Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 1059-1069.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84162

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Location- and quantity-based effects of mepiquat chloride application on cotton plant-type

ZHAO Wen-Chao1,2,DU Ming-Wei1,LI Fang1,TIAN Xiao-Li1,*(),LI Zhao-Hu1   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University / Engineering Research Center of Plant Growth Regulator, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100193, China
    2 Dezhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dezhou 253000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2018-11-29 Accepted:2019-01-19 Online:2019-07-12 Published:2019-03-11
  • Contact: Xiao-Li TIAN E-mail:tianxl@cau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Program of Introducing International Super Agricultural Science and Technology(948 Program 2016-X25);the China Agricultural Research System(CARS-15-16)

RichHTML352

10

PDF

740

Abstract:

The plant growth regulator mepiquat chloride (MC; 1,1-dimethyl piperidinium chloride) has been successfully and worldwide used in cotton production. It has been known that MC application time decides its effect location and MC application rate decides its effect strength. However, there were less detailed information on the location- and quantity-based effects of MC on cotton stem and branches. In the present field study, MC was respectively applied at early squaring stage, after peak squaring stage, before peak blooming stage, after peak blooming stage and post-topping stage with a range of rates. We monitored plant height at three days interval during MC valid period, and measured all internodes of stem and fruiting branches prior to harvest. Under the condition of topping in late July, the overall effectiveness scope of MC (across different application times) on main stem ranged from the fourth internode below the uppermost node (named as N) to the sixth internode above N node. In terms of the effectiveness scope of MC on fruiting branches, it covered the 11 fruiting branches below N node and five branches above N node. In addition, the influenced internodes in most fruiting branches below N node were more than those above N node. When we overlaid the effectiveness scopes of MC application after peak squaring and before peak blooming, the effect was covered almost all internodes of both main stem (above the node of the first fruiting branch) and fruiting branches. Moreover, we found that there was not always a good linear relationship between MC rate and its effective strength. Besides application time and rate, the location- and quantity-based effects of MC may depend on temperature, rainfall, plant biomass and source-sink relationship.

Key words: cotton, 1, 1-dimethyl piperidinium chloride, application time, application rate, main stem, fruiting branches

Table 1

Monthly weather data during cotton growing season in Hejian city"

月份
Month		 平均温度 Average temperature (°C) 降水量 Rainfall (mm) 日照时数 Sunshine duration (h)
2013 2014 30-yeara 2013 2014 30-yeara 2013 2014 30-yeara
4 12.2 16.6 14.4 8.5 30.8 26.1 270.7 247.4 256.5
5 20.9 22.9 21.4 26.5 38.0 35.3 258.2 316.8 282.1
6 24.6 25.6 25.7 80.1 30.0 66.7 187.3 297.9 244.8
7 26.2 28.2 27.2 279.1 42.4 161.7 187.0 297.6 222.6
8 26.5 26.0 24.8 96.7 93.0 170.9 238.8 302.0 199.1
9 20.2 20.8 19.4 39.2 19.6 64.2 184.3 226.2 209.1
10 12.8 14.6 13.6 5.0 6.8 12.2 169.3 180.1 197.9
平均 Average 20.5 22.1 20.9 — — — — — —
总计Total — — — 535.1 260.6 537.0 1495.6 1868.0 1612.3

Table 2

Mepiquat chloride (MC) application time and rates for each experiment in 2013 and 2014"

试验编号
Experiment number		 DPC应用时间 MC application time CK DPC剂量 MC rate (g hm-2)
生育时期
Growth stage		 日期 Date (month/day) 主茎节数 Stem nodes M1 M2 M3 M4
2013 2014 2013 2014
1 现蕾期 Squaring 6/2 6/3 7 7 0 3.8 7.5 11.3 15.0
2 盛蕾期后 After peak squaring 6/14 6/14 12 12 0 7.5 15.0 22.5 30.0
3 盛花期前 Before peak blooming 7/3 7/6 18 17 0 22.5 45.0 67.5 90.0
4 盛花期后 After peak blooming 7/13 7/16 20 18 0 30.0 60.0 90.0 120.0
5 打顶后 Post-topping 7/31 8/2 0 45.0 90.0 135.0 180.0

Fig. 1

Effect of mepiquat chloride (MC) applied at squaring stage (A), after peak squaring (B), before peak blooming (C), and after peak blooming (D) on the daily increase of stem in 2013 and 2014 CK denotes control; M1-M4 indicate four MC rates; treatments are the same as those given in Table 2. Significance levels among treatments (**P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05) are given. # indicates month/date, MC application time."

Fig. 2

Dynamic changes of cotton plant height of mepiquat chloride (MC) applied at squaring stage (A), after peak squaring (B), before peak blooming (C), and after peak blooming (D) in 2013 and 2014 CK denotes control; M1-M4 indicate four MC rates; Treaments are the same as those given in Table 2. Significance levels among treatments (**P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05) are given. # indicates month/date, MC application time; Arrows represent the inflection point of growth rate."

Fig. 3

Effects of mepiquat chloride (MC) applied at squaring stage(A), after peak squaring (B), before peak blooming (C), and after peak blooming (D) on the internode length of main stem in 2013 and 2014 CK denotes control, and M1-M4 indicate four MC rates; Treaments are the same as those given in Table 2. Significance levels among treatments (**P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05) are given."

Table 3

Effect of mepiquat chloride applied after peak squaring, before peak blooming, and after peak blooming on the length of fruit branches in 2013 and 2014"

年份Year 生育时期
Growing stage		 DPC剂量(2)
MC rate(2)		 果枝序号 Number of fruit branches
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
2013 盛蕾期后
After peak squaring		 CK (cm) / 29.9 32.6 / / / / / / / / / / / /
M1 (%) / -4.1% -5.9% / / / / / / / / / / / /
M2 (%) / -9.6% -18.2% / / / / / / / / / / / /
M3 (%) / -13.8% -11.4% / / / / / / / / / / / /
M4 (%) / -9.4% -16.6% / / / / / / / / / / / /
盛花期前
Before peak blooming		 CK (cm) / / / 31.4 31.6 31.5 31.4 32.3 31.0 32.5 30.5 28.9 27.0 25.2 24.2
M1 (%) / / / -3.3% -5.3% -10.6% -13.7% -18.6% -12.9% -16.1% -15.3% -16.5% -15.9% -16.4% -20.0%
M2 (%) / / / -11.5% -10.9% -13.1% -20.1% -23.7% -18.1% -21.5% -21.3% -18.2% -19.8% -18.9% -23.7%
M3 (%) / / / -9.2% -11.1% -16.0% -19.4% -26.2% -21.0% -25.1% -21.0% -24.6% -25.3% -24.8% -29.7%
M4 (%) / / / -9.6% -11.8% -16.4% -20.0% -25.1% -25.8% -29.0% -27.8% -26.0% -26.5% -24.7% -28.3%
盛花期后
After peak blooming		 CK (cm) / / / / / / / / 31.4 30.9 28.7 27.8 25.9 24.4 24.1
M1 (%) / / / / / / / / -11.1% -14.5% -16.7% -20.3% -19.4% -14.3% -20.0%
M2 (%) / / / / / / / / -10.8% -16.2% -16.3% -21.5% -23.2% -23.6% -23.3%
M3 (%) / / / / / / / / -14.8% -24.0% -26.3% -31.1% -31.2% -30.1% -28.3%
M4 (%) / / / / / / / / -18.2% -26.0% -26.8% -33.2% -34.6% -34.0% -38.1%
2014 盛蕾期后
After peak squaring		 CK (cm) 25.0 26.6 26.1 25.8 24.5 23.4 23.2 / / / / / / / /
M1 (%) -6.4% -17.1% -16.1% -18.0% -15.7% -13.7% -18.8% / / / / / / / /
M2 (%) -13.1% -18.8% -18.1% -19.2% -17.8% -16.1% -18.0% / / / / / / / /
M3 (%) -25.4% -28.4% -28.2% -27.6% -28.2% -21.7% -25.8% / / / / / / / /
M4 (%) -24.5% -24.7% -30.1% -30.6% -29.2% -25.8% -25.9% / / / / / / / /
盛花期前
Before peak blooming		 CK (cm) / / / / 22.5 20.9 20.2 18.8 16.9 15.9 14.7 / / / /
M1 (%) / / / / -7.7% -13.6% -19.9% -26.0% -23.8% -19.0% -18.0% / / / /
M2 (%) / / / / -16.8% -24.7% -36.0% -40.7% -38.4% -29.2% -34.4% / / / /
M3 (%) / / / / -18.7% -24.6% -31.8% -38.1% -36.6% -36.9% -36.3% / / / /
M4 (%) / / / / -17.4% -25.9% -33.4% -39.2% -41.5% -43.2% -29.4% / / / /
盛花期后
After peak blooming		 CK (cm) / / / / / / 23.4 21.9 22.2 20.8 19.7 / / / /
M1 (%) / / / / / / -18.6% -18.8% -28.3% -32.2% -32.0% / / / /
M2 (%) / / / / / / -16.4% -16.1% -26.8% -30.3% -31.3% / / / /
M3 (%) / / / / / / -23.6% -26.0% -36.2% -36.2% -38.6% / / / /
M4 (%) / / / / / / -17.7% -24.7% -34.6% -40.2% -37.6% / / / /

Fig. 4

Schematic diagram of cotton plant type in response to mepiquat chloride applied at squaring stage (A), after peak squaring (B), before peak blooming (C), after peak blooming (D), and post-topping (E) in 2013 1-CK-5-CK denote control at different stages, and 1-MC-5-MC indicate the mean of four mepiquat chloride rates at different stages; Treaments are the same as those given in Table 2; Green parts indicate the internodes affected by MC; N indicates the node of main stem when mepiquat chloride was applied; Bar= 10 cm."

Fig. 5

Schematic diagram of cotton plant type in response to mepiquat chloride applied at squaring stage (A), after peak squaring (B), before peak blooming (C), after peak blooming (D), and post-topping (E) in 2014 1-CK-5-CK denote control at different stages, and 1-MC-5-MC indicate the mean of four mepiquat chloride rates at different stages; Treaments are the same as those given in Table 2; Green parts indicate the internodes affected by MC; N indicates the node of main stem when mepiquat chloride was applied; Bar = 10 cm."

[1] 李丕明, 奚惠达, 何钟佩, 韩碧文 . 农作物化控栽培工程技术的发展与中国农业现代化前景. 北京农业大学学报, 1991,17(增刊):1-5.
Li P M, Xi H D, He Z P, Han B W . The engineering development of chemically-manipulated crop culture in relation to the prospect of agricultural modernization in china. Acta Agric Univ Pekinensis, 1991,17(suppl.):1-5 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] Rademacher W . Growth retardants: effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 2000,51:501-531.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.501
[3] York A C . Cotton cultivar response to mepiquat chloride. Agron J, 1983,75:663-667.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500040020x
[4] York A C . Response of cotton to mepiquat chloride with varying N rates and plant populations. Agron J, 1983,75:667-672.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500040021x
[5] 何钟佩, 奚惠达, 杨秉芳, 李丕明, 韩碧文 . DPC效应的定向、定量诱导及其在棉花丰产栽培中的应用. 北京农业大学学报, 1984,10(1):19-28.
He Z P, Xi H D, Yang B F, Li P M, Han B W . The key to get good yield of cotton by inducing the response to DPC towards a planned direction and in planned strength. Acta Agric Univ Pekinensis, 1984,10(1):19-28 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 何钟佩, 李丕明, 奚惠达, 李召虎, 白玉良 . DPC化控技术在棉花上的应用和发展~从防止徒长到系统的定向诱导. 北京农业大学学报, 1991,17(增刊):58-63.
He Z P, Li P M, Xi H D, Li Z H, Bai Y L . The using and development of DPC chemical controlling technique in cotton culture. Acta Agric Univ Pekinensis, 1991,17(suppl.):58-63 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] Zhao D, Oosterhuis D M . Pix plus and mepiquat chloride effects on physiology, growth, and yield of field-grown cotton. J Plant Growth Regul, 2000,19:415-422.
doi: 10.1007/s003440000018
[8] Pettigrew W T, Johnson J T . Effects of different seeding rates and plant growth regulators on early planted cotton. J Cotton Sci, 2005,9:189-198.
[9] Kerby T A . Cotton response to mepiquat chloride. Agron J, 1985,77:515-518.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1985.00021962007700040003x
[10] Reddy V R, Baker D N, Hodges H F . Temperature and mepiquat chloride effects on cotton canopy architecture. Agron J, 1990,82:190-195.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200020004x
[11] Gwathmey C O, Craig Jr C C . Managing earliness in cotton with mepiquat type growth regulators. Crop Manag, 2003,12:1-8.
[12] Siebert J D, Stewart A M . Influence of plant density on cotton response to mepiquat chloride application. Agron J, 2006,98:1634-1639.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2006.0083
[13] 何钟佩, 陈洪战, 李丕明, 李召虎 . DPC调控棉花氮素追肥时期的复合效应研究. 北京农业大学学报, 1991,17(增刊):31-37.
He Z P, Chen H Z, Li P M, Li Z H . Studies on the complex response of applying nitrogen at different stage under DPC control. Acta Agric Univ Pekinensis, 1991,17(suppl.):31-37 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 李丕明, 何钟佩, 李召虎 . 棉花应用缩节安(DPC)化控技术研究概况与进展. 作物杂志, 1991, ( 2):1-3.
Li P M, He Z P, Li Z H . Outline and progression about the study of DPC chemical control on cotton. Crops, 1991, ( 2):1-3 (in Chinese).
[15] Ren X M, Zhang L Z, Du M W, Evers J B, van der Werf W, Tian X L, Li Z H . Managing mepiquat chloride and plant density for optimal yield and quality of cotton. Field Crops Res, 2013,149:1-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.04.014
[16] Yang F Q, Du M W, Tian X L, Eneji A E, Duan L S, Li Z H . Plant growth regulation enhanced potassium uptake and use efficiency in cotton. Field Crops Res, 2014,163:109-118.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.03.016
[17] Wilson Jr D G, York A C, Edmisten K L . Narrow-row cotton response to mepiquat chloride. J Cotton Sci, 2007,11:177-185.
[18] Biles S P, Cothren J T . Flowering and yield response of cotton to application of mepiquat chloride and PGR-IV. Crop Sci, 2001,41:1834-1837.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.1834
[19] McConnell J S, Baker W H, Frizzell B S, Varvil J J . Response of cotton to nitrogen fertilization and early multiple applications of mepiquat chloride. J Plant Nutr, 1992,15:457-468.
doi: 10.1080/01904169209364333
[20] Reddy V R, Trent A, Acock B . Mepiquat chloride and irrigation versus cotton growth and development. Agron J, 1992,84:930-933.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400060004x
[21] Nichols S P, Snipes C E, Jones M A . Evaluation of row spacing and mepiquat chloride in cotton. J Cotton Sci, 2003,7:148-155.
[22] Alkuddsi Y, Patil S S, Manjula S M, Patil B C, Nadaf H L, Nandihali B S . Association analysis of seed cotton yield components and physiological parameters in derived F1 inter specific crosses of cotton. Bioscience Methods, 2013,4(5):23-33.
[23] Baloch M J, Khan N U, Rajput M A, Jatoi W A, Gul S, Rind I H, Veesar N F . Yield related morphological measures of short duration cotton genotypes. J Anim Plant Sci, 2014,24:1198-1211.
[24] 任晓明 . 黄淮海棉区适宜机械采收棉田的种植密度和化学调控技术研究. 中国农业大学博士学位论文,北京, 2013.
Ren X M . Managing Plant Density and Chemical Chontrol for Mechanical Harvesting in the Yellow River Valley. PhD Dissertation of China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2013 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
[25] 中国农业科学院棉花研究所. 中国棉花栽培学. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2013. pp 125-185.
Cotton Research Institute Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Cultivation of Cotton in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2013. pp 125-185(in Chinese).
[26] Kerby T A, Bourland F M, Hake K D. Physiological rationales in plant monitoring and mapping. In: Stewart J M, Oosterhuis D M, Heitholt J J, Mauney J R, eds. Physiology of Cotton. New York: Springer, 2010. pp 304-317.
[27] Reddy A R, Reddy K R, Hodges H F . Mepiquat chloride (PIX)- induced changes in photosynthesis and growth of cotton. Plant Growth Regul, 1996,20:179-183.
doi: 10.1007/BF00043305
[28] Rosolem C A, Oosterhuis D M, Souza F S D . Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature. Sci Agric, 2013,70:82-87.
doi: 10.1590/S0103-90162013000200004
[29] Yeates S J, Constable G A, McCumstie T . Developing management options for mepiquat chloride in tropical winter season cotton. Field Crops Res, 2002,74:217-230.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00005-9
[30] Hodges H F, Reddy V R, Reddy K R . Mepiquat chloride and temperature effects on photosynthesis and respiration of fruiting cotton. Crop Sci, 1991,31:1301-1308.
[31] Guthrie D, Landivar J, Munier D, Stichler C, Weir B. Pix application strategies. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America, 1995[ 2018-12-26].
[32] Landivar J A, Zypman S, Lawlor D J, Vasek J, Crenshaw C. The use of an estimated plant Pix concentration for the determination of timing and rate of application. In: Herber D J, Richter D A, eds. 1992 Beltwide Cotton Conference. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America, 1992. pp 1047-1049.
[33] Livingston S D, Stichler C R, Landivar J A. Using mepiquat chloride on the Texas Coast to reduce cotton plant height. Texas: The Texas A&M University Sytem, 1996[ 2018-12-26].
[34] 赵文超 . 黄河流域棉区棉花缩节安(DPC)定位定量及与其他因素的互作效应的研究. 中国农业大学博士学位论文, 北京, 2017.
Zhao W C . Study on Location Detection and Quantitative Effect of Mepiquat Chloride and Its Interaction with Other Factors on Cotton in the Yellow River Valley of China. PhD Dissertation of China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] CUI Lian-Hua, ZHAN Wei-Min, YANG Lu-Hao, WANG Shao-Ci, MA Wen-Qi, JIANG Liang-Liang, ZHANG Yan-Pei, YANG Jian-Ping, YANG Qing-Hua. Molecular cloning of two maize (Zea mays) ZmCOP1 genes and their transcription abundances in response to different light treatments [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1312-1324.
[2] ZHOU Jing-Yuan, KONG Xiang-Qiang, ZHANG Yan-Jun, LI Xue-Yuan, ZHANG Dong-Mei, DONG He-Zhong. Mechanism and technology of stand establishment improvements through regulating the apical hook formation and hypocotyl growth during seed germination and emergence in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1051-1058.
[3] SUN Si-Min, HAN Bei, CHEN Lin, SUN Wei-Nan, ZHANG Xian-Long, YANG Xi-Yan. Root system architecture analysis and genome-wide association study of root system architecture related traits in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1081-1090.
[4] YANG De-Wei, WANG Xun, ZHENG Xing-Xing, XIANG Xin-Quan, CUI Hai-Tao, LI Sheng-Ping, TANG Ding-Zhong. Functional studies of rice blast resistance related gene OsSAMS1 [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[5] ZHU Zheng, WANG Tian-Xing-Zi, CHEN Yue, LIU Yu-Qing, YAN Gao-Wei, XU Shan, MA Jin-Jiao, DOU Shi-Juan, LI Li-Yun, LIU Guo-Zhen. Rice transcription factor WRKY68 plays a positive role in Xa21-mediated resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[6] YAO Xiao-Hua, WANG Yue, YAO You-Hua, AN Li-Kun, WANG Yan, WU Kun-Lun. Isolation and expression of a new gene HvMEL1 AGO in Tibetan hulless barley under leaf stripe stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1181-1190.
[7] YAN Xiao-Yu, GUO Wen-Jun, QIN Du-Lin, WANG Shuang-Lei, NIE Jun-Jun, ZHAO Na, QI Jie, SONG Xian-Liang, MAO Li-Li, SUN Xue-Zhen. Effects of cotton stubble return and subsoiling on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, and yield of cotton in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[8] ZHENG Shu-Feng, LIU Xiao-Ling, WANG Wei, XU Dao-Qing, KAN Hua-Chun, CHEN Min, LI Shu-Ying. On the green and light-simplified and mechanized cultivation of cotton in a cotton-based double cropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 541-552.
[9] LIU Dan, ZHOU Cai-E, WANG Xiao-Ting, WU Qi-Meng, ZHANG Xu, WANG Qi-Lin, ZENG Qing-Dong, KANG Zhen-Sheng, HAN De-Jun, WU Jian-Hui. Rapid identification of adult plant wheat stripe rust resistance gene YrC271 using high-throughput SNP array-based bulked segregant analysis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 553-564.
[10] ZHOU Yue, ZHAO Zhi-Hua, ZHANG Hong-Ning, KONG You-Bin. Cloning and functional analysis of the promoter of purple acid phosphatase gene GmPAP14 in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 590-596.
[11] WANG Juan, ZHANG Yan-Wei, JIAO Zhu-Jin, LIU Pan-Pan, CHANG Wei. Identification of QTLs and candidate genes for 100-seed weight trait using PyBSASeq algorithm in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 635-643.
[12] YUAN Jia-Qi, LIU Yan-Yang, XU Ke, LI Guo-Hui, CHEN Tian-Ye, ZHOU Hu-Yi, GUO Bao-Wei, HUO Zhong-Yang, DAI Qi-Gen, ZHANG Hong-Cheng. Nitrogen and density treatment to improve resource utilization and yield in late sowing japonica rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[13] DING Hong, XU Yang, ZHANG Guan-Chu, QIN Fei-Fei, DAI Liang-Xiang, ZHANG Zhi-Meng. Effects of drought at different growth stages and nitrogen application on nitrogen absorption and utilization in peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
[14] MA Hong-Bo, LIU Dong-Tao, FENG Guo-Hua, WANG Jing, ZHU Xue-Cheng, ZHANG Hui-Yun, LIU Jing, LIU Li-Wei, YI Yuan. Application of Fhb1 gene in wheat breeding programs for the Yellow-Huai Rivers valley winter wheat zone of China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 747-758.
[15] ZHOU Jie-Qiang, ZHANG Gui-Lian, DENG Hua-Bing, MING Xing-Quan, LEI Bin, LI Fan, TANG Wen-Bang. Advantages of small grain male sterile lines in seed production for a new combination Zhuoliangyou 141 through the mixed-sowing manner [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 320-331.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd