欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (01): 110-121.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00110

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于主成分和SOM聚类分析的高粱品种萌发期抗旱性鉴定与分类

王艺陶,周宇飞,李丰先,依兵,白薇,闫彤,许文娟,高明超,黄瑞冬*   

  1. 沈阳农业大学农学院, 辽宁沈阳 110866
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-28 修回日期:2013-08-16 出版日期:2014-01-12 网络出版日期:2013-10-22
  • 通讯作者: 黄瑞冬, E-mail: r_huang@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-06-02-02)资助。

Identification and Classification of Sorghum Cultivars for Drought Resistance during Germination Stage Based on Principal Components Analysis and Self Organizing Map Cluster Analysis

WANG Yi-Tao,ZHOU Yu-Fei,LI Feng-Xian,YI Bing,BAI Wei,YAN Tong,XU Wen-Juan,GAO Ming-Chao,HUANG Rui-Dong*   

  1. College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
  • Received:2013-02-28 Revised:2013-08-16 Published:2014-01-12 Published online:2013-10-22
  • Contact: 黄瑞冬, E-mail: r_huang@126.com

摘要:

采用人工气候箱内培养皿培养, PEG-6000溶液模拟干旱胁迫环境, 在萌发期以80、120、150和175 g L–1 PEG-6000水溶液处理31个高粱品种, 旨在根据高粱品种萌发期对不同干旱胁迫程度的响应, 筛选出具有抗旱能力的高粱品种并探讨高粱萌发期抗旱性鉴定的方法。通过主成分分析法(PCA)和神经网络自组织映射(SOM)聚类分析法对各高粱品种进行抗旱性综合分析与评定。PCA结果表明, 相对芽长、相对根长和相对萌发抗旱指数载荷量最大, 将其作为萌发期高粱抗旱性筛选的主要评价指标, 并对31个高粱品种抗旱性排序。通过SOM聚类分析将31个高粱品种按抗旱性强弱分为5类, 吉杂305等4个品种为高度抗旱品种, HL5等4个品种为抗旱品种, 辽杂10号等8个品种为中等抗旱品种, 锦杂103等7个品种为干旱敏感品种, 锦杂93等8个品种为高度干旱敏感品种。研究认为, 相对芽长、相对根长和相对萌发抗旱指数等可以作为高粱品种抗旱性鉴定的重要指标; SOM聚类分析可作为品种抗旱性分类的重要方法。

关键词: 高粱, 抗旱性, 主成分分析, SOM聚类分析

Abstract:

PEG-6000 was used to simulate drought stress environmentin artificial climate chamber for studying the effects of different concentrations of PEG-6000 (80, 120, 150, and 175 g L–1) on the response of 31 sorghum cultivars at germination stage, with the objectives of screening drought-resistant cultivars and exploring methods suitable for assessing drought-resistance of sorghum cultivars. Through principal component analysis (PCA) and Self-Organizing-Map (SOM) cluster analysis, the drought-resistance of 31 sorghum cultivars was evaluated. PCA showed that relative bud length, relative root length and drought-resistance index during germination had the maximum weight in values, and were used as the main indices for evaluating and ranking the drought-resistant capabilities of 31 sorghum cultivars. Five groups of drought-resistance capabilities of 31 sorghum cultivars were detected based on SOM cluster analysis: four cultivars including Jiza305 were highly drought-resistant, four cultivars including HL8 were drought-resistant, eight cultivars including Liaoza 10 were medium drought-resistant, seven cultivars including Jinza 103 were drought-sensitive and eight cultivars including Jinza93 were highly drought-sensitive. In conclusion, relative bud length, relative root length and germination drought-resistance index can be used as indices for identifying drought-resistance in sorghum, and SOM cluster analysis is an important method for classifying drought-resistance.

Key words: Sorghum, Drought resistance, Principal component analysis (PCA), Self-Organizing-Map (SOM) cluster analysis

[1]Lobell D B, Field C B. Global scale climate-crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Letts, 2007, 2: 1–7



[2]Hlavinka P, Trnka M, Semeradova D, Dubrovsky M, Zalud Z, Mozny M. Effect of drought on yield variability of key crops in Czech Republic. Agric Yor Meteorol, 2009, 149: 431–442



[3]山仑, 陈培元. 旱地农业生理生态基础. 北京: 科学技术出版社, 1998. pp 1–18



Shan L, Chen P Y. Dryland agriculture ecological and physiological basis. Beijing: Science Press, 1998. pp 1–18 (in Chinese)



[4]崔江慧, 李霄, 常金华. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对高粱幼苗生理特性的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(9): 160–165



Cui J H, Li X, Chang J H. Biochemical characteristics in sorghum seedlings under PEG simulated drought stress. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2011, 27(9): 160–165 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Li Y P, Ye W, Wang M, Yan X D. Climate change and drought: a risk assessment of crop-yield impacts. Clim Res, 2009, 39: 31–46



[6]山仑, 徐炳成.论高粱的抗旱性及在旱区农业中的地位.中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 2342–2348



Shan L, Xu B C. Discussion on drought resistance of sorghum and its status in agriculture in arid and semiarid regions. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 2342–2348 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]张智猛, 万书波, 戴良香, 吴正峰, 陈静, 苗华荣. 花生萌芽期水分胁迫品种适应性及抗旱性评价. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(5): 173–182



Zhang Z M, Wan S B, Dai L X, Wu Z F, Chen J, Miao H R. A study on appraisal of suitability and drought-resistance of different peanut varieties at germination stage. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2009, 27(5): 173–182 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]孟庆立, 关周博, 冯佰利, 柴岩, 胡银岗.谷子抗旱相关性状的主成分与模糊聚类分析.中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 2667–2675



Meng Q L, Guan Z B, Feng B L, Chai Y, Hu Y G. Principal component analysis and fuzzy clustering on drought-tolerance related traits of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 2667–2675 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]李文娆, 张岁岐, 山仑.水分胁迫下紫花苜蓿和高粱种子萌发特性及幼苗耐旱性. 生态学报, 2009, 29: 3066–3074



Li W R, Zhang S Q, Shan L. Seeds germination characteristics and drought-tolerance of alfalfa and sorghum seedling under water stress. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29: 3066–3074 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]刘鑫, 迟道才, 吴萍.基 于MATLAB的SOM网络的干旱聚类分析. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2008, 39: 61–64



Liu, Chi D C, Wu P. SOM network’s on clustering analysis of the drought based on Matlab. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2008, 39: 61–64 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]文勇立, 李学东, 王永, 马力, 章杰, 陈世忠, 杨克美. 种养结合模式下基于R平台的土壤养分SOM神经网络分析. 西南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 37: 393–400



Wen Y L, Li X D, Wang Y, Ma L, Zhang J, Chen S Z, Yang K M. Self-organizing mapping (SOM) neural network analysis of soil nutrient based on R after using the model of combination of planting and breeding. J Southwest Univ Natl (Nat Sci Edn), 2011, 37: 393–400 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Michel B E, Kaufmann M R. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiol, 1973, 51: 914–916



[13]付学琴, 贺浩华, 文飘, 罗向东, 谢建坤. 东乡野生稻回交重组系的抗旱性评价体系. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23: 1277–1285



Fu X Q, He H H, Wen P, Luo X D, Xie J K. Drought resistance evaluation system for backcross lines of Dongxiang common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). Chin J Appl Ecol, 2012, 23: 1277–1285 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]齐华, 许晶, 孟显华, 王晓波, 刘明, 管宏军.水分胁迫下燕麦萌芽期抗旱指标的研究.种子, 2009, 28(7): 7–10



Qi H, Xu J, Meng X H, Wang X B, Liu M, Guan H J. Studies on the drought resistance index of oat at germination stage under water stress. Seed, 2009, 28(7): 7–10 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]孙璐, 周宇飞, 汪澈, 肖木辑, 陶冶, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬.高粱品种萌发期耐盐性筛选与鉴定.中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 1714–1722



Sun L, Zhou Y F, Wang C, Xiao M J, Tao Y, Xu W J, Huang R D. Screening and identification of sorghum cultivars for salinity tolerance during germination. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 1714–1722 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]田伯红, 王素英, 李雅静, 王建广, 张立新, 梁凤芹, 翟玉柱, 刘金荣.谷子地方品种发芽期和苗期对NaCl胁迫的反应和耐盐品种筛选. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 2218–2222



Tian B H, Wang S Y, Li J Y, Wang J G, Zhang L X, Liang F Q, Zhai Y Z, Liu J R. Response to sodium chloride stress at germination and seedling and identification of salinity tolerant genotypes in foxtail millet landraces originated from China. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 2218–2222 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]安永平, 强爱玲, 张媛媛, 张文银, 曹桂兰, 韩龙植. 渗透胁迫下水稻种子萌发特性及抗旱性鉴定指标研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2006, 7: 421–426



An Y P, Qiang A L, Zhang Y Y, Zhang W Y, Cao G L, Han L Z. Study on characteristics of germination and drought-resistance index by osmotic stress in rice. J Plant Genet Resourc, 2006, 7: 421–426 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]时立文. SPSS19.0统计分析从入门到精通.北京: 清华大学出版社, 2012. pp 300–305



Shi L W. SPSS19.0 statistical analysis savvy. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2012. pp 300–305 (in Chinese)



[19]高福元, 赵成章, 卓玛兰草. 高寒山地甘肃臭草斑块特征与土壤水分的关系. 应用与环境生物学报, 2012, 18: 571–574



Gao F Y, Zhao C Z, Zhuo Malancao. Relationship between soil moisture and patch characteristics of Melica Przewalskyii communities in a degraded alpine grassland in Gansu, China. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2012, 18: 571–574 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]朱春燕, 黄丹枫, 蔡保松, 俞晨玺, 邓浩宣, 卓俊义. 甜瓜品种资源萌发期耐盐性及其指标评价. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2010, 28(6): 504–508



Zhu C Y, Huang D F, Cai B S, Yu C X, Deng H X, Zhuo J Y. Salt tolerance and indicators assessment of melon germplasms in germination stage. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Agric Sci Edn), 2010, 28(6): 504–508 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]孙景宽, 张文辉, 张洁明, 刘宝玉, 刘新成. 种子萌发期4种植物对干旱胁迫的响应及其抗旱性评价研究. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26: 1811–1818



Sun J K, Zhang W H, Zhang J M, Liu B Y, Liu X C. Response to droughty stresses and drought-resistances evaluation of four species during seed germination. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin, 2006, 26: 1811–1818 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]马斌, 周志宇, 张丽莉, 高文星.阿拉善荒漠区土壤因子与白沙蒿人工种群生长的主成分分析. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27: 859–863



Ma B, Zhou Z Y, Zhang L L, Gao W X. The principal component analysis of soil and population growth status of Artemisia sphaerocephala in arid region of Alex desert. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin, 2007, 27: 859–863 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]李翠, 梁燕, 张纪涛, 罗雷. 渗透胁迫对番茄种子萌发特性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29: 173–179



Li C, Liang Y, Zhang J T, Luo L. Effects of osmotic stress on germination characteristics of tomato. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2011, 29: 173–179 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]罗音, 王玉军, 谢胜利, 赵新西, 杨兴洪, 王玮. 等渗水分与盐分胁迫对烟草种子萌发的影响及外源甜菜碱的保护作用. 作物学报, 2005, 31: 1029–1034



Luo Y, Wang Y J, Xie S L, Zhao X X, Yang X H, Wang W. Effects of isotonic water and salt stress on seed germination of tobacco and protective function of exogenous glycinebetaine. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31: 1029–1034 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[25]刘杰, 刘公社, 齐冬梅, 李芳芳, 汪恩华. 聚乙二醇处理对羊草种子萌发及活性氧代谢的影响. 草业学报, 2002, 11: 59–64



Liu J, Liu G S, Qi D M, Li F F, Wang E H. Effect of PEG on germination and active oxygen metabolism in wildrye (Leymus chinensis) seeds. Acta Pratac Sin. 2002, 11: 59–64 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26]陈家伟, 陈清华, 尹春华, 方福康. SOM与中国不同地区人力资本构成分析. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 42: 107–110



Chen J W, Chen Q H, Yin C H, Fang F K. SOM and Chinese human capital components analysis between areas. J Beijing Norm Univ (Nat Sci), 2006, 42: 107–110 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[27]吴春旭, 鲍满园, 苟清龙. 自组织映射聚类算法在电信客户细分中的应用. 计算机系统应用, 2010, 19(8): 168–172



Wu C X, Bao M Y, Gou Q L. Application of self organization map to classification of the telecommunication company. Comp Syst Appl, 2010, 19(8): 168–172 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[28]陈志强, 陈健飞. 基于SOM的漳浦样区土壤分类研究. 吉林师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, (2): 4–6



Chen Z Q, Chen J F. The soil classification study based on SOM in Zhangpu. Jilin Norm Univ J (Nat Sci Edn), 2007, (2): 4–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[29]Lu Y L, Hao Z F, Xie C X. Large-scale screening for maize drought resistance using multiple selection criteria evaluated under water-stressed and well-watered environments. Field Crops Res, 2011, 124: 37–45

[1] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[2] 黄丽霞, 张卫卫, 甄一越, 王秋宝, 田洪岭, 李国栋, 刘龙龙, 张丽君. 盐胁迫下苦荞萌发期耐盐碱性评价及种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 459-479.
[3] 王菲菲, 张胜忠, 杨贵华, 苗华荣, 胡晓辉, 张则林, 刘莎莎, 乔利仙, 单世华, 陈静. 331份花生种质苗期耐盐性综合评价和强耐盐种质鉴选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 279-294.
[4] 付江鹏, 柳发财, 闫宝琴, 王永栋, 李利利, 魏玮, 周英霞. 控释肥替代普通尿素对旱作高粱干物质积累分配、产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2501-2513.
[5] 尹丽娜, 张锐, 陈国欢, 白磊, 李俊, 郭华春, 杨芳. 不同马铃薯品种块茎创伤愈合能力的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2399-2411.
[6] 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746.
[7] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾. 冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 797-811.
[8] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 张立异. 中国高粱株高和节间数全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 568-585.
[9] 王语新, 陈天羽, 翟红, 张欢, 高少培, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 刘庆昌. 甘薯激酶基因IbHT1的克隆及抗旱性功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 301-311.
[10] 何梅, 张佳蕾, 范士凯, 孟静静, 王建国, 郭峰, 李新国, 万书波, 杨莎. 花生抗旱基因AhCPK8及其互作蛋白GAPDH的克隆及分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2713-2726.
[11] 陈昊翔, 万鑫杰, 陈青, 王劲松, 董二伟, 王媛, 黄晓磊, 刘秋霞, 焦晓燕. 石灰性褐土条件下高粱与玉米耐瘠薄特性及对土壤肥力响应的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2775-2787.
[12] 聂波涛, 刘德泉, 陈健, 崔正果, 侯云龙, 陈亮, 邱红梅, 王跃强. 北方春大豆品种农艺和品质性状分析与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2248-2266.
[13] 闫锋, 董扬, 李清泉, 赵富阳, 侯晓敏, 刘洋, 李青超, 赵蕾, 范国权, 刘凯. 谷子育成品种萌芽期耐冷性综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2207-2218.
[14] 刘波, 池明, 曹梦琦, 唐达, 杨恒照, 张卫华, 薛聪. 过表达马铃薯StuPPO9基因对烟草抗旱能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2237-2247.
[15] 孙美红, 王彩琴, 王蓉, 白文斌, 高振峰. Bacillus velezensis G-1·脂肽悬浮种衣剂的制备及其对高粱丝黑穗病菌的防侵染效果[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1467-1485.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!