欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 797-811.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.44097

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价

金欣欣(), 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾()   

  1. 河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所 / 河北省作物遗传育种重点实验室, 河北石家庄 050035
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-14 接受日期:2024-09-18 出版日期:2025-03-12 网络出版日期:2024-09-30
  • 通讯作者: *王瑾, E-mail: wangjinnky@163.com
  • 作者简介:E-mail: jinxinxin1984@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    财政部和农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-13);河北省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(HBCT2024040101);河北省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(HBCT2024040204);河北省花生现代种业科技创新团队(21326316D);河北省农林科学院创新工程(2022KJCXZX-LYS-11)

Identification and comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance in high oleic acid Jihua peanut varieties

JIN Xin-Xin(), SONG Ya-Hui, SU Qiao, YANG Yong-Qing, LI Yu-Rong, WANG Jin()   

  1. Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences / Hebei Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Shijiazhuang 050035, Hebei, China
  • Received:2024-06-14 Accepted:2024-09-18 Published:2025-03-12 Published online:2024-09-30
  • Contact: *E-mail: wangjinnky@163.com
  • Supported by:
    China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-13);Hebei Agriculture Research System(HBCT2024040101);Hebei Agriculture Research System(HBCT2024040204);Science and Technology Innovation Team of Modern Peanut Seed Industry(21326316D);Talents Construction Project of Science and Technology Innovation of Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences(2022KJCXZX-LYS-11)

RichHTML

2

PDF

95

摘要：

干旱是影响高油酸花生生产的主要限制因素之一, 鉴定高油酸花生品种的抗旱性, 筛选抗旱指标, 对于培育抗旱品种和开展抗旱机制研究具有重要意义。本研究利用26份冀花系列高油酸花生新品种为材料, 2022年和2023年在旱棚抗旱池内设置正常灌水和干旱胁迫2个处理, 测定成熟期各品种的9个农艺性状、5个经济性状和5个品质性状, 采用相关分析、主成分分析、隶属函数、灰色关联度、逐步回归分析、聚类分析以及抗旱性度量值(D)、综合抗旱系数(CDC)、加权抗旱系数(WDC), 对其进行抗旱性鉴定及综合评价。结果表明, 干旱处理下多数农艺、经济性状的测定值比正常灌水处理低9.73%~49.19%, 品质性状比正常灌水处理低0.78%~9.84%。各测定指标的单项抗旱系数(DC)存在一定的相关性。8个主成分可以代表高油酸花生抗旱性89.81%的原始信息。基于D值、CDC值和WDC值的高油酸花生抗旱性排序相近。D值与CDC值、WDC值均呈极显著正相关, 相关系数分别为0.885、0.913。依据D值可将高油酸花生划分为3个抗旱级别, 其中抗旱型品种9个, 中等抗旱型品种10个, 干旱敏感型品种7个。抗旱性较突出的高油酸花生有冀花1353和冀花712。产量、主茎高、单株果数和饱果率可作为高油酸花生品种成熟期抗旱性鉴定的主要指标。研究结果可为高油酸花生抗旱育种、抗旱机理、抗旱栽培提供理论参考和生产指导。

关键词: 高油酸, 花生, 抗旱性, 综合评价

Abstract:

Drought is one of the primary limiting factors in the production of high oleic acid peanuts. Identifying drought resistance and screening for drought resistance indices in high oleic acid peanut varieties are crucial for breeding drought-resistant cultivars and advancing research on drought resistance mechanisms. In this study, 26 high oleic acid peanut varieties of the Jihua series were evaluated for drought tolerance under controlled drought conditions during 2022-2023. At maturity, each variety’s nine agronomic indicators, five economic indicators, and quality indicators were determined under both normal irrigation and drought stress treatments. To identify and assess drought resistance, we employed correlation analysis, principal component analysis, membership function analysis, grey relational analysis, stepwise regression analysis, cluster analysis, comprehensive drought resistance evaluation values (D-values), comprehensive drought resistance coefficients (CDC), and weighted drought resistance coefficients (WDC). The results showed that agronomic and economic indicators under drought treatment were reduced by 9.73%-49.19% compared to those under irrigation, while quality traits decreased by 0.78%-9.84%. Significant correlations were observed among the individual drought resistance coefficients (DC) of each index. Eight principal components were able to represent 89.81% of the original information related to drought resistance in high oleic acid peanuts. The drought resistance of high oleic acid peanuts was consistent across D-values, CDC-values, and WDC-values, with D-values showing strong positive correlations with CDC-values and WDC-values (correlation coefficients of 0.885 and 0.913, respectively). Based on D-values, the high oleic acid peanut varieties were categorized into three groups: nine drought-resistant varieties, ten moderately drought-resistant varieties, and seven drought-sensitive varieties. Among the varieties, Jihua 1353 and Jihua 712 exhibited exceptional drought resistance. Key indicators such as yield, main stem height, pod number per plant, and full pod rate can serve as primary criteria for identifying drought resistance in high oleic acid peanut varieties at maturity. These findings provide a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for breeding, understanding the mechanisms of, and cultivating drought-resistant high oleic acid peanuts.

Key words: high oleic acid, peanut, drought resistance, comprehensive evaluation

表1

供试高油酸花生品种"

序号
Number		 名称
Name		 序号
Number		 名称
Name		 序号
Number		 名称
Name
1 冀花4211 Jihua 4211 10 冀花28号 Jihua 28 19 冀花51 Jihua 51
2 冀花18号 Jihua 18 11 冀花915 Jihua 915 20 冀花1120 Jihua 1120
3 冀花13号 Jihua 13 12 冀花714 Jihua 714 21 冀花1182 Jihua 1182
4 冀花11号 Jihua 11 13 冀花2112 Jihua 2112 22 冀花2121 Jihua 2121
5 冀花19号 Jihua 19 14 冀花572 Jihua 572 23 冀花521 Jihua 521
6 冀花21号 Jihua 21 15 冀花2011 Jihua 2011 24 冀花113白 Jihua 113 bai
7 冀花25号 Jihua 25 16 冀花712 Jihua 712 25 冀花2912 Jihua 2912
8 冀花16号 Jihua 16 17 冀花311 Jihua 311 26 冀花1353 Jihua 1353
9 冀花29号 Jihua 29 18 冀花97 Jihua 97

表2

灌水和干旱处理下高油酸花生各指标测定值的差异分析"

性状
Trait		 处理
Treatment		 最小值
Min.		 最大值
Max.		 平均值
Ave		 标准偏差
SD		 变异系数
CV		 t值
t-value		 P值
P-value		 相关系数
r
主茎高
SH (cm)		 CK 35.65 72.77 49.94 8.71 17.44 9.770 0** 0.612
T 28.03 65.12 36.11 7.47 20.68
侧枝长
BL (cm)		 CK 39.35 76.50 54.10 9.10 16.83 9.758 0** 0.629
T 32.28 71.36 40.05 7.69 19.20
总分枝数
TBN		 CK 5.38 9.30 7.54 0.97 12.92 -1.138 0.266 0.766
T 5.68 9.47 7.69 0.97 12.60
结果枝数
NBP		 CK 5.39 9.20 7.39 0.93 12.64 -1.638 0.114 0.801
T 5.56 9.47 7.58 0.97 12.81
地上部干重
SDW (g plant-1)		 CK 17.24 37.76 27.47 5.92 21.56 5.434 0** 0.700
T 16.43 29.21 22.96 4.02 17.52
根干重
RDW (g plant-1)		 CK 0.43 1.08 0.68 0.18 25.97 -1.885 0.071 0.794
T 0.52 0.96 0.72 0.13 17.57
单株果重
PWP (g)		 CK 12.57 25.54 19.01 3.69 19.42 13.872 0** 0.408
T 5.66 14.13 9.66 2.17 22.48
单株果数
PNP		 CK 7.95 18.65 14.33 2.54 17.75 15.285 0** 0.586
T 5.00 12.11 8.00 1.96 24.49
饱果率
FPR		 CK 0.58 0.83 0.71 0.05 7.34 8.815 0** 0.051
T 0.42 0.70 0.54 0.09 16.13
根冠比
RSR		 CK 0.010 0.022 0.015 0.003 20.14 -11.897 0** 0.397
T 0.018 0.032 0.024 0.004 16.05
百果质量
PW (g)		 CK 140.59 272.34 211.74 32.78 15.48 10.108 0** 0.875
T 116.01 216.29 180.24 28.31 15.71
百仁质量
SW (g)		 CK 52.84 106.33 83.03 13.87 16.71 9.242 0** 0.873
T 40.60 89.34 70.66 12.88 18.22
出米率
SPR (%)		 CK 54.25 77.24 67.06 5.34 7.96 6.547 0** 0.796
T 39.62 76.77 60.53 8.17 13.49
产量
Y (kg hm-2)		 CK 3576.75 6016.50 4936.80 668.10 13.53 23.345 0** 0.707
T 1430.70 3590.55 2752.50 537.45 19.52
油酸
OA (%)		 CK 75.38 83.29 80.01 1.92 2.40 4.423 0** 0.954
T 74.09 82.61 79.39 2.26 2.85
亚油酸
LA (%)		 CK 2.15 6.16 3.14 0.79 25.28 5.300 0** 0.943
T 2.05 6.02 2.83 0.88 31.09
油亚比
O/L		 CK 12.27 39.59 27.33 5.84 21.35 -4.728 0** 0.891
T 12.35 40.15 30.51 7.37 24.15
蔗糖含量
SC (mg g-1)		 CK 19.27 86.00 34.63 11.46 33.10 1.632 0.115 0.748
T 22.65 68.86 32.18 9.52 29.59
含油量
OC (%)		 CK 34.59 53.07 50.06 3.51 7.01 4.151 0** 0.827
T 34.64 51.29 48.45 3.08 6.35

表3

高油酸花生各指标的抗旱系数"

品种
Variety		 主茎高SH 侧枝长BL 总分枝数TBN 结果枝数NBP 地上部干重SDW 根干重RDW 单株果重PWP 单株果数PNP 饱果率FPR 根冠比RSR 百果质量PW 百仁质量SW 出米率SPR 产量Y 油酸OA 亚油酸LA 油亚比O/L 蔗糖含量SC 含油量OC
冀花1120 Jihua 1120 0.57 0.62 0.94 0.93 0.76 1.08 0.42 0.34 0.74 1.860 0.82 0.80 0.86 0.41 1.00 0.78 1.34 0.84 0.96
冀花113白 Jihua 113bai 0.77 0.75 1.02 1.02 0.77 0.86 0.46 0.54 0.82 1.425 0.78 0.77 0.76 0.45 0.98 1.01 1.00 0.88 0.98
冀花1182 Jihua1182 0.59 0.57 1.12 1.12 0.71 0.95 0.33 0.42 0.60 1.867 0.74 0.72 0.85 0.47 0.98 0.98 1.11 0.84 0.93
冀花11号 Jihua 11 0.72 0.77 1.00 1.02 0.95 0.99 0.78 0.75 0.96 1.147 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.64 0.99 0.90 1.10 1.92 0.94
冀花1353 Jihua 1353 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.06 0.95 1.46 0.46 0.70 0.75 1.939 0.85 0.86 0.89 0.69 1.01 0.80 1.22 0.97 0.97
冀花13号 Jihua 13 0.73 0.77 1.11 1.11 0.82 1.01 0.68 0.74 0.57 1.538 0.86 0.89 0.99 0.52 0.98 0.94 1.02 0.77 0.96
冀花16号 Jihua 16 0.71 0.71 1.00 1.02 0.92 1.20 0.45 0.48 0.64 1.871 0.88 0.85 0.91 0.54 1.00 0.88 1.11 0.65 0.96
冀花18号 Jihua 18 0.69 0.84 0.79 0.83 0.97 1.19 0.71 0.59 0.62 1.356 0.95 1.03 0.92 0.61 0.99 0.95 1.01 0.88 0.94
冀花19号 Jihua 19 0.69 0.77 1.00 1.01 0.93 1.17 0.53 0.60 0.87 1.556 0.81 0.83 0.96 0.52 0.98 1.03 0.95 0.85 1.01
冀花2011 Jihua 2011 0.64 0.69 1.13 1.14 0.93 1.17 0.50 0.53 0.72 1.853 0.90 0.93 1.01 0.63 1.00 0.74 1.29 1.08 0.91
冀花2112 Jihua 2112 0.74 0.75 1.02 1.04 0.87 1.32 0.63 0.60 0.91 1.995 0.77 0.81 0.86 0.58 0.99 0.96 1.03 1.18 0.87
冀花2121 Jihua 2121 0.74 0.80 0.99 0.93 0.88 0.90 0.36 0.41 0.61 1.285 0.90 0.88 0.73 0.39 0.99 0.90 1.12 0.89 1.06
冀花21号 Jihua 21 0.68 0.70 1.04 1.02 0.85 0.98 0.46 0.57 0.70 1.388 0.78 0.80 0.79 0.47 0.98 1.04 0.92 0.77 1.01
冀花25号 Jihua 25 0.84 0.76 1.02 1.03 0.83 1.06 0.38 0.44 0.71 1.699 0.86 0.88 1.03 0.49 1.00 0.81 1.19 0.78 0.94
冀花28号 Jihua 28 0.71 0.71 0.93 0.95 0.88 1.27 0.42 0.51 0.61 2.306 0.87 0.83 0.88 0.49 1.01 0.79 1.19 1.13 0.95
冀花2912 Jihua 2912 0.89 0.93 1.15 1.14 0.92 0.87 0.49 0.60 0.68 1.154 0.93 0.92 0.97 0.69 0.99 1.06 0.92 1.09 0.95
冀花29号 Jihua 29 0.64 0.63 0.97 0.99 0.63 0.88 0.64 0.54 1.11 1.356 0.89 0.89 0.93 0.63 1.00 0.85 1.16 0.79 0.97
冀花311 Jihua 311 0.55 0.55 1.01 1.03 0.62 0.97 0.47 0.43 0.93 1.777 0.88 0.85 0.93 0.54 1.00 0.80 1.22 1.10 1.01
冀花4211 Jihua 4211 0.81 0.73 1.06 1.07 1.13 1.52 0.66 0.52 0.69 1.776 0.94 0.88 0.87 0.58 0.99 1.03 0.96 0.93 0.97
冀花51 Jihua 51 0.55 0.58 1.07 1.06 0.60 1.04 0.52 0.70 0.96 1.884 0.86 0.87 1.00 0.59 0.99 0.88 1.13 1.48 0.97
冀花521 Jihua 521 0.96 0.92 1.07 1.08 0.84 1.02 0.37 0.45 0.79 1.570 0.70 0.62 0.88 0.53 0.98 0.98 1.01 0.80 1.00
冀花572 Jihua 572 0.92 0.92 1.13 1.13 1.09 1.03 0.65 0.65 0.76 1.229 0.90 0.92 0.83 0.61 0.99 0.85 1.16 0.90 0.97
冀花712 Jihua 712 0.93 0.87 1.11 1.08 0.69 1.19 0.42 0.52 0.88 2.175 0.89 0.90 0.97 0.55 0.99 0.78 1.27 0.74 1.05
冀花714 Jihua 714 0.80 0.80 1.09 1.10 0.93 0.99 0.62 0.75 0.69 1.259 0.91 0.90 0.85 0.63 1.00 0.93 1.02 0.64 0.95
冀花915 Jihua 915 0.71 0.74 0.94 1.01 0.89 1.33 0.52 0.65 0.80 2.053 0.90 0.90 0.98 0.65 1.00 0.87 1.13 1.08 0.97
冀花97 Jihua 97 0.57 0.67 0.84 0.86 0.81 0.92 0.52 0.57 0.71 1.421 0.74 0.75 0.96 0.57 1.01 0.76 1.33 0.99 0.97
最小值Min 0.55 0.55 0.79 0.83 0.60 0.86 0.33 0.34 0.57 1.15 0.70 0.62 0.73 0.39 0.98 0.74 0.92 0.64 0.87
最大值Max 0.96 0.93 1.15 1.14 1.13 1.52 0.78 0.75 1.11 2.31 0.95 1.03 1.03 0.69 1.01 1.06 1.34 1.92 1.06
平均值Average 0.73 0.75 1.02 1.03 0.85 1.09 0.52 0.56 0.76 1.64 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.56 0.99 0.90 1.11 0.96 0.97
变异系数CV 16.35 14.25 8.54 7.91 15.25 16.52 23.09 20.03 17.76 19.90 7.76 9.34 8.74 14.55 0.91 10.78 11.09 27.91 4.03

表4

高油酸花生各指标抗旱系数之间的相关性"

指标
Index		 主茎高SH 侧枝长BL 总分枝数TBN 结果枝数NBP 地上部干重SDW 根干重RDW 单株果重PWP 单株果数PNP 饱果率FPR 根冠比RSR 百果质量PW 百仁质量SW 出米率SPR 产量Y 油酸OA 亚油酸LA 油亚比O/L 蔗糖含量SC 含油量OC
主茎高SH 1
侧枝长BL 0.898** 1
总分枝数TBN 0.434* 0.230 1
结果枝数NBP 0.416* 0.205 0.964** 1
地上部干重SDW 0.475* 0.586** 0.035 0.082 1
根干重RDW 0.181 0.146 -0.075 0.008 0.469* 1
单株果重PWP -0.010 0.134 -0.136 -0.030 0.381 0.130 1
单株果数PNP 0.161 0.315 0.166 0.247 0.280 0.113 0.689** 1
饱果率FPR -0.127 -0.208 -0.002 0.044 -0.438* -0.097 0.258 0.160 1
根冠比RSR -0.141 -0.308 -0.005 0.042 -0.240 0.642** -0.404* -0.274 -0.005 1
百果质量PW 0.135 0.186 0.023 0.047 0.329 0.239 0.401* 0.234 -0.067 -0.090 1
百仁质量SW 0.050 0.195 -0.059 -0.033 0.296 0.207 0.509** 0.372 -0.040 -0.140 0.914** 1
出米率SPR -0.099 -0.097 0.038 0.147 -0.220 0.186 0.014 0.118 0.104 0.331 0.203 0.283 1
产量Y 0.224 0.324 0.150 0.296 0.294 0.279 0.551** 0.663** 0.296 -0.122 0.419* 0.454* 0.392* 1
油酸OA -0.189 -0.162 -0.362 -0.314 0.015 0.290 -0.058 -0.034 0.009 0.322 0.290 0.227 0.273 0.309 1
亚油酸LA 0.230 0.236 0.207 0.207 0.258 -0.117 0.168 0.167 -0.126 -0.414* -0.144 -0.157 -0.335 -0.059 -0.764** 1
油亚比O/L -0.305 -0.322 -0.194 -0.217 -0.334 0.045 -0.275 -0.303 0.126 0.415* -0.002 0.006 0.263 -0.051 0.683** -0.957** 1
蔗糖含量SC -0.240 -0.150 -0.065 -0.018 -0.007 0.032 0.358 0.366 0.408* -0.018 0.073 0.089 -0.022 0.335 0.084 -0.092 0.081 1
含油量OC 0.163 0.139 0.007 -0.143 -0.210 -0.214 -0.358 -0.227 0.070 -0.113 0.025 -0.103 -0.192 -0.362 -0.191 0.016 0.007 -0.279 1

表5

高油酸花生各指标抗旱系数在不同区间的分布"

指标
Index		 0 < DC <0.2 0.2 < DC < 0.4 0.4 < DC < 0.6 0.6 < DC < 0.8 0.8 < DC < 1 1 < DC < 2.4
次数
Times		 频率Frequency 次数Times 频率Frequency 次数Times 频率Frequency 次数
Times		 频率Frequency 次数
Times		 频率Frequency 次数
Times		 频率Frequency
主茎高SH 0 0 0 0 5 19 13 50 8 31 0 0
侧枝长BL 0 0 0 0 3 12 17 65 6 23 0 0
总分枝数TBN 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 6 23 19 73
结果枝数BPN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 23 20 77
地上部干重SDW 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 17 65 2 8
根干重RDW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 38 16 62
单株果重PWP 0 0 4 15 14 54 8 31 0 0 0 0
单株果数PNP 0 0 1 4 15 58 10 38 0 0 0 0
饱果率FPR 0 0 0 0 1 4 16 62 8 31 1 4
根冠比RSR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 100
百果质量PW 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 23 20 77 0 0
百仁质量SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 19 20 77 1 4
出米率SPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12 21 81 2 8
产量Y 1 4 16 62 9 35 0 0 0 0 0 0
油酸OA 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 85 0 0 4 15
亚油酸LA 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 14 54 5 19
油亚比O/L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 15 22 85
蔗糖含量SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 11 42 8 31
含油量OC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 77 6 23

表6

高油酸花生各指标主成分特征向量及贡献率"

指标
Index		 主成分 Principal component
PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7 PC8
主茎高SH 0.614 -0.253 0.551 -0.012 0.161 0.379 0.068 -0.077
侧枝长BL 0.694 -0.153 0.396 -0.213 0.175 0.410 0.004 -0.174
总分枝数TBN 0.392 -0.305 0.367 0.687 0.144 -0.136 -0.158 0.256
结果枝NBP 0.450 -0.193 0.339 0.741 0.035 -0.154 -0.157 0.169
地上部干重SDW 0.673 0.074 0.258 -0.461 -0.306 0.110 -0.167 0.155
根干重RDW 0.178 0.440 0.475 -0.113 -0.564 0.038 0.418 0.107
单株果重PWP 0.617 0.405 -0.525 -0.091 -0.079 -0.015 0.024 -0.009
单株果数PNP 0.682 0.314 -0.302 0.196 -0.039 0.121 -0.015 -0.125
饱果率FPR -0.071 0.219 -0.451 0.495 0.209 0.355 0.432 0.013
根冠比RSR -0.455 0.310 0.518 0.252 -0.419 -0.075 0.354 0.092
百果质量PW 0.437 0.551 0.125 -0.249 0.388 -0.375 0.127 0.285
百仁质量SW 0.457 0.607 0.002 -0.250 0.348 -0.397 0.086 0.128
出米率SPR -0.053 0.514 0.216 0.361 0.091 -0.317 0.110 -0.562
产量Y 0.600 0.597 -0.053 0.275 0.020 0.160 -0.029 -0.216
油酸OA -0.313 0.756 0.235 -0.166 0.049 0.209 -0.228 -0.024
亚油酸LA 0.519 -0.661 -0.270 -0.052 -0.262 -0.225 0.200 -0.080
油亚比O/L -0.636 0.540 0.241 0.087 0.225 0.235 -0.232 0.110
蔗糖含量SC 0.109 0.378 -0.504 0.273 -0.191 0.296 0.011 0.394
含油量OC -0.175 -0.372 0.135 -0.188 0.609 0.146 0.476 0.114
特征根Characteristic root 4.335 3.697 2.364 2.126 1.526 1.198 0.979 0.839
贡献率Contribution rate (%) 22.814 19.461 12.441 11.187 8.033 6.306 5.150 4.415
累计贡献率
Cumulative contribution rate (%)		 22.814 42.274 54.715 65.903 73.936 80.242 85.392 89.807
因子权重Factor weight 0.254 0.217 0.139 0.125 0.089 0.070 0.057 0.049

表7

高油酸花生抗旱性评价的D值、CDC值和WDC值"

品种
Variety		 隶属函数值Subordinate function value D CDC WDC
μ(x1) μ(x2) μ(x3) μ(x4) μ(x5) μ(x6) μ(x7) μ(x8) 数值
Value		 排序
Rank		 数值Value 排序Rank 数值
Value		 排序
Rank
冀花1120
Jihua 1120		 0 0.637 0.591 0.427 0.529 0.427 0.276 0.681 0.400 25 0.846 21 0.795 24
冀花113白
Jihua 113 bai		 0.476 0.114 0.361 0.568 0.584 0.577 0.452 0.583 0.414 22 0.844 22 0.812 21
冀花1182
Jihua 1182		 0.228 0.162 0.577 0.843 0.271 0.085 0.071 0.620 0.343 26 0.837 25 0.787 26
冀花11号
Jihua 11		 0.819 0.812 0 0.658 0.528 0.933 0.293 0.953 0.642 7 0.954 3 0.934 1
冀花1353
Jihua 1353		 0.659 0.918 0.932 0.632 0.466 0.910 0.457 0.514 0.731 1 0.968 1 0.926 2
冀花13号
Jihua 13		 0.755 0.503 0.537 0.691 0.600 0 0.283 0.268 0.544 13 0.894 13 0.862 14
冀花16号
Jihua 16		 0.433 0.643 0.779 0.448 0.466 0.239 0.386 0.471 0.517 18 0.884 16 0.839 17
冀花18号
Jihua 18		 0.737 0.877 0.335 0 0.531 0.179 0.597 0.185 0.527 16 0.887 14 0.862 15
冀花19号
Jihua 19		 0.616 0.383 0.446 0.561 0.493 0.363 0.943 0.251 0.507 19 0.899 12 0.865 11
冀花2011
Jihua 2011		 0.506 1.000 0.775 0.828 0.550 0.186 0.002 0.675 0.651 4 0.936 7 0.890 10
冀花2112
Jihua 2112		 0.609 0.658 0.434 0.749 0 0.627 0.521 0.487 0.548 12 0.944 6 0.901 6
冀花2121
Jihua 2121		 0.373 0.253 0.597 0.153 0.960 0.476 0.434 1.000 0.445 21 0.828 26 0.794 25
冀花21号
Jihua 21		 0.525 0.112 0.397 0.496 0.522 0.321 0.536 0.559 0.402 24 0.839 24 0.807 22
冀花25号
Jihua 25		 0.379 0.676 0.842 0.580 0.681 0.330 0.238 0.244 0.542 14 0.880 17 0.838 18
冀花28号
Jihua 28		 0.261 0.842 0.779 0.394 0.296 0.533 0.416 0.709 0.528 15 0.918 10 0.862 13
冀花2912
Jihua 2912		 1.000 0.480 0.610 0.710 0.802 0.272 0.169 0.325 0.648 5 0.915 11 0.893 8
冀花29号
Jihua 29		 0.396 0.817 0.207 0.702 0.946 0.429 0.587 0.273 0.556 11 0.869 20 0.842 16
冀花311
Jihua 311		 0.149 0.750 0.408 0.751 0.836 0.299 0.621 0.711 0.517 17 0.876 18 0.832 20
冀花4211
Jihua 4211		 0.841 0.624 0.723 0.429 0.238 0.209 0.808 0.838 0.626 8 0.952 4 0.911 3
冀花51
Jihua 51		 0.397 0.819 0.246 1.000 0.610 0.262 0.731 0.584 0.581 10 0.934 8 0.891 9
冀花521
Jihua 521		 0.520 0 0.756 0.728 0.481 1.000 0.515 0.140 0.477 20 0.872 19 0.836 19
冀花572
Jihua 572		 0.925 0.610 0.695 0.568 0.815 0.691 0.087 0.748 0.697 3 0.929 9 0.905 5
冀花712
Jihua 712		 0.453 0.653 1.000 0.770 1.000 0.608 1.000 0.514 0.706 2 0.948 5 0.899 7
冀花714
Jihua 714		 0.850 0.625 0.560 0.560 0.717 0.351 0.063 0.429 0.612 9 0.887 15 0.864 12
冀花915
Jihua 915		 0.555 0.956 0.632 0.572 0.446 0.445 0.789 0.391 0.643 6 0.955 2 0.911 4
冀花97 Jihua 97 0.122 0.817 0.344 0.393 0.565 0.828 0 0 0.413 23 0.840 23 0.806 23
平均值Average 0.547 0.898 0.860
变异系数CV 0.191 0.048 0.051

表8

高油酸花生各指标DC与D值、WDC值的关联度及各指标权重"

指标
Index		 关联度
γD		 排序
Rank		 权重
Weight		 关联度
γWDC		 排序
Rank
主茎高SH 0.837 4 0.060 0.843 10
侧枝长BL 0.826 5 0.059 0.862 7
总分枝数TBN 0.657 15 0.047 0.816 12
结果枝数NBP 0.654 16 0.047 0.813 13
地上部干重SDW 0.755 7 0.054 0.905 4
根干重RDW 0.631 17 0.045 0.776 14
单株果重PWP 0.907 3 0.065 0.684 18
单株果数PNP 0.918 2 0.065 0.714 16
饱果率FPR 0.821 6 0.058 0.851 8
根冠比RSR 0.463 19 0.033 0.503 19
百果质量PW 0.750 9 0.053 0.941 1
百仁质量SW 0.751 8 0.053 0.940 2
出米率SPR 0.723 11 0.051 0.907 3
产量Y 0.951 1 0.068 0.706 17
油酸OA 0.672 14 0.048 0.848 9
亚油酸LA 0.732 10 0.052 0.892 5
油亚比O/L 0.620 18 0.044 0.754 15
蔗糖含量SC 0.708 12 0.050 0.842 11
含油量OC 0.685 13 0.049 0.871 6

图1

基于D值的高油酸花生抗旱性系统聚类图 品种名称见表1。"

表9

不同类别高油酸花生的性状指标"

指标
Index		 抗旱品种
Drought resistant variety		 中等抗旱品种
Medium drought resistant variety		 干旱敏感品种
Drought sensitive varieties
主茎高SH (cm) 41.68 41.77 46.54
侧枝长BL (cm) 45.51 45.65 51.11
总分枝数TBN 7.16 7.94 7.75
结果枝数NBP 7.01 7.81 7.63
地上部干重SDW (g plant-1) 21.71 25.70 29.01
根干重RDW (g plant-1) 0.62 0.69 0.82
单株果重PWP (g) 14.37 15.01 13.31
单株果数PNP 10.84 12.44 9.75
饱果率FPR 0.63 0.64 0.61
根冠比RSR 0.019 0.019 0.021
百果质量PW (g) 207.08 191.73 187.83
百仁质量SW (g) 82.23 76.52 70.39
出米率SPR (%) 66.74 65.08 58.17
产量Y (kg hm-2) 272.86 263.93 224.14
油酸OA (%) 80.00 80.51 78.17
亚油酸LA (%) 2.85 2.73 3.53
油亚比O/L 29.43 31.12 25.11
蔗糖含量SC (mg g-1) 31.94 31.91 37.42
含油量OC (%) 49.94 49.78 47.64

表10

高油酸花生抗旱性模型预测"

因变量
Dependent variable		 多元逐步回归方程
Multiple stepwise regression equation		 决定系数R2 F值
F-value		 P值
P-value		 相关系数r
CDC值
CDC-value		 WDC值
WDC-value		 产量
Yield
D值
D-value		 Y = -0.888+0.438X14+0.349X1+0.667X11+ 0.088X10 + 0.144X9+0.199X8 0.929 41.58** 0.0001 0.885** 0.913** 0.777**
CDC值
CDC-value		 Y = 0.369+0.141X14+0.133 X6+0.066X18+ 0.116X3+0.066X1+0.088 X12 0.949 58.50** 0.0001 0.974** 0.701**
WDC值
WDC-value		 Y = 0.320+0.171X14+0.092X6+0.069X18 + 0.103X1+0.119X12+0.100X4 0.958 72.25** 0.0001 0.777**
[1] 中华人民共和国国家统计局. [2024-05-30]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01.
National Bureau of Statistics, the People’s Republic of China. [2024-05-30]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01.
[2] Clavel D, Diouf O, Khalfaoui J L, Braconnier S. Genotypes variations in fluorescence parameters among closely related groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)lines and their potential for drought screening programs. Field Crops Res, 2006, 96: 296-306.
[3] 姜慧芳, 任小平. 干旱胁迫对花生叶片SOD活性和蛋白质的影响. 作物学报, 2004, 30: 169-174.
Jiang H F, Ren X P. The effect on SOD activity and protein content in groundnut leaves by drought stress. Acta Agron Sin, 2004, 30: 169-174 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Ravi K, Vadez V, Isobe S, Mir R R, Guo Y, Nigam S N, Gowda M V C, Radhakrishnan T, Bertioli D J, Knapp S J, Varshney R K. Identification of several small main-effect QTLs and a large number of epistatic QTLs for drought tolerance related traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2011, 122: 1119-1132.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1517-0 pmid: 21191568
[5] Park S Y, Grabau E. Differential isoform expression and protein localization from alternatively spliced Apetala2 in peanut under drought stress. J Plant Physiol, 2016, 206: 98-102.
[6] 代小冬, 杜培, 秦利, 刘华, 张忠信, 高伟, 刘娟, 徐静, 董文召, 张新友. 花生抗旱性研究进展. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42: 1788-1794.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.06.039
Dai X D, Du P, Qin L, Liu H, Zhang Z X, Gao W, Liu J, Xu J, Dong W Z, Zhang X Y. Research progress and prospect of drought resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Chin J Trop Crops, 2021, 42: 1788-1794 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 严美玲, 李向东, 林英杰, 王丽丽, 周录英. 苗期干旱胁迫对不同抗旱花生品种生理特性、产量和品质的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 113-119.
Yan M L, Li X D, Lin Y J, Wang L L, Zhou L Y. Effects of drought during seedling stage on physiological traits, yield and quality of different peanut cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 113-119 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 张智猛, 万书波, 戴良香, 宋文武, 陈静, 石运庆. 花生抗旱性鉴定指标的筛选与评价. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35: 100-109.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00100
Zhang Z M, Wan S B, Dai L X, Song W W, Chen J, Shi Y Q. Estimating and screening of drought resistance indexes of peanut. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35: 100-109 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 任婧瑶, 王婧, 艾鑫, 赵姝丽, 李仍媛, 蒋春姬, 赵新华, 殷冬梅, 于海秋. 干旱胁迫下花生苗期耐旱生理应答特性分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2022, 44: 138-146.
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2020300
Ren J Y, Wang J, Ai X, Zhao S L, Li R Y, Jiang C J, Zhao X H, Yin D M, Yu H Q. Physiological response of peanut at seedling stage under drought stress. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2022, 44: 138-146 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 张智猛, 万书波, 戴良香, 宋文武, 陈静, 苗华荣. 花生品种芽期抗旱性指标筛选与综合性评价. 中国农业科技导报, 2010, 12(1): 85-91.
Zhang Z M, Wan S B, Dai L X, Song W W, Chen J, Miao H R. Index screening and comprehensive evaluation for drought resistance of peanut varieties at germination stage. J Agric Sci Technol, 2010, 12(1): 85-91 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 厉广辉, 万勇善, 刘风珍, 张昆. 不同抗旱性花生品种根系形态及生理特性. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 531-541.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00531
Li G H, Wan Y S, Liu F Z, Zhang K. Morphological and physiological traits of root in different drought resistant peanut cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 531-541 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 于树涛, 于国庆, 孙泓希, 任亮, 尤淑丽, 王虹, 周文雨, 王传堂. 高油酸花生品种(系)抗旱性综合评价. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19: 2747-2757.
Yu S T, Yu G Q, Sun H X, Ren L, You S L, Wang H, Zhou W Y, Wang C T. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of high oleic acid peanut varieties(lines). Mol Plant Breed, 2021, 19: 2747-2757 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 王瑾, 李玉荣, 张嘉楠, 程增书, 陈四龙, 宋亚辉, 张朋娟. 中国花生主栽品种抗旱性鉴定及其遗传多样性分析. 中国农业科技导报, 2015, 17(1): 57-64.
Wang J, Li Y R, Zhang J N, Cheng Z S, Chen S L, Song Y H, Zhang P J. Identification of drought resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)main cultivar in china and analysis of its genetic diversity. J Agric Sci Technol, 2015, 17(1): 57-64 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 程增书, 王瑾, 李玉荣, 苏俏. 花针期灌溉对花生植株生长及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(6): 124-131.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20192504
Jin X X, Song Y H, Cheng Z S, Wang J, Li Y R, Su Q. Effects of irrigation on growth and yield of peanut at anthesis. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2021, 36(6): 124-131 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20192504
[15] 张晨, 戴良香, 张冠初, 丁红, 徐扬, 郭庆, 张智猛, 石书兵. 旱盐复合胁迫对花生荚果发育特性、产量和品质的影响. 花生学报, 2023, 52(1): 72-79.
Zhang C, Dai L X, Zhang G C, Ding H, Xu Y, Guo Q, Zhang Z M, Shi S B. Effects of drought-salt combined stress on pod development, yield and quality of peanut. J Peanut Sci, 2023, 52(1): 72-79 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 张智猛, 戴良香, 丁红, 陈殿绪, 杨伟强, 宋文武, 万书波. 中国北方主栽花生品种抗旱性鉴定与评价. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 495-504.
Zhang Z M, Dai L X, Ding H, Chen D X, Yang W Q, Song W W, Wan S B. Identification and evaluation of drought resistance in different peanut varieties widely grown in Northern China. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 495-504 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 宁东贤, 周红琴, 赵玉坤, 杨丽萍. 不同黑花生品种抗旱性状分析与综合评价. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(5): 43-51.
Ning D X, Zhou H Q, Zhao Y K, Yang L P. Synthetical evaluation and analysis of drought resistance traits of different black peanut varieties. J Shanxi Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2021, 41(5): 43-51 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 孟雨, 田文仲, 温鹏飞, 丁志强, 张学品, 贺利, 段剑钊, 刘万代, 郭天财, 冯伟. 基于不同发育阶段协同的小麦品种抗旱性综合评判. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 570-582.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.21008
Meng Y, Tian W Z, Wen P F, Ding Z Q, Zhang X P, He L, Duan J Z, Liu W D, Guo T C, Feng W. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of wheat varieties based on synergy of different developmental stages. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 570-582 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.21008
[19] 汪灿, 周棱波, 张国兵, 张立异, 徐燕, 高旭, 姜讷, 邵明波. 薏苡种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选. 作物学报, 2017, 43: 1381-1394.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01381
Wang C, Zhou L B, Zhang G B, Zhang L Y, Xu Y, Gao X, Jiang N, Shao M B. Identification and indices screening of drought resistance at adult plant stage in Job’s tears germplasm resources. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43: 1381-1394 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 张海燕, 解备涛, 汪宝卿, 董顺旭, 段文学, 张立明. 不同甘薯品种抗旱性评价及耐旱指标筛选. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 419-430.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84087
Zhang H Y, Xie B T, Wang B Q, Dong S X, Duan W X, Zhang L M. Evaluation of drought tolerance and screening for drought- tolerant indicators in sweetpotato cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 419-430 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 王倩, 董孔军, 薛亚鹏, 刘少雄, 王若楠, 杨佳琪, 陆平, 王瑞云, 杨天育, 刘敏轩. 糜子核心种质成株期抗旱性鉴定评价与抗旱种质筛选. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56: 4163-4174.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.21.003
Wang Q, Dong K J, Xue Y P, Liu S X, Wang R N, Yang J Q, Lu P, Wang R Y, Yang T Y, Liu M X. Identification and evaluation of drought tolerance and screening of drought-tolerant germplasm for core germplasms in proso millet at adult stage. Sci Agric Sin, 2023, 56: 4163-4174 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.21.003
[22] 罗俊杰, 欧巧明, 叶春雷, 王方, 王镛臻, 陈玉梁. 重要胡麻栽培品种的抗旱性综合评价及指标筛选. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1259-1273.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01259
Luo J J, Ou Q M, Ye C L, Wang F, Wang Y Z, Chen Y L. Comprehensive valuation of drought resistance and screening of indices of important flax cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1259-1273 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 王兴荣, 李玥, 张彦军, 李永生, 汪军成, 徐银萍, 祁旭升. 青稞种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 1279-1287.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.11048
Wang X R, Li Y, Zhang Y J, Li Y S, Wang J C, Xu Y P, Qi X S. Drought resistance identification and drought resistance indexes screening of tibetan hulless barley resources at adult stage. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 1279-1287 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 廖俊华, 何泽民, 游宇, 毛金雄. 我国高油酸花生的研究进展. 粮食与油脂, 2023, 36(4): 5-8.
Liao J H, He Z M, You Y, Mao J X. Research progress of high-oleic acid peanut in China. Cereals Oils, 2023, 36(4): 5-8 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 廖伯寿. 我国花生生产发展现状与潜力分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42: 161-166.
Liao B S. A review on progress and prospects of peanut industry in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2020, 42: 161-166 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2020115
[26] 李丽, 崔顺立, 穆国俊, 杨鑫雷, 侯名语, 李文平, 刘富强, 刘立峰. 高油酸花生遗传改良研究进展. 中国油料作物学报, 2019, 41: 986-997.
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2019160
Li L, Cui S L, Mu G J, Yang X L, Hou M Y, Li W P, Liu F Q, Liu L F. Research progress of peanut breeding with high oleic acid. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2019, 41: 986-997 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2019160
[27] 韩艳红, 于沐, 石彦召, 杨海棠, 胡延岭, 刘软枝, 李盼, 朱桢桢. 基于隶属函数法对13个花生品种品质的综合评价. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(2): 7-11.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0979
Han Y H, Yu M, Shi Y Z, Yang H T, Hu Y L, Liu R Z, Li P, Zhu Z Z. Comprehensive evaluation of the quality of 13 peanut varieties by membership function method. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2022, 38(2): 7-11 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0979
[28] 刘博宽, 赵楠楠, 崔顺立, 李秀坤, 刘盈茹, 何美敬, 侯名语, 杨鑫雷, 穆国俊, 刘立峰. 不同花生品种抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标评价. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(19): 27-35.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0236
Liu B K, Zhao N N, Cui S L, Li X K, Liu Y R, He M J, Hou M Y, Yang X L, Mu G J, Liu L F. Peanut varieties: drought resistance identification and drought resistance indices' evaluation. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2021, 37(19): 27-35 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 陈雷, 杨明达, 贺群岭, 李帅, 王宏青, 张枫叶, 张梦圆, 吴继华. 基于不同生育时期干旱对花生抗旱性的综合评定. 花生学报, 2024, 53(2): 31-38.
Chen L, Yang M D, He Q L, Li S, Wang H Q, Zhang F Y, Zhang M Y, Wu J H. Comprehensive evaluation on drought resistance of peanuts at different growth stages. J Peanut Sci, 2024, 53(2): 31-38 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 晋高锐, 吴小丽, 邓丽, 陈玉宁, 喻博伦, 郭建斌, 丁膺宾, 刘念, 罗怀勇, 陈伟刚, 黄莉, 周小静, 淮东欣, 谭家壮, 姜慧芳, 任丽, 雷永, 廖伯寿. 兼抗黄曲霉侵染和产毒高油酸花生新种质的创制与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 687-895.
[2] 赵斐斐, 李少雄, 刘浩, 李海芬, 王润风, 黄璐, 余倩霞, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 鲁清, 曹玉曼. 花生主茎节间和侧枝节间长度的关联作图及候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 548-556.
[3] 王润风, 李文佳, 廖泳俊, 鲁清, 刘浩, 李海芬, 李少雄, 梁炫强, 洪彦彬, 陈小平. 花生核心种质资源荚果成熟度评鉴及早熟种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 395-404.
[4] 王语新, 陈天羽, 翟红, 张欢, 高少培, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 刘庆昌. 甘薯激酶基因IbHT1的克隆及抗旱性功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 301-311.
[5] 胡朋举, 郭颂, 宋亚辉, 金欣欣, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 王瑾. 多环境下花生含油量遗传及QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 324-333.
[6] 聂波涛, 刘德泉, 陈健, 崔正果, 侯云龙, 陈亮, 邱红梅, 王跃强. 北方春大豆品种农艺和品质性状分析与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2248-2266.
[7] 闫锋, 董扬, 李清泉, 赵富阳, 侯晓敏, 刘洋, 李青超, 赵蕾, 范国权, 刘凯. 谷子育成品种萌芽期耐冷性综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2207-2218.
[8] 刘永惠, 沈一, 沈悦, 梁满, 沙琴, 张旭尧, 陈志德. 花生干旱诱导型启动子AhMYB44-11-Pro的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2157-2166.
[9] 刘波, 池明, 曹梦琦, 唐达, 杨恒照, 张卫华, 薛聪. 过表达马铃薯StuPPO9基因对烟草抗旱能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2237-2247.
[10] 朱荣昱, 赵蒙杰, 姚云凤, 李艳红, 李向东, 刘兆新. 秸秆还田方式与播种深度对夏直播花生土壤物理性状与出苗特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2106-2121.
[11] 李晓菲, 高华伟, 广慧, 石宇欣, 谷勇哲, 齐照明, 邱丽娟. 大豆种质资源萌发期耐莠去津鉴定评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1699-1709.
[12] 杨启睿, 李岚涛, 张铎, 王雅娴, 盛开, 王宜伦. 施磷对夏花生产量品质、光温生理特性及根系形态的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1841-1854.
[13] 李航, 刘丽, 黄乾, 刘文豪, 司爱君, 孔宪辉, 王旭文, 赵福相, 梅拥军, 余渝. 棉花种质资源萌发期耐盐性鉴定及筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1147-1157.
[14] 李海芬, 鲁清, 刘浩, 温世杰, 王润风, 黄璐, 陈小平, 洪彦彬, 梁炫强. 花生赤霉素3-β-双加氧酶(AhGA3ox)基因家族的全基因组鉴定及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 932-943.
[15] 鲁清, 刘浩, 李海芬, 王润风, 黄璐, 梁炫强, 陈小平, 洪彦彬, 刘海燕, 李少雄. 花生含油量全基因组选择及近红外光谱筛选的育种技术探究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 969-980.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2