agrophysical properties of rape siliques and seed losses at maturation and harvest. Proceedings of the 8th International Rapeseed Congress, 1991: 1272–1277



[9]Wen Y-C(文雁成), Fu T-D(傅廷栋), Tu J-X(涂金星), Ma C-Z(马朝芝), Shen J-X(沈金雄), Zhang S-F(张书芬). Advances in studies of pod shattering resistance in rapeseed. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2009, 10(1): 140–145 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Summers J E, Bruce D M, Vancanneyt G, Redig P, Werner C P, Morgan C and Child R D. Pod shatter resistance in the resynthesized Brassica napus line DK142. J Agric Sci, 2003, 140: 43–52



[11]Roberts J A, Elliott K A, Gonzalez-Carranza Z H. Abscission, dehiscence, and other cell separation processes. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2002, 53: 131–158



[12]Kadkol G. Brassica Shatter-Resistance Research Update. 16th Australian Research Assembly on Brassicas, 2009



[13]Wei W h, Li Y C, Wang L J, Liu S Y, Yan X H, Mei D S, Li Y D, Xu Y S, Peng P F, Hu Q. Development of a novel Sinapis arvensis disomic addition line in Brassica napus containing the restorer gene for Nsa CMS and improved resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and pod shattering. Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 120: 1089–1097



[14]Morgan C L, Ladbrooke Z L, Bruce D M, Child R and Arthur A E. Breeding oilseed rape for pod shattering resistance. J Agric Sci, 2000, 135: 347–359



[15]Wen Y-C(文雁成), Fu T-D(傅廷栋), Tu J-X(涂金星), Ma C-Z(马朝芝), Shen J-X(沈金雄), Zhang S-F(张书芬). Screening and analysis of resistance to silique shattering in rape (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(1): 163–166 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Zhu J(朱军). New approaches of genetic analysis for quantitative traits and their applications in breeding. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric & Life Sci)(浙江大学学报?农业与生命科学版), 2000, 26(1): 1–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Wu J-X(吴吉祥), Zhu J(朱军). Methods for predicting genotypic value and heterosis of crop hybrids offspring at different environments. J Zhejiang Agric Univ (浙江农业大学学报), 1994, 20(6): 587–592 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Mongkolporn O, Kadkol G P, Pang E C K, Taylor P W J. Identification of RAPD markers linked to recessive genes conferring silique shatter resistance in Brassica rape. Plant Breed, 2003, 122: 479–484



[19]Peng P-F(彭鹏飞). Determination, Genetic Analysis and QTL Mapping of Pod Shatter Resistance in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). MS Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2009 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Wen Y-C(文雁成). Analysis of silique shatter resistance and its QTLs mapping in Brassica napus L. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2012 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]Hu Z Y, Hua W, Huang S M, Yang H L, Zhan G M, Wang X F, Liu G H, Wang H Z. Discovery of pod shatter-resistant associated SNPs by deep sequencing of a representative library followed by bulk segregant analysis in rapeseed. PloS ONE, 2012, 7: 1–7



[22]Zuo Q-F(左清凡), Zhu J (朱军), Liu Y-B(刘宜柏), Pan X-Y(潘晓云), Zhang J-Z (张建中). Genetic analysis of genotype?environment interaction for yield components of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in unequal experiment design. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(4): 482–488 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]He Y-T(何余堂), Li D-R(李殿荣). A preliminary study of pod shatter resistance in hybrid Brassica napus L. Shaanxi J Agric Sci (陕西农业科学), 1996, 3: 30–31 (in Chinese)



[24]Wu J-X(吴吉祥), Wang G-J(王国建), Zhu J(朱军), Xu F-H(许馥华), Ji D-F(季道藩). Genetic analysis on direct and maternal effects of seed traits in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1995, 21(6): 659–664 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[2] 蒯婕, 娄洪祥, 谭晓强, 郜耿东, 邵东李, 肖胜男, 赵杰, 徐正华, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生. 直播油菜单产提升的生理基础及实践途径[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 982-992.
[3] 张全军, 吴东丽, 刘聪, 朱永超, 杨大生, 孔祥胜. 1981—2024年长江中下游油菜发育期时空格局演变特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1140-1152.
[4] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[5] 谭文清, 惠荣奎, 张凡丽, 覃磊, 毛舒香, 邓力超, 郭一鸣, 曲亮, 严明理. 油菜耐渍性快速鉴定及耐渍种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1035-1045.
[6] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[7] 王楚锐, 李开祥, 赵志, 肖麓, 唐国永, 赵志刚, 徐亮, 杜德志, 柳海东. 甘蓝型春油菜早花基因BnCRY2功能位点KASP标记的开发及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 708-721.
[8] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[9] 娄洪祥, 幸仁鹏, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 蒯婕, 周广生. 播种期对长江中游甘蓝型油菜光温资源利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 539-551.
[10] 李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630.
[11] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117.
[12] 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[13] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[14] 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.
[15] 李炳霖, 叶晓磊, 肖红, 肖国滨, 吕伟生, 刘君权, 任涛, 陆志峰, 鲁剑巍. 镁肥用量对油菜产量和镁吸收量及因冻害减产程度的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1850-1860.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2