Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，Apr. 30, 2025

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 2069-2077.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.02069

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Response of Nitrogen Use Efficiency to Plant Density and Nitrogen Application Rate for Maize Hybrids from Different Eras in Heilongjiang Province

QIAN Chun-Rong1,3,YU Yang3,GONG Xiu-Jie3,JIANG Yu-Bo3,ZHAO Yang3,HAO Yu-Bo3,LI Liang3,ZHANG Wei-Jian1,2,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Applied Ecology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China; 3 Institute of Crop Cultivation and Farming, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China
  • Received:2012-03-28 Revised:2012-07-05 Online:2012-11-12 Published:2012-09-10
  • Contact: 张卫建, E-mail: zhangweij@caas.net.cn, Tel: 010-62156856

PDF

1595

Cited

10

Abstract:

n this study, eight typical maize hybrids released from 1970s to 2000s in Heilongjiang Province were selected to investigate the responses of grain yield, Nitrogen (N) partial factor productivity (PFP), N agronomic efficiency (NAE) and N recovery efficiency (NRE) to N application rate and plant density in 2009 and 2010. During the variety improvement period of 1970s–2000s, PFP and NRE increased significantly by 3.41 kg kg-1 10 yr-1 and 2.26 per cent 10 yr-1, respectively. NAE increased significantly from 1970 to 2000 and descended after 2000. N harvest index decreased significantly by 1.51 per cent 10 yr-1. Grain N, stem N and leaf N accumulations rose significantly by 0.09, 0.07, and 0.12 g plant-1 10 yr-1. There were significant interactions among eras, plant densities and N application rates for above indicators. Nitrogen use efficiency exhibited decline trends with increasing N application rate and parabolic shape response to increasing plant density, and got the maximum in the population range of 50 000–70 000 plants ha-1. The theoretical optimal plant density for the maximal NUE was higher in newer hybrids than in the older ones. Higher plant population led to decrease N accumulation and N harvest index in grain, stem and leaf for all hybrids from different eras. Higher N application rate tended to promote N accumulation in grain, stem and leaf, but had different effects on N harvest index for hybrids from different eras. Compared to the varieties released abroad, there is a great potential in maize variety improvement for high-yield and higher-NUE in Northeast China. According to the existing variety’s traits, increasing plant density can enhance not only maize yield but also NUE.

Key words: Northeast China, Food security, Resource use efficiency, Maize variety succession, High-yield with high efficiency

[1]Hirel B, Gouis J L, Ney B, Gallais A. The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within intergrated approaches. J Exp Bot, 2007, 58: 2369–2387



[2]Delmer D. Agriculture in the developing world: connecting innovations in plant research to downstream applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102: 15739–15746



[3]Duvick D N. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). In: Duvick D N, Sparks L, eds. Advances in Agronomy. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2005. pp 83–145



[4]Duvick D N. Genetic progress in yield of United States maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica, 2005, 50: 193–202



[5]Duvick D N, Cassman K G. Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the North-central United States. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1622–1630



[6]Qiao C G, Wang Y J, Guo H A, Chen X J, Liu J Y, Li S Q. A review of advances in maize production in Jilin province during 1974–1993. Field Crops Res, 1996, 47: 65–75



[7]Russell W A.Genetic improvement of maize yields. Adv Agron, 1991, 46: 245–298



[8]Duvick D N. Genetic contributions to advances in yield of U.S. maize. Maydica, 1992, 37: 39–79



[9]Luque S F, Cirilo A G, Otegui M E. Genetic gains in grain yield and related physiological attributes in Argentine maize hybrids. Field Crops Res, 2006, 95: 383–397



[10]Eyherabide G H, Damilano A L, Colazo J C. Genetic gain for grain yield of maize in Argentina. Maydica, 1994, 39: 207–211



[11]Cunha Fernandes J S, Franzon J F. Thirty years of genetic progress in maize (Zea mays L.) in a tropical environment. Maydica, 1997, 42: 21–27



[12]Xie Z-J(谢振江), Li M-S(李明顺), Xu J-S(徐家舜), Zhang S-H(张世煌). Contributions of genetic improvement to yields of maize hybrids during different eras in North China. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(3): 781–789 (in chinese with English abstract)



[13]Hu C-H(胡昌浩), Dong S-T(董树亭), Wang K-J(王空军), Sun Q-Q(孙庆泉). Studies on development law for main agronomice characters of maize hybrid in different eras. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 1998, 6(3): 50–54 (in Chinese)



[14]Duvick D N. Genetic contributions to yield gains of U.S. hybrid maize, 1930 to 1980. In: Fehr W R ed. Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of Five Major Crop Plants. CSSA Special Publication 7. Madison, WI: ASA and CSSA, 1984. pp 15–47



[15]Tollenaar M, Wu J. Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1597–1604



[16]Echarte L, Luque S, Andrade F H, Sadras V O, Cirilo A, Otegui M E, Vega C R C. Response of maize kernel number to plant density in Argentinean hybrids released between 1965 and 1993. Field Crops Res, 2000, 68: 1–8



[17]Sangoi L, Ender M, Guidolin A F, Almeida M L, Konflanz V A. Nitrogen fertilization impact on agronomic traits of maize hybrids released at different decades. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 2001, 36: 757–764



[18]McCullough D E, Aguilera A, Tollenaar M. N uptake, N partitioning, and photosynthetic N-use efficiency of an old and a new maize hybrid. Can J Plant Sci, 1994, 74: 479–484



[19]Sangoi L, Gracietti M A, Rampazzo C, Bianchetti P. Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant density. Field Crops Res, 2002, 79: 39–51



[20]Carlone M R, Russell W A. Response to plant densities and nitrogen levels for four maize cultivars from different eras of breeding. Crop Sci, 1987, 27: 465–470



[21]Tollenaar M, Lee E A. Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Res, 2002, 75: 161–169



[22]Ci X K, Li M S, Xu J S, Lu Z Y, Bai P F, Ru G L, Liang X L, Zhang D G, Li X H, Bai L, Xie C X, Hao Z F, Zhang S H, Dong S T. Trends of grain yield and plant traits in Chinese maize cultivars from the 1950s to the 2000s. Euphytica, 2012, 185: 395–406



[23]O'Neill P M, Shanahan J F, Schepers J S, Caldwell B. Agronomic responses of corn hybrids from different eras to deficit and adequate levels of water and nitrogen. Agron J, 2004, 96: 1660–1667



[24]Wu Q P, Chen F J, Chen Y L, Yuan L X, Zhang F S, Mi G H. Root growth in response to nitrogen supply in Chinese maize hybrids released between 1973 and 2009. Sci China (Ser C: Life Sci), 2011, 54(7): 642–650



[25]Ding L, Wang K J, Jiang G M, Biswas D K, Xu H, Li L F, Li Y H. Effects of nitrogen deficiency on photosynthetic traits of maize hybrids released in different years. Ann Bot, 2005, 96: 925–930



[26]Dyson T. World food tredns and prospects to 2025. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96: 5929–5936



[27]Zhang F-S(张福锁), Wang J-Q(王激清), Zhang W-F(张卫峰), Cui Z-L(崔振岭), Ma W-Q(马文奇), Chen X-P(陈新平), Jiang R-F(江荣风). Nutrient use efficiencies of major ceral crops in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pedol Sin (土壤学报), 2008, 45(5): 915–924 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[28]Ma B L, Subedi K D, Liu A. Variations in grain nitrogen removal associated with management practices in maize production. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2006, 76: 67–80



[29]Raun W R, Johnson G V. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron J, 1999, 91: 357–363



[30]Castleberry R M, Crum C W, Krull F. Genetic yield improvement of U.S. maize cultivars under varying fertility and climatic environments. Crop Sci, 1984, 24: 33–36



[31]Moll R H, Kamprath E J, Jackson W A. Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agron J, 1982, 74: 562–564



[32]Cardwell V B. Fifty years of Minnesota corn production: Sources of yield increase. Agron J, 1982, 74: 984–990



[33]Ciampitti I A, Vyn T J. A comprehensive study of plant density consequences on nitrogen uptake dynamics of maize plants from vegetative to reproductive stages. Field Crops Res, 2011, 121: 2–18



[34]Osaki M, Makoto L, Toshiaki T. Ontogenetic changes in the contents of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, and chlorophyll in individual leaves of maize. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 1995, 41: 285−293



[35]Lü L-H(吕丽华), Tao H-B(陶洪斌), Wang P(王璞), Liu M(刘明), Zhao M(赵明), Wang R-Z(王润正). Carbon and nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen use efficiency in summer maize under different planting densities. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(4): 718−723 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[36]Qian C-R(钱春荣). Response to Plant Density and Nitrogen Application Rate for Maize Hybrids and Cultivation Approach for High-Yield with High-Efficiency in Northeast China. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] WANG Dan, ZHOU Bao-Yuan, MA Wei, GE Jun-Zhu, DING Zai-Song, LI Cong-Feng, ZHAO Ming. Characteristics of the annual distribution and utilization of climate resource for double maize cropping system in the middle reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] YAN Sheng-Ji, DENG Ai-Xing, SHANG Zi-Yin, TANG Zhi-Wei, CHEN Chang-Qing, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Wei-Jian. Characteristics of carbon emission and approaches of carbon mitigation and sequestration for carbon neutrality in China’s crop production [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 930-941.
[3] SONG Shi-Qin, YANG Qing-Long, WANG Dan, LYU Yan-Jie, XU Wen-Hua, WEI Wen-Wen, LIU Xiao-Dan, YAO Fan-Yun, CAO Yu-Jun, WANG Yong-Jun, WANG Li-Chun. Relationship between seed morphology, storage substance and chilling tolerance during germination of dominant maize hybrids in Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 726-738.
[4] YAN Yan, ZHANG Yu-Shi, LIU Chu-Rong, REN Dan-Yang, LIU Hong-Run, LIU Xue-Qing, ZHANG Ming-Cai, LI Zhao-Hu. Variety matching and resource use efficiency of the winter wheat-summer maize “double late” cropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 423-436.
[5] ZHOU Bao-Yuan,GE Jun-Zhu,HOU Hai-Peng,SUN Xue-Fang,DING Zai-Song,LI Cong-Feng,MA Wei,ZHAO Ming. Characteristics of annual climate resource distribution and utilization for different cropping systems in the south of Yellow-Huaihe-Haihe Rivers plain [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(6): 937-949.
[6] ZHOU Bao-Yuan,MA Wei,SUN Xue-Fang,DING Zai-Song,LI Cong-Feng,ZHAO Ming. Characteristics of annual climate resource distribution and utilization in high-yielding winter wheat-summer maize double cropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(4): 589-600.
[7] LI Shu-Ya,TIAN Shao-Yang,YUAN Guo-Yin,GE Jun-Zhu,XU Ying,WANG Meng-Ying,CAO Cou-Gui,ZHAI Zhong-Bing,LING Xiao-Xia,ZHAN Ming,ZHAO Ming. Comparison of Yield and Resource Utilization Efficiency among Different Maize and Rice Cropping Systems in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(10): 1537-1547.
[8] ZHOU Bao-Yuan, WANG Zhi-Min, YUE Yang, MA Wei, ZHAO Ming. Comparison of Yield and Light-temperature Resource Use Efficiency between Wheat-Maize and Maize-Maize Cropping Systems [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(09): 1393-1405.
[9] GAO Hong,LI Fei-Fei,Lü Guo-Yi,XIA Ying-Jun,WANG Jia-Yu,SUN Jian,TANG Liang,XU Zheng-Jin. Effect of Indica-Japonica Hybridization on Grain Quality of Rice Cultivars in Northeast China [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39(10): 1806-1813.
[10] LI Zhi-Jie,ZHANG Zhen-Ping,ZHANG Yi,DENG Ai-Xing,SONG Zhen-Wei,ZHENG Cheng-Yan,ZHANG Wei-Jian. Responses of Plant Productivity and Nitrogen Use Efficiency to Nitrogen Fertilization Rate among Rice Varieties Released from Different Years in Liaoning Province [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39(09): 1679-1686.
[11] QIAN Chun-Rong1,3,YU Yang3,GONG Xiu-Jie,JIANG Yu-Bo,ZHAO Yang,WANG Jun-He,YANG Zhong-Liang,ZHANG Wei-Jian. Response of Grain Yield to Plant Density and Nitrogen Application Rate for Maize Hybrids Released from Different Eras in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(10): 1864-1874.
[12] LIU Zhi-Juan,YANG Xiao-Guang,WANG Jing,Lü Shuo,LI Ke-Nan,XUN Xin,WANG En-Li. Adaptability of APSIM Maize Model in Northeast China [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(04): 740-746.
[13] ZHANG Jun;ZHAO Tuan-Jie;GAI Jun-Yi. Genetic Diversity and Genetic Structure of Soybean Cultivar Population Released in Northeast China [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(09): 1529-1536.
[14] ZHU Da-Wei;JIN Zhi-Qing. Impacts of Changes in Both Climate and Its Variability on Food Produc-tion in Northeast China [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(09): 1588-1597.
[15] WANG Mei-Yun;REN Tian-Zhi;ZHAO Ming;LI Shao-Kun;WANG Xiao-Bo;LI Li-Juan;CHEN Chang-Li. Matter Production and Resources Use Efficiency of Double-Cropping Silage Maize System [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(08): 1316-1323.
Viewed
Full text
551
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 0 0 0 551

  From Others local
  Times 12 539
  Rate 2% 98%

Abstract
424
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 424
  From Others local
  Times 60 364
  Rate 14% 86%

Cited
Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd