欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 932-940.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84112

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于生命周期法的中国2004—2015年油菜生产氮足迹分析

陈中督,徐春春,纪龙,方福平()   

  1. 中国水稻研究所, 浙江杭州 311300
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-23 接受日期:2019-01-12 出版日期:2019-06-12 网络出版日期:2019-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 方福平
  • 作者简介:E-mail: chenzhongdu@caas.cn
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300210);浙江省自然科学基金青年基金项目(LQ18G030013)

Assessment of the nitrogen footprint in oilseed rape production of China during 2004 to 2015 base on life cycle assessment method

Zhong-Du CHEN,Chun-Chun XU,Long JI,Fu-Ping FANG()   

  1. China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2018-08-23 Accepted:2019-01-12 Published:2019-06-12 Published online:2019-06-12
  • Contact: Fu-Ping FANG
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Project of National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFD0300210);the Project of National Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang(LQ18G030013)

摘要:

农业领域的活性氮排放日趋严重, 系统分析农业生产过程中活性氮排放有利于促进我国农业绿色健康发展。本文基于2004—2015年我国油菜产量、农资投入产出等统计资料数据, 运用氮足迹理论和生命周期法系统评价我国油菜生产氮足迹时空分布状况及其构成。结果表明, 我国油菜生产单位面积氮足迹为7572.0 g N-eq hm -2, 呈现逐年下降的趋势。氮肥投入和NH3挥发是我国油菜生产活性氮排放主要来源, 分别占油菜生产氮足迹的20%和54%。内蒙古、上海、江苏3个省、区、市的单位面积氮足迹和单位产量氮足迹显著高于低产省市, 其中氮肥、磷肥、复合肥产生的氮足迹值分别高80.6%、76.9%和57.8% (P < 0.05)。我国油菜单位面积氮足迹随着油菜产量的增加呈增加的趋势, 但不存在显著相关性。研究结论表明, 发展油菜生产节肥技术是我国油菜绿色健康发展的重要举措。

关键词: 氮足迹, 油菜, 生命周期, 时空分布, 中国

Abstract:

The loss of reactive nitrogen in agriculture has increasingly become serious, systematic analysis of reactive nitrogen emissions from agricultural production is conducive to promoting the green and healthy development of agriculture in China. Based on the statistical data of crop yield and farmland investment in the oilseed rape production of China, the spatiotemporal dynamic change of nitrogen footprint (NF) and its composition of oilseed rape during 2004-2015 in China was estimated using the theory of NF and life cycle assessment method in the agricultural sector. The NF of oilseed rape was 7572.0 g N-eq ha -1 during 2004-2015, and decreasing year by year, with an average annual decline of 1.0%. The main components of the NF were from fertilizer application (20%) and NH3 emission (54%) in the oilseed rape production. Obvious differences also were observed among mainly agricultural provinces in China, that is, the higher nitrogen footprint per area (NFa) and nitrogen footprint per yield (NFy) in Inner Mongolia, Shanghai, and Jiangsu region. The NFa and NFy in high yield region were significantly higher than those in low yield region. Among them, the NF of nitrogenous fertilizer, phosphate fertilizer and compound fertilizer increased by 80.6%, 76.9%, and 57.8%, respectively (P < 0.05). The NFa of rapeseed in China showed a trend of increase with the increase of rapeseed yield, but there was no significant correlation. The results suggest that improving crop management practices that limit fertilizer consumption is an important measure for the green and healthy development of rapeseed in China.

Key words: nitrogen footprint, oilseed rape, life cycle assessment, spatiotemporal distribution, China

图1

活性氮排放计算边界"

表1

农业投入资料的活性氮排放系数"

项目
Item
N2O排放系数
N2O emission coefficient
(g N-eq kg-1)
NOx排放系数
NOx emission coefficient
(g N-eq kg-1)
柴油Diesel 0.06 0.5
柴油燃烧Combustion 0.14 3.83
氮肥N 0.09 13.47
磷肥P2O5 0.013 2.16
钾肥K2O 0.017 2.90
杀虫剂 Insecticides 0.1661 13.18
除草剂 Herbicides 0.1015 8.06
杀菌剂 Fungicides 0.1057 8.41

图2

2004-2015年我国油菜生产单位面积氮足迹(a)、单位产量氮足迹(b)变化情况"

表2

2004-2015年我国油菜生产单位面积氮足迹大小及组成"

种类
Item
年份 Year
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
农资投入 Farm inputs (g N-eq hm-2)
氮肥 N 1659.7 1509.2 1574.3 1525.5 1454.3 1511.3 1470.6 1448.2 1346.5 1275.3 1303.8 1271.3
磷肥 P 59.3 76.3 79.5 73.7 56.7 63.2 54.4 55.7 49.9 45.3 38.8 38.5
钾肥 K 12.3 16.6 10.1 9.6 10.9 6.1 7.4 6.1 7.9 6.6 5.7 6.6
复混肥 CF 124.6 164.5 178.3 206.9 223.2 225.3 251.4 251.8 263.1 305.1 329.8 347.9
除草剂 H 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
杀虫剂 In 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
杀菌剂 Fu 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4
柴油 D 31.1 29.8 27.6 35.8 38.4 46.4 49.9 52.1 63.5 71.2 91.2 101.3
直接活性氮损失 Direct reactive nitrogen loss
Nr-NH3 4413.2 4106.8 4296.2 4225.5 4076.0 4223.4 4168.5 4112.9 3877.3 3774.7 3891.9 3842.9
Nr-NO3- 353.7 329.2 344.4 338.7 326.7 338.5 334.1 329.7 310.8 302.6 312.0 308.0
Nr-NH4+ 1108.8 1031.8 1079.4 1061.6 1024.1 1061.1 1047.3 1033.4 974.2 948.4 977.8 965.5
Nr-N2O 289.7 269.6 282.0 277.3 267.5 277.2 273.6 270.0 254.5 247.8 255.5 252.3
NFa (g N-eq hm-2) 8114.0 7595.2 7933.4 7816.2 7539.5 7814.1 7718.9 7621.4 7209.1 7038.4 7267.9 7195.7
NFy (g N-eq kg-1) 4.02 3.97 4.03 3.57 3.73 3.92 4.11 3.90 3.69 3.37 3.62 3.45

图3

我国各省份2004-2015年油菜生产单位面积氮足迹、单位产量氮足迹及其变化率分布 a: 单位面积氮足迹分布; b: 2004-2015年单位面积氮足迹变化率分布; c: 单位产量氮足迹分布; d: 2004-2015年单位产量氮足迹变化率分布。"

表3

我国典型省份冬油菜氮足迹、投入及产业构成"

项目
Item
氮足迹、投入及构成Nitrogen footprint, input and composition
高产High yield 低产 Low yield
省市 Province or municipality 上海 Shanghai 安徽 Anhui
江苏 Jiangsu 江西 Jiangxi
浙江 Zhejiang 湖南 Hunan
农资投入 氮肥N 2110.9±455.4 1168.9±211.1
Farm input (g N-eq hm-2) 磷肥P 68.1±21.1 38.5±10.2
钾肥K 3.9±1.2 12.1±6.5
复混肥CF 308.9±91.2 195.8±62.5
除草剂 H 1.6 1.6
杀虫剂 In 0.57 0.57
杀菌剂 Fu 59.35 59.35
柴油 D 49.8±11.3 30.47±8.7
项目
Item
氮足迹、投入及构成Nitrogen footprint , input and composition
高产High yield 低产 Low yield
田间直接氮损失 Nr-NH3 5888.6±1231.1 3306.1±721.5
Indirect emission in field Nr-NO3- 472.0±101.3 265.0±92.2
(g N-eq hm-2) Nr-NH4+ 1479.5±311.4 830.6±111.2
Nr-N2O 386.5±101.7 217.0±91.2
单位面积氮足迹 NFa (g N-eq hm-2) 10829.8±2221.1 6126.0±1101.6
产量 Yield (kg hm-2) 2328.0±913.4 1708.8±771.3
单位产量氮足迹 NFy (g N-eq kg-1) 4.74±1.14 3.61±1.01

图4

中国油菜产量与单位面积氮足迹(a)和单位产量氮足迹(b)的关系"

[1] Sutton M A, Oenema O, Erisman J W, Leip A . Too much of a good thing. Nature, 2011,472:159-161.
[2] Erisman J W, Sutton M A, Galloway J, Klimont Z, Winiwarter W . How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nat Geosci, 2008,1:636-639.
doi: 10.1038/ngeo325
[3] 秦树平, 胡春胜, 张玉铭, 王玉英, 董文旭, 李晓欣 . 氮足迹研究进展. 中国生态农业学报, 2011,19:462-467.
Qin S P, Hu C S, Zhang Y M, Wang Y Y, Dong W X, Li X X . Advances in nitrogen footprint research. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2011,19:462-467 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Xue X B, Landis A E . Eutrophication potential of food consumption patterns. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44:6450-6456.
doi: 10.1021/es9034478 pmid: 20704246
[5] Pierer M, Winiwarter W, Leach A M, Galloway J N , The nitrogen footprint of food products and general consumption patterns in Austria. Food Policy, 2014,49:128-136.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.07.004
[6] 傅廷栋 . 中国油菜生产与品种改良. 华中农业大学学报, 1999,18:501-504.
Fu T D . Rapeseed production and variety improvement in China. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 1999,18:501-504 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 涂金星, 张冬晓, 张毅 . 我国油菜育种目标及品种审定问题的商榷. 中国油料作物学报, 2007,29:350-352.
Tu J X, Zhang D X, Zhang Y . Discussion on some standards of variety registration and breeding goals of Brassica napus in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2007,29:350-352 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 徐华丽 . 长江流域油菜施肥状况调查及配方施肥效果研究. 华中农业大学硕士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2012.
Xu H L . Investigation of Rapeseed Fertilization in Yangtze River Basin and Study on the Effect of Formula Fertilization. MS Thesis of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei,China, 2012 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] Moldanová J, Grennfelt P, Jonsson Å. Nitrogen as a Threat to European Air Quality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011. pp 405-433.
[10] 陈中督 . 农作措施对双季稻田固碳减排效应与农户低碳技术采纳行为研究. 中国农业大学博士学位论文, 北京, 2017.
Chen Z D . Impacts of Farming Practices on Carbon Sequestration and Emission Mitigation in Double Rice Field and Farmers’ Adoption Behavior of Low Carbon Technology. PhD Dissertation of China Agricultural University, Beijing,China, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Ibáñez-Forés V, Bovea M D, Simó A . Life cycle assessment of ceramic tiles. environmental and statistical analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 2011,16:916-928.
doi: 10.1007/s11367-011-0322-6
[12] 梁龙 . 基于LCA的循环农业环境影响评价方法探讨及实证研究. 中国农业大学博士学位论文, 北京, 2009.
Liang L . Environmental Impact Assessment of Circular Agriculture Based on Life Cycle Assessment: Methods and Case Studies. PhD Dissertation of China Agricultural University, Beijing,China, 2009 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 傅廷栋, 梁华东, 周广生 . 油菜绿肥在现代农业中的优势及发展建议. 中国农技推广, 2012,28(8):37-49.
Fu T D, Liang H D, Zhou G S . The advantages and development suggestions of rapeseed green manure in modern agriculture. China Agric Technol Extension, 2012,28(8):37-49 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 邹娟, 鲁剑巍, 陈防, 李银水 . 长江流域油菜氮磷钾肥料利用率现状研究. 作物学报, 2011,37:729-734.
Zou J, Lu J W, Chen F, Li Y S . Status of nutrient use efficiencies of rapeseed in the Yangtze River basin. Acta Agron Sin, 2011,37:729-734 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] Gan Y, Liang C, Campbell C A, Zentner R P, Lemke R L, Wang H, Yang C . Carbon footprint of spring wheat in response to fallow frequency and soil carbon changes over 25 years on the semiarid Canadian prairie. Eur J Agron, 2012,43:175-184.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2012.07.004
[16] Breiling M, Hoshino T, Matsuhashi R. Contributions of Rice Production to Japanese Greenhouse Gas Emissions Applying Life Cycle Assessment as a Methodology. Laboratory for Land Resource Sciences, Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Tokyo, and the University of Tokyo, 1999, p 32. .
[17] 王淳, 周卫, 李祖章 . 不同施氮量下双季稻连作体系土壤氨挥发损失研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18:349-358.
Wang C, Zhou W, Li Z Z . Effects of different nitrogen application rates on ammonia volatilization from paddy fields under double-harvest rice system. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2012,18:349-358 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 崔晓晨, 李安宁, 王国占 . 三大粮食作物农机作业成本及效益分析: 基于全国26个省的农机户问卷调查. 农机化研究, 2011,33(2):15-18.
Cui X C, Li A N, Wang G Z . Research on machinery cost of grain-production in China: based on a nationwide questionnaire survey. J Agric Mechanization Res, 2011,33(2):15-18 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 董彦彬 . 2006年国内油菜籽产量与价格分析. 农业展望, 2006,2(7):26.
Dong Y B . Analysis of domestic rapeseed production and price in 2006. Agric Outlook. 2006,2(7):26 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 伊然 . 大豆等6种农产品实行进口备案制. 中国油脂, 2008, ( 7):12.
Yi R . Soybean and other six agricultural products to implement the import record system. China Oils Fats, 2008, ( 7):12 (in Chinese).
[21] 陈魏涛, 曹宏鑫, 张保军, 张文宇 . 氮素营养诊断技术及其在油菜上的应用研究进展. 江苏农业学报, 2016,32:953-960.
Chen W T, Cao H X, Zhang B J, Zhang W Y . Research progresses in nitrogen diagnosis technology and its application in rapeseed. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2016,32:953-960 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 张筱蕾, 刘飞, 聂鹏程 . 高光谱成像技术的油菜叶片氮含量及分布快速检测. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2014,34:2514-2518.
Zhang X L, Liu F, Nie P C . Rapid detection of nitrogen content and distribution in oilseed rape leaves based on hyperspectral imaging. Spectroscopy Spectral Anal, 2014,34:2514-2518 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 任涛, 鲁剑巍 . 中国冬油菜氮素养分管理策略. 中国农业科学, 2016,49:3506-3521.
Ren T, Lu J W . Integrated nitrogen management strategy for winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) in China. Sci Agric Sin, 2016,49:3506-3521 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[2] 蒯婕, 娄洪祥, 谭晓强, 郜耿东, 邵东李, 肖胜男, 赵杰, 徐正华, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生. 直播油菜单产提升的生理基础及实践途径[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 982-992.
[3] 张全军, 吴东丽, 刘聪, 朱永超, 杨大生, 孔祥胜. 1981—2024年长江中下游油菜发育期时空格局演变特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1140-1152.
[4] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[5] 谭文清, 惠荣奎, 张凡丽, 覃磊, 毛舒香, 邓力超, 郭一鸣, 曲亮, 严明理. 油菜耐渍性快速鉴定及耐渍种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1035-1045.
[6] 王楚锐, 李开祥, 赵志, 肖麓, 唐国永, 赵志刚, 徐亮, 杜德志, 柳海东. 甘蓝型春油菜早花基因BnCRY2功能位点KASP标记的开发及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 708-721.
[7] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[8] 娄洪祥, 幸仁鹏, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 蒯婕, 周广生. 播种期对长江中游甘蓝型油菜光温资源利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 539-551.
[9] 李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630.
[10] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117.
[11] 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[12] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[13] 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.
[14] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[15] 李炳霖, 叶晓磊, 肖红, 肖国滨, 吕伟生, 刘君权, 任涛, 陆志峰, 鲁剑巍. 镁肥用量对油菜产量和镁吸收量及因冻害减产程度的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1850-1860.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!