Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (05): 696-705.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00696

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of Heterosis in Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrids Seedlings Based on Proteomics

HAN Ping-An1,LU Xiao-Ping1,*,MI Fu-Gui2,ZHANG Rui-Xia3,LI Mei-Na3,XUE Chun-Lei1,DONG Jing1,CONG Meng-Lu1   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China;2 College of Ecology and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia
    Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China; 3Hohhot Seed Management Station, Hohhot 010020, China
  • Received:2015-09-07 Revised:2016-01-11 Online:2016-05-12 Published:2016-02-18
  • Contact: LU Xiaoping, E-mail: lxpnmnd@126.com E-mail:hanpingan327@163.com
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31160302,31460375) and the Science and Technology Plan Projects of Hohhot (2012-major plans-8-2).

Abstract:

Sorghum-sudangrass hybrids are typically used for studying heterosis in forage crops. In this study, we carried out proteomic research on sorghum-sudangrass hybrids and their parents at the three-leaf stage by two dimensional electrophoresis-based proteomics and bioinformatic methods. More than 400 protein spots were detected, in which 34 proteins showed significant differences between hybrid and parents in expression, including dominant expression (showing three single-parent silent, seventeen high-parent and five low-parent expression) and overdominant expression (showing one hybrid-specific, six above-high-parent, two below-low-parent expression). Thus, we speculated that dominant and overdominant effects play key roles, and dominant effect is a major factor in the formation of heterosis in sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Moreover, the 27 out of 34 proteins were related to eight functional categories, i.e., photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, stress response, ATP synthesis, protein synthesis, electron transfer, signal transduction and unknown. The up-regulated photosynthetic proteins were the biggest category, which indicates that photosynthesis in the leaves of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid is enhanced resultig in producing more organic matter, so that showing heterosis. The identified key node proteins in the interaction networks were the potential target proteins for future genetic manipulation of the specific proteins of heterosis. Our findings provide a theoretical basis on heterosis analysis of sorghum-sudangrass hybrids, which is potentially useful for other forage plants.

Key words: Sorghum-sudangrass hybrids, Leaves, Heterosis, Proteomics

[1]韩平安, 逯晓萍, 王亚男, 米福贵, 张瑞霞, 董婧. 基于重组自交系群体的高丹草抗倒高产种质的筛选. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(5): 51–57
Han P A, Lu X P, Wang Y N, Mi H G, Zhang R X, Dong J. Screening of the lodging-resistance and high-yielding germplasm of sorghum sudan grass hybrid based on recombinant inbred line populations. Chin J Grassland, 2014, 36(5): 51–57 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Lu X P, Yun J F, Gao Cui P, Surya A. Quantitative trait loci analysis of economically important traits in Sorghum bicolor S. sudanense hybrid. Can J Plant Sci, 2011, 91: 81–90
[3]Bruce A B. The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science, 1910, 32: 627–628
[4]Davenport C. Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science, 1908, 28: 454–456
[5]Crow J F. Alternative hypotheses of hybrid vigor. Genetics, 1948, 33: 477–487
[6]Hull F H. Recurrent selection for specific combining ability in corn. Agron J, 1945, 37: 134–145
[7]Powers L. An expansion of Jones’s theory for the explanation of heterosis. Am Nat, 1944, 78: 275–280
[8]Williams W. Heterosis and the genetics of complex characters. Nature, 1959, 184: 527–530
[9]Stupar R M, Springer N M. Cis-transcriptional variation in maize inbred lines B73 and Mo17 leads to additive expression patterns in the F1 hybrid. Genetics, 2006, 173: 2199–2210
[10]Zhang L, Peng Y, Wei X, Dai Y, Yuan D, Lu Y, Pan Y, Zhu Z. Small RNAs as important regulators for the hybrid vigour of super-hybrid rice. J Exp Bot, 2014, 65: 5989–6002
[11]Wang H, Feng Q, Zhang M, Yang C, Sha W, Liu B. Alteration of DNA methylation level and pattern in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) pure-lines and inter-line F1 hybrids following low-dose laser irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol B, 2010, 99(3): 150–153
[12]Gao M, Huang Q, Chu Y, Ding C, Zhang B, Su X. Analysis of the leaf methylomes of parents and their hybrids provides new insight into hybrid vigor in populus deltoides. BMC Genet, 2014, 15 (suppl-1): S8
[13]Song X, Ni Z, Yao Y, Xie C, Li Z, Wu H, Zhang Y, Sun Q. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) root proteome and differentially expressed root proteins between hybrid and parents. Proteomics, 2007, 7: 3538–3557
[14]Song X, Ni Z, Yao Y, Zhang Y, Sun Q. Identification of differentially expressed proteins between hybrid and parents in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedling leaves. Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 118: 213–225
[15]Wang W, Meng B, Ge X, Song S, Yang Y, Yu X, Wang L, Hu S, Liu S, Yu J. Proteomic profiling of rice embryos from a hybrid rice cultivar and its parental lines. Proteomics, 2008, 8(22): 480–4821
[16]进茜宁, 付志远, 丁冬, 刘宗华, 李卫华, 汤继华. 玉米杂交种先玉335 及其亲本种子萌发过程中胚芽蛋白质组学分析. 作物学报, 2011, 37(9): 1689−1694
Jin X N, Fu Z Y, Ding D, Liu Z H, Li W H, Tang J H. Proteomic analysis of plumule in seed germination for an elite hybrid pioneer 335 and its parental lines in maize. Acta agron sin, 2011, 37(9): 1689−1694 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]郭宝健, 隋志鹏, 李洋洋, 冯万军, 闫文文, 李慧敏, 孙其信, 倪中福. 玉米杂交种与亲本苗期叶片差异表达蛋白谱分析. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(14): 3046−3054
Guo B J, Sui Z P, Li Y Y, Feng W J, Yan W W, Li H M, Sun Q X, Ni Z F. Differentially expressed protein profile of maize seedling leaves between hybrid and its parental lines. Sci agric sin, 2013, 14: 3046−3054 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]郭宝健, 宋方威, 冯万军, 隋志鹏, 孙其信, 倪中福. 玉米杂交种与亲本雌穗花器官形成期蛋白差异表达谱分析. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 845−854
Guo B J, Song F W, Feng W J, Sui Z P, Sun Q X, Ni Z F. Differentially expressed protein profiling during ear floral development between maize hybrid and its parents. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 845−854
[19]Ajit K S, Syed I A, Nabonita S, Renu S. Differential proteomic analysis of salt stress response in sorghum bicolor leaves. J Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2011, 71: 321–328
[20]Han B, Li C, Zhang L, Fang Y, Feng M, Li J. Novel royal jelly proteins identified by gel-based and gel-free proteomics. J Agric Food Chem, 2011, 59: 10346−10355
[21]Hoecker N, Lamkemeyer T, Sarholz B, Paschold A, Fladerer C, Madlung J, Wurster K, Stahl M, Piepho H P, Nordheim A, Hochholdinger F. Analysis of non additive protein accumulation in young primary roots of a maize (Zea mays L.) F1-hybrid compared to its parental inbred lines. Proteomics, 2008, 8: 3882–3894
[22]Zhang C, Yin Y, Zhang A, Lu Q, Wen X, Zhu Z, Zhang L, Lu C. Comparative proteomic study reveals dynamic proteome changes between superhybrid rice LYP9 and its parents at different developmental stages. J Plant Physiol, 2012, 16: 387–398
[23]Xia Y, Ning Z, Bai G, Li R, Yan G, Siddique K H, Baum M, Guo P. Allelic variations of a light harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein gene (Lhcb1) associated with agronomic traits in barley. PLoS One, 2012, 7: e37573
[24]Green B R, Pichersky E, Kloppstech K. Chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins: an extended family. Trends Biochem Sci, 1999, 16: 181–186
[25]Hall M, Kieselbach T, Sauer U H, Schröder W P. Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of PPD6, a PsbP-domain protein from Arabidopsis thaliana. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun, 2012, 68: 278–280
[26]Plaxton, W C. The organization and regulation of plant glycolysis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1996, 47: 185–214
[27]Sweetlove L J, Beard K F, Nunes-Nesi A, Fernie A R, Ratcliffe R G. Not just a circle: flux modes in the plant TCA cycle. Trends Plant Sci, 2010, 15: 462–70
[28]Bhushan D, Pandey A, Choudhary M K, Datta A, Chakraborty S, Chakraborty N. Comparative protemics analysis of differentially expressed proteins in chickpea extracellular matrix during dehydration stress. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2007, 6: 1868–1884
[29]George S, Venkataraman G, Parida A. A chloroplast-localized and auxin-induced glutathione S-transferase from phreatophyte Prosopis juliflora confer drought tolerance on tobacco. J Plant Physiol, 2010, 167(4): 311–318
[30]Huang C, Guo T, Zheng S C, Feng Q L, Liang J H, Li L. Increased cold tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana transformed with Choristoneura fumiferana glutathione S-transferase gene. Biol Plant, 2009, 53: 183–187
[31]Csiszár J, Horváth E, Váry Z, Gallé Á, Bela K, Brunner S, Tari I. Glutathione transferase supergene family in tomato: salt stress-regulated expression of representative genes from distinct GST classes in plants primed with salicylic acid. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2014, 78: 15–26
[32]Kumar S, Asif M H, Chakrabarty D, Tripathia R D, Dubeyb R S, Trivedi P K. Expression of a rice Lambda class of glutathione S-transferase OsGSTL2, in arabidopsis provides tolerance to heavy metal and other abiotic stress. J Hazard Mater, 2013, 248–249: 228–237
[33]Moustaka J, Tanou G, Adamakis I D, Eleftheriou E P, Eleftheriou M M, Moustakas M. Leaf age-dependent photoprotective and antioxidative response mechanisms to paraquat-induced oxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int J Mol Sci, 2015, 16: 13989–14006.
[34]McCarty R E. A plant biochemist's view of H+-ATPases and ATP syntheses. J Exp Bot, 1992, 172: 431–41
[35]von Ballmoos C, Dimroth P. Two distinct proton binding sites in the ATP synthase family. Biochemistry, 2007, 46: 11800–11809
[36]Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant physiology. USA Sinauer, 2002, 145–50
[37]Zhang H, Luo M, Day R C, Talbot M J, Ivanova A, Ashton A R, Chaudhury A M, Macknight R C, Hrmova M, Koltunow A M.Developmentally regulated HEART STOPPER, a mitochondrially targeted L18 ribosomal protein gene, is required for cell division, differentiation, and seed development in Arabidopsis.J Exp Bot, 2015, erv296
 
[1] MI Wen-Bo, FANG Yuan, LIU Zi-Gang, XU Chun-Mei, LIU Gao-Yang, ZOU Ya, XU Ming-Xia, ZHENG Guo-Qiang, CAO Xiao-Dong, FANG Xin-Ling. Differential proteomics analysis of fertility transformation of the winter rape thermo-sensitive sterile line PK3-12S (Brassica rapa L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(10): 1507-1516.
[2] MA Jin-Jiao,LAN Jin-Ping,ZHANG Tong,CHEN Yue,GUO Ya-Lu,LIU Yu-Qing,YAN Gao-Wei,WEI Jian,DOU Shi-Juan,YANG Ming,LI Li-Yun,LIU Guo-Zhen. Overexpression of OsMPK17 protein enhances drought tolerance of rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(01): 20-30.
[3] XIANG Li-Yuan,XU Kai,SU Jing,WU Chao,YUAN Xiong,ZHENG Xing-Fei,DIAO Ying,HU Zhong-Li,LI Lan-Zhi. Genetic dissection of combining ability and heterosis of rice agronomic traits based on pathway analysis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(9): 1319-1326.
[4] Yong-Fu REN,Guo-Peng CHEN,Tian PU,Cheng CHEN,Jin-Xi ZENG,Xiao PENG,Yan-Wei MA,Wen-Yu YANG,Xiao-Chun WANG. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics to low light stress in ear leaves of high photosynthetic efficiency maize at narrow row of maize-soybean strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(5): 728-739.
[5] ZHANG Han-Xiao,LIN Shen,ZUO Qing-Song,YANG Guang,FENG Qian-Nan,FENG Yun-Yan,LENG Suo-Hu. Effects of plant density and N fertilizer spraying concentration on growth of rapeseed blanket seedlings [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(11): 1691-1698.
[6] Qi-Qi SONG,SINGH Pratiksha,Kumar SINGH Rajesh,Xiu-Peng SONG,Hai-Bi LI,You-Ye NONG,Li-Tao YANG,Yang-Rui LI. Proteomic analysis of sugarcane-Sporisorium scitamineum interaction based on iTRAQ technique [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(1): 55-69.
[7] Rong-Fa LI,Peng LIU,Qing-Long YANG,Hao REN,Shu-Ting DONG,Ji-Wang ZHANG,Bin ZHAO. Effects of Lower Leaf Senescence on Carbon and Nitrogen Distribution and Yield Formation in Maize (Zea mays L.) with High Planting Density [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(7): 1032-1042.
[8] Ying-Bin ZOU,Min HUANG. Opportunities and Challenges for Crop Production in China during the Transition Period [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(6): 791-795.
[9] Dao-Ping WANG,Jiang XU,Yong-Ying MU,Wen-Xiu YAN,Meng-Jie ZHAO,Bo MA,Qun LI,Li-Na ZHANG,Ying-Hong PAN. Proteomic Analysis of the Effect of 2,4-Epibrassinolide on Rice Seedlings Response to Cold Stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(6): 897-908.
[10] Qi-Yue WANG, Shu-Jun MENG, Ke ZHANG, Zhan-Hui ZHANG, Ji-Hua TANG, Dong DING. Investigation of Maize miRNA Involved in Developing-ear Heterosis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(6): 796-813.
[11] Jing DONG,Xiao-Ping LU,Kun-Ming ZHANG,Chun-Lei XUE,Rui-Xia ZHANG. Analysis of SNP and Allele-specific Expression in Transcriptome of Sorghum bicolor × Sorghum sudanense and Their Parents [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(12): 1809-1817.
[12] ZHANG Zheng,ZHANG Xue-Li,MO Bo-Cheng,Dai Zhi-Jun,HU Zhong-Li,LI Lan-Zhi,ZHENG Xing-Fei. Combining Ability Analysis ofAgronomic Trait in Indica × IndicaHybrid Rice [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43(10): 1448-1457.
[13] DENG Chang-Zhe,YAO Hui,AN Fei-Fei,LI Kai-Mian,CHEN Song-Bi. Chromoplast Isolation and Its Proteomic Analysis from Cassava Storage Roots [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43(09): 1290-1299.
[14] YANG Hui-Li,LIN Ya-Nan,ZHANG Huai-Sheng,WEI Xiao-Yi,DING Dong,XUE Ya-Dong. Mapping of QTLs and Heterotic Loci for Flowering Time-related Traits in Maize [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43(05): 678-690.
[15] YU Tao,LI Geng,ZHANG Cheng-Fen,LIU Peng,DONG Shu-Ting,ZHANG Ji-Wang,ZHAO Bin. Differential Expression Characteristics of Proteins Involved in Early Development of Maize Grain [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43(04): 608-619.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!