Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (7): 1895-1905.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.21052

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of different soil water content on water consumption by wheat and analysis of senescence characteristics of root and flag leaf

ZHANG Zhen1(), SHI Yu1,*(), ZHANG Yong-Li1, YU Zhen-Wen1, WANG Xi-Zhi2   

  1. 1College of Agriculture, Shandong Agricultural University / State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology / Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
    2Jining Yanzhou Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Jining 272000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2022-07-26 Accepted:2022-11-25 Online:2023-07-12 Published:2022-12-06
  • Contact: *E-mail: shiyu@sdau.edu.cn E-mail:zhangzhenxiaomai@163.com;shiyu@sdau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    The National Natural Science Foundation of China(32172114);The China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-03);The Special funds for Taishan Scholars Project

RichHTML412

27

PDF

858

Abstract:

The objective of this study is to clarify the effect of soil water content on wheat grain yield and the physiological reasons for its formation. During the winter wheat growing season from 2019 to 2021, four kinds of soil water content treatments were set under the field conditions of the wheat test station in Shijiawangzi village, Xiaomeng town, Yanzhou district, Shandong province: No-irrigation (W0), and the relative water content of the soil in the 0-40 cm soil layer was supplemented to 65% (W1), 75% (W2), and 85% (W3) at jointing and anthesis stages, and the winter wheat variety was Jimai 22. The effects of soil water content on water consumption, leaf and root senescence, and grain yield of wheat were studied. The results showed that the number of kernel number and 1000-kernel weight of W2 treatment were significantly higher than those of other treatments, and the highest grain yield and water use efficiency were obtained. Compared with W0, W1, and W3, the grain yield was 48.49%, 20.80%, 8.68% (2019-2020) and 46.87%, 17.36%, 7.53% (2020-2021), respectively. The water use efficiency was 21.70%, 14.25%, 15.59% (2019-2020) and 25.44%, 11.90%, 13.39% (2020-2021), respectively. Compared with the other treatments, root length density in the 40-100 cm soil layer, superoxide dismutase activity and root activity in the 40-60 cm soil layer in W2 treatment were significantly higher than those in other treatments after anthesis, and the content of malondialdehyde was significantly lower than those in other treatments. After anthesis, the superoxide dismutase activity of flag leaves in W2 treatment was significantly higher than that in W0 and W1 treatments, but there was no significant difference in W3 treatment, and the content of malondialdehyde was significantly lower than that in W0 and W1 treatments, but there was no significant difference in W3 treatment. W2 treatment increased significantly water consumption, daily water consumption, water consumption model coefficient, and soil water storage consumption in the 40-120 cm soil layer from anthesis to maturity. In conclusion, the appropriate soil moisture content could promote root growth, delay plant aging, and then improve the absorption and utilization of deep soil moisture, ensure the supply of water during grain filling, and improve significantly grain yield in wheat. Under the conditions of this experiment, the effect of W2 treatment was the best when the relative water content of 0-40 cm soil layer was increased by 75% at the jointing and anthesis stages in wheat.

Key words: wheat, water consumption characteristics, senescence characteristics, grain yield

Table 1

Wheat grain yield, yield components, and water use efficiency under different treatments"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 穗数
Spike number
(×104 hm-2)		 穗粒数
Kernel number		 千粒重
1000-kernel weight
(g)		 籽粒产量
Grain yield
(kg hm-2)		 水分利用效率
Water use efficiency
(kg hm-2 mm-1)
2019-2020 W0 543.23±19.13 c 32.62±0.77 c 37.26±0.66 c 6285.82±459.86 d 16.27±0.34 c
W1 602.40±14.50 b 33.03±0.96 c 38.47±0.98 c 7726.80±326.98 c 17.33±0.29 b
W2 642.73±16.89 a 38.39±1.06 a 44.25±0.85 a 9333.90±323.69 a 19.80±0.45 a
W3 660.61±16.54 a 34.81±0.68 b 40.56±0.78 b 8588.70±289.65 b 17.13±0.36 b
2020-2021 W0 559.74±17.89 c 33.25±1.25 c 38.61±0.68 c 7042.74±236.95 d 16.94±0.23 c
W1 617.11±17.99 b 33.66±1.22 c 39.03±0.85 c 8813.56±258.97 c 18.99±0.33 b
W2 660.76±13.69 a 40.99±1.36 a 47.65±0.95 a 10,343.60±215.98 a 21.25±0.28 a
W3 682.72±19.78 a 36.50±0.96 b 41.85±0.77 b 9619.27±321.58 b 18.74±0.29 b

Fig. 1

Root length density after anthesis under different treatments A: flowering stage in 2019 and 2020; B: 10 days after flowering in 2019 and 2020; C: 20 days after flowering in 2019 and 2020; D: flowering period in 2020 and 2021; E: 10 days after flowering in 2020 and 2021; F: 20 days after flowering in 2020 and 2021. Values followed by different lowercase letters above the bars mean significant differences at the 0.05 probability level in the same soil layer."

Fig. 2

Superoxide dismutase activity of root after anthesis under different treatments A: flowering stage in 2019 and 2020; B: 10 days after flowering in 2019 and 2020; C: 20 days after flowering in 2019 and 2020; D: flowering period in 2020 and 2021; E: 10 days after flowering in 2020 and 2021; F: 20 days after flowering in 2020 and 2021. Values followed by different lowercase letters above the bars mean significant differences at the 0.05 probability level in the same soil layer."

Fig. 3

Malondialdehyde concentration of root after anthesis under different treatments A: flowering stage in 2019 and 2020; B: 10 days after flowering in 2019 and 2020; C: 20 days after flowering in 2019 and 2020; D: flowering period in 2020 and 2021; E: 10 days after flowering in 2020 and 2021; F: 20 days after flowering in 2020 and 2021. Values followed by different lowercase letters above the bars mean significant differences at the 0.05 probability level in the same soil layer."

Fig. 4

Root TTC reduction activities under different treatments after anthesis A: flowering stage in 2019 and 2020; B: 10 days after flowering in 2019 and 2020; C: 20 days after flowering in 2019 and 2020; D: flowering period in 2020 and 2021; E: 10 days after flowering in 2020 and 2021; F: 20 days after flowering in 2020 and 2021. Values followed by different lowercase letters above the bars mean significant differences at the 0.05 probability level in the same soil layer."

Fig. 5

Superoxide dismutase activity of flag leaves after anthesis under different treatments Lowercase letters in each column indicate significant difference between different treatments at the 0.05 probability level in the same growth period."

Fig. 6

Malondialdehyde concentration of flag leaves after anthesis under different treatments Lowercase letters in each column indicate significant difference between different treatments at the 0.05 probability level in the same growth period."

Table 2

Water consumption sources and their ratio of the total water consumption amount under different treatments"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 耗水来源
Water consumption sources (mm)		 总耗水量
Total water
consumption
amount (mm)		 占总耗水量的比例
Ratio of the total water consumption amount (%)
灌水量
I		 降雨量
P		 土壤贮水消耗量
SWC		 灌水量
I		 降雨量
P		 土壤贮水消耗量
SWC
2019-2020 W0 0 163 224.26±6.36 a 387.26±10.25 d 0 42.09±1.14 a 57.91±2.69 a
W1 88.97±14.56 c 163 200.78±5.69 b 452.75±8.89 c 19.61±1.06 c 36.00±1.21 b 44.35±2.58 b
W2 115.28±12.63 b 163 197.15±4.56 b 475.43±9.58 b 24.25±1.89 b 34.28±1.03 c 41.47±1.21 c
W3 150.00±15.96 a 163 187.52±5.32 c 500.52±10.59 a 29.97±1.59 a 32.57±0.96 d 37.46±2.10 d
2020-2021 W0 0 202.5 213.25±4.36 a 415.75±10.07 d 0 48.71±1.36 a 51.29±2.69 a
W1 59.56±10.26 c 202.5 201.95±3.69 b 464.01±8.26 c 12.84±1.35 c 43.64±1.68 b 43.52±1.05 b
W2 81.40±8.25 b 202.5 202.97±4.69 b 486.87±8.56 b 16.72±1.54 b 41.59±1.64 c 41.69±1.23 c
W3 119.34±11.69 a 202.5 190.56±3.59 c 513.40±9.65 a 22.66±1.14 a 39.44±1.89 d 37.90±1.84 d

Table 3

Water consumption amount, daily water consumption amount, and consumption percentage of different growth stages under different treatments"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 播种-拔节期Sowing-jointing 拔节期-开花期Jointing-anthesis 开花期-成熟期Anthesis-maturity
CW
(mm)		 DW
(mm d-1)		 PW
(%)		 CW
(mm)		 DW
(mm d-1)		 PW
(%)		 CW
(mm)		 DW
(mm d-1)		 PW
(%)
2019-
2020		 W0 185.56±
4.25		 1.08±
0.05		 47.92±
1.26 a		 103.45±
496 c		 5.17±
0.23 c		 26.71±
2.46 b		 98.25±
9.68 c		 2.28±
0.65 c		 25.37±
1.69 c
W1 185.56±
4.25		 1.08±
0.05		 40.99±
1.36 b		 116.17±
3.69 b		 5.81±
0.25 b		 25.66±
1.69 b		 151.02±
11.26 b		 3.51±
0.46 b		 33.35±
1.58 b
W2 185.56±
4.25		 1.08±
0.05		 39.03±
1.65 c		 117.14±
5.51 b		 5.86±
0.19 b		 24.64±
2.18 b		 172.73±
8.46 a		 4.02±
0.23 a		 36.33±
2.36 a
W3 185.56±
4.25		 1.08±
0.04		 37.07±
0.69 d		 157.16±
6.98 a		 7.86±
0.21 a		 31.40±
2.36 a		 157.80±
8.74 b		 3.67±
0.31 b		 31.53±
2.14 b
2020-
2021		 W0 232.54±
5.26		 1.27±
0.03		 55.93±
1.23 a		 64.52±
3.25 c		 3.23±
0.29 c		 15.52±
2.96 b		 118.69±
5.42 d		 2.63±
0.15 c		 28.55±
1.84 c
W1 232.54±
5.26		 1.27±
0.03		 50.12±
1.69 b		 74.62±
2.69 b		 3.73±
0.24 b		 16.08±
3.21 b		 156.85±
4.26 c		 3.49±
0.16 b		 33.80±
2.08 b
W2 232.54±
5.26		 1.27±
0.03		 47.76±
1.24 c		 77.05±
3.65 b		 3.85±
0.26 b		 15.83±
1.98 b		 177.28±
4.89 a		 3.94±
0.24 a		 36.41±
1.69 a
W3 232.54±
5.26		 1.27±0.03 45.29±
1.34 d		 116.18±
2.85 a		 5.81±
027 a		 22.63±
2.37 a		 164.68±
3.96 b		 3.66±
0.19 b		 32.08±
1.69 b

Fig. 7

Soil water consumption amount of 0-200 cm soil layer under different treatment Lowercase letters in each row indicate significant difference between different treatments at the 0.05 probability level in the same growth period."

[1] Zhang M M, Dong B D, Qiao Y Z, Shi C H, Yang H, Wang Y K, Liu M Y. Yield and water use responses of winter wheat to irrigation and nitrogen application in the North China Plain. J Integr Agric, 2018, 17: 1194-1206.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61883-5
[2] Xu E, Wang R, Zhang H Q, Yu Z X. Coupling index of water consumption and soil fertility correlated with winter wheat production in North China Region. Ecol Indic, 2019, 102: 154-165.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.02.045
[3] Meena R P, Karnam V, Tripathi S C, Jha A, Sharma R K, Singh G P. Irrigation management strategies in wheat for efficient water use in the regions of depleting water resources. Agric Water Manag, 2019, 214: 38-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.01.001
[4] Li J P, Wang Y Q, Zhang M, Liu Y, Xu X X, Lin G, Wang Z M, Yang Y M, Zhang Y H. Optimized micro-sprinkling irrigation scheduling improves grain yield by increasing the uptake and utilization of water and nitrogen during grain filling in winter wheat. Agric Water Manag, 2019, 211: 59-69.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.047
[5] Si Z Y, Zain M, Mehmood F, Wang G S, Gao Y, Duan A W. Effects of nitrogen application rate and irrigation regime on growth, yield, and water-nitrogen use efficiency of drip-irrigated winter wheat in the North China Plain. Agric Water Manag, 2020, 231: 106002.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106002
[6] Li J P, Zhang Z, Yao C S, Liu Y, Wang Z M, Fang B T, Zhang Y H. Improving winter wheat grain yield and water-/nitrogen-use efficiency by optimizing the micro-sprinkling irrigation amount and nitrogen application rate. J Integr Agric, 2021, 20: 606-621.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63407-4
[7] 潘晓莹, 武继承, 张森森, 杨永辉, 王越, 李敏杰, 高翠民, 何方. 分期施肥补灌对小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2020, 18(4): 63-69.
Pan X Y, Wu J C, Zhang S S, Yang Y H, Wang Y, Li M J, Gao C M, He F. Effects of staged fertilization and supplementary irrigation on wheat yield and water use. J Water Resourc Architect Engin, 2020, 18(4): 63-69. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 杨明达, 马守臣, 杨慎骄, 张素瑜, 关小康, 李学梅, 王同朝, 李春喜. 氮肥后移对抽穗后水分胁迫下冬小麦光合特性及产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26: 3315-3321.
Yang M D, Ma S C, Yang S J, Zhang S Y, Guan X K, Li X M, Wang T C, Li C X. Effects of postponing nitrogen application on photosynthetic characteristic and grain yield of winter wheat subjected to water stress after heading stage. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2015, 26: 3315-3321. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 徐龙龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 范虹, 樊志龙, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强. 水氮减量对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦主要光合生理参数的影响. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 437-447.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.01093
Xu L L, Yin W, Hu F L, Fan H, Fan Z L, Zhao C, Yu A Z, Chai Q. Effect of water and nitrogen reduction on main photosynthetic physiological parameters of film-mulched maize no-tillage rotation wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 437-447. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.01093
[10] 郑云普, 常志杰, 韩怡, 卢云泽, 陈文娜, 田银帅, 殷嘉伟, 郝立华. 土壤水分亏缺和大气CO2浓度升高对冬小麦光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 2920-2933.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.11109
Zheng Y P, Chang Z J, Han Y, Lu Y Z, Chen W N, Tian Y S, Yin J W, Hao L H. Effects of soil water deficit and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on leaf photosynthesis of winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 2920-2933. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 韩占江, 于振文, 王东, 张永丽. 测墒补灌对冬小麦干物质积累与分配及水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 457-465.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00457
Han Z J, Yu Z W, Wang D, Zhang Y L. Effects of supplemental irrigation based on testing soil moisture on dry matter accumulation and distribution and water use efficiency in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 457-465 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00457
[12] Xu X X, Zhang M, Li J P. Improving water use efficiency and grain yield of winter wheat by optimizing irrigation in the North China Plain. Field Crops Res, 2018, 221: 219-227.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.011
[13] Li J, Xu X, Lin G, Wang Y. Micro-irrigation improves grain yield and resource use efficiency by co-locating the roots and N-fertilizer distribution of winter wheat in the North China Plain. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 643: 367-377.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.157
[14] Li Y, Huang G H, Chen Z J, Xiong Y W, Huang Q Z, Xu X, Huo Z L. Effects of irrigation and fertilization on grain yield, water and nitrogen dynamics and their use efficiency of spring wheat farmland in an arid agricultural watershed of northwest China. Agric Water Manag, 2022, 260: 107277.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107277
[15] Liu W X, Ma G, Wang C Y, Wang J R, Lu H F, Li S S, Feng W, Xie Y X, Ma D Y, Kang G Z. Irrigation and nitrogen regimes promote the use of soil water and nitrate nitrogen from deep soil layers by regulating root growth in wheat. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 32.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00032 pmid: 29449850
[16] Yan S C, Wu Y, Fan J L, Zhang F C, Qiang S C, Zheng J, Xiang Y Z, Guo J J, Zou H Y. Effects of water and fertilizer management on grain filling characteristics, grain weight and productivity of drip-fertigated winter wheat. Agric Water Manag, 2019, 213: 983-995.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.12.019
[17] Lyu G, Kang Y, Li L, Wan S. Effect of irrigation methods on root development and profile soil water uptake in winter wheat. Irrigation Sci, 2010, 28, 387-398.
doi: 10.1007/s00271-009-0200-1
[18] 董伟欣, 韩立杰, 张月辰. 春季不同水肥处理对小麦形态、生理和产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(2): 161-169.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20190603
Dong W X, Han L J, Zhang Y C. Effects of different water and fertilizer treatments on the morphology, physiology and yield of wheat in Spring. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2020, 35(2): 161-169. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20190603
[19] Wu Y, Wang H Z, Yang X W, Meng Z J, He D X. Soil water effect on root activity, root weight density, and grain yield in winter wheat. Crop Sci, 2017, 57: 437-443.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.11.0704
[20] Ali S, Xu Y Y, Jia Q M, Ahmad I, Ma X C, Henchirl M, Ren X L, Zhang P, Cai T, Zhang J H, Jia Z K. Ridge-furrow mulched with plastic film improves the anti-oxidative defence system and photosynthesis in leaves of winter wheat under deficit irrigation. PLoS One, 2018, 13: 0200277.
[21] Ahmed N, Zhang Y S, Li K, Zhou Y Y, Zhang M C, Li Z H. Exogenous application of glycine betaine improved water use efficiency in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) via modulating photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidative capacity under conventional and limited irrigation conditions. Crop J, 2019, 7: 635-650
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2019.03.004
[22] Xu X, Zhang M, Li J, Liu Z, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Zhou S, Wang Z. Improving water use efficiency and grain yield of winter wheat by optimizing irrigation in the North China Plain. Field Crops Res, 2018, 221: 219-227.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.011
[23] Xu C L, Tao H B, Tian B J, Gao Y B, Ren J H, Wang P. Limited-irrigation improves water use efficiency and soil reservoir capacity through regulating root and canopy growth of winter wheat. Field Crops Res, 2016, 196: 268-275.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.009
[24] Jha S K, Gao Y, Liu H, Huang Z D, Wang G S, Liang Y P, Duan A W. Root development and water uptake in winter wheat under different irrigation methods and scheduling for North China. Agric Water Manag, 2017, 182: 139-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.12.015
[1] SU Zai-Xing, HUANG Zhong-Qin, GAO Run-Fei, ZHU Xue-Cheng, WANG Bo, CHANG Yong, LI Xiao-Shan, DING Zhen-Qian, YI Yuan. Identification of wheat dwarf mutant Xu1801 and analysis of its dwarfing effect [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(8): 2133-2143.
[2] YANG Xiao-Hui, WANG Bi-Sheng, SUN Xiao-Lu, HOU Jin-Jin, XU Meng-Jie, WANG Zhi-Jun, FANG Quan-Xiao. Modeling the response of winter wheat to deficit drip irrigation for optimizing irrigation schedule [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(8): 2196-2209.
[3] LI Yu-Xing, MA Liang-Liang, ZHANG Yue, QIN Bo-Ya, ZHANG Wen-Jing, MA Shang-Yu, HUANG Zheng-Lai, FAN Yong-Hui. Effects of exogenous trehalose on physiological characteristics and yield of wheat flag leaves under high temperature stress at grain filling stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(8): 2210-2224.
[4] LIU Qiong , YANG Hong-Kun, CHEN Yan-Qi, WU Dong-Ming, HUANG Xiu-Lan, FAN Gao-Qiong. Effect of nitrogen application rate on grain quality, wine quality and volatile flavor compounds of waxy and no-waxy wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(8): 2240-2258.
[5] LIN Fen-Fang, CHEN Xing-Yu, ZHOU Wei-Xun, WANG Qian, ZHANG Dong-Yan. Hyperspectral remote sensing detection of fusarium head blight in wheat based on the stacked sparse auto-encoder algorithm  [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(8): 2275-2287.
[6] LIU Shi-Jie, YANG Xi-Wen, MA Geng, FENG Hao-Xiang, HAN Zhi-Dong, HAN Xiao-Jie, ZHANG Xiao-Yan, HE De-Xian, MA Dong-Yun, XIE Ying-Xin, WANG Chen-Yang, WANG Li-Fang. Effects of water and nitrogen application on root characteristics and nitrogen utilization in winter wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(8): 2296-2307.
[7] ZHANG Lu-Lu, ZHANG Xue-Mei, MU Wen-Yan, HUANG Ning, GUO Zi-Kang, LUO Yi-Nuo, WEI Lei, SUN Li-Qian, WANG Xing-Shu, SHI Mei, WANG Zhao-Hui. Grain Mn concentration of wheat in main wheat production regions of China: Effects of cultivars and soil factors [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(7): 1906-1918.
[8] DONG Zhi-Qiang, LYU Li-Hua, YAO Yan-Rong, ZHANG Jing-Ting, ZHANG Li-Hua, YAO Hai-Po, SHEN Hai-Ping, JIA Xiu-Ling. Yield and quality of strong gluten wheat Shiluan 02-1 under water and nitrogen interaction [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(7): 1942-1953.
[9] LI Ling-Yu, ZHOU Qi-Rui, LI Yang, ZHANG An-Min, WANG Bei-Bei, MA Shang-Yu, FAN Yong-Hui, HUANG Zheng-Lai, ZHANG Wen-Jing. Transcriptome analysis of exogenous 6-BA in regulating young spike development of wheat after low temperature at booting stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(7): 1808-1817.
[10] FENG Lian-Jie, YU Zhen-Wen, ZHANG Yong-Li, SHI Yu. Effects of irrigation on tiller occurrence, photo-assimilates production and distribution in different stem and tillers and spike formation in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(6): 1653-1667.
[11] ZHU Xu-Dong, YANG Lan-Feng, CHEN Yuan-Yuan, HOU Ze-Hao, LUO Yi-Rou, XIONG Ze-Hao, FANG Zheng-Wu. Biological functional analysis of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) FeSGT1 gene in enhancing drought stress resistance [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(6): 1573-1583.
[12] XU Ran, CHEN Song, XU Chun-Mei, LIU Yuan-Hui, ZHANG Xiu-Fu, WANG Dan-Ying, CHU Guang. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer rates on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of japonica-indica hybrid rice cultivar Yongyou 1540 and its physiological bases [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(6): 1630-1642.
[13] WANG Hao, SUN Ni-Na, WANG Chu, XIAO Lu-Ning, XIAO Bei, LI Dong, LIU Jie, QIN Ran, WU Yong-Zhen, SUN Han, ZHAO Chun-Hua, LI Lin-Zhi, CUI Fa, LIU Wei. Genetic basis analysis of high-yielding in Yannong wheat varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(6): 1584-1600.
[14] GAO Xin, GUO Lei, SHAN Bao-Xue, XIAO Yan-Jun, LIU Xiu-Kun, LI Hao-Sheng, LIU Jian-Jun, ZHAO Zhen-Dong, CAO Xin-You. Types and ratios of starch granules in grains and their roles in the formation and improvement of wheat quality properties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(6): 1447-1454.
[15] LU Mao-Ang, PENG Xiao-Ai, ZHANG Ling, WANG Jian-Lai, HE Xian-Fang, ZHU Yu-Lei. Genetic diversity of wheat breeding parents revealed by 55K SNP-based microarray [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(6): 1708-1714.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Li Shaoqing, Li Yangsheng, Wu Fushun, Liao Jianglin, Li Damo. Optimum Fertilization and Its Corresponding Mechanism under Complete Submergence at Booting Stage in Rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2002, 28(01): 115 -120 .
[2] Wang Lanzhen;Mi Guohua;Chen Fanjun;Zhang Fusuo. Response to Phosphorus Deficiency of Two Winter Wheat Cultivars with Different Yield Components[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29(06): 867 -870 .
[3] YANG Jian-Chang;ZHANG Jian-Hua;WANG Zhi-Qin;ZH0U Qing-Sen. Changes in Contents of Polyamines in the Flag Leaf and Their Relationship with Drought-resistance of Rice Cultivars under Water Deficiency Stress[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[4] Yan Mei;Yang Guangsheng;Fu Tingdong;Yan Hongyan. Studies on the Ecotypical Male Sterile-fertile Line of Brassica napus L.Ⅲ. Sensitivity to Temperature of 8-8112AB and Its Inheritance[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[5] Wang Yongsheng;Wang Jing;Duan Jingya;Wang Jinfa;Liu Liangshi. Isolation and Genetic Research of a Dwarf Tiilering Mutant Rice[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[6] WANG Li-Yan;ZHAO Ke-Fu. Some Physiological Response of Zea mays under Salt-stress[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[7] TIAN Meng-Liang;HUNAG Yu-Bi;TAN Gong-Xie;LIU Yong-Jian;RONG Ting-Zhao. Sequence Polymorphism of waxy Genes in Landraces of Waxy Maize from Southwest China[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[8] HU Xi-Yuan;LI Jian-Ping;SONG Xi-Fang. Efficiency of Spatial Statistical Analysis in Superior Genotype Selection of Plant Breeding[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(03): 412 -417 .
[9] WANG Yan;QIU Li-Ming;XIE Wen-Juan;HUANG Wei;YE Feng;ZHANG Fu-Chun;MA Ji. Cold Tolerance of Transgenic Tobacco Carrying Gene Encoding Insect Antifreeze Protein[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(03): 397 -402 .
[10] ZHENG Xi;WU Jian-Guo;LOU Xiang-Yang;XU Hai-Ming;SHI Chun-Hai. Mapping and Analysis of QTLs on Maternal and Endosperm Genomes for Histidine and Arginine in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) across Environments[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(03): 369 -375 .
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd