欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (03): 506-512.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00506

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

烤烟苗期含硒量和根际硒形态的研究

秦恩华1;杨兰芳2,*   

  1. 1 湖北民族学院生物科学与技术学院，湖北恩施445000；2 湖北大学资源环境学院，湖北武汉430062
  • 收稿日期:2007-05-24 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-03-12 网络出版日期:2008-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨兰芳

Selenium Content in Seedling and Selenium Forms in Rhizospheric Soil of Nicotiana tabacum L.

QIN En-Hua1,YANG Lan-Fang2,*   

  1. 1 School of Biological Science and Technology, Hubei Institute for Nationalities, Enshi, 445000, Hubei; 2 School of Resource and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, Hubei, China
  • Received:2007-05-24 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-03-12 Published online:2008-03-12
  • Contact: YANG Lan-Fang

PDF

1344

被引次数

7

摘要： 以烤烟品种NC89为试材, 通过天然含硒和低硒土施硒处理的盆栽试验，对烤烟苗期含硒量和根际-根外土壤硒的存在形态进行了分析。结果表明，烤烟苗期根系含硒量高于地上部，并随天然含硒和施硒量的增加而增加，且与施硒量呈极显著的正相关。天然含硒土中，残渣态硒（Res-Se）占2/3以上，而低硒土施硒下，KH2PO4-Se所占比例最大。无论天然含硒土还是施硒低硒土，水溶性硒（H2SO4-Se）所占比例均不到1%，而根际土壤总硒、KH2PO4-Se和NH3·H2O-Se的含量均高于根外土。土壤施硒处理的NH3·H2O-Se占总硒的比例高于根外土壤，而Res-Se所占比例低于根外土。由此可见，烤烟能够富集土壤中的硒，天然含硒土和低硒土施硒的硒形态分布不同，施硒土壤硒的有效性高于天然含硒土，烤烟根际硒的有效性高于根外土，烤烟根际通过促进有机态硒的形成而减少土壤矿物对硒的固定来提高土壤施硒的有效性。

关键词: 烤烟, 苗期, 天然含硒土, 土壤施硒, 根际, 硒形态

Abstract: Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element for human and animals, and it may be beneficial to increase Se content of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.), but the relationship between Se availability and forms in soil for plant growth had been rarely reported so far. In order to understand the relationship between the Se content in tobacco and soil, and to develop Se-enriched tobacco, we performed a pot experiment using cultivar NC89 with natural Se-enriched and Se-supplied soil treatments. The Se content in seedlings and the Se forms in rhizospheric and nonrhizospheric soil were analyzed. The results showed that selenium content was higher in roots than in shoots of tobacco at seedling stage; it increased both in roots and shoots of tobacco with increase of Se level in natural Se-enriched soil, and there was a significant correlation between Se content and soil Se applications. In natural Se-enriched soil, the residual Se (Res-Se) content was the highest which accounted for more than 2/3 of the total Se in middle and high Se-enriched soil, while in Se-supplied soil, the content of extractable Se with KH2PO4 (KH2PO4-Se) was the highest which accounted for 43%–46% of total Se and was significantly correlated to Se content in tobacco. Both in natural Se-enriched and Se-supplied soil, content of extractable selenium with K2SO4 (K2SO4-Se) was the least which was less than 1% of total selenium, but the contents of total selenium, KH2PO4-Se and NH3·H2O-Se were significantly higher in rhizospheric soil than in nonrhizospheric soil. In Se-supplied soil, the percentage of NH3·H2O-Se was higher and the percentage of Res-Se was lower in rhizosphere than in nonrhizosphere. Our experiment showed that tobacco could accumulate Se well from soil, and absorb Se easier from Se-supplied soil than natural Se-enriched soil. The rhizosphere of tobacco, where distributed more available Se, can promote the formation of NH3·H2O-Se and reduce the Se fixation with minerals in soil, therefore increase Se availability in soil.

Key words: Nicotiana tabacum L., Seedling stage, Natural Se-enriched soil, Se application in soil, Rhizosphere, Se form

[1] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[2] 亓青松, 牛翔雨, 刘冰可, 康禄, 王琛, 封德顺. 小偃麦辐射诱变种质芽期和苗期耐盐鉴定、筛选及耐盐指标评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 389-404.
[3] 鲁雅妮, 丁超杰, 张煜, 杜习军, 齐学礼, 胡琳, 许为钢. 河南省200份小麦品种苗期茎基腐病抗性鉴定与全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 363-375.
[4] 李诗晴, 王茜, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及相关基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 376-388.
[5] 姬炫彤, 卞春松, 金黎平, 李森, 秦军红, 李广存. 不同耐旱型马铃薯根际微生物对干旱的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 165-177.
[6] 王菲菲, 张胜忠, 杨贵华, 苗华荣, 胡晓辉, 张则林, 刘莎莎, 乔利仙, 单世华, 陈静. 331份花生种质苗期耐盐性综合评价和强耐盐种质鉴选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 279-294.
[7] 胡润慧, 汪军成, 司二静, 张宏, 李兴茂, 马小乐, 孟亚雄, 王化俊, 刘青, 姚立蓉, 李葆春. 小麦苗期耐旱耐盐种质筛选及抗旱耐盐综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2371-2386.
[8] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[9] 高梦娟, 赵贺莹, 陈家辉, 陈晓倩, 牛萌康, 钱琪润, 崔陆飞, 邢江敏, 银庆淼, 郭雯, 张宁, 孙丛苇, 阳霞, 裴丹, 贾奥琳, 陈锋, 余晓东, 任妍. 小麦抗纹枯病新位点Qse.hnau-5AS的定位及其候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2240-2250.
[10] 葛家豪, 雷欣月, 王清明, 韩慧冰, 李少飞, 王琦璇, 冯佰利, 高金锋. 苦荞苗期耐低磷种质筛选及耐低磷综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2911-2922.
[11] 胡志康, 舒雨, 王会, 杨莹莹, 廖俊宇, 刘佳, 成洪涛, 郭晨, 张园园, 刘胜毅, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 甘蓝型油菜苗期耐碱性种质综合鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2681-2692.
[12] 孙现军, 胡正, 姜雪敏, 王世佳, 陈向前, 张惠媛, 张辉, 姜奇彦. 大豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定评价与筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2179-2186.
[13] 郭春林, 林满红, 陈婷, 陈鸿飞, 林文芳, 林文雄. 根际微生物响应再生稻衰老的演变特征及其延效机制[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2039-2052.
[14] 陈家婷, 白欣, 谷雨杰, 张潇文, 郭慧娟, 常利芳, 陈芳, 张树伟, 张晓军, 李欣, 冯瑞云, 畅志坚, 乔麟轶. 小麦芽期和苗期耐盐鉴定方法的适用性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1193-1206.
[15] 李云香, 张思甜, 侯万伟, 张小娟. ICARDA引进小麦种质苗期的抗旱性鉴定及SNP关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2742-2753.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2