欢迎访问作物学报，今天是 2025年4月7日 星期一
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (8): 2122-2130.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.44006

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆萌发期耐盐性鉴定方法建立及耐盐大豆资源筛选

刘欣玥1,2(), 郭潇阳2, 王欣茹2, 辛大伟1,*(), 关荣霞2,*(), 邱丽娟2,*()   

  1. 1东北农业大学农学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150030
    2农作物基因资源与遗传改良国家重大科学工程 / 农业农村部北京大豆生物学重点实验室/作物基因资源与育种全国重点实验室 / 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-09 接受日期:2024-04-01 出版日期:2024-08-12 网络出版日期:2024-04-20
  • 通讯作者: * 辛大伟, E-mail: xdawei@163.com;关荣霞, E-mail: guanrongxia@caas.cn;邱丽娟, E-mail: qiulijuan@caas.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 1240054143@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    科技创新2030-重大项目(2023ZD0403601);国家自然科学基金项目(31830066)

Establishment of screening method for salt tolerance at germination stage and identification of salt-tolerant germplasms in soybean

LIU Xin-Yue1,2(), GUO Xiao-Yang2, WANG Xin-Ru2, XIN Da-Wei1,*(), GUAN Rong-Xia2,*(), QIU Li-Juan2,*()   

  1. 1Agricultural College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, Heilongjiang, China
    2National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI) / Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding / Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2024-01-09 Accepted:2024-04-01 Published:2024-08-12 Published online:2024-04-20
  • Contact: * E-mail: xdawei@163.com;E-mail: guanrongxia@caas.cn;E-mail: qiulijuan@caas.cn
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Innovation 2030-Major Projects(2023ZD0403601);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31830066)

RichHTML

34

PDF

477

摘要：

土壤盐渍化会影响大豆萌发和生长, 筛选萌发期耐盐大豆种质对于耐盐大豆品种选育及盐渍土利用意义重大。本研究以8份代表性大豆种质为材料, 蛭石为培养基质, 用150 mmol L-1 NaCl进行盐胁迫处理, 以水处理作为对照, 测量2 d和3 d的大豆发芽率和芽长, 旨在建立大豆萌发期耐盐性鉴定指标和评价方法。与对照相比, 盐胁迫下大豆发芽率和芽长均下降。盐处理2 d不同种质间相对发芽率、相对芽长无显著差异, 盐处理3 d相对芽长差异显著, 可用以进行不同大豆萌发期耐盐性评价。以150 mmol L-1 NaCl对48份大豆种质进行盐处理, 3 d相对芽长作为评价指标, 将萌发期耐盐性划分为5级, 1级为高度耐盐型, 2级为耐盐型, 3级为中度盐敏感型, 4级为盐敏感型, 5级为高度盐敏感型。鉴定出萌发期高度耐盐种质5份, 耐盐种质12份。同时对48份种质进行出苗期和苗期耐盐性鉴定, 鉴定出3份从萌发期到苗期均耐盐的种质, 分别为中黄685、黑农94和东生104。本研究建立了一套室内大豆萌发期耐盐性鉴定方法, 为耐盐种质鉴定利用奠定了基础。

关键词: 大豆, 种质资源, 萌发期, 耐盐性鉴定

Abstract:

Salinity tolerance is prioritized for soybean because salt can affect soybean germination and growth. Screening for salt-tolerant soybean germplasms is of great significance for the breeding salt-tolerant soybean varieties and the utilization of saline lands for production. In this study, eight representative soybean germplasms were used as the experimental materials, soybean seeds were planted in vermiculite and treated with 150 mmol L-1 NaCl or water as the control. The germination rate and radicle length of soybean were measured after 2 days and 3 days treatment, aiming to establish the identification index and evaluation method of soybean salt tolerance at germination stage. In comparison to control, the germination rate and radicle length of soybean decreased under salt stress. No significant difference was observed in the germination rate and relative radicle length (RRL) between germplasms after 2 days salt treatment. Significant difference was observed in RRL after 3 days salt stress. Therefore, RRL was selected as the evaluation indicator to distinguish salt tolerance of 48 soybean germplasms. The 48 germplasms were divided into 5 levels by using RRL after 3 days salt treatment. Level 1, level 2, level 3, level 4, and level 5 was high tolerant, tolerant, medium sensitive, sensitive, and most sensitive, respectively. Five high salt-tolerant germplasms and 12 salt-tolerant germplasms were identified at germination stage. These germplasms were screened for salt tolerance at both emergence and seedling stages Three soybeans were identified for salt tolerance from germination stage to seeding stage, namely Zhonghuang 685, Heinong 94, and Dongsheng 104. In conclusion, a screening method for salt tolerance at germination stage under controlled condition was established, which laid a foundation for the identification and utilization of salt tolerant germplasms.

Key words: soybean, germplasm, germination stage, evaluation for salt tolerance

表1

48个大豆种质萌发期、出苗期和苗期耐盐指标及GmSALT3单倍型"

序号
No.		 大豆名称
Soybean name		 3 d相对芽长Relative radicle length 3 d after salt stress 耐盐等级Salt tolerance level GmSALT3基因型
Haplotype of GmSALT3
萌发期Germination stage 出苗期Emergence stage 苗期Seedling stage
1 中黄685 Zhonghuang 685 0.61 1 1 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
2 东生104 Dongsheng 104 0.60 1 2 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
3 黑农94 Heinong 94 0.59 1 2 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
4 通农15 Tongnong 15 0.58 1 3 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
5 铁丰31 Tiefeng 31 0.56 1 2 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
6 中吉602 Zhongji 602 0.54 2 1 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
7 吉科黄豆20 Jikehuangdou 20 0.53 2 5 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
8 赤16-33 Chi 16-33 0.50 2 4 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
9 中黄39 Zhonghuang 39 0.50 2 2 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
10 齐农7号 Qinong 7 0.50 2 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
11 通农943 Tongnong 943 0.50 2 2 5 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
12 中黄320 Zhonghuang 320 0.49 2 2 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
13 中黄324 Zhonghuang 324 0.48 2 1 4 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
14 中联豆5022 Zhongliandou 5022 0.48 2 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
15 汾豆78 Fendou 78 0.47 2 3 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
16 中黄204 Zhonghuang 204 0.47 2 3 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
17 长农52 Changnong 52 0.46 2 3 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
18 抗线虫8号 Kangxianchong 8 0.45 3 2 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
19 中黄343 Zhonghuang 343 0.44 3 1 5 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
20 中黄48 Zhonghuang 48 0.44 3 1 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
21 中黄349 Zhonghuang 349 0.44 3 3 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
22 Williams 82 0.43 3 3 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
23 中黄311 Zhonghuang 311 0.41 3 1 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
24 通农102 Tongnong 102 0.40 3 2 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
25 中黄314 Zhonghuang 314 0.40 3 1 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
26 中黄329 Zhonghuang 329 0.40 3 2 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
27 中黄354 Zhonghuang 354 0.40 3 1 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
28 公552 Gong 552 0.39 3 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
29 中黄357 Zhonghuang 357 0.39 3 1 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
30 吉大豆2号 Jidadou 2 0.37 3 5 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
31 中黄37 Zhonghuang 37 0.36 3 5 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
32 中黄306 Zhonghuang 306 0.36 3 3 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
33 中黄339 Zhonghuang 339 0.36 3 1 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
34 吉育3528 Jiyu 3528 0.35 4 1 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
35 中黄301 Zhonghuang 301 0.34 4 2 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
36 通野19-4260-3 Tongye 19-4260-3 0.33 4 5 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
37 吉农169 Jinong 169 0.32 4 4 3 杂合 Heterozygous haplotype
38 齐农5号 Qinong 5 0.32 4 4 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
39 黑农532 Heinong 532 0.32 4 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
40 NY27-38 0.31 4 4 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
41 圣豆17 Shengdou 17 0.31 4 4 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
42 中黄302 Zhonghuang 302 0.30 4 3 1 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
43 中黄318 Zhonghuang 318 0.30 4 1 2 耐盐单倍型 Salt-tolerant haplotype
44 齐转19147 Qizhuan 19147 0.29 4 5 3 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
45 齐转20364 Qizhuan 20364 0.27 4 5 5 杂合 Heterozygous haplotype
46 中黄616 Zhonghuang 616 0.25 5 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
47 齐农30 Qinong 30 0.24 5 3 5 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype
48 中黄618 Zhonghuang 618 0.21 5 4 4 敏感单倍型 Salt-sensitive haplotype

图1

根系分析系统识别图例 A: 豆芽黑白二值图像; B: 胚根识别分析图像。"

图2

8个大豆种质在对照和150 mmol L-1 NaCl处理条件下2 d (A)和3 d (B) 的表型"

图3

不同处理(对照和150 mmol L-1 NaCl)大豆的发芽率及芽长 A、B: 2 d发芽率和芽长; C、D: 3 d发芽率和芽长。数据为3次生物学重复均值, 误差线为标准误(n = 3)。柱子上方小写字母表示同一种质的不同处理在0.05概率水平差异显著。"

表2

不同大豆种质萌发期相对发芽率和相对芽长变异"

指标
Index name		 最小值
Minimum		 最大值
Maximum		 平均值
Average		 标准偏差
Standard deviation		 偏度
Skewness		 峰度
Kurtosis		 变异系数
Coefficient of variation
2 d相对发芽率
Relative germination rate after 2 days (%)		 72 100 92.17 0.11 -0.75 -0.98 0.12
3 d相对发芽率
Relative germination rate after 3 days (%)		 74 100 95.76 0.10 -1.31 2.30 0.10
2 d相对芽长
Relative radicle length after 2 days		 0.26 0.52 0.39 0.10 -0.18 -1.80 0.25
3 d相对芽长
Relative radicle length after 3 days		 0.21 0.61 0.44 0.12 -0.63 0.35 0.27

表3

8个种质盐处理2 d和3 d相对发芽率和相对芽长差异分析"

大豆名称
Soybean name		 2 d相对发芽率
Relative germination rate after 2 d (%)		 3 d相对发芽率
Relative germination rate after 3 d (%)		 2 d相对芽长
Relative radicle length after 2 d		 3 d相对芽长
Relative radicle length after 3 d
中吉602 Zhongji 602 79±14 a 93±9 a 0.38±0.08 a 0.55±0.10 a
中黄685 Zhonghuang 685 100±0 a 97±5 a 0.50±0.06 a 0.61±0.06 a
中黄311 Zhonghuang 311 86±8 a 100±5 a 0.30±0.06 a 0.41±0.07 abc
中黄39 Zhonghuang 39 100±6 a 100±0 a 0.52±0.04 a 0.50±0.07 ab
中黄324 Zhonghuang 324 100±8 a 90±0 a 0.44±0.03 a 0.48±0.02 ab
中黄349 Zhonghuang 349 100±0 a 100±0 a 0.46±0.07 a 0.44±0.04 ab
中黄616 Zhonghuang 616 72±7 a 100±0 a 0.26±0.04 a 0.34±0.08 bc
中黄618 Zhonghuang 618 94±12 a 74±19 a 0.26±0.07 a 0.21±0.04 c

图4

大豆萌发期、出苗期和苗期耐盐等级差异分析 A: 萌发期种质间相对芽长差异分析; B: 萌发期、出苗期和苗期耐盐种质维恩图。小写字母表示在0.05概率水平差异显著。"

表4

大豆3个发育时期耐盐等级的相关性分析"

耐盐等级
Salt tolerance
level		 萌发期
Germination stage		 出苗期
Emergence stage		 苗期
Seedling stage
萌发期Germination stage 1
出苗期Emergence stage 0.282 1
苗期Seedling stage 0.136 0.093 1
[1] Parida A K, Das A B. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2005, 60: 324-349.
[2] FAO. 2021. Salt-affected soils. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Available from: http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-management/management-of-some-problem-soils/salt-affected-soils/more-information-on-salt-affected-soils/en/.
[3] 王佳丽, 黄贤金, 钟太洋, 陈志刚. 盐碱地可持续利用研究综述. 地理学报, 2011, 66: 673-684.
Wang J L, Huang X J, Zhong T Y, Chen Z G. Review on sustainable utilization of salt-affected land. Acta Geogr Sin, 2011, 66: 673-684 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11821/xb201105010
[4] 佚名. 中国大豆优势区域布局规划(2008-2015年). 农业工程技术(农产品加工业), 2009, (8): 4-5.
Yi M. Soybean advantage area layout planning in China (2008-2015). Agric Engr Technol (Agric Prod Proc Ind), 2009, (8): 4-5 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Phang T H, Shao G, Lam H M. Salt tolerance in soybean. J Integr Plant Biol, 2008, 50: 1196-1212.
[6] Jenks M A, Hasegawa P M, Jain S M. Advances in Molecular Breeding Toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops. Dordrech: Springer, 2007. pp 739-773.
[7] Abel G H, MacKenzie A J. Salt Tolerance of soybean varieties (Glycine max L. Merrill) during germination and later growth. Crop Sci, 1964, 4: 157-161.
[8] Singleton P W, Bohlool B B. Effect of salinity on nodule formation by soybean. Plant Physiol, 1984, 74: 72-76.
doi: 10.1104/pp.74.1.72 pmid: 16663389
[9] Katerji N, Van Hoorn J W, Hamdy A, Mastrorilli M, Karam F. Salinity and drought, a comparison of their effects on the relationship between yield and evapotranspiration. Agric Water Manag, 1998, 36: 45-54.
[10] Parker M B, Gaines T P, Hook J E, Gascho G J, Maw B W. Chloride and water stress effects on soybean in pot culture. J Plant Nutr, 1987, 10: 517-538.
[11] 邵桂花, 宋景芝, 刘惠令. 大豆种质资源耐盐性鉴定初报. 中国农业科学, 1986, 19(6): 30-35.
Shao G H, Song J Z, Liu H L. Preliminary studies on the evaluation of salt tolerance in soybean varieties. Sci Agric Sin, 1986, 19(6): 30-35 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 韩毅强, 高亚梅, 杜艳丽, 张玉先, 杜吉到, 张文慧, 潘绍玉. 大豆耐盐碱种质资源鉴定. 中国油料作物学报, 2021, 43: 1016-1024.
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2020353
Han Y Q, Gao Y M, Du Y L, Zhang Y X, Du J D, Zhang W H, Pan S Y. Identification of saline-alkali tolerant germplasm resources of soybean during the whole growth stage. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2021, 43: 1016-1024 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 刘谢香, 常汝镇, 关荣霞, 邱丽娟. 大豆出苗期耐盐性鉴定方法建立及耐盐种质筛选. 作物学报, 2020, 46: 1-8.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.94062
Liu X X, Chang R Z, Guan R X, Qiu L J. Establishment of screening method for salt tolerant soybean at emergence stage and screening of tolerant germplasm. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46: 1-8 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 郭秀秀, 李照君, 樊守金, 李娜娜, 蒲艳艳, 宫永超, 丁汉凤. 大豆种质资源芽期耐盐性鉴定及耐盐品种筛选. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 6: 47-51.
Guo X X, Li Z J, Fan S J, Li N N, Pu Y Y, Gong Y C, Ding H F. Identification of salt tolerance and screening of salt tolerant varieties of soybean germplasm at germination stage. Anhui Agric Sci, 2019, 6: 47-51 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 张鹏, 徐晨, 徐克章, 张治安, 李大勇, 季平, 冯引弟. 大豆品种耐盐性的快速鉴定法及不同时期耐盐性的研究. 中国油料作物学报, 2013, 35: 572.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2013.05.016
Zhang P, Xu C, Xu K Z, Zhang Z A, Li D Y, Ji P, Feng Y D. Fast identification method of salt-tolerance and research on salt- tolerance at different stages of soybean cultivars. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2013, 35: 572 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 张新草, 薛项潇, 姜深, 王延峰, 曹永策. 大豆种质发芽期耐盐碱性鉴定及指标筛选. 西北农业学报, 2020, 29(3): 8.
Zhang X C, Xue X X, Jiang S, Wang Y F, Cao Y C. Identification of mixed saline-alkali tolerance and screening of indicators in soybean at germination stage. J Northwest Agric Sci, 2020, 29(3): 8 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 徐恒恒, 黎妮, 刘树君, 王伟青, 王伟平, 张红, 程红焱, 宋松泉. 种子萌发及其调控的研究进展. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1141-1156.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01141
Xu H H, Li N, Liu S J, Wang W Q, Wang W Q, Zhang H, Cheng H Y, Song S Q. Research progress in seed germination and its control. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1141-1156 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 牛远, 杨修艳, 戴存凤, 王博文, 任高磊, 吴静磊, 王飞兵, 陈新红. 大豆芽期和苗期耐盐性评价指标筛选. 大豆科学, 2018, 37: 215-223.
Niu Y, Yang X Y, Dai C F, Wang B W, Ren G L, Wu J L, Wang F B, Chen X H. Related indices selection of soybean salt tolerance at germination and seedling. Soybean Sci, 2018, 37: 215-223 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 姬丹丹, 刘畅, 曹其聪, 向凤宁. 不同大豆品种芽期和苗期耐盐性比较研究. 山东轻工业学院学报(自然科学版), 2011, 25(2): 4-7.
Ji D D, Liu C, Cao Q C, Xiang F N. Comparison of the salt tolerance at sprout and seedling in different soybean. Shandong Polytechnic Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2011, 25(2): 4-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 邵桂花, 万超文, 李舒凡. 大豆芽期耐盐生理初步研究. 作物杂志, 1994, (6): 25-27.
Shao G H, Wan C W, Li S F. Preliminary study on salt tolerance physiology of soybean at germination stage. Crops, 1994, (6): 25-27 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] Hosseini M K, Powell A A, Bingham I J. Comparison of the seed germination and early seedling growth of soybean in saline conditions. Seed Sci Res, 2002, 12: 165-172.
[22] 姜静涵, 关荣霞, 郭勇, 常汝镇, 邱丽娟. 大豆苗期耐盐性的简便鉴定方法. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 1248-1256.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01248
Jiang J H, Guan R X, Guo Y, Chang R Z, Qiu L J. Simple evaluation method of tolerance to salt at seedling stage in soybean. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 1248-1256 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] Guan R X, Yu L L, Liu X X, Li M Q, Chang R Z, Gilliham M, Qiu L J. Selection of the salt tolerance gene GmSALT3 during six decades of soybean breeding in China. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 794241.
[24] Shao G H, Wan C W, Li S F. Preliminary study on the physiology of soybean tolerance to salt stress at germinating stage. Crops, 1994, 6: 25-27.
[25] 张兆宁, 李江辉, 赵怡宇, 范亚茹, 杜艳丽, 韩德志, 张玉先, 杜吉到. 不同程度盐胁迫下大豆萌发期耐盐性鉴定. 大豆科学, 2023, 42: 335-343.
Zhang Z N, Li J H, Zhao Y Y, Fan Y R, Du Y L, Han D Z, Zhang Y X, Du J D. Salt tolerance identification of soybean at germination stage under different. Soybean Sci, 2023, 42: 335-343 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] Ohto M, Fischer R L, Goldberg R B, Nakamura K, Harada J J. Control of seed mass by APETALA2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102: 3123.
[27] 白光红, 张义荣, 刘弋菊, 邢鸿雁, 严建兵, 彭惠茹, 章建新, 李建生. ImageJ图象处理软件在测量玉米子粒大小中的应用. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(1): 147-151.
Bai G H, Zhang Y R, Liu Y J, Xing H Y, Yan J B, Peng H R, Zhang J X, Li J S. Application of ImageJ analysis software in measuring kernel size of maize seeds. J Maize Sci, 2009, 17(1): 147-151 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] Flowers T J. Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 307-319.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh003 pmid: 14718494
[29] 张巧凤, 陈宗金, 吴纪中, 蒋彦婕, 杨继书, 蔡士宾. 小麦种质芽期和苗期的耐盐性鉴定评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 2013, 14: 620-626.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2013.04.007
Zhang Q F, Chen Z J, Wu J Z, Jiang Y J, Yang J S, Cai S B. Screening for salinity tolerance at germination and seedling stages in wheat germplasm. J Plant Genet Resour, 2013, 14: 620-626 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] Khatun S, Flowers T J. Effects of salinity on seed set in rice. Plant Cell Environ, 1995, 18: 61-67.
[31] Giaveno C D, Ribeiro R V, Souza G M, Oliveira R F. Screening of tropical maize for salt stress tolerance. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol, 2007, 7: 304-313.
[32] Zhang W, Liao X, Cui Y, Ma W Y, Zhang X N, Du H Y, Ma Y J, Ning L H, Wang H, Huang F, Yang H, Kan G Z, Yu D Y. A cation diffusion facilitator, GmCDF1, negatively regulates salt tolerance in soybean. PLoS Genet, 2019, 15: e1007798.
[33] Guan R X, Qu Y, Guo Y, Yu L L, Liu Y, Jiang J H, Chen J G, Ren Y L, Liu G Y, Tian L, Jin L G, Liu Z X, Hong H L, Chang R Z, Gilliham M, Qiu L J. Salinity tolerance in soybean is modulated by natural variation in GmSALT3. Plant J, 2015, 80: 937-950.
[1] 聂波涛, 刘德泉, 陈健, 崔正果, 侯云龙, 陈亮, 邱红梅, 王跃强. 北方春大豆品种农艺和品质性状分析与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2248-2266.
[2] 孙现军, 胡正, 姜雪敏, 王世佳, 陈向前, 张惠媛, 张辉, 姜奇彦. 大豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定评价与筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2179-2186.
[3] 李晓菲, 高华伟, 广慧, 石宇欣, 谷勇哲, 齐照明, 邱丽娟. 大豆种质资源萌发期耐莠去津鉴定评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1699-1709.
[4] 王蕊, 孙擘, 张云龙, 张茗起, 范亚明, 田红丽, 赵怡锟, 易红梅, 匡猛, 王凤格. 叶绿体标记在玉米种质资源快速分组中的应用分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1867-1876.
[5] 张红梅, 张威, 王琼, 贾倩茹, 孟珊, 熊雅文, 刘晓庆, 陈新, 陈华涛. 大豆籽粒Ve含量的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1223-1235.
[6] 苗龙, 舒阔, 李娟, 黄茹, 王业杏, Soltani Muhammad YOUSOF, 许竞好, 吴传磊, 李佳佳, 王晓波, 邱丽娟. 大豆根茎过渡区弯曲突变体Mrstz的鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1091-1103.
[7] 李航, 刘丽, 黄乾, 刘文豪, 司爱君, 孔宪辉, 王旭文, 赵福相, 梅拥军, 余渝. 棉花种质资源萌发期耐盐性鉴定及筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1147-1157.
[8] 王亚琪, 徐海风, 李曙光, 傅蒙蒙, 余希文, 赵志鑫, 杨加银, 赵团结. 大豆类病变皱叶突变体NT301遗传分析和2对基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 808-819.
[9] 王琼, 朱宇翔, 周密密, 张威, 张红梅, 陈新, 陈华涛, 崔晓艳. 大豆叶型性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 623-632.
[10] 刘薇, 王玉斌, 李伟, 张礼凤, 徐冉, 王彩洁, 张彦威. 过量表达大豆异丙基苹果酸脱氢酶基因GmIPMDH促进植株开花和生长[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 613-622.
[11] 宋健, 熊亚俊, 陈伊洁, 徐瑞新, 刘康林, 郭庆元, 洪慧龙, 高华伟, 谷勇哲, 张丽娟, 郭勇, 阎哲, 刘章雄, 关荣霞, 李英慧, 王晓波, 郭兵福, 孙如建, 闫龙, 王好让, 姬月梅, 常汝镇, 王俊, 邱丽娟. 大豆巢式关联作图(NAM)群体构建及花色和种皮色遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 556-575.
[12] 柯会锋, 苏红梅, 孙正文, 谷淇深, 杨君, 王国宁, 徐东永, 王洪这, 吴立强, 张艳, 张桂寅, 马峙英, 王省芬. 棉花现代品种资源产量与纤维品质性状鉴定及分子标记评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 280-293.
[13] 李世宽, 洪慧龙, 付佳祺, 谷勇哲, 孙如建, 邱丽娟. BSA-Seq结合RNA-Seq技术挖掘大豆叶片提前黄化衰老基因[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 294-309.
[14] 杨立达, 任俊波, 彭新月, 杨雪丽, 罗凯, 陈平, 袁晓婷, 蒲甜, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 施氮与种间距离下大豆/玉米带状套作作物生长特性及其对产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 251-264.
[15] 石宇欣, 刘欣玥, 孙建强, 李晓菲, 郭潇阳, 周雅, 邱丽娟. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术编辑GmBADH1基因改变大豆耐盐性[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 100-109.
Viewed
Full text
509
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 34 45 0 430

  From Others local
  Times 22 487
  Rate 4% 96%

Abstract
405
Just accepted Online first Issue
25 0 380
  From local
  Times 405
  Rate 100%

Cited
Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王丽燕;赵可夫. 玉米幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[2] 秦治翔;杨佑明;张春华;徐楚年;翟志席. 棉纤维次生壁增厚相关基因的cDNA克隆与分析[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 860 -866 .
[3] 倪大虎;易成新;李莉;汪秀峰;张毅;赵开军;王春连;章琦;王文相;杨剑波. 分子标记辅助培育水稻抗白叶枯病和稻瘟病三基因聚合系[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 100 -105 .
[4] 戴小军;梁满中;陈良碧. 栽培稻种内核糖体基因的ITS序列比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(11): 1874 -1878 .
[5] 汪保华;武耀廷;黄乃泰;郭旺珍;朱协飞;张天真. 陆地棉重组自交系产量及产量构成因子性状的上位性QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(11): 1755 -1762 .
[6] 王春梅;冯祎高;庄丽芳;曹亚萍;亓增军;别同德;曹爱忠;陈佩度. 普通小麦近缘物种黑麦1R、簇毛麦1V及鹅观草1Rk#1染色体特异分子标记的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(11): 1741 -1747 .
[7] 周录英;李向东;王丽丽;汤笑;林英杰. 钙肥不同用量对花生生理特性及产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 879 -885 .
[8] 王立新;李云伏;常利芳;黄 岚;李宏博;葛玲玲;刘丽华;姚 骥;赵昌平;姚 骥;赵昌平. 建立小麦品种DNA指纹的方法研究[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(10): 1738 -1740 .
[9] 郑天清;徐建龙;傅彬英;高用明;Satish VERUKA;Renee LAFITTE;翟虎渠;万建民;朱苓华;黎志康. 回交高代选择导入系的纹枯病抗性与抗旱性的遗传重叠研究[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(08): 1380 -1384 .
[10] 杨燕;赵献林;张勇;陈新民;何中虎;于卓;夏兰琴. 四个小麦抗穗发芽分子抗性标记有效性的验证与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 17 -24 .
京ICP备15008789号-2