欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 2185-2191.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.02185

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

甘蓝型黄籽油菜自交系转化体系的建立

林呐,刘列钊,殷家明,王瑞,柴友荣,李加纳*   

  1. 西南大学农学与生物科技学院 / 重庆市油菜工程技术研究中心 / 南方山地农业教育部工程研究中心,重庆 400716
  • 收稿日期:2011-12-01 修回日期:2012-07-05 出版日期:2012-12-12 网络出版日期:2012-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 李加纳, E-mail: ljn1950@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由高等学校学科创新工程计划“111”项目(B12006)和国家自然科学基金项目(31071450)资助。

Establishment of a Transformation System Using Inbred Line of Yellow-Seeded Brassica napus

LIN Na,LIU Lie-Zhao,YIN Jia-Ming,WANG Rui,CHAI You-Rong,LI Jia-Na*   

  1. College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University / Chongqing Rapeseed Engineering & Technology Research Center / Engineering Research Center of South Upland Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400716, China
  • Received:2011-12-01 Revised:2012-07-05 Published:2012-12-12 Published online:2012-10-08
  • Contact: 李加纳, E-mail: ljn1950@swu.edu.cn

摘要:

利用黄籽甘蓝型油菜自交系建立和优化了遗传转化系统。首先构建了由质粒pCNRΔ6脂肪酸脱氢酶基因插入到植物的高效表达载体pCAMBIA2301G。利用在MurashigeSkoog培养基(含有200 mmol L–1乙酰丁香酮)培养5~7 d的下胚轴外植体与农杆菌株LBA4404共培养63~69 h (pCNR),再于芽诱导培养基上培养3个月诱导芽再生。在最佳条件下,平均转化效率约为1.3%。转化植株的GUS分析和PCR分析结果表明,外源基因成功导入甘蓝型油菜。Southern杂交表明,这些转化子含有目标基因1~2个拷贝。用气相色谱分析转基因植物种子的脂肪酸,γ-亚麻酸含量达8.2%

关键词: 甘蓝型油菜, Δ6-脂肪酸饱和酶, 转化

Abstract:

In this research, we established a transformation system using an inbred line of yellow-seeded Brassica napus. Hypocotyl explants precultured for 5–7 d on Murashige and Skoog medium containing 200 μmol L–1 acetosyringone were cocultured with Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 (pCNR) for 63–69 hours.The plasmid pCNR was constructed by inserting Δ6-fatty acid desaturase gene from Rhizopusstolonifer into plant high-efficient expression vector pCAMBIA2301G. Kanamycin-tolerant shoots were regenerated on shoot induction medium for three months after Agrobacterium inoculation. The average transformation efficiency was about 1.3% under optimal conditions. Results from GUS assay and PCR analysis of transformed plants indicated that the introduced genewas integrated into B. napus genomes.The Southern blot revealed that those transformants carried one or two copies of the goal gene. The fatty acids of the transgenic plant seeds were analyzed by GC, and the γ-linolenic content was 8.2%.

Key words: Brassica napus, Δ6-fatty acid desaturase, Transformation

[1]Knutzon D S, Thompson G A, Radke S E, JohnsonW B, Knauf V C, Kridl J C. Modification of Brassica seed oil by antisense expression of a stearoly acyl carrier protein desaturase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1992, 89: 2624–2628



[2]Shi S-W(石淑稳), Zhou Y-M(周永明), Sun X-C(孙学成), Zhang X-L(张献龙). Transformation of Brassica napus with herbicide resistance gene. J Huazhong Agric Univ (华中农业大学学报), 1998, 17(3): 205–210 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Xu B-B(许本波), Xie L-L(谢伶俐), Tian Z-H(田志宏), Yan H(严寒), He Y(何勇). Study on genetic transformation system of yellow-seed rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agric Jiangxi (江西农业学报), 2007, 19 (8): 4–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Poulsen G B. Genetic transformation of Brassica. Plant Breed, 1996, 115: 209–225



[5]Khan M R, Rashid H, Ansar M, Chaudry Z. High frequency shoot regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer in Canola (Brassica napus). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2003, 75: 223–231



[6]Leng H(冷虹), Li J N(李加纳), Lu H(陆合), Chai Y R(柴友荣), Yin J M(殷家明). Construction of seed-specific expression vector of Δ6-fatty acid desaturase gene. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2006, 22: 66–70 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J, 1994, 6, 271–282



[8]Hood E E, Chilton W S, Chilton M D, Fraley R T. T-DNA and opine synthetic loci in tumors incited by Agrobacterium tumefaciens A281 on soybean and alfalfa plants. J Bacteriol, 1986, 168: 1283–1290



[9]Ohta S, Mita S, Hattori T, Nakamura K. Construction and expression in tobacco of a beta-glucoronidase (GUS) reporter gene containing an intron within the coding sequence. Plant Cell Physiol, 1990, 31: 805–813



[10]An G, Ebert R R, Mitra A. Binary vectors. In: Gelvin S B, Schilperroort R A, eds. Plant Molecular Biology Manual. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988. A3: pp 1–19



[11]Jefferson R A. Asaaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 1987, 5: 387–405



[12]Doyle J J, Doyle J L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull, 1987, 19: 11–15



[13]Rücker B, Röbbelen G. Impact of low linolenic acid content on seed yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Breed, 1996, 115: 226–230



[14]Tsukazaki H, Kuginuki Y, Aida R, Suzuki T. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of a doubled haploid line of cabbage. Plant Cell Rep, 2002, 21: 257–262



[15]Godwin I, Todd G, Lloyd B F, Newbury H J. The effects of acetosyringone and pH on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vary according to plant species. Plant Cell Rep, 1991, 9: 671–675



[16]Godwin A K, Testa J R, Handel L M, Liu Z, Vanderveer L A, Tracey P A, Hamilton T C. Spontaneous transformation of rat ovarian surface epithelial cells: association with cytogenetic changes and implications for repeated ovulation in the etiology of ovarian cancer. J Nat Cancer Inst, 1992, 84: 592–601



[17]Holford P, Hernandez N, Newbury H J. Factors influencing the efficiency of T-DNA transfer during co-cultivation of Antirrhinum majus with Agrobacterium bumefaciens. Plant Cell Rep, 1993, 11: 196–199



[18]Metz T D, Dixit R, Earle E D. Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) and cabbage (B. oleracea var. capitata). Plant Cell Rep, 1995, 15: 287–292



[19]Takasaki T, Hatakeyama K, Ojima K, Watanabe M, Toriyama K, Hinata K. Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Brassica rapa L. Breed Sci, 1997, 47: 127–136



[20]Henzi M X, Christey M C, McNeil D L. Factors that influence Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica). Plant Cell Rep, 2000, 19: 994–999



[21]Deroles S C, Gardner R C. Analysis of T-DNA structure in a large number of transgenic petunias generated by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Plant Mol Biol, 1988, 11: 365–377



[22]Stoger E, Fink C, Pfosser M, Heberle B E. Plant transformation by particle bombardment of embryogenic pollen. Plant Cell Rep, 1995, 14: 273–278

[1] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[2] 何鹏旭, 姚立蓉, 陈远玲, 闫妍, 张宏, 汪军成, 李葆春, 杨轲, 司二静, 孟亚雄, 马小乐, 王化俊. 大麦干旱胁迫萌发生理及分子机理的差异性与相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2412-2432.
[3] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[4] 袁鑫, 赵卓凡, 赵瑞清, 刘孝伟, 郑名敏, 刘育生, 董好胜, 邓丽娟, 曹墨菊, 黄强. 一份玉米小籽粒发育突变体mn-like1的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1569-1581.
[5] 夏琦, 郭滢, 王坤美, 王思忆, 巨建业, 彭雅雯, 刘忠松, 夏石头. 甘蓝型油菜种子和种皮中水杨酸含量与原花色素积累的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1189-1197.
[6] 王晓琳, 刘忠松, 康雷, 杨柳. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度和每角粒数基因定位以及角果皮转录组动态分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 888-899.
[7] 张琴, 戴成, 马朝芝. 生长素响应报告基因转化甘蓝型油菜及各组织GUS动态信号分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 667-675.
[8] 孙程明, 周晓婴, 陈锋, 张维, 王晓东, 彭琦, 郭月, 高建芹, 胡茂龙, 付三雄, 张洁夫. 长链非编码RNA (lncRNA)在甘蓝型油菜分枝角度调控中的功能分析与预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 559-567.
[9] 黄绒, 周渠晨, 陈楚铭, 罗倩, 易东, 杜常欢, 黄祥宇, 盛锋, 杜雪竹. 过表达BnNRT2.3-like对油菜氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3184-3197.
[10] 巨建业, 杨柳, 陈浩, 康雷, 夏石头, 刘忠松. 单细胞核转录组分析揭示油菜种皮分化过程和种子颜色差异原因[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2860-2874.
[11] 张雯, 李玉, 王创, 石磊, 丁广大. 甘蓝型油菜磷转运蛋白BnaPT48的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2983-2995.
[12] 胡志康, 舒雨, 王会, 杨莹莹, 廖俊宇, 刘佳, 成洪涛, 郭晨, 张园园, 刘胜毅, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 甘蓝型油菜苗期耐碱性种质综合鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2681-2692.
[13] 王晨, 贺丹, 姚敏, 邱萍, 何昕, 熊兴华, 康雷, 刘忠松, 钱论文. 基于转录组分析鉴定甘蓝型油菜开花候选基因以及BnaCOR27功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2693-2704.
[14] 徐林珊, 郜耿东, 王宇, 王家星, 杨吉招, 武亚瑞, 张宵寒, 常影, 李真, 谢雄泽, 龚德平, 王晶, 葛贤宏. 甘蓝型油菜漆酶基因家族成员表达模式及与茎秆抗折力的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 134-148.
[15] 李嘉欣, 黄莹, 吴潞梅, 赵伦, 易斌, 马朝芝, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 文静. 甘蓝型油菜BnaSLY1基因进化分析及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 44-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!