Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (9): 2335-2346.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.44015

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Deep side fertilization improved soybean yield by optimizing leaf function and nitrogen accumulation

XU Yi-Fan**(), XU Cai-Long**(), LI Rui-Dong, WU Zong-Sheng, HUA Jian-Xin, YANG Lin, SONG Wen-Wen*(), WU Cun-Xiang*()   

  1. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Soybean Industrial Technology R & D Center, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2024-01-24 Accepted:2024-05-21 Online:2024-09-12 Published:2024-06-04
  • Contact: *E-mail: wucunxiang@caas.cn; E-mail: songwenwen@caas.cn
  • About author:First author contact:**Contributed equally to this work
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2023YFE0105000);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32101845);China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-04)

Abstract:

Fertilizers play a crucial role in providing essential nutrients for crops, promoting photosynthesis, and enhancing crop growth and yield formation. The Huang-Huai-Hai region is a significant soybean production area in China, known for high-quality soybean cultivation. Optimizing fertilization techniques in this region is pivotal for improving soybean yields and reducing soybean import pressure in China. In this experiment, we implemented four treatments: no fertilization (F0), side deep fertilization (F1), equidistant deep fertilization (F2), and surface fertilization (F3). The objective was to study the variations in soybean leaf physiological indices, material accumulation, and yield composition under different fertilization methods. Our aim was to elucidate the relationship between fertilization practices and soybean production, providing theoretical support for sustainable and efficient soybean production in the Huang-Huai-Hai region. The results demonstrated that the F1 treatment significantly increased the potential photochemical quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), the actual photochemical quantum yield of photosystem II [Y(II)], the electron transfer rate (ETR), and the photochemical fluorescence quenching coefficient (qP) of soybean leaves during the pod-grain stage. Compared to the other treatments, the F1 treatment led to a 3.61%-22.86% increase in Y(II) in soybean leaves during the late reproductive stage. Regarding antioxidant metabolism, the F1 treatment significantly enhanced the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) in soybean leaves. In comparison to the other treatments, the F1-treated leaves exhibited a 6.32%-35.34% increase in SOD activity and a 1.93%-50.55% increase in CAT activity during the late seed filling stage, subsequently contributing to a boosted net photosynthetic rate (29.42%-70.10%). The enhancement of photosynthetic function in the F1 treatment resulted in increased dry matter (1.17%-101.18%) and nitrogen (1.01%-88.14%) accumulation during the middle and late fertility stages, providing a foundation for increased yield. Changes in fertilization practices (F1 and F2 treatments) led to a significant increase in soybean yield by 10.66% and 6.55%, respectively, compared to the F3 treatment. Further analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between soybean leaf Fv/Fm, Y(II), Pn, SOD, CAT activities, and the number of pods per plant, number of grains per plant, and overall yield. In conclusion, side-depth fertilization enhanced the late antioxidant system function of soybean leaves, improved photosynthesis and material accumulation, optimized yield composition, and promoted increased soybean yield.

Key words: side deep fertilization, chlorophyll, fluorescence parameters, photosynthetic capacity, yield

Fig. 1

Rainfall and temperature at the test site 2020-2022"

Fig. 2

Schematic representation of fertilizer application methods for different treatments F0: no fertilization; F1: side deep fertilization; F2: equidistant deep fertilization; F3: surface fertilization."

Table 1

Effects of treatment (T) and year (Y) and their interactions on the measured parameters of this study"

项目
Item
变异来源Source of variation
产量
Yield
单株
荚数
Pods per plant
单株
粒数
Seeds per plant
百粒重
100-seed weight
叶面积指数LAI 净光合速率Pn 蒸腾
速率
Tr
最大光化学量子产量Fv/Fm 实际光化学效率Y(II) 电子传递速率ETR 光化学淬灭系数qP 超氧化物歧化酶SOD 过氧化氢酶CAT
处理Treatment (T) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** NS ** ** **
年份
Year (Y)
** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
处理×年份
T×Y
NS ** ** NS ** ** NS NS NS

Fig. 3

Effect of fertilizer application methods on stay-green of soybean F0: no fertilization, F1: side deep fertilization, F2: equidistant deep fertilization, F3: surface fertilization."

Fig. 4

Effects of fertilizer application methods on net photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate of soybean F0: no fertilization; F1: side deep fertilization; F2: equidistant deep fertilization; F3: surface fertilization; R1: beginning bloom; R3: beginning pod; R5: beginning seed; R7: beginning maturity. Pn: net photosynthetic rate; Tr: transpiration rate."

Fig. 5

Effects of fertilizer application methods on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of soybean in 2022 F0: no fertilization, F1: side deep fertilization, F2: equidistant deep fertilization, F3: surface fertilization; R1: beginning bloom; R3: beginning pod; R5: beginning seed; R7: beginning maturity. Y(II): actual photochemical efficiency; Fv/Fm: optimal/maximal quantum yield of photosystem II; ETR: electron transport rate; qp: photochemical quenching."

Fig. 6

Effects of fertilizer application methods on SOD and CAT activities in soybean F0: no fertilization; F1: side deep fertilization; F2: equidistant deep fertilization; F3: surface fertilization; V3: third node; R1: beginning bloom; R3: beginning pod; R5: beginning seed; R7: beginning maturity. CAT: catalase; SOD: superoxide dismutase."

Fig. 7

Correlation analysis of yield and leaf photosynthetic function related indexes F0: no fertilization; F1: side deep fertilization; F2: equidistant deep fertilization; F3: surface fertilization. Pn: net photosynthetic rate; Tr: transpiration rate; Y(II): actual photochemical efficiency; Fv/Fm: optimal/maximal quantum yield of photosystem II; CAT: catalase; SOD: superoxide dismutase. ** indicates significant differences at the 0.01 probability level. NS: no significant difference."

Fig. 8

Effects of fertilizer application methods on dry matter and nitrogen accumulation in soybean F0: no fertilization; F1: side deep fertilization; F2: equidistant deep fertilization; F3: surface fertilization."

Fig. 9

2020-2022 Soybean yield and yield components of each treatment F0: no fertilization; F1: side deep fertilization; F2: equidistant deep fertilization; F3: surface fertilization. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at the 0.05 probability level between treatments during the same growth period."

Fig. 10

Correlation analysis of leaf photosynthetic, physiological characteristics, and yield components SPP: seeds per plant; PPP: pods per plant; HSW: hundred-seed weight; Pn: net photosynthetic rate; Tr: transpiration rate; Y(II): actual photochemical efficiency; qP: photochemical quenching; CAT: catalase; SOD: superoxide dismutase. * and ** indicate significant differences at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively. NS: no significant difference."

[1] 司伟, 韩天富. “十四五”时期中国大豆增产潜力与实现路径. 农业经济问题, 2021, (7): 17-24.
Si W, Han T F. China’s soybean yield increase potential and realization path during the “14th five-year plan” period. Issu Agric Econ, 2021, (7): 17-24 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] Li J, Luo G, Shaibu A S, Li B, Zhang S, Sun J. Optimal fertilization level for yield, biological and quality traits of soybean under drip irrigation system in the arid region of Northwest China. Agronomy, 2022, 12: 291.
[3] Almeida L F A, Correndo A, Ross J, Licht M, Casteel S, Singh M, Naeve F, Vann R, Bais J, Kandel H, Lindsey L, Conley S, Kleinjan J, Kovacs P, Berning D, Hefley T, Reiter M, Holshouser D, Ciampitti I A. Soybean yield response to nitrogen and sulfur fertilization in the United States: contribution of soil N and N fixation processes. Eur J Agron, 2023, 145: 126791.
[4] Aserse A A, Markos D, Getachew G, Halla M, Lindström K. Rhizobial inoculation improves drought tolerance, biomass and grain yields of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) at Halaba and Boricha in Southern Ethiopia. Arch Agron Soil Sci, 2020, 66: 488-501.
[5] Sheteiwy M S, Ali D F I, Xiong Y C, Brestic M, Skalicky M, Hamoud Y A, Ulhassan Z, Shaghaleh H, Abdelgawad H, Farooq M, Sharma A, Sawah A M E. Physiological and biochemical responses of soybean plants inoculated with Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol, 2021, 21: 195.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-02949-z pmid: 33888066
[6] Xu Q Z, Liu X, Zhang C Y, Du W G, Guan Y F, Yang W Q. Insights into soybean with high photosynthetic efficiency. Adv Bot Res, 2022, 102: 121-151.
[7] Kubar M S, Shar A H, Kubar K A, Rind N A, Ullah H, Kalhoro S A, Wang C, Feng M C, Gujar A, Sun H, Yang W, Enshasy H E, Brestic M, Zivcak M, Ondrisik P, Aljuaid B, Shehawi A, Ansari M J. Optimizing nitrogen supply promotes biomass, physiological characteristics and yield components of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Saud J Biol Sci, 2021, 28: 6209-6217.
[8] El Amine B, Mosseddaq F, Naciri R, Oukarroum A. Interactive effect of Fe and Mn deficiencies on physiological, biochemical, nutritional and growth status of soybean. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2023, 199: 107718.
[9] De Souza A P, Burgess S J, Doran L, Hansen J, Manukyan L, Maryn N, Gotarkar D, Leonelli L, Niyogi K, Long S P. Soybean photosynthesis and crop yield are improved by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science, 2022, 377: 851-854.
doi: 10.1126/science.adc9831 pmid: 35981033
[10] Wu D, Zhang Y X, Gu W Q, Feng Z B, Xiu L Q, Zhang W M, Chen W F. Long term co-application of biochar and fertilizer could increase soybean yield under continuous cropping: insights from photosynthetic physiology. J Sci Food Agric, 2024, 104: 3113-3122.
[11] Singh S K, Reddy V R, Fleisher D H, Timlin D J. Interactive effects of temperature and phosphorus nutrition on soybean: leaf photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and nutrient efficiency. Photosynthetica, 2019, 57: 248-257.
doi: 10.32615/ps.2019.036
[12] Nasar J, Wang G Y, Zhou F J, Gitari H, Zhou X B, Tabl K M, Hasan M E, Ali H, Waqas M M, Ali I, Jahan M S. Nitrogen fertilization coupled with foliar application of iron and molybdenum improves shade tolerance of soybean under maize-soybean intercropping. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13: 1014640.
[13] Tripathi A, Pandey M, Sharma P. A review: effects of nitrogenous fertilizers on soil (pH, microbial community, greenhouse gases emission and carbon pool). Environ Contamin Rev, 2022, 5: 44-48.
[14] 黄恒, 姜恒鑫, 刘光明, 袁嘉琦, 汪源, 赵灿, 王维领, 霍中洋, 许轲, 戴其根, 张洪程, 李德剑, 刘国林. 侧深施氮对水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 2232-2249.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.02086
Huang H, Jiang H X, Liu G M, Yuan J Q, Wang Y, Zhao C, Wang W L, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Dai Q G, Zhang H C, Li D J, Liu G L. Effects of side deep placement of nitrogen on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 2232-2249 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.02086
[15] Zhang Z, Wang Y F, Wang Z M, Ashraf U, Mo Z W, Tian H, Duan M Y, Li Y Q, Tang X R, Pan S G. Precise delivery of nitrogen at tillering stage enhances grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in double rice cropping systems of South China. Field Crops Res, 2022, 289: 108736.
[16] Chen G Z, Wu P, Wang J Y, Zhou Y D, Ren L Q, Cai T, Zhang P, Jia Z K. How do different fertilization depths affect the growth, yield, and nitrogen use efficiency in rain-fed summer maize? Field Crops Res, 2023, 290: 108759.
[17] Wu P, Liu F, Chen G Z, Wang J Y, Huang F Y, Cai T, Zhang P, Jia Z. Can deep fertilizer application enhance maize productivity by delaying leaf senescence and decreasing nitrate residue levels? Field Crops Res, 2022, 277: 108417.
[18] Chen H, Gao L P, Li M C, Liao Y T, Liao Q X. Fertilization depth effect on mechanized direct-seeded winter rapeseed yield and fertilizer use efficiency. J Sci Food Agric, 2023, 103: 2574-2584.
[19] Ohyama T, Ikebe K, Okuoka S, Ozawa T, Nishiura T, Ishiwata T, Yamazaki A, Tanaka F, Takahashi T, Umezawa T, Ohshima H, Kato T, Maeda Y, Saito A, Higuchi K, Ohtake N, Takahashi Y, Harada N, Ohkama-Ohtsu N. A deep placement of lime nitrogen reduces the nitrate leaching and promotes soybean growth and seed yield. Crop Environ, 2022, 1: 221-230.
[20] Jong H K, Kang C K, Rho I R. Growth and yield responses of soybean according to subsurface fertigation. Agron J, 2023, 115: 1877-1891.
[21] Li Y L, Chen P, Fu Z D, Luo K, Lin P, Gao C, Liu S S, Pu T, Yong T W, Yang W Y. Maize-soybean relay cropping increases soybean yield synergistically by extending the post-anthesis leaf stay-green period and accelerating grain filling. Crop J, 2023, 11: 1921-1930.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2023.05.011
[22] Fortunato A A, Debona D, Bernardeli A M A, Rodrigues F Á. Changes in the antioxidant system in soybean leaves infected by Corynespora cassiicola. Phytopathology, 2015, 105: 1050-1058.
[23] Liang X Y, Wang C J, Wang H T, Yao Z L, Qiu X F, Wang J D, He W Q. Biogas slurry topdressing as replacement of chemical fertilizers reduces leaf senescence of maize by up-regulating tolerance mechanisms. J Environ Manag, 2023, 344: 118433.
[24] Ahmad I, Ahmad S, Kamran M, Yang X N, Hou F J, Yang B P, Ding R X, Liu T, Han Q F. Uniconazole and nitrogen fertilization trigger photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence, and delay leaf senescence in maize at a high population density. Photosynthetica, 2021, 59: 192-202.
[25] Viljevac Vuletić M, Spanic V. Characterization of photosynthetic performance during natural leaf senescence in winter wheat: Multivariate analysis as a tool for phenotypic characterization. Photosynthetica, 2020, 58: 301-313.
[26] Cha-Um S, Kirdmanee C. Effect of salt stress on proline accumulation, photosynthetic ability and growth characters in two maize cultivars. Pak J Bot, 2009, 41: 87-98.
[27] Luo K, Xie C, Wang J, Du Q, Cheng P, Wang T, Wu Y C, Yang W Y, Yong T W. Uniconazole, 6-benzyladenine, and diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate increase the yield of soybean by improving the photosynthetic efficiency and increasing grain filling in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system. J Plant Growth Regul, 2021, 40: 1869-1880.
[28] Morrison M J, Voldeng H D, Cober E R. Agronomic changes from 58 years of genetic improvement of short-season soybean cultivars in Canada. Agron J, 2000, 92: 780-784.
[29] Ahmed S, Raza M A, Zhou T, Hussain S, Khalid M H B, Feng L, Wasaya A, Iqbal N, Ahmed A, Liu W, Yang W. Responses of soybean dry matter production, phosphorus accumulation, and seed yield to sowing time under relay intercropping with maize. Agronomy, 2018, 8: 282.
[30] Dass A, Rajanna G A, Babu S, Lal S K, Choudhary A K, Singh R, Rathore S S, Kaur R, Dhar S, Singh T, Raj R, Shekhawat K, Singh C, Kumar B. Foliar application of macro- and micronutrients improves the productivity, economic returns, and resource-use efficiency of soybean in a semiarid climate. Sustainability, 2022, 14: 5825.
[31] Xu C L, Li R D, Song W W, Wu T T, Sun S, Han T F, Wu C X. High density and uniform plant distribution improve soybean yield by regulating population uniformity and canopy light interception. Agronomy, 2021, 11: 1880.
[32] Sadras V O, Villalobos F J, Fereres E. Radiation interception, radiation use efficiency and crop productivity. In: Villalobos F J, Fereres E, eds. Principles of Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture. Berlin: Springer Press, 2017. pp 169-188.
[33] Liu T N, Wang Z L, Cai T. Canopy apparent photosynthetic characteristics and yield of two spike-type wheat cultivars in response to row spacing under high plant density. PLoS One, 2016, 11: e0148582.
[34] Zhang X D, Yang L C, Xue X K, Kamran M, Ahmad I, Dong Z Y, Liu T N, Jia Z K, Zhang P, Han Q F. Plastic film mulching stimulates soil wet-dry alternation and stomatal behavior to improve maize yield and resource use efficiency in a semi-arid region. Field Crops Res, 2019, 233: 101-113.
[35] Chen Y Y, Fan P S, Mo Z W, Kong L L, Tian H, Duan M Y, Li L, Wu L J, Wang Z M, Tang X R, Pan S G. Deep placement of nitrogen fertilizer affects grain yield, nitrogen recovery efficiency, and root characteristics in direct-seeded rice in South China. J Plant Growth Regul, 2021, 40: 379-387.
[1] ZHANG Gui-Qin, WANG Hong-Zhang, GUO Xin-Song, ZHU Fu-Jun, GAO Han, ZHANG Ji-Wang, ZHAO Bin, REN Bai-Zhao, LIU Peng, REN Hao. Effects of organic material inputs on soil physicochemical properties and summer maize yield formation in coastal saline-alkali land [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2323-2334.
[2] ZHANG Zhen, HE Jian-Ning, SHI Yu, YU Zhen-Wen, ZHANG Yong-Li. Effects of row spacing and planting patterns on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2396-2407.
[3] YANG Yu-Chen, JIN Ya-Rong, LUO Jin-Chan, ZHU Xin, LI Wei-Hang, JIA Ji-Yuan, WANG Xiao-Shan, HUANG De-Jun, HUANG Lin-Kai. Identification and expression analysis of the WD40 gene family in pearl millet [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2219-2236.
[4] LIU Zhi-Peng, GOU Zhi-Wen, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, FAN Zhi-Long, HU Fa-Long, FAN Hong, WANG Qi-Ming. Effect of green manure on wheat and maize yields in diversified cropping patterns in an arid irrigated agricultural area [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2415-2424.
[5] SUN Zhao-Hua, REN Hao, WANG Hong-Zhang, WANG Zi-Qiang, YAO Hai-Yan, XIN Ai-Mei, ZHAO Bin, ZHANG Ji-Wang, REN Bai-Zhao, LIU Peng. Effects of foliar silicon sprays on leaf photosynthetic performance and grain yield of summer maize in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2383-2395.
[6] PENG Jie, XIE Xiao-Qi, ZHANG Zhao, YAO Xiao-Fen, QIU Shen, CHEN Dan-Dan, GU Xiao-Na, WANG Yu-Jie, WANG Chen-Chen, YANG Guo-Zheng. Relationship between cotton yield and canopy microenvironment under summer direct seeding [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2371-2382.
[7] LOU Hong-Xiang, HUANG Xiao-Yu, JIANG Meng, NING Ning, BIAN Meng-Lei, ZHANG Lei, LUO Dong-Xu, QIN Meng-Qian, KUAI Jie, WANG Bo, WANG Jing, ZHAO Jie, XU Zheng-Hua, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Optimal allocation of sowing date and sowing rate of late-sowing rapeseed in the Yangtze River Basin [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(8): 2091-2105.
[8] LIU Chen, WANG Kun-Kun, LIAO Shi-Peng, YANG Jia-Qun, CONG Ri-Huan, REN Tao, LI Xiao-Kun, LU Jian-Wei. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application levels on yield and nitrogen absorption and utilization of oilseed rape under maize-oilseed rape and rice-oilseed rape rotation fields [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(8): 2067-2077.
[9] YANG Qi-Rui, LI Lan-Tao, ZHANG Duo, WANG Ya-Xian, SHENG Kai, WANG Yi-Lun. Effect of phosphorus application on yield, quality, light temperature physiological characteristics, and root morphology in summer peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(7): 1841-1854.
[10] CAO Zi-Qi, ZHAO Xiao-Qing, ZHANG Xiang-Qian, WANG Jian-Guo, LI Juan, HAN Yun-Fei, LIU Dan, GAO Yan-Hua, LU Zhan-Yuan, REN Yong-Feng. Effects of nitrogen application levels on the accumulation, distribution of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, and the corresponding yield of Cyperus esculentus in sandy soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(7): 1805-1817.
[11] HAN Xiao-Chen, ZHANG Gui-Qin, WANG Ya-Hui, REN Hao, WANG Hong-Zhang, LIU Guo-Li, LIN Dian-Xu, WANG Zi-Qiang, ZHANG Ji-Wang, ZHAO Bin, REN Bao-Zhao, LIU Peng. Effects of soil conditioners on soil salinity content and maize yield in coastal saline-alkali land [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(7): 1776-1786.
[12] YAN Zi-Heng, WANG Xian-Ling, SHAO Dong-Li, GAO Geng-Dong, NING Ning, JIA Cai-Hua, KUAI Jie, WANG Bo, XU Zheng-Hua, WANG Jing, ZHAO Jie, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Effect of chlorophyll degradation rate in seed on key quality of rapeseed oil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(7): 1818-1828.
[13] ZHANG Zhi-Yuan, ZHOU Jie-Guang, LIU Jia-Jun, WANG Su-Rong, WANG Tong-Zhu, ZHAO Cong-Hao, YOU Jia-Ning, DING Pu-Yang, TANG Hua-Ping, LIU Yan-Lin, JIANG Qian-Tao, CHEN Guo-Yue, WEI Yu-Ming, MA Jian. Identification and verification of low-tillering QTL based on a new model of genetic analysis in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(6): 1373-1383.
[14] LI Chang-Xi, DONG Zhan-Peng, GUAN Yong-Hu, LIU Jin-Wei, LI Hang, MEI Yong-Jun. Genetic contribution and decision coefficient analysis of agronomic characters and lint yield traits of upland cotton in southern Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(6): 1486-1502.
[15] WANG Fei-Er, GUO Yao, LI Pan, WEI Jin-Gui, FAN Zhi-Long, HU Fa-Long, FAN Hong, HE Wei, YIN Wen, CHEN Gui-Ping. Compensation mechanism of increased maize density on yield with water and nitrogen reduction supply in oasis irrigation areas [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(6): 1616-1627.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!