欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 1941-1949.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01941

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

盐胁迫下高粱新生叶片结构和光合特性的系统调控

王鑫1,2,李志强3,谷卫彬1,石雷1,唐宇丹1,高辉远2,赵世杰2,姜闯道1   

  1. 1中国科学院植物研究所，北京100093；2山东农业大学生命科学学院，山东泰安271018；3北京农业职业技术学院，北京102442
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-06 修回日期:2010-06-27 出版日期:2010-11-12 网络出版日期:2010-08-30
  • 通讯作者: 姜闯道, E-mail: jcdao@ibcas.ac.cn, Tel: 010-62836657
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30770223和30871455)和国家作物重点实验室开放基金(2010KF04)资助。

Systemic Regulation of Structure and Photosynthetic Characteristics in Developing Leaves in Sorghum Seedlings under Salt Stress

WANG Xin1,2,LI Zhi-Qiang3,GU Wei-Bin1,SHI-Lei1,TANG Yu-Dan1,GAO Hui-Yuan2,ZHAO Shi-Jie2,JIANG Chuang-Dao1,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China; 2 College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agriculture University, Tai’an 271018, China; 3 Beijing Vocational College of Agriculture, Beijing 102442, China
  • Received:2010-04-06 Revised:2010-06-27 Published:2010-11-12 Published online:2010-08-30
  • Contact: JIANG Chuang-Dao,E-mail:jcdao@ibcas.ac.cn,Tel:010-62836657

PDF

2604

被引次数

74

摘要： 以C4作物高粱为材料，研究了盐胁迫下新生叶片结构和光合特性的系统调控。结果表明：(1)盐胁迫导致成熟叶和新生叶水势、光合速率、气孔导度明显下降，光抑制程度略有增强；并且新生叶片上下表面气孔密度均增加。(2)非盐胁迫条件下，成熟叶遮荫对其自身和新生叶水势影响不显著，但两者光合速率、气孔导度和叶片可溶性糖含量降低，对强光敏感性增强；同时，降低成熟叶光强还显著降低新生叶的叶片厚度、气孔密度、维管束鞘细胞表面积；(3)盐胁迫下成熟叶遮荫诱导的新生叶结构和光合功能变化与非盐胁迫条件下趋势相似。双因素方差分析显示，盐胁迫下成熟叶遮荫能明显加剧高粱成熟叶和新生叶两者光合速率和气孔导度的下降并增强对强光的敏感性。因此认为，盐胁迫下高粱新生叶片的结构和光合功能均受到系统信号调控；提高成熟叶所处环境光强有助于改善盐胁迫下新生叶发育和碳同化能力，并一定程度上缓解光抑制。这对理解盐胁迫下高粱抗盐性具有重要意义。

关键词: 盐胁迫, 光合特性, 系统调控, 光抑制, 高粱

Abstract: The influences of a systemic signal, from mature leaves, on the photosynthetic characteristics of developing leaves in sorghum seedlings under salt stress were carefully investigated. Salt stress significantly decreased water potential, net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and slightly increased extent of photoinhibition both in mature and newly developed leaves. In newly developed leaves, stomatal density of both adaxial and abaxial surfaces increased. Under non-salt stress condition, water potential both in mature and newly developed leaves was hardly affected when mature leaves exposed to weak light. However, carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance, soluble sugar content decreased markedly and the extent of photoinhibition increased largely in mature leaves and newly developed leaves due to the shading of mature leaves. Meanwhile, stomatal density, mesophyll thickness and surface area of bundle sheath decreased in newly developed leaves when light intensity decreased for mature leaves. In salt-stressed group, changes in photosynthetic structure and function had a similar tendency with that in non-salt stress group, but a further decline in photosynthesis was observed. Two-way ANOVA among these four treatments showed that there was a synergistic effect between salt stress and high irradiance which impaired the photosynthetic ability more heavily and enhanced photoinhibition. Accordingly, we concluded that there is a systemic regulation on the photosynthetic structure and performance of newly developed leaves under salt stress. The enhancement of the light intensity of mature leaves is very important for the improvement of development, carbon assimilation and the alleviation of photoinhibition in newly developed leaves under salt stress.

Key words: Salt stress, Photosynthetic characteristics, Systemic regulation, Photoinhibition, Sorghum

[1]Bongi G, Loreto F. Gas-exchange properties of salt-stressed olive (Olea europea L.) leaves. Plant Physiol, 1989, 90: 1408–1416
[2]Mishra S K, Subrahmanyam D, Singhal G S. Interactionship between salt and light stress on the primary process of photosynthesis. J Plant Physiol, 1991, 138: 92–96
[3]Sharma P K, Hall D O. Interaction of salt stress and photoinhibition on photosynthesis in barley and sorghum. J Plant Physiol, 1991, 138: 614–619
[4]Belkhodja R, Morales F, Abadia A, Gomez-Aparisi J, Abadia J. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a possible tool for salinity tolerance screening in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Physiol, 1994, 104: 667–673
[5]Masojidek J, Hall D O. Salinity and drought stresses are amplified by high irradiance in sorghum. Photosynthetica, 1992, 27: 159–171
[6]Melgar J C, Guidi L, Remorini D, Agati G, Degl’Innocenti E, Castelli S, Baratto, M C, Faraoni C, Tattini M. Antioxidant defenses and oxidative damage in salt-treated olive plants under contrasting sunlight irradiance. Tree Physiol, 2009, DOI:10.1093/treephys/tpp047
[7]Allakhverdiev S I, Nishiyama Y, Miyairi S, Yamamoto H, Inagaki N, Kanesaki Y, Murata N. Salt stress inhibits the repair of photodamaged photosystem II by suppressing the transcription and translation of psbA genes in Synechocystis. Plant Physiol, 2002, 130: 1443–1453
[8]Murata N, Takahashi S, Nishiyama Y, Allakhverdiev S I. Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2007, 1767: 414–421
[9]Xu D-Q(许大全), Zhang Y-Z(张玉忠), Zhang R-X(张荣铣). Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol Commun (植物生理学通讯), 1992, 28: 237–243 (in Chinese)
[10]Demmig-Adams B, Adams W W. Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1992, 43: 599–626
[11]Wu Z-F(吴正锋), Wang C-B(王才斌), Li X-G(李新国), Wang F-H (王法宏), Wan S-B(万书波), Liu J-H(刘俊华), Zheng Y-P(郑亚萍), Sun K-X(孙奎香). Effects of shading at seedling stage on photosynthetic characteristic of Arachis hypoaea L. leaves. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2009, 29(3): 1366–1373 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Guo F(郭峰), Qu Y-Y(曲妍妍), Xin C-P(信长朋), Liang Y(梁燕), Liang X(梁雪), Tian J-C(田纪春), Meng Q-W(孟庆伟), Zhao S-J(赵世杰). Response of photosynthetic apparatus to different irradiance in flag leaves of high-yielding winter wheat PH01-35 grown under low light conditions. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(1): 179−184 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Yang X-H(杨兴洪), Zou Q(邹琦), Zhao S-J(赵世杰). Photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves of cotton plants grown in full light and 40% sunlight. Acta Phytoecol Sin (植物生态学报), 2005, 29(1): 8–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Bongi G, Long S P. Light dependent damage to photosynthesis in olive leaves during chilling and high temperature stress. Plant, Cell Environ, 1987, 10: 241–249
[15]Lake J A, Quick W P, Beerling D J, Woodward F I. Plant development: signals from mature to new leaves. Nature, 2001, 411: 154
[16]Thomas P W, Woodward F I, Quick W P. Systemic irradiance signalling in tobacco. New Phytol, 2004, 161: 193–198
[17]Yano S, Terashima I. Separate localization of light signal perception for sun or shade type chloroplast and palisade tissue differentiation in Chenopodium album. Plant Cell Physiol, 2001, 42: 1303–1310
[18]Karpinski S, Reynolds H, Karpinska B, Creissen G, Wingsle G, Mullineaux P. Systemic signalling and acclimation in response to excess excitation energy in Arabidopsis. Science, 1999, 284: 654–657
[19]Li D-J(黎大爵), Liao F-S(廖馥荪). Sweet Sorghum and Utility. Beijing: Science Press, 1992. p 17
[20]Ge J-L(葛江丽), Shi L(石雷), Gu W-B(谷卫彬), Tang Y-D(唐宇丹), Zhang J-Z(张金政), Jiang C-D(姜闯道), Ren D-M(任大明). Photosynthetic characteristics and the regulation of photosystem II function in salt-stressed sweet sorghum seedlings. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(8): 1272–1278 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Li P-M(李鹏民), Gao H-Y(高辉远), Strasser R J. Application of the chlorophyll fluorescence induction dynamics in photosynthesis study. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol, 2005, 31: 559–566 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]Jiang C D, Li P M, Gao H Y. Enhanced photoprotection at the early stages of leaf expansion in field-grown soybean plants. Plant Sci, 2005, 168: 911–919
[23]Jiang C D, Jiang G M, Wang X Z. Increased photosynthetic activities and thermostability of photosystem II with leaf development of Elm seedlings (Ulmus Punila) probed by the fast fluorescence rise OJIP. Environ Exp Bot, 2006, 58: 261–268
[24]Coupe S A, Palmer B G, Lake J A, Overy S A, Oxborough K, Woodward F I, Gray J E, Quick W. Systemic signalling of environmental cues in Arabidopsis leaves. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57: 329–341
[25]Thain J F. Curvature correction factors in the measurement of cell surface areas in plant tissues. J Exp Bot, 1983, 34: 87–94
[26]Zhao S-J(赵世杰), Shi G-A(史国安), Dong X-C(董新纯). Laboratory Guide for Plant Physiology. Beijing: Beijing Science & Technology Press, 2002. pp 84–85
[27]Gregoriou K, Pontikis K, Vemmos S. Effects of reduced irradiance on leaf morphology, photosynthetic capacity, and fruit yield in olive (Olea europaea L.). Photosynthetica, 2007, 45: 172–181
[1] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[2] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[3] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[4] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[5] 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1和PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
[6] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[7] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[8] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[9] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[10] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[11] 付江鹏, 柳发财, 闫宝琴, 王永栋, 李利利, 魏玮, 周英霞. 控释肥替代普通尿素对旱作高粱干物质积累分配、产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2501-2513.
[12] 李雪婷, 任昊, 王洪章, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘莹, 姚海燕, 刘鹏. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型玉米品种叶片光合性能和干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1091-1101.
[13] 李培华, 李杰, 孟祥宇, 孙玉晨, 冯永佳, 李云丽, 刁邓超, 赵雯, 吴玮, 韩德俊, 张嵩午, 郑炜君. 高温胁迫下冷型小麦的抗逆性评估及其生理响应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1118-1130.
[14] 李乔, 叶杨春, 常旭虹, 王德梅, 王艳杰, 杨玉双, 马瑞琦, 赵广才, 蔡瑞国, 张敏, 刘希伟. 花后高温干旱逆境对冬小麦光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1077-1090.
[15] 潘炬忠, 韦萍, 朱德平, 邵胜雪, 陈珊珊, 韦雅倩, 高维维. 水稻转录因子OsERF104的克隆和功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 900-913.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2