欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 156-161.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00156

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆子粒棉子糖含量与生态因子的关系

李卫东1,卢为国1,**,梁慧珍1,王树峰1,李金英1,于兆成2,耿臻3,刘亚非4   

  1. 1河南省农业科学院经济作物研究所/国家大豆改良中心郑州分中心,河南郑州450002;2濮阳市农业科学研究所,河南濮阳457000;3周口市农业科学院,河南周口466001;4焦作市农业科学研究所,河南焦作454151
  • 收稿日期:2008-05-16 修回日期:2008-07-18 出版日期:2009-01-12 网络出版日期:2008-11-18
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD01A04),国家“十五”科技攻关计划项目(2004BA525B06)资助

Effects of Ecological Factors on Raffinose Content in Soybean Seed

LI Wei-Dong1,LU Wei-Guo1,**,LIANG Hui-Zhen1,WANG Shu-Feng1,LI Jin-Ying1,YU Zhao-Cheng2,GENG Zhen3,LIU Ya-Fei4   

  1. 1Insititute of Industrial Crops,Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou450002,China;2Puyang Agricultural Institute,Puyang 457000,China;3Zhoukou Agricultural Institute,Zhoukiu 466001,Henan;4Jiaozuo Agricultural Institute,Jiaozuo 454151,China
  • Received:2008-05-16 Revised:2008-07-18 Published:2009-01-12 Published online:2008-11-18

摘要:

棉子糖是人与动物重要的营养成分。为了研究生态因子对大豆子粒中棉子糖含量的影响,20012002年在河南省夏大豆主产区的3个试点,以豫豆25为材料分13期播种,将78个样本子粒的棉子糖含量与气象、土壤养分和海拔等37个生态因子进行统计分析。诸样本棉子糖含量的变异范围为0.22%~0.87%。用逐步回归法筛选出8个生态因子与大豆棉子糖含量极显著正相关,各因子对于棉子糖含量影响的最大、最小值分别为0.392%0.156%按各因子的贡献大小依次为鼓粒成熟期昼夜温差分枝期日照、土壤pH值、花荚期日照、土壤锰含量、花荚期降水、分枝期降水、出苗期降水。该结果对高棉子糖含量品种选育和配套栽培技术研究有参考价值。

关键词: 大豆, 棉子糖, 生态因子, 分期播种

Abstract:

Raffinose is one of principal nutrients for both human beings and animals. To reveal the correlation between raffinose content in soybean seed and ecological factors, at the present experiment, soybean cultivar Yudou 25 was sown at three locations with 13 sowing dates in Henan province in 2001 and 2002, the raffinose contents in 78 soybean seed samples and 37 ecological factors including meteorological factors, soil nutrition and altitudes were investigated. The correlated factors were screened by stepwise regression, which showed significance on raffinose content. The results indicated that the raffinose content was substantially affected by the environmental conditions ranging from 0.220–0.869% among all samples, and positively correlated with eight ecological factors. The greatest difference in raffinose content caused by 8 ecological factors was 0.392%, and the smallest was 0.156%. The contribution to raffinose content in turn was the square of the diurnal temperature range at seed-filling and maturing stage, sunshine hour at branching stage, pH of soil, sunshine hour at blooming and podding stage, Mn content in soil, rainfall at blooming and podding stage, rainfall at branching stage, and rainfall at emergence stage. The results provided a reference for developing soybean cultivars with higher raffinose content.

Key words: Soybean[Glycine max(L.).Merrill], Raffinose, Ecological factors, Seeding dates

[1]Zhai F-L(翟凤林). Crop Quality Breeding(作物品质育种). Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1991. p 413(in Chinese)
[2]Miu J-W(缪金伟). Physiological characters of Soybean oligosaccharides. Chin J Animal Husbandry Vet Med (畜牧兽医科技信息), 2007, (3): 90(in Chinese)
[3]Wang L-Z(王连铮), Wang J-L(王金陵). Soybean Genetics & Breeding (大豆遗传育种学). Beijing: Science Press, 1992. pp 86–87(in Chinese)
[4]Institute of Nanjing Pedology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (中国科学院南京土壤研究所). Physicochemical Analysis of Soil(土壤理化分析). Beijing: Science Press, 1981(in Chinese)
[5]Liu Q-K(刘酋开). Traditional Agrochemical Analysis of Soil (土壤农化常规分析方法). Beijing: Science Press, 1984(in Chinese)
[6]Chinese Society of Soil Science (中国土壤学会). Methods of Agrochemical Analysis of Soil (土壤农业化学分析方法). Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1999(in Chinese)
[7]Xia H-T(夏海涛). Analysis of soybean oligosaccharides by HPLC with ELS detector. Chin J Appl Chem (应用化学), 2006, 23(4): 462–464(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Tang Q-Y(唐启义), Feng M-G(冯明光). Practical Statistics and DPS Data Processing System (实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1997. pp 221–230(in Chinese)
[9]Li W-D(李卫东), Lu W-G(卢为国), Liang H-Z(梁慧珍), Wang S-F(王树峰), Yuan B-J(苑保军), Geng Z(耿臻), Wang S-G(王素阁), Fan Y-Y(范彦英), Yang C-Y(杨彩云), Liu Y-F(刘亚非). Effects of eco-physiological factors on soybean protein content. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(10): 1065–1068(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Li W-D(李卫东), Wang S-F(王树峰), Lu W-G(卢为国), Liang H-Z(梁慧珍), Geng Z(耿臻), Yuan B-J(苑保军), Wang S-G(王素阁), Fan-Y-Y(范彦英), Yang C-Y(杨彩云), Liu Y-F(刘亚非). Effects of eco-physiological factors on soybean fat content. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2006, 25(2): 127–132(in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[3] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[4] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[5] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[6] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[7] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[8] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[9] 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[10] 殷丛丛, 李睿琦, 岳霈尧, 李晨, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 基于闭合哑铃介导等温扩增可视化检测大豆花叶病毒SC15方法的建立及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1248-1260.
[11] 许睿, 何妙华, 王昊, 李卫, 任杰, 夏志强. 基于空间转录组技术解析大豆种胚对X射线辐射的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3121-3132.
[12] 林洋, 史晓蕾, 陈强, 刘兵强, 杨庆, 于慧娟, 闫龙, 武小霞, 杨春燕. 大豆蛋白质脂肪及脂肪酸组分相关QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2899-2910.
[13] 王浩辰, 王克晶, 韩娟, 李向华. 东南沿海短绒野大豆两种代表性生境自然种群的空间遗传结构特征:种群内取样策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2875-2885.
[14] 李威, 朱玉鹏, 孙宾成, 温有祥, 吴宗声, 徐一帆, 宋雯雯, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥. 转基因大豆结合免耕平作实现东北地区大豆生产轻简化[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2738-2749.
[15] 陈敏, 贾蓉, 张金传, 张辰煜, 褚俊聪, 姚伟, 葛军勇, 王星宇, 杨亚东, 曾昭海, 臧华栋. 半干旱区燕麦与豆科作物带状复合种植的产量优势及氮素利用特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2727-2737.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!