欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (03): 378-383.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆苗期耐低磷性及其QTL定位

崔世友1,2; 耿雷跃1; 孟庆长1 ; 喻德跃1,*   

  1. 1 南京农业大学国家大豆改良中心/作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室,江苏南京210095;2 江苏沿江地区农科所,江苏南通226541
  • 收稿日期:2006-05-17 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-03-12 网络出版日期:2007-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 喻德跃

QTL Mapping of Phosphorus Deficiency Tolerance in Soybean (Glycine max L.) during Seedling Stage

CUI Shi-You 1,2; GENG Lei-Yue1;MENG Qing-Chang 1;YU De-Yue 1,*   

  1. 1 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement/ National Center for Soybean Improvement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu; 2 Jiangsu Yanjiang Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Nantong 226541, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2006-05-17 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-03-12 Published online:2007-03-12
  • Contact: YU De-Yue

摘要:

利用来自波高和南农94-156(耐低磷种质)的重组自交系群体NJ(SP)BN(151个家系)通过盆栽试验研究与耐低磷有关的性状,并进行耐低磷性状的QTL定位。初步结果表明,不施磷处理的总干重主要由单株P吸收量决定,而与磷利用效率无关;而单株P吸收量与根干重、根效率均极显著正相关,单株P吸收量变异的76.2%由根效率决定。不施磷处理的根冠比(R/S)显著增加主要是茎干重无显著变化而根干重显著增加所致。在D1b+W、F、G、N和O等5个连锁群上共检测到7个QTL与耐低磷有关。分别可解释所对应性状表型变异的4.8%~17.0%,其中5个QTL的增效基因来自亲本波高,2个QTL的增效基因来自亲本南农94-156。

关键词: 大豆, RIL群体, 数量性状位点, 耐低磷

Abstract:

Phosphorus (P) deficiency is a major abiotic stress that limits productivity of crops such as soybean throughout the world. In the present investigation, 151 recombinant inbred line (RIL) families derived from a cross between Bogao and Nannong 94-156 (low phosphorus tolerant germplasm) and their genetic maps were used to detect quantitative trait locus (QTL) associated with P deficiency tolerance by pot culture of soybean seedlings with two treatments of minus-P and plus-P. After six weeks of seeding, the relative total dry weight (RTDW), relative phosphorus uptake per plant (RPU), relative phosphorus use efficiency (RPUE), and relative root to shoot ratio (RR/S) were measured as indices for tolerance to phosphorus deficiency. The primary results showed that total dry weight under P-minus condition was determined by phosphorus uptake per plant, and no correlation between phosphorus use efficiency and total dry weight. Phosphorus uptake per plant was significantly and positively correlated with root dry weight and root efficiency (P uptake per unit weight of root), and 76.2% of variation of phosphorus uptake per plant came from root efficiency. Root/shoot ratio under P-minus condition was increased significantly due to no significant change of shoot dry weight and significant increase of root dry weight. Seven QTLs associated with phosphorus deficiency tolerance were detected and mapped on the linkage groups of D1b+W, F, G, N, and O. Each QTL explained 4.8%–17.0% of phenotypic variation, positive alleles of five QTLs among them were from female parent ‘Bogao’, and those of the other QTLs from male parent ‘Nannong 94-156’. Three of seven QTLs were mapped on linkage group G, among them one major QTL for RTDW explained more than 10% of the phenotypic variation was detected between sat_203 and sat_185 on LG-G by using CIM and MIM methods.

Key words: Soybean (Glycine max L.), RIL population, Quantitative trait locus, Phosphorus deficiency tolerance

[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[3] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[4] 张胜忠, 李国卫, 戈立江, 王菲菲, 胡晓辉, 苗华荣, 李燕, 钟文, 陈静. 花生机械脱壳损伤相关农艺指标筛选与QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 644-652.
[5] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[6] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[7] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[8] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[9] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[10] 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[11] 殷丛丛, 李睿琦, 岳霈尧, 李晨, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 基于闭合哑铃介导等温扩增可视化检测大豆花叶病毒SC15方法的建立及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1248-1260.
[12] 王晓琳, 刘忠松, 康雷, 杨柳. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度和每角粒数基因定位以及角果皮转录组动态分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 888-899.
[13] 许睿, 何妙华, 王昊, 李卫, 任杰, 夏志强. 基于空间转录组技术解析大豆种胚对X射线辐射的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3121-3132.
[14] 葛家豪, 雷欣月, 王清明, 韩慧冰, 李少飞, 王琦璇, 冯佰利, 高金锋. 苦荞苗期耐低磷种质筛选及耐低磷综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2911-2922.
[15] 林洋, 史晓蕾, 陈强, 刘兵强, 杨庆, 于慧娟, 闫龙, 武小霞, 杨春燕. 大豆蛋白质脂肪及脂肪酸组分相关QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2899-2910.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!