Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (12): 3118-3128.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.32045

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of straw return on soil nutrients and crop yield in rice-rapeseed rotation

CHE Pin-Gao1(), CHEN Guo-Hui1,*(), CAO Guo-Jun1, GAO Bing-Ke1, CHEN Yan-Fang1, XIONG Wen1, YING Zhi-Hong1, ZHOU Qing-You2   

  1. 1Jiujiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi, China
    2Ruichang Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ruichang 332200, Jiangxi, China
  • Received:2023-10-26 Accepted:2024-08-15 Online:2024-12-12 Published:2024-09-02
  • Contact: *E-mail: diyfuture@foxmail.com
  • Supported by:
    Jiangxi Province Modern Agriculture Industry Technology System(JXARS-02);Jiujiang Municipal Rural Revitalization Modern Agricultural Development Special Fund Project Rice “Three Increases and Two Reductions” Demonstration Project

Abstract:

A seven-year field study from 2016 to 2023 was conducted on typical paddy soil in Jiujing city, Jiangxi province, to evaluate the effects of different straw returning methods on soil nutrients and crop yield in a rice-rapeseed rotation system in the middle-lowerYangtze Plain of China. The study included four treatments: no straw returning (CK), rice straw returning during the rapeseed season (T1), rapeseed straw returning during the rice season (T2), and straw returning during both the rape and rice seasons (T3). Measurements of shoot and root dry matter, crop yield, and soil nutrient content were taken at key growth stages during the 2022 rice season and the 2022-2023 rape season. The results indicated that, compared with CK, straw returning significantly increased soil pH and the contents of organic matter, and N, P, K, and other nutrients. The T3 treatment was particularly effective, significantly increasing soil pH by 9.7% and 12.9%, alkali-nitrogen by 32.9% and 25.5%, available phosphorus by 33.5% and 24.3%, available potassium by 56.3% and 58.6%, total nitrogen by 22.9% and 33.0%, and organic matter by 26.6% and 50.8% (P < 0.05) in the rice and rape seasons, respectively. Dry matter accumulation in rice initially increased and then decreased as the growth period extended. The T2 treatment significantly promoted dry matter accumulation, whereas the T3 treatment inhibited it during the early stages of rice growth. Compared with straw removal, straw returning increased rice grain yield, with the largest increase of 13.9% observed in the T2 treatment (P < 0.05). In rapeseed, dry matter accumulation continued to increase with the growth period, and the T2 treatment most significantly promoted this accumulation. Compared with CK, the T2 treatment resulted in the largest increase in rapeseed grain yield, by 20.0% (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that available potassium was significantly positively correlated with the rice seed setting rate (r = 0.84**, P < 0.01). Total nitrogen and available potassium were significantly positively correlated with the number of pods per plant (r = 0.705*, r = 0.623*, P < 0.05) and rape yield (r = 0.623*, r = 0.690*, P < 0.05). These findings suggest that the major reason for the yield increase may be the elevated content of soil total nitrogen and available potassium due to straw returning. Considering soil nutrients, dry matter accumulation, and crop yield, rape straw returning during the rice season (T2) performed best and could be recommended for promotion and application in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River.

Key words: oil rice rotation, returning straw to the field, soil nutrients, dry matter accumulation, yield

Fig. 1

Monthly average temperature and precipitation in the experimental area from 2022 to 2023"

Fig. 2

Dry matter accumulation of crops under different straw returning conditions CK: no straw returning in both rice and rapeseed seasons; T1: rice straw returning only in the rapeseed season; T2: rapeseed straw returning only in the rice season; T3: straw returning in both rice and rapeseed seasons."

Table 1

Rice yield and component factors of different treatments"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
株高
Plant height
(cm)
有效穗数
Effective panicle
(hm−2)
穗粒数
Grains per ear
穗实粒数
Grain number per spike
结实率
Seed-setting rate
(%)
千粒重
1000-grain weight
(g)
产量
Yield
(kg·hm−2)
收获指数
Harvest index
2021 CK 107.8±1.90 b 258.3±12.68 ab 194.6±2.35 b 158.4±1.84 b 81.39±1.88 a 21.27±0.90 a 6962.00±159.19 b 0.54±0.01 a
T1 110.5±1.90 ab 233.0±11.85 c 190.9±3.62 b 142.2±1.79 c 74.46±1.46 c 21.47±0.19 a 7198.40±154.45 ab 0.52±0.01 ab
T2 113.4±2.26 a 274.1±9.21 a 207.3±2.08 a 164.6±1.79 a 79.38±0.10 ab 21.59±0.06 a 7923.80±61.47 a 0.49±0.01 c
T3 107.9±1.36 b 251.3±5.12 bc 203.8±2.26 a 157.8±2.08 b 77.39±1.84 b 21.73±0.06 a 7214.75±143.82 ab 0.51±0.02 bc
2022 CK 108.9±1.62 b 233.9±8.21 b 187.0±2.21 b 144.0±2.54 b 76.97±1.40 c 20.98±0.37 a 6686.55±80.71 c 0.54±0.01 a
T1 109.9±2.89 ab 226.1±4.20 b 187.3±1.56 b 154.6±2.18 a 82.53±0.53 a 20.78±0.41 a 6918.00±102.05 b 0.52±0.01 b
T2 112.9±1.94 a 285.2±13.53 a 192.6±1.58 a 153.8±3.87 a 79.87±1.37 b 20.81±0.29 a 7617.90±37.53 a 0.50±0.01 b
T3 106.1±1.15 b 220.8±4.65 b 181.9±2.70 c 147.3±2.48 b 80.98±0.90 ab 21.02±0.44 a 6829.35±80.68 bc 0.54±0.01 a

Table 2

Yield and yield components of rapeseed under different treatments"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
株高
Plant height
(cm)
分枝高度
Branch height
(cm)
一级有效分枝数
Number of primary effective
单株主角果数
Number of main pods per plant
单株分枝角果数
Number of branch pods per plant
每角粒数
Seed number per pod
产量
Yield
(kg hm−2)
收获指数
Harvest index
2022 CK 153.7±2.21 a 52.00±1.15 b 6.84±0.27 a 58.84±3.10 b 125.76±8.10 c 26.92±2.74 a 1853.32±29.23 c 0.28±0.01 a
T1 148.8±1.47 b 56.52±2.87 ab 6.83±0.18 a 64.05±4.05 ab 178.47±4.98 a 27.55±1.92 a 1964.22±57.71 b 0.27±0.01 a
T2 153.4±2.90 a 53.87±3.39 b 6.70±0.15 a 68.29±1.11 a 175.60±7.17 a 27.71±1.06 a 2304.75±41.48 a 0.24±0.01 b
T3 142.6±2.71 c 60.63±3.44 a 6.21±0.32 b 62.81±2.31 b 147.83±6.17 b 26.26±2.21 a 2035.68±79.74 b 0.25±0.01 b
2023 CK 147.3±4.05 b 65.89±3.42 a 5.89±0.32 b 57.44±3.02 ab 113.19±10.48 c 28.89±2.53 a 1777.78±83.85 c 0.29±0.00 a
T1 149.9±3.02 b 65.78±2.80 a 6.25±0.38 b 54.33±3.18 b 165.11±6.85 a 29.20±1.33 a 1855.56±47.67 bc 0.28±0.01 b
T2 156.2±4.33 a 63.22±3.29 ab 6.89±0.16 a 61.89±4.68 a 171.22±12.51 a 29.67±1.76 a 2133.30±33.30 a 0.27±0.01 c
T3 149.2±3.97 b 59.44±3.56 b 5.94±0.31 b 55.56±1.50 b 140.78±7.03 b 30.00±0.88 a 1938.92±38.48 b 0.28±0.01 b

Table 3

Soil nutrients under different straw returning treatments"

种植季
Cultivation
season
处理
Treatment
pH 有效磷
Available P
(mg kg-1)
速效钾
Available K
(mg kg-1)
碱解氮
Alkali N
(mg kg-1)
全氮
Total N
(g kg-1)
有机质
Organic matter
(g kg-1)
水稻季
Rice
season
CK 5.78±0.06 b 15.71±0.60 c 57.22±1.34 d 98.29±1.22 b 1.09±0.08 b 16.82±0.55 b
T1 5.95±0.17 ab 17.98±0.77 b 85.30±1.38 b 107.72±4.80 b 1.30±0.08 ab 18.68±0.81 ab
T2 6.30±0.04 a 19.76±0.69 a 79.64±0.63 c 108.59±8.45 b 1.22±0.06 ab 18.68±1.61 ab
T3 6.34±0.28 a 20.97±0.36 a 89.46±1.01 a 130.65±3.98 a 1.34±0.11 a 21.30±2.16 a
油菜季
Rape
season
CK 5.19±0.04 b 16.92±0.29 c 56.39±1.25 c 95.82±1.92 b 1.03±0.08 b 15.19±0.23 c
T1 5.26±0.01 b 18.81±0.03 ab 74.48±2.92 b 104.98±7.50 ab 1.27±0.06 a 19.69±0.42 b
T2 5.46±0.11 b 18.56±0.73 b 84.84±3.83 a 97.98±6.30 b 1.33±0.05 a 19.34±0.92 b
T3 5.86±0.18 a 21.04±1.51 a 89.46±1.01 a 120.23±6.22 a 1.37±0.08 a 22.90±0.79 a

Fig. 3

Correlation between soil nutrients and crop yield and yield components In Fig. a, numbers 1-13 represent the soil pH, organic matter, total N, alkali N, available P, available K, plant height, effective panicle, total grain number per panicle, filled grain number per panicle, setting percentage, 1000-grain weight, and grain yield in rice season, respectively. In Fig. b, numbers 1-13 in represent the soil pH, organic matter, total N, alkali N, available P, available K, plant height, branch height, effective branch number, main pod number, branch pod number per plant, seed number per pod, and grain yield in rape season, respectively. * and ** indicate significant correlations at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels (bilateral), respectively."

[1] 何虎, 吴建富, 曾研华, 胡凯, 黄山, 曾勇军, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 稻草全量还田下氮肥运筹对双季晚稻产量及其氮素吸收利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20: 811-820.
He H, Wu J F, Zeng Y H, Hu K, Huang S, Zeng Y J, Pan X H, Shi Q H. Effects of nitrogen management on yield and nitrogen utilization of double cropping late rice under total rice straw incorporation. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2014, 20: 811-820 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] Shi T T, Liu Y Q, Zhang L B, Hao L, Gao Z Q. Burning in agricultural landscapes: an emerging natural and human issue in China. Landsc Ecol, 2014, 29: 1785-1798.
[3] 张树杰, 张春雷. 气候变化对我国油菜生产的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30: 1749-1754.
Zhang S J, Zhang C L. Influences of climate changes on oilseed rape production in China. J Agro-Environ Sci, 2011, 30: 1749-1754 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 陈中督, 徐春春, 纪龙, 方福平. 2004-2015年长江中下游地区冬油菜生产碳足迹的时空变化. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27: 1105-1114.
Chen Z D, Xu C C, Ji L, Fang F P. Spatial and temporal changes in carbon footprint for oilseed rape production in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River during 2004-2015. Chin J Eco- Agric, 2019, 27: 1105-1114 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] 陈国徽, 赵小敏, 谢国强, 张颂, 高冰可, 陈艳芳, 曹国军, 蒋发辉. 油稻轮作下秸秆还田对土壤化学性质及作物产量的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2022, 44: 813-824.
Chen G H, Zhao X M, Xie G Q, Zhang S, Gao B K, Chen Y F, Cao G J, Jiang F H. Effect of straw return on soil chemical properties and crop yield in rice-rape rotation. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2022, 44: 813-824 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 伍佳, 王忍, 吕广动, 隆斌庆, 杨飞翔, 陈慧娜, 黄璜. 不同秸秆还田方式对水稻产量及土壤养分的影响. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(6): 177-183.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.201751760
Wu J, Wang R, Lyu G D, Long B Q, Yang F X, Chen H N, Huang H. Effects of different straw returning ways on rice yield and soil nutrients. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2019, 34(6): 177-183 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.201751760
[7] 吴玉红, 王吕, 崔月贞, 郝兴顺, 王保军, 田霄鸿, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 轮作模式及秸秆还田对水稻产量、稻米品质及土壤肥力的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27: 1926-1937.
Wu Y H, Wang L, Cui Y Z, Hao X S, Wang B J, Tian X H, Li X G, Qin Y H. Effects of rotation mode and straw returning on rice yield, rice quality and soil fertility. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2021, 27: 1926-1937 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 李书田, 金继运. 中国不同区域农田养分输入、输出与平衡. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 4207-4229.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.20.009
Li S T, Jin J Y. Nutrient input, output and balance of farmland in different regions of China. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 4207-4229 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 孙小祥, 常志州, 靳红梅, 沈明星, 陆长婴, 王海候. 太湖地区不同秸秆还田方式对作物产量与经济效益的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2017, 33: 94-99.
Sun X X, Chang Z Z, Jin H M, Shen M X, Lu C Y, Wang H H. Effects of different straw returning methods on crop yield and economic benefit in Taihu Lake area. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2017, 33: 94-99 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 管方圆, 刘琛, 傅庆林, 李鹏, 林义成, 郭彬. 添加秸秆对水稻产量和土壤碳氮及微生物群落的影响. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(2): 223-230.
Guan F Y, Liu C, Fu Q L, Li P, Lin Y C, Guo B. Effects of straw addition on rice yield, soil carbon, nitrogen, and microbial community. Trans CSAE, 2022, 38(2): 223-230 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 刘禹池, 曾祥忠, 冯文强, 秦鱼生, 王昌全, 涂仕华, 陈道全. 稻-油轮作下长期秸秆还田与施肥对作物产量和土壤理化性状的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20: 1450-1459.
Liu Y C, Zeng X Z, Feng W Q, Qin Y S, Wang C Q, Tu R H, Chen D Q. Effects of long-term straw returning and fertilization on crop yield and soil physicochemical properties under rice-tanker cropping. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2014, 20: 1450-1459 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 白重阳, 秦猛, 崔士泽, 赵爽, 杨丽爽, 韩文博, 郑桂萍, 刘丽华. 膨化秸秆还田对寒地水稻产量、品质及氮素利用的影响. 中国稻米, 2022, 28: 38-40.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.02.007
Bai C Y, Qin M, Cui S Z, Zhao S, Yang L S, Han W B, Zheng G P, Liu L H. Effects of expanded straw returning on yield, quality and nitrogen use of rice in cold region. China Rice, 2022, 28: 38-40 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 郝建华, 丁艳锋, 王强盛, 刘正辉, 李刚华, 乔晶, 刘杨, 王绍华. 麦秸还田对水稻群体质量和土壤特性的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2010, 33(3): 13-18.
Hao J H, Ding Y F, Wang Q S, Liu Z H, Li G H, Qiao J, Liu Y, Wang S H. Effects of wheat straw returning on rice population quality and soil characteristics. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2010, 33(3): 13-18 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 刘世平, 聂新涛, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲. 免耕套种与秸秆还田对水稻生长和稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21: 71-76.
Liu S P, Nie X T, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K. Effects of no-tillage intercropping and straw returning on rice growth and quality. Chin J Rice Sci, 2007, 21: 71-76 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 马宗国, 卢绪奎, 万丽, 陈祖光, 左辉. 小麦秸秆还田对水稻生长及土壤肥力的影响. 作物杂志, 2003, (5): 37-38.
Ma Z G, Lu X K, Wan L, Chen Z G, Zuo H. Effects of wheat straw returning on rice growth and soil fertility. Crops, 2003, (5): 37-38 (in Chinese).
[16] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第3版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. pp 25-109.
Bao S D. Soil agrochemical analysis, 3rd edn. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. pp 25-109 (in Chinese).
[17] 洪春来, 魏幼璋, 黄锦法, 王润屹, 杨肖娥. 秸秆全量直接还田对土壤肥力及农田生态环境的影响研究. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2003, 29: 627-633.
Hong C L, Wei Y Z, Huang J F, Wang R Y, Yang X E. Study on the effect of total straw returning directly on soil fertility and farmland ecological environment. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric Life Sci), 2003, 29: 627-633 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 于天一, 孙秀山, 石程仁, 王才斌. 土壤酸化危害及防治技术研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33: 3137-3143.
Yu T Y, Sun X S, Shi C R, Wang C B. Research progress on soil acidification hazards and control techniques. Chin J Ecol, 2014, 33: 3137-3143 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 武志杰, 张海军, 许广山, 张玉华, 刘春萍. 玉米秸秆还田培肥土壤的效果. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13: 539-542.
Wu Z J, Zhang H J, Xu G S, Zhang Y H, Liu C P. Effect of maize straw returning on soil fertility. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2002, 13: 539-542 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 吕焕哲, 王凯荣, 谢小立, 王开峰. 有机物料对酸性红壤铝毒的缓解效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13: 637-641.
Lyu H Z, Wang K R, Xie X L, Wang K F. Alleviation effect of organic materials on aluminum toxicity in acid red soil. Plant Nutr Fer Sci, 2007, 13: 637-641 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 高亚军, 朱培立, 黄东迈, 王志明, 李生秀. 稻麦轮作条件下长期不同土壤管理对有机质和全氮的影响. 土壤与环境, 2000, 9(1): 27-30.
Gao Y J, Zhu P L, Huang D M, Wang Z M, Li S X. Long-term impact of different soil management on organic matter and total nitrogen in rice-based cropping system. Soil Environ Sci, 2000, 9(1): 27-30 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 武际, 郭熙盛, 鲁剑巍, 万水霞, 王允青, 许征宇, 张晓玲. 不同水稻栽培模式下小麦秸秆腐解特征及对土壤生物学特性和养分状况的影响. 生态学报, 2013, 33: 565-575.
Wu J, Guo X S, Lu J W, Wan S X, Wang Y Q, Xu Z Y, Zhang X L. Decomposing characteristics of wheat straw under different rice cultivation patterns and its effects on soil biological characteristics and nutrient status. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33: 565-575 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 李逢雨, 孙锡发, 冯文强, 秦鱼生, 王昌全, 涂仕华. 麦秆、油菜秆还田腐解速率及养分释放规律研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15: 374-380.
Li F Y, Sun X F, Feng W Q, Qin Y S, Wang C Q, Tu S H. Nutrient release patterns and decomposing rates of wheat and rapeseed straw. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2009, 15: 374-380 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 罗珠珠, 黄高宝, 张仁陟, 蔡立群, 李玲玲, 谢军红, Guangdi Li. 长期保护性耕作对黄土高原旱地土壤肥力质量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18: 458-464.
Luo Z Z, Huang G B, Zhang R Z, Cai L Q, Li L L, Xie J H, Guangdi L. Effect of long-term conservation tillage on soil fertility in rain-fed areas of the Loess Plateau. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2010, 18: 458-464 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 范呈根. 稻草不同还田方式对水稻产量、养分吸收特性和土壤肥力的影响. 江西农业大学硕士学位论文,江西南昌, 2017.
Fan C G. Effects of Different Rice Straw Returning Methods on Rice Yield, Nutrient Absorption Characteristics and Soil Fertility. MS Thesis of Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 戴志刚, 鲁剑巍, 鲁明星, 杨文兵, 范先鹏. 油菜秸秆用量对淹水培养土壤表层溶液理化性质的影响. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(1): 197-201.
Dai Z G, Lu J W, Lu M X, Yang W B, Fan X P. Effect of rape straw rate on physicochemical properties of soil surface solution under waterlogged incubation. J Soil Water Conserv, 2010, 24(1): 197-201 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 戴志刚, 鲁剑巍, 李小坤, 鲁明星, 杨文兵, 高祥照. 不同作物还田秸秆的养分释放特征试验. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(6): 272-276.
Dai Z G, Lu J W, Li X K, Lu M X, Yang W B, Gao X Z. Nutrient release characteristics of different crop straws manure. Trans CSAE, 2010, 26(6): 272-276 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 游来勇, 李冰, 王昌全, 杨娟, 白根川, 黄春. 秸秆还田量对麦-稻轮作体系作物产量、氮素吸收利用效率的影响. 核农学报, 2015, 29: 2394-2401.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2015.12.2394
You L Y, Li B, Wang C Q, Yang J, Bai G C, Huang C. Effects of straw returning amount on crop yield, nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency in wheat-rice rotation system. J Agric Nucl Sci, 2015, 29: 2394-2401 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 季红娟, 赵步洪, 陈刚, 郑青松, 张小祥, 李育红, 肖宁, 潘存红, 李爱宏. 扬粳 805 产量和品质对麦秸还田与施氮量的响应. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 37(4): 60-64.
Ji H J, Zhao B H, Chen G, Zheng Q S, Zhang X X, Li Y H, Xiao N, Pan C H, Li A H. Response of yield and quality of Yangjing 805 to wheat straw returning and nitrogen application rate. J Yangzhou Univ (Agric Life Sci), 2016, 37(4): 60-64 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 裴鹏刚. 秸秆还田耦合施氮水平对稻田土壤生化特征及水稻生育特性的影响. 中国农业科学院硕士学位论文,北京, 2014.
Pei P G. Effects of Straw Returning Coupled with Nitrogen Application on Soil Biochemical Characteristics and Rice Growth Characteristics. MS Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 苏卫, 冯跃华, 许桂玲, 管正策, 欧达, 张佳凤, 王玲莉. 秸秆还田与施氮量对喀斯特地区杂交籼稻干物质积累和产量的影响. 核农学报, 2019, 33: 1856-1864.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.09.1856
Su W, Feng Y H, Xu G L, Guan Z C, Ou D, Zhang J F, Wang L L. Effects of straw returning and nitrogen application rate on dry matter accumulation and yield of indica hybrid rice in Karst Region. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2019, 33: 1856-1864 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.09.1856
[32] 马春梅, 王永吉, 于舒函, 王家睿. 稻草还田与施氮量对水稻氮素吸收及产量影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2017, 48(6): 9-16.
Ma C M, Wang Y J, Yu S H, Wang J R. Effects of straw returning and nitrogen application rate on nitrogen uptake and yield of rice. J Northeast Agric Univ, 2017, 48(6): 9-16 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 周文新, 雷驰, 屠乃美. 水稻源库关系研究动态. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 30: 389-393.
Zhou W X, Lei C, Tu N M. Research trends of on source-sink relationship of rice. J Hunan Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2004, 30: 389-393 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] 李敏, 张洪程, 杨雄, 葛梦婕, 马群, 魏海燕, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲. 水稻高产氮高效型品种的物质积累与转运特性. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 101-109.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00101
Li M, Zhang H C, Yang X, Ge M J, Ma Q, Wei H Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K. Material accumulation and transport characteristics of high-yield and high-efficiency rice varieties. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 101-109 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[35] 苏伟. 稻草还田对油菜生长、土壤肥力的综合效应及其机制研究. 华中农业大学博士学位论文,湖北武汉, 2014.
Su W. Study on the comprehensive effect and mechanism of straw returning on rape growth and soil fertility. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36] Singh Y, Singh B, Timsina J. Crop residue management for nutrient cycling and improving soil productivity in rice-based cropping systems in the Tropics. Adv Agron, 2005, 85: 269-407.
[37] 黄菲, 刘言, 李继福, 欧阳玲, 龙鹏, 李新涛. 水旱轮作条件下还田秸秆腐解和养分释放特征研究. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 14(18): 54-60.
Huang F, Liu Y, Li J F, Ou-Yang L, Long P, Li X T. Study on decomposition and nutrient release characteristics of straw under irrigation-drought rotation. J Yangtze Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2017, 14(18): 54-60 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38] 吴玉红, 王吕, 崔月贞, 郝兴顺, 王保军, 田霄鸿, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 轮作模式及秸秆还田对水稻产量、稻米品质及土壤肥力的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27: 1926-1937.
Wu Y H, Wang L, Cui Y Z, Hao X S, Wang B J, Tian X H, Li X G, Qin Y H. Effects of crop rotation pattern and straw returning on rice yield, rice quality and soil fertility. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2021, 27: 1926-1937 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39] 戴志刚, 鲁剑巍, 李小坤, 鲁明星, 杨文兵, 高祥照. 不同作物还田秸秆的养分释放特征试验. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(6): 272-276.
Dai Z G, Lu J W, Li X K, Lu M X, Yang W B, Gao X Z. Experiment on nutrient release characteristics of different crop straw returning to field. Trans CSAE, 2010, 26(6): 272-276 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[40] 代文才, 高明, 兰木羚, 黄容, 王金柱, 王子芳, 韩晓飞. 不同作物秸秆在旱地和水田中的腐解特性及养分释放规律. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25: 188-199.
Dai W C, Gao M, Lan M L, Huang R, Wang J Z, Wang Z F, Han X F. Nutrient release patterns and decomposition characteristics of different crop straws in drylands and paddy fields. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2017, 25: 188-199 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[41] F. W. T. 彭宁德弗里斯, D. N. 简森, H. F. W. 坦伯杰, A. H. 贝克马. 几种一年生作物生长的生态生理过程模拟. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1991. pp 102-103.
Penningdevries F W T, Jansen D N, Tenberge H F W, Bakema A H. Simulation of Ecophysiological Processes of Growth in Several Annual Crops. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1991. pp 102-103 (in Chinese).
[42] 靳玉婷, 刘运峰, 胡宏祥, 穆静, 高梦瑶, 李先藩, 薛中俊, 龚静静. 持续性秸秆还田配施化肥对油菜-水稻轮作周年氮磷径流损失的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 1937-1951.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.09.00
Jin Y T, Liu Y F, Hu H X, Mu J, Gao M Y, Li X F, Xue Z J, Gong J J. Effects of continuous straw returning combined with chemical fertilizer on annual nitrogen and phosphorus runoff loss in rape-rice rotation. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 1937-1951 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[43] 王天尧, 何庆虎, 周祖清, 赵永刚, 刘署艳. “稻-油”轮作秸秆还田及耕作模式对油菜产量的影响. 农业科技通讯, 2019, (9): 120-122.
Wang T Y, He Q H, Zhou Z Q, Zhao Y G, Liu S Y. Effects of rice-rape rotation straw returning and tillage patterns on rapeseed yield. Bull Agric Sci Tech, 2019, (9): 120-122 (in Chinese).
[44] 陈红琳, 陈尚洪, 王昌桃, 郑开林, 蒋梁材, 刘定辉. 成都平原不同秸秆还田量对土壤水分及机播油菜生长的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2015, 37: 264-268.
Chen H L, Chen S H, Wang C T, Zheng K L, Jiang L C, Liu D H. Effects of different straw returning amount on soil moisture and machine-sown rape growth in Chengdu Plain. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2015, 37: 264-268 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[45] 吴玉红, 陈浩, 郝兴顺, 田霄鸿, 崔月贞, 张春辉. 秸秆还田与化肥配施对油菜-水稻产量构成因素及经济效益的影响. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33: 2007-2012.
Wu Y H, Chen H, Hao X S, Tian X H, Cui Y Z, Zhang C H. Effects of straw returning combined with chemical fertilizer on yield components and economic benefits of rape-rice. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2020, 33: 2007-2012 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[46] 王秋菊, 刘峰, 迟凤琴, 焦峰, 张春峰, 姜辉, 李鹏绯, 朱宝国. 秸秆还田及氮肥调控对不同肥力白浆土氮素及水稻产量影响. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(14): 105-111.
Wang Q J, Liu F, Chi F Q, Jiao F, Zhang C F, Jiang H, Li P F, Zhu B G. Effects of straw returning and nitrogen control on nitrogen and rice yield in white pulpy soil with different fertility. Trans CSAE, 2019, 35(14): 105-111 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[47] 方娅婷, 李会枝, 廖世鹏, 鲁飘飘, 鲁剑巍. 氮肥和磷肥用量对油菜开花性状的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2019, 41: 199-204.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2019.02.006
Fang Y T, Li H Z, Liao S P, Lu P P, Lu J W. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and phosphorus fertilizer on flowering characters of oilseed rape. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2019, 41: 199-204 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] ZHANG Jun, HU Chuan, ZHOU Qi-Hui, REN Kai-Ming, DONG Shi-Yan, LIU Ao-Han, WU Jin-Zhi, HUANG Ming, LI You-Jun. Effects of nitrogen reduction and organic fertilizer substitution on dry matter accumulation, translocation, distribution, and yield of dryland winter wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(1): 207-220.
[2] ZHAO Li-Ming, DUAN Shao-Biao, XIANG Hong-Tao, ZHENG Dian-Feng, FENG Nai-Jie, SHEN Xue-Feng. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation and plant growth regulators on photosynthetic characteristics and endogenous hormones of rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(1): 174-188.
[3] WANG Li-Ping, LI Pan, ZHAO Lian-Hao, FAN Zhi-Long, HU Fa-Long, FAN Hong, HE Wei, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen. Response of senescence characteristics for maize leaves under different plastic mulching and using patterns in oasis irrigation areas of northwestern China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(1): 233-246.
[4] WANG Yuan, XU Jia-Yin, DONG Er-Wei, WANG Jing-Song, LIU Qiu-Xia, HUANG Xiao-Lei, JIAO Xiao-Yan. Effects of manure replacement of chemical fertilizer nitrogen on yield, nitrogen accumulation, and quality of foxtail millet  [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(1): 149-160.
[5] XIN Ming-Hua, MI Ya-Di, WANG Guo-Ping, LI Xiao-Fei, LI Ya-Bing, DONG He-Lin, HAN Ying-Chun, FENG Lu. Effect of row spacing configuration and density regulation on dry matter production and yield in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(1): 221-232.
[6] LI Chao, FU Xiao-Qiong. Comprehensive evaluation of regional trial varieties of medium mature hybrid cotton in the Yellow River Basin based on GYT biplot [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(1): 30-43.
[7] DING Shu-Qi, CHENG Tong, WANG Bi-Kun, YU De-Bin, RAO De-Min, MENG Fan-Gang, ZHAO Yin-Kai, WANG Xiao-Hui, ZHANG-Wei. Effects of planting density on photosynthetic production and yield formation of soybean varieties from different eras [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(1): 161-173.
[8] ZHANG Gui-Qin, WANG Hong-Zhang, GUO Xin-Song, ZHU Fu-Jun, GAO Han, ZHANG Ji-Wang, ZHAO Bin, REN Bai-Zhao, LIU Peng, REN Hao. Effects of organic material inputs on soil physicochemical properties and summer maize yield formation in coastal saline-alkali land [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2323-2334.
[9] ZHANG Zhen, HE Jian-Ning, SHI Yu, YU Zhen-Wen, ZHANG Yong-Li. Effects of row spacing and planting patterns on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2396-2407.
[10] XU Yi-Fan, XU Cai-Long, LI Rui-Dong, WU Zong-Sheng, HUA Jian-Xin, YANG Lin, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Cun-Xiang. Deep side fertilization improved soybean yield by optimizing leaf function and nitrogen accumulation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2335-2346.
[11] YANG Yu-Chen, JIN Ya-Rong, LUO Jin-Chan, ZHU Xin, LI Wei-Hang, JIA Ji-Yuan, WANG Xiao-Shan, HUANG De-Jun, HUANG Lin-Kai. Identification and expression analysis of the WD40 gene family in pearl millet [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2219-2236.
[12] LIU Zhi-Peng, GOU Zhi-Wen, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, FAN Zhi-Long, HU Fa-Long, FAN Hong, WANG Qi-Ming. Effect of green manure on wheat and maize yields in diversified cropping patterns in an arid irrigated agricultural area [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2415-2424.
[13] SUN Zhao-Hua, REN Hao, WANG Hong-Zhang, WANG Zi-Qiang, YAO Hai-Yan, XIN Ai-Mei, ZHAO Bin, ZHANG Ji-Wang, REN Bai-Zhao, LIU Peng. Effects of foliar silicon sprays on leaf photosynthetic performance and grain yield of summer maize in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2383-2395.
[14] PENG Jie, XIE Xiao-Qi, ZHANG Zhao, YAO Xiao-Fen, QIU Shen, CHEN Dan-Dan, GU Xiao-Na, WANG Yu-Jie, WANG Chen-Chen, YANG Guo-Zheng. Relationship between cotton yield and canopy microenvironment under summer direct seeding [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2371-2382.
[15] LOU Hong-Xiang, HUANG Xiao-Yu, JIANG Meng, NING Ning, BIAN Meng-Lei, ZHANG Lei, LUO Dong-Xu, QIN Meng-Qian, KUAI Jie, WANG Bo, WANG Jing, ZHAO Jie, XU Zheng-Hua, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Optimal allocation of sowing date and sowing rate of late-sowing rapeseed in the Yangtze River Basin [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(8): 2091-2105.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Yan Mei;Yang Guangsheng;Fu Tingdong;Yan Hongyan. Studies on the Ecotypical Male Sterile-fertile Line of Brassica napus L.Ⅲ. Sensitivity to Temperature of 8-8112AB and Its Inheritance[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[2] Wang Yongsheng;Wang Jing;Duan Jingya;Wang Jinfa;Liu Liangshi. Isolation and Genetic Research of a Dwarf Tiilering Mutant Rice[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[3] Hu Yuqi;Liao Xiaohai. A STUDY ON THE COEFFICIENT OF LEAVES SHAPE OF MAIZE[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 1986, (01): 71 -72 .
[4] LIANG Tai-Bo;YIN Yan-Ping;CAI Rui-Guo;YAN Su-Hui;LI Wen-Yang;GENG Qing-Hui;WANG Ping;WANG Zhen-Lin. Starch Accumulation and Related Enzyme Activities in Superior and Inferior Grains of Large Spike Wheat[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(01): 150 -156 .
[5] WANG Cheng-Zhang;HAN Jin-Feng;SHI Ying-Hua;LI Zhen-Tian;LI De-Feng. Production Performance in Alfalfa with Different Classes of Fall Dormancy[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(01): 133 -141 .
[6] TIAN Zhi-Jian;Yi Rong;CHEN Jian-Rong;GUO Qing-Quan;ZHANG Xue-Wen;. Cloning and Expression of Cellulose Synthase Gene in Ramie [Boehme- ria nivea (Linn.) Gaud.][J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(01): 76 -83 .
[7] ZHAO Xiu-Qin;ZHU Ling-Hua;XU Jian-Long;LI Zhi-Kang. QTL Mapping of Yield under Irrigation and Rainfed Field Conditions for Advanced Backcrossing Introgression Lines in Rice[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(09): 1536 -1542 .
[8] WU Ying ; SONG Feng-Sun ; LU Xu-Zhong; ZHAO Wei; YANG Jian-Bo; LI Li ;. Detecting Genetically Modified Soybean by Real-time Quantitative PCR Technique[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(10): 1733 -1737 .
[9] GOU Ling ; HUANG Jian-Jun; ZHANG Bin; LI Tao; SUN Rui; ZHAO Ming ;. Effects of Population Density on Stalk Lodging Resistant Mechanism and Agronomic Characteristics of Maize[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(10): 1688 -1695 .
[10] YU Jing;ZHANG Lin;CUI Hong;ZHANG Yong-Xia;CANG Jing;HAO Zai-Bin;LI Zhuo-Fu. Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Dongnongdongmai 1 before Wintering in High-Cold Area[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(11): 2019 -2025 .