Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (11): 2908-2916.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.42013

• RESEARCH NOTES • Previous Articles    

A preliminary study on the effect of alternative oxidase (AOX) inhibition on the control of Magnaporthe oryzae

XU Fei(), LIU Yang, XU Jian-Cheng, YU Lu-Lu()   

  1. Wuhan University of Bioengineering / Applied Biotechnology Center, Wuhan 430415, Hubei, China
  • Received:2024-03-04 Accepted:2024-06-20 Online:2024-11-12 Published:2024-07-12
  • Contact: E-mail: lulu2019@whsw.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31900242);Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(2022CFB009)

Abstract:

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the world’s major food crops. As the largest rice producer globally, China faces significant challenges annually due to rice blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae. This disease can affect rice throughout its entire growth period, leading to substantial yield reductions and even total crop failure. Notably, alternative oxidase (AOX), a terminal oxidase in the mitochondrial respiratory electron transport chain, is widely present in both plants and fungi. AOX is known to play a role in regulating plant growth and development under stress conditions and in the fungal stress response. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of the structural differences between rice AOX and M. oryzae AOX proteins and employed AOX inhibitors to assess their potential in inhibiting and controlling M. oryzae. Our results revealed that while the amino acid residues in the dual-iron catalytic active center of rice and M. oryzae AOX proteins are relatively conserved, there are significant differences in the size of the ubiquinone channel, amino acid composition, and the shape of the hydrophobic pocket. Treatment with AOX inhibitors significantly slowed the growth of M. oryzae hyphae and reduced the severity of disease symptoms on rice leaves. These findings suggest that AOX is a promising target for inhibiting M. oryzae, offering potential application value in the control of rice blast disease.

Key words: rice, alternative oxidase, Magnaporthe oryzae, disease control, inhibitor

Fig. 1

Chemical structure of SHAM and UQ10"

Fig. 2

Results of MoAOX and OsAOX protein sequence alignment * represents the amino acid residues conserved by the AOX protein catalytic activity center."

Fig. 3

Comparative analysis of MoAOX and OsAOX1a protein structures A: modeling and comparative analysis of the secondary structure of MoAOX and OsAOX1a proteins. Homologous modeling of MoAOX and OsAOX1a proteins is modeled on the known AOX protein (PDB ID: 3w54) by SWISSMODE. B: comparison of short α helix and loop regions between MoAOX and OsAOX1a proteins. C: comparison of MoAOX and OsAOX1a ubiquinone channels. Red represents hydrophobic amino acid residues, and yellow represents hydrophilic amino acid residues. Distance measurement unit at the entrance: ?."

Fig. 4

Comparative analysis of hydrophobic channels of MoAOX and OsAOX1a proteins The hydrophobic channel was analyzed by Caver3.0, and the amino acid residues contained in 6 ? near the hydrophobic channel were labeled. The secondary structure and amino acid residues in the red region are hydrophobic amino acids, the secondary structure and amino acid residues in the yellow region are hydrophilic amino acids, and the purple region is diiron center."

Fig. 5

Comparison of inhibition efficiency to M. oryzae ZB13 and ZB15 are two small species of rice blast. The “na” in the histogram indicates that there are no available data. Values (means±SD) represent the mean of three independent replicates and different lowercase letters indicated significant differences between different treatments (P < 0.05)."

Fig. 6

Effect of different concentrations of AOX inhibitor treatment on rice leaves infected by M. oryzae A: comparison of rice blast disease on rice leaves. Except for the normal rice leaves, the remaining rice leaves were infected with M. oryzae (ZB13) for two days and then sprayed with different concentrations of SHAM. The spraying was done once a day, and the infection of M. oryzae on the leaves was observed after one week. B: comparison of total respiration rate (Vt) of rice leaves among different samples. C: proportion of AOX respiration to total respiration (Valt/Vt) from different rice leaf samples. Values (means ± SD) represent the mean of three independent replicates and different lowercase letters indicated significant differences between different treatments (P < 0.05)."

Fig. 7

Comparison of the toxicity of AOX inhibitor treatment to M. oryzae and rice leaves A: results of NBT staining. B: results of trypan blue staining. C: morphology of rice plants after seven days of continuous treatment with 2.0 mmol L-1 SHAM. For this experiment, M. oryzae (ZB13) was sprayed with 2.0 mmol L-1 SHAM and then left for 24 hours for NBT and trypan blue staining. Rice leaves was continuously sprayed with 2.0 mmol L-1 SHAM for seven days and then stained with NBT and trypan blue."

[1] 韩艺娟, 鲁国东. 水稻与稻瘟病菌相互作用研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2018, 34(2): 25-37.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2017-0623
[2] Han Y J, Lu G D. Recent understanding on the interactions between rice and Magnaporthe oryzae. Biotechnol Bull 2018, 34(2): 25-37 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] Yin J, Zou L, Zhu X, Cao Y, He M, Chen X. Fighting the enemy: How rice survives the blast pathogen’s attack. Crop J, 2021, 9: 543-552.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2021.03.009
[4] Jo L, Pelletier J M, Hsu S W, Baden R, Goldberg R B, Harada J J. Combinatorial interactions of the LEC1 transcription factor specify diverse developmental programs during soybean seed development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2020, 117: 1223-1232.
[5] Kumar S, Kashyap P L, Mahapatra S, Jasrotia P, Singh G P. New and emerging technologies for detecting Magnaporthe oryzae causing blast disease in crop plants. Crop Prot, 2021, 143: 105473.
[6] Galhano R, Talbot N J. The biology of blast: understanding how Magnaporthe oryzae invades rice plants. Fungal Biol Rev, 2011, 25: 61-67.
[7] Xu F, Copsey A C, Young L, Barsottini M R O, Albury M S, Moore A L. Comparison of the kinetic parameters of alternative oxidases from Trypanosoma brucei and Arabidopsis thaliana: a tale of two cavities. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 744218.
[8] DelSaz N F, Ribas-Carbo M, McDonald A E, Lambers H, Fernie A R, Florez-Sarasa I. An in vivo perspective of the role(s) of the alternative oxidase pathway. Trends Plant Sci, 2018, 23: 206-219.
doi: S1360-1385(17)30259-5 pmid: 29269217
[9] Xu F, Peng Y, He Z Q, Yu L L. The role of cyanoalanine synthase and alternative oxidase in promoting salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol 2023, 23: 163.
[10] Xu F, Yuan S, Zhang D W, Lv X, Lin H H. The role of alternative oxidase in tomato fruit ripening and its regulatory interaction with ethylene. J Exp Bot, 2012, 63: 5705-5716.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers226 pmid: 22915749
[11] Selinski J, Scheibe R, Day D A, Whelan J. Alternative oxidase is positive for plant performance. Trends Plant Sci, 2018, 23: 588-597.
doi: S1360-1385(18)30080-3 pmid: 29665989
[12] Moore A L, Albury M S, Crichton P G, Affourtit C. Function of the alternative oxidase: is it still a scavenger. Trends Plant Sci, 2002, 7: 478-481.
[13] Li G B, He J X, Wu J L, Wang H, Zhang X, Liu J, Hu X H, Zhu Y, Shen S, Bai Y F, Yao Z L, Liu X X, Zhao J H, Li D Q, Li Y, Huang F, Huang Y Y, Zhao Z X, Zhang J W, Zhou S X, Ji Y P, Pu M, Qin P, Li S G, Chen X W, Wang J, He M, Li W T, Wu X J, Xu Z J, Wang W M, Fan J. Overproduction of OsRACK1A, an effector-targeted scaffold protein promoting OsRBOHB- mediated ROS production, confers rice floral resistance to false smut disease without yield penalty. Mol Plant, 2022, 15: 1790-1806.
[14] Li Y, Cao X L, Zhu Y, Yang X M, Zhang K N, Xiao Z Y, Wang H, Zhao J H, Zhang L L, Li G B. Osa-miR398b boosts H2O2 production and rice blast disease-resistance via multiple superoxide dismutases. New Phytol, 2019, 222: 1507-1522.
doi: 10.1111/nph.15678 pmid: 30632163
[15] Hu J, Liu M, Zhang A, Dai Y, Chen W, Chen F, Wang W, Shen D, Telebanco-Yanoria M J, Ren B. Co-evolved plant and blast fungus ascorbate oxidases orchestrate the redox state of host apoplast to modulate rice immunity. Mol Plant, 2022, 15: 1347-1366.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.07.001 pmid: 35799449
[16] Kido Y, Shiba T, Inaoka D K, Sakamoto K, Nara T, Aoki T, Honma T, Tanaka A, Inoue M, Matsuoka S. Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of cyanide-insensitive alternative oxidase from Trypanosoma brucei brucei. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2010, 66: 275-278.
[17] May B, Young L, Moore A L. Structural insights into the alternative oxidases: are all oxidases made equal. Biochem Soc Trans, 2017, 45: 731-740.
[18] Kawano Y. Fine-tuning ROS homeostasis by ROD1 is a battleground between rice and Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol Plant 2021, 14: 1979-1981.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.11.005 pmid: 34785317
[19] Liu X, Zhang Z. A double-edged sword: reactive oxygen species (ROS) during the rice blast fungus and host interaction. FEBS J, 2022, 289: 5505-5515.
[20] Liu Y, Yu L L, Peng Y, Geng X X, Xu F. Alternative oxidase inhibition impairs tobacco root development and root hair formation. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 664792.
[21] Manbir S P, Kumari A, Gupta K J. Alternative oxidase plays a role in minimizing ROS and RNS produced under salinity stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol Plant 2022, 174: e13649.
[1] Hu Zhao, Qian Run, Xie Feng-Pu, Ying Su-Ping. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the SPX gene family in rice under phosphorus treatment [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] Zou Yi-Mei, Xu Min, Wang Hai-Yang, Yao Hui, Wang Jia-Feng, Liu Hao, Ren Dai-Sheng. Analysis of transcription factor regulatory networks in two-line male sterile rice seedling roots in response to salt stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] Yan An, Jiang Kun-Wei, Wang Rong-Yuan, Tian Lin, Zhang Lu, Wang Yun, Xu Jian-Long. Identification and cloning of SVN7 controlling small vascular bundle number in the rice flag leaf [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] Chen Wei, Wei Wan-Juan, Zhao Qi-Bing, Chang Dong-Wei, Yu Ling-Bo, Zhai Peng-Fei, Feng Zhi-Ming, Chen Zong-Xiang, Ren Yang-Tao, Yang Peng, Liu Hai-Lang, Li Zhen-Fu, Yang Yong-Le, Jin Yan-Gang, Zuo Shi-Min. Developing new germplasm of high-quality and early-maturing rice by editing Hd6 via CRISPR/Cas9 [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[5] Shi Shao-Jie, Liu Kai, Chen Zi-Yi, Wang Hui-Ying, Li San-He, Zhou Lei, You Ai-Qing. Cloning and functional analysis of the dwarf and multi-tiller gene DMT1 in rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[6] Liu Chang-You, Wang Shen, Shi Hui-Ying, Shen Ying-Chao, Sun Lei, Wang Yan, Zhang Zhi-Xiao, Su Qiu-Zhu, Tian Jing, Fan Bao-Jie. QTL mapping for bruchid resistance in an adzuki bean distant hybridization population using rice bean genetic resources [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 936-944.
[7] Ye Fan, Li Shuai, Li Si-Yu, Chen Yun, Dou Chao-Yin, Liu Li-Jun. Effects of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and population quality in Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[8] Liu Ning, Fan Ping, Wang Cheng, Chen Qi-Qi, Cheng Qing-Yue, Tie Xia-Na, Tang Jing-Sha, Liu Bin-Bin, Xie Hong-Kun, Wang Jia-Yue, Shi Yuan-Qing, Ma Jun. Effects of reduced nitrogen application combined with organic fertilizer on yield formation and nitrogen utilization in mechanically transplanted rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 866-880.
[9] Qin Yi-Yan, Fu Yao, Su Chang, Li Na, Xu Jing-Ru, Cheng Xiao-Ran, Zhang Qi, Zhao Ming-Hui. Functional analysis of OsST41 regulating salt tolerance in rice seedlings [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[10] Zhu Jin-Juan, Wang Hui-Ping, Yang Guo-Dong, Wang Yu-Cheng, Yang Chen, Wang Bin, Agustiani Nurwulan, Tu Jun-Ming, Bi Jun-Guo, Cui Ke-Hui, Huang Jian-Liang, Peng Shao-Bing, Yuan Shen. Effects of water management and variety type on grain yield and quality in ratoon rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(1): 295-315.
[11] WANG Chan, WU Ying-Ying, LI Wen-Qi, LI Xia, WANG Fang-Quan, ZHOU Tong, YANG Jie. Development of functional markers of rice stripe disease resistance gene STV11 based on HRM technique [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[12] GUO Bao-Wei, WANG Wang, WANG Kai, WANG Yan, ZENG Xin, JING Xiu, WANG Jing, NI Xin-Hua, XU Ke, ZHANG Hong-Cheng. Population dynamic characteristics and formation mechanisms of super high-yielding of two types of glutinous rice in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze Rive [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(9): 2433-2453.
[13] CHEN Hui-Ying, HE Jia-Xin, ZHU Bin, HUANG Shi-Xuan, ZHOU Xing-You, WU Jun-Quan, YANG Mei-Yan. Whole genome analysis and biological characterization of phage vB_XaS_ HDB2 infected with Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[14] YANG Hai-Yang, WU Lin-Xuan, LI Bo-Wen, SHI Han-Feng, YUAN Xi-Long, LIU Jin-Zhao, CAI Hai-Rong, CHEN Shi-Yi, GUO Tao, WANG Hui. OsWRI3, identified based on QTL mapping, regulates seed shattering in rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[15] WANG Fen, WU Dong-Li, ZHANG Quan-Jun. Response of phenological phase stages of single-cropping rice to climate change in Hubei province, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(7): 1934-1948.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!