粒用高粱养分吸收、产量及品质对氮磷钾营养的响应

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01269

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于2011—2012年在山西省农业科学院东阳农业试验基地的大田定位试验，2013年在高粱/玉米轮作体系下，以晋杂23高粱[Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]为试料，设置NPK、PK、NK、NP和CK (不施肥) 5个施肥处理，每个处理3次重复，采用随机区组排列，研究土壤养分耗竭条件下氮磷钾肥对粒用高粱生长、养分吸收、产量和品质的影响。结果表明，出苗后76 d，NPK、PK、NK和NP处理最大叶叶面积分别比CK增加18.7%、4.1%、17.9%和16.6%，单株总功能叶面积分别比CK处理增加54.1%、18.4%、47.4%和48.2%；整个生育期施肥处理对叶片生物量有显著影响。自出苗后121 d，各施肥处理对茎干物质累积具有显著影响。NPK、PK、NK和NP处理籽粒产量分别比CK增加了93.8%、35.5%、91.2%和78.1%。自出苗后100 d，CK和PK处理叶片中的N含量显著低于NPK、NK和NP处理，此时CK和NK处理显著降低了叶片中P含量。在收获期，CK处理显著降低了籽粒中N含量。CK、PK和NP处理提高了直链淀粉含量，而支链淀粉含量下降，导致直链/支链比值相应增加。施氮肥处理(NPK、NP、NK)的籽粒蛋白质含量明显高于CK和PK处理；NPK处理分别提高了73.9%和40.3%。NPK处理籽粒单宁含量比CK和PK处理分别提高15.6%和22.7%。研究表明，不施肥和不施氮肥显著降低了粒用高粱植株生长、干物质积累、籽粒产量、氮磷养分吸收以及籽粒中支链淀粉、蛋白质和单宁含量，不施肥和不施氮对高粱的影响明显大于不施磷或不施钾，平衡施肥有利于粒用高粱产量的提高和品质的改善。

关键词: 粒用高粱, 氮磷钾养分, 养分吸收, 籽粒产量, 籽粒品质

Abstract:

The field experiment conducted with the fixed plots tested in Dongyang Agricultural Experiment Station of Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences in 2011 and 2012 was carried out to investigate the effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium on nutrient uptake, yield and quality of grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] cv. Jinza 23 under the sorghum-maize rotation cropping system in 2013. The experiment included five treatments with fertilizers NPK, PK, NK, NP, and CK (without fertilization) with three replicates in a completely randomized block design. The experimental results showed that at 76 days after emergence, the sorghum maximum leaf area of NPK, PK, NP, and NK treatments increased by 18.7%, 4.1%, 17.9%, and 16.6%，respectively; and the total functional leaf area per plant increased by 54.1%, 18.4%, 47.4%, and 48.2% respectively compared with CK treatment. Fertilization treatment had significantly influences on leaf biomass throughout growth period. Since 121 days after emergence, there were significant effects of different fertilization treatments on the stem biomass. Comparison with CK treatment, the sorghum grain yield of NPK, PK, NK, and NP treatments increased by 93.8%, 35.5%, 91.2%, and 78.1% respectively. The N contents in leaves of CK and PK treatments were significantly lower than those of NPK, NK, and NP treatments at 100 days after emergence. The P contents in leaves of CK and NK treatments decreased significantly as well. At 149 days after emergence, CK significantly reduced the N content in grains. The treatments of CK, PK, and NP increased the amylose contents in grains, while decreased the amylopectin content, resulting in an increased amylose/amylopectin ratio accordingly. The protein content in applying N fertilizer treatments of NPK, NP and NK was significantly higher than that of CK and PK. The grain protein content in NPK treatment was 73.9% and 40.3%, more than that in CK and PK treatments respectively. The grain tannin content of NPK treatment was the highest among treatments. The tannin content of NPK treatment increased by 15.6% and 22.7% respectively, compared with that of CK and PK treatments. These results demonstrated that no N application or no fertilization significantly reduces the growth, dry matte accumulation, grain yield, N and P uptake, and the concentrations of amylase, protein and tannin in grains of grain sorghum. The effect of no N application or no fertilization on sorghum is significantly greater than that of no P or K application. Balanced fertilization with N, P and K is beneficial to increase grain yield and improve grain quality of grain sorghum.

Key words: Grain sorghum, N, P, K nutrition, Nutrient uptake, Grain yield, Grain quality

王劲松，焦晓燕，丁玉川，董二伟，白文斌，王立革，武爱莲. 粒用高粱养分吸收、产量及品质对氮磷钾营养的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(08): 1269-1278.

WANG Jin-Song,JIAO Xiao-Yan,DING Yu-Chuan,DONG Er-Wei,BAI Wei-Bin,WANG Li-Ge,WU Ai-Lian. Response of Nutrient Uptake, Yield and Quality to Nutrition of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Grain Sorghum[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(08): 1269-1278.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01269

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2015/V41/I08/1269

参考文献

[1]Sato S, Clemente T, Dweikat I. Identication of an elite sorghum genotype with high in vitro performance capacity. In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl, 2004, 40: 57−60

[2]卢庆善, 邹剑秋, 朱凯, 张志鹏. 试论我国高粱产业发展一论全国高粱生产优势区. 杂粮作物, 2009, 29(2): 78−80

Lu Q S, Zou J Q, Zhu K, Zhang Z P. Discussion on development of sorghum industries in China: discussion on superiority area of sorghum production in China. Rain Fed Crops, 2009, 29(2): 78−80 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]Sher A, Barbanti L, Ansar M, Malik M A. Growth response and plant water status in forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) cultivars subjected to decreasing levels of soil moisture. Aust J Crop Sci, 2013, 7: 801−808

[4]Farrá I, Faci J M. Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agric Water Manage, 2006, 83: 135−143

[5]山仑, 徐炳成. 论高粱的抗旱性及在旱区农业中的地位. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 2342−2348

Shan L, Xu B C. Discussion on drought resistance of sorghum and its status in agriculture in arid and semiarid regions. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 2342−2348 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]王鑫, 李志强, 谷卫彬, 石雷, 唐宇丹, 高辉远, 姜闯道. 盐胁迫下高粱新生叶片结构和光合特性的系统调控. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 1941−1949

Wang X, Li Z Q, Gu W B, Shi L, Tang Y D, Gao H Y, Zhao S J, Jiang C D. Systemic regulation of anatomic structure and photosynthetic characteristics of developing leaves in sorghum seedlings under salt stress. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 1941−1949 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Moore W J, Ditmore M, TeBeest D O. The effects of cropping history on grain sorghum yield and anthracnose severity in Arkansas. Crop Prot, 2009, 737−743

[8]Patil S L, Sheelavantar M N. Soil water conservation and yield of winter sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) as influenced by tillage, organic materials and nitrogen fertilizer in semi-arid tropical India. Soil Till Res, 2006, 89: 246−257

[9]Mesfin T, Tesfahunegn G B, Wortmann C S, Nikus O, Mamo M. Tied-ridging and fertilizer use for sorghum production in semi-arid Ethiopia. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2009, 85: 87−94

[10]董二伟, 王劲松, 韩鹏远, 王立革, 丁玉川, 焦晓燕. 高粱干物质积累、养分吸收特点及其分配规律的研究. 山西农业科学, 2012, 40: 645−650

Dong E W, Wang J S, Han P Y, Wang L G, Ding Y C, Jiao X Y. Study on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake characteristics and their distribution rule in sorghum. J Shanxi Agric Sci, 2012, 40: 645−650 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]王宜伦, 李潮海, 何萍, 金继运, 韩燕来, 张许, 谭金芳. 超高产夏玉米养分限制因子及养分吸收积累规律研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16: 559−566

Wang Y L, Li C H, He P, Jin J Y, Han Y L, Zhang X, Tan J F. Nutrient restrictive factors and accumulation of super-high- yield summer maize. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2010, 16: 559−566 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]马建华, 王玉国, 孙毅, 尹美强, 牛常青, 杨艳君. 低磷胁迫不同品种苗期形态及生理指标的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19: 1083−1091

Ma J H, Wang Y G, Sun Y, Yin M Q, Niu C Q, Yang Y J. Effects of low phosphorus stress on the morphologies and physiological indices of different sorghum cultivars at seedling stage. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2013, 19: 1083−1091 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第3版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. pp 30−177

Bao S D. Soil and Agro-Chemistry Analysis, 3rd edn. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000. pp 30−177 (in Chinese)

[14]霍权恭, 范璐, 周展明. 高粱单宁含量的测定(GB/T 15686-2008), 中华人民共和国国家标准

Huo Q G, Fan L, Zhou Z M. Sorghum-Determiination of tannin content (GB/T 15686−2008), State Standard of the People’s Republic of China

[15]谷物籽粒粗淀粉测定方法(GB 5006-1985)，中华人民共和国国家标准

Determination of crude starch in cereals seeds (GB 5006-1985), State Standard of the People's Republic of China

[16]水稻、玉米、谷子籽粒淀粉直链淀粉测定法(GB 7684-1987), 中华人民共和国国家标准

Determination of amylase in grains of rice, maize and millet (GB 7684-1987), State Standard of the People's Republic of China

[17]王建国, 刘鸿翔, 王守宇, 韩晓增. 黑土农田养分平衡与养分消长规律. 土壤学报, 2003, 40: 246−251

Wang J G, Liu H X, Wang S Y, Han X Z. Law of nutrient equilibrium, gain and loss in black soil farmland. Acta Pedol Sin, 2003, 40: 246−251 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]申丽霞, 王璞, 兰林旺, 孙西欢. 施氮对夏玉米碳氮代谢及穗粒数形成的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13: 1074–1079

Shen L X, Wang P, Lan L W, Sun X H. Effect of nitrogen supply on carbon-nitrogen metabolism and kernel set in summer maize. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2007, 13: 1074−1079 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]王晓楠, 吴贳玉, 付连双, 李卓夫. 氮肥处理对春小麦穗粒数形成阶段的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2011, 42(4): 32−35

Wang X N, Wu S Y, Fu L S, Li Z F. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer treatment on growth stage of spring wheat kernels per spike. J Northeast Agric Univ, 2011, 42(4): 32−35 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]申瑞玲, 陈明, 任贵兴. 高粱淀粉的研究进展. 中国粮油学报, 2012, 27(7): 123−128

Shen R L, Chen M, Ren G X. Research progress of the sorghum starch. J Chin Cere Oils Assoc, 2012, 27(7): 123−128 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21]孔令旗, 张文毅, 李振武. 高粱籽粒淀粉含量的配合力与杂种优势分析. 辽宁农业科学, 1992, (1): 18−20

Kong L Q, Zhang W Y, Li Z W. Combining ability and heterosis analysis of starch content in sorghum grains. J Liaoning Agric Sci, 1992, 1: 18−20 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]余飞, 邓丹霞, 董婧, 黄赣辉. 直连淀粉含量的影响因素及其应用研究进展. 食品科学, 2007, 28: 604−607

Yu F, Deng D X, Dong Q. Influence factors of amylase content and its applied research progress. Food Sci, 2007, 28: 604−607 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]李超, 肖木辑, 周宇飞, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬. 不同播期对高粱籽粒淀粉含量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2009, 40: 708−711

Li C, Xiao M J, Zhou Y F, Xu W J, Huang R D. Effect of sowing dates on the starch contentsin sorghum grains. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2009, 40: 708−711 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[24]于泳, 黄瑞冬, 赵尚文, 蒋文春. 不同施氮水平对高粱子粒淀粉积累规律的影响. 作物杂志, 2008, (5): 20–24

Yu Y, Huang R D, Zhao S W, Jiang W C. Effect of different nitrogen application levels on starch accumulation in sorghum grains. Crops, 2008, (5): 20−24 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25]曹昌林, 董良利, 宋旭东, 史丽娟. 氮、磷、钾配施对高粱籽粒淀粉含量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2010, (5): 68−70

Cao C L, Dong L L, Song X D, Shi L J. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on starch content in sorghum grains. J Shandong Agric Sci, 2010, (5): 68−70 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[26]高欣, 肖木辑, 周宇飞, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬. 种植密度对高粱子粒淀粉积累的影响. 作物杂志, 2009, (6): 35−37

Gao X, Xiao M J, Zhou Y F，Xu W J, Huang R D. Effect of planting density on starch accumulation in sorghum grains. Crops, 2009, (6): 35−37 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[27]尹静, 胡胜连, 肖佳雷, 李文雄. 不同形态氮肥对春小麦品种籽粒淀粉及其组分的调节效应. 作物学报, 2006, 32: 1294−1300

Yi Q, Hu S L, Xiao J L, Li W X. Effect of different types of n-fertilizer on the accumulation of grain starch and its components in different spring wheat cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32: 1294−1300 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[28]卢庆善, 高粱学, 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999. pp 227−229

Lu Q S. Sorghum Science, Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1999. pp 227−229 (in Chinese)

[29]戴延波, 邹铁祥, 荆奇, 姜东, 曹卫星. 氮、钾水平对小麦籽粒蛋白质合成关键酶活性的影响. 生态学报, 2009, 29: 4976−4982

Dai Y B, Zou T X, Jing Q, Jiang D, Cao W X. Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on key regulation enzyme activities involved in grain protein formation in w inter wheat. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29: 4976−4982 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[30]Mulimani V H, Supriya D. Tannic acid content in sorghum (Sorghum bicolour M.): effects of processing. Plant Foods Hum Nutr, 1994, 46: 195−200

[31]宋高友, 苏益民, 陆伟. 酒业高粱育种方向的探讨. 核农学通报, 1996, 17(4): 165−168

Song G Y, Su Y M, Lu W. Discussion on sorghum breading direction of wine industry. J Nucl Agric Sci, 1996, 17(4): 165−168 (in Chinese with English abstract)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed