欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 1273-1278.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14070

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

rDNA和端粒重复序列鉴定马铃薯和茄子体细胞杂种染色体丢失和融合

王海波1,2(), 应静文1, 何礼1,3, 叶文宣1, 涂卫1, 蔡兴奎1, 宋波涛1,*(), 柳俊1   

  1. 1农业农村部马铃薯生物学与生物技术重点实验室 / 园艺植物生物学教育部重点实验室 / 湖北省马铃薯工程技术研究中心 / 华中农业大学, 湖北武汉 430070
    2湖北民族大学生物科学与技术学院, 湖北恩施 445000
    3四川省农业科学院园艺研究所, 四川成都610066
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-20 接受日期:2021-09-10 出版日期:2022-05-12 网络出版日期:2021-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 宋波涛
  • 作者简介:E-mail: wanghaibo0519@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(马铃薯, CARS09-P07)资助

Identification of chromosome loss and rearrangement in potato and eggplant somatic hybrids by rDNA and telomere repeats

WANG Hai-Bo1,2(), YING Jing-Wen1, HE Li1,3, YE Wen-Xuan1, TU Wei1, CAI Xing-Kui1, SONG Bo-Tao1,*(), LIU Jun1   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education / Potato Engineering and Technology Research Center of Hubei Province / Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
    2College of Biological Science and Technology, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, Hubei, China
    3Horticulture Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2021-04-20 Accepted:2021-09-10 Published:2022-05-12 Published online:2021-10-18
  • Contact: SONG Bo-Tao
  • Supported by:
    China Agriculture Research System (Potato, CARS-09-P07)

RichHTML

17

PDF

563

摘要：

植物体细胞杂交是植物种质资源创制的重要方法。体细胞杂种在原生质体再生的过程中染色体会产生非常多的遗传变异。研究体细胞杂种的染色体行为为马铃薯体细胞杂种的创制和利用提供理论基础。本研究采用rDNA和端粒重复序列作为探针进行原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization), 并结合基因组原位杂交(genomic in situ hybridization), 对马铃薯和茄子体细胞杂种染色体组成和变异进行了分析。原位杂交结果表明, 体细胞杂种中存在马铃薯和茄子融合的染色体和双着丝粒染色体, 并发现部分融合染色体是由马铃薯和茄子2号染色体末端对末端融合得到的。重排的双着丝粒染色体的着丝粒一个来源于马铃薯, 一个来源于茄子。此外, 体细胞杂种中来源于茄子的5S rDNA在体细胞杂种再生及稳定的过程中全部丢失。研究结果表明马铃薯与茄子在进行体细胞杂交的过程中, 染色体是不稳定的, 容易造成融合后代出现双着丝粒和染色体重排等现象。体细胞杂种的染色体会通过染色体重排、双着丝粒、rDNA均一化等多种形式使其染色体趋于稳定。

关键词: 马铃薯, 茄子, 体细胞杂种, rDNA, 染色体重排

Abstract:

Somatic hybridization is an important way to create new germplasm. Somatic hybrids produced plenty of genetic variation during protoplast regeneration. In this study, to analyze the chromosome composition and variation of potato and eggplant somatic hybrids, rDNAs and telomeric repeats were used as probes for FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization), combined with GISH (Genomic in situ hybridization). The results showed that rearranged chromosomes and dicentric chromosomes existed in somatic hybrids, and the parts of the rearranged chromosomes was derived from the end-to-end fusion of potato and eggplant chromosomes 2. One centromere of the rearranged dicentric chromosomes was derived from potato and the other was from eggplant. Eggplant 5S rDNA sites were lost in somatic hybrids to homogenize the rDNA of somatic hybrids. The results of this study indicated that the chromosomes were unstable during the somatic hybridization of potato and eggplant, which can easily cause dicentric and chromosomal rearrangements in somatic hybrids. The chromosomes of somatic hybrids tended to be stable through various ways such as chromosome rearrangement, dicentric and rDNA homogenization.

Key words: potato, eggplant, somatic hybrids, rDNA, chromosome rearrangement

图1

rDNAs在AC142和508.3上的定位 a: rDNAs在AC142上的定位; b: rDNAs在508.3上的定位, 其中a、b中红色荧光信号为5S rDNA信号, 绿色荧光信号为25S rDNA信号。标尺为10 μm。"

图2

rDNA探针结合GISH鉴定马铃薯和茄子体细胞杂种中染色体的组成 a: 体细胞杂种60-13染色体中含有rDNA位点染色体的识别(红色为5S位点, 绿色为25S位点); b: 来自a中的染色体经过洗涤后再开展GISH鉴定其亲本来源(红色为马铃薯染色体, 绿色为茄子染色体)。箭头指示25S位点, 箭指示5S位点。标尺为10 μm。"

图3

rDNA、端粒重复序列结合GISH鉴定体细胞杂种中重排染色体的来源 a: 体细胞杂种PE60-10染色体中含有rDNA的染色体的识别(红色为5S位点, 绿色为25S位点); b: 来自a中的染色体经过洗涤后再开展GISH鉴定其亲本来源(红色为马铃薯染色体, 绿色为茄子染色体); c: 端粒探针信号在体细胞杂种PE60-10染色体中的分布(红色为端粒探针信号); d: 来自c中的染色体经过洗涤后再开展GISH鉴定其亲本来源(红色为马铃薯染色体, 绿色为茄子染色体)。图a和b中箭头指示25S位点, 箭指示5S位点, 图c和d中椭圆和圆形框指示含有rDNA位点的重排染色体。图a、b、c和d方框中放大的染色体为椭圆框中指示的染色体。标尺为10 μm。"

图4

体细胞杂种PE60-10中末端融合的染色体产生的示意图 染色体上明显染色很浅的区域为核仁组织区(NOR)。图中的染色体来自作为体细胞融合的马铃薯和茄子亲本, 以及它们的体细胞杂种PE60-10。"

图5

体细胞杂种PE60-10中染色体重排形成的双着丝粒 a和b分别显示来自体细胞杂种PE60-10的2个染色体分裂相。箭指示具有双着丝粒的染色体。白色方框中显示该染色体的黑白图片以利于观察染色体上的缢痕。白色线条指示主缢痕, 黄色线条指示该染色体上另外一个明显的缢痕。标尺为10 μm。"

[1] Xiang F N, Xia G M, Chen H M. Effect of UV dosage on somatic hybridization between common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Avena sativa L. Plant Sci, 2003, 164:697-707.
doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00021-9
[2] 王晶, 向凤宁, 夏光敏, 陈惠民. 利用不对称体细胞杂交向小麦转移高冰草染色体小片段. 中国科学, 2004, 34:113-120.
Wang J, Xiang F N, Xia G M, Chen H M. Using asymmetric somatic hybridization to transfer small chromosome fragments from tall wheatgrass to wheat. Sci China, 2004, 34:113-120 (in Chinese).
[3] Greplová M, Polzerová H, Vlastníková H. Electrofusion of protoplasts from Solanum tuberosum, S. bulbocastanum and S. pinnatisectum. Acta Physiol Plant, 2008, 30:787-796.
doi: 10.1007/s11738-008-0183-1
[4] Tarwacka J, Polkowska-Kowalczyk L, Kolano B, Kolano B, Śliwka J, Wielgat B. Interspecific somatic hybrids Solanum villosum (+) S. tuberosum, resistant to Phytophthora infestans. J Plant Physiol, 2013, 170:1541-1548.
doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.06.013
[5] Fock I, Collonnier C, Purwito A, Luisetti J, Souvannavong V, Vedel F, Servaes A, Ambroise A, Kodja H, Ducreux G, Sihachakr D. Resistance to bacterial wilt in somatic hybrids between Solanum tuberosum and Solanum phureja. Plant Sci, 2000, 160:165-176.
pmid: 11164589
[6] Yu Y, Ye W X, He L, Cai X K, Liu T, Liu J. Introgression of bacterial wilt resistance from eggplant to potato via protoplast fusion and genome components of the hybrids. Plant Cell Rep, 2013, 32:1687-1701.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1480-8
[7] Austin S, Baer M A, Helgeson J P. Transfer of resistance to potato leaf roll virus from Solanum brevidens into Solanum tuberosum by somatic fusion. Plant Sci, 1985, 39:75-81.
doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(85)90195-5
[8] Thieme R, Rakosy-Tican E, Gavrilenko T, Antonova O, Schubert J, Nachtigall M, Heimbach U, Thieme T. Novel somatic hybrids (Solanum tuberosum L.+ Solanum tarnii) and their fertile BC1 progenies express extreme resistance to potato virus Y and late blight. Theor Appl Genet, 2008, 116:691-700.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0702-2
[9] Bastia T, Carotenuto N, Basile B, Zoina A, Cardi T. Induction of novel organelle DNA variation and transfer of resistance to frost and Verticillium wilt in Solanum tuberosum through somatic hybridization with 1EBN S. commersonii. Euphytica, 2000, 116:1-10.
doi: 10.1023/A:1003943704037
[10] Bidani A, Nouri-Ellouz O, Lakhoua L, Sihachakr D, Cheniclet C, Mahjoub A, Drira N, Gargouri-Bouzid R. Interspecific potato somatic hybrids between Solanum berthaultii and Solanum tuberosum L. showed recombinant plastome and improved tolerance to salinity. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2007, 91:179-189.
doi: 10.1007/s11240-007-9284-6
[11] Raina S, Rani V. GISH technology in plant genome research. Methods Cell Sci, 2001, 23:83-104.
doi: 10.1023/A:1013197705523
[12] Zluvova J, Lengerova M, Markova M, Hobza R, Nicolas M, Vyskot B, Charlesworth D, Negrutiu I, Janousek B. The inter-specific hybrid Silene latifolia × S. viscosa reveals early events of sex chromosome evolution. Evol Dev, 2005, 7:327-336.
pmid: 15982369
[13] 何礼. 茄属种及其种间体细胞杂种的染色体特征分析. 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2013.
He L. Optimization of Potato Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and Chromosome Characteristics of Solanum Genomes and the Inter-specific Somatic Hybrids. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2013 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] Wang H B, Cheng Z N, Wang B S, Dong J K, Ye W X, Yu Y, Liu T, Cai X K, Song B T, Liu J. Combining genome composition and differential gene expression analyses reveals that SmPGH1 contributes to bacterial wilt resistance in somatic hybrids. Plant Cell Rep, 2020, 39:1235-1248.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-020-02563-7
[15] Dong F, Song J, Naess S K, Helgeson J P, Gebhardt C, Jiang J. Development and applications of a set of chromosome-specific cytogenetic DNA markers in potato. Theor AppI Genet, 2000, 101:1001-1007.
doi: 10.1007/s001220051573
[16] He L, Liu J, Torres G A, Zhang H Q, Jiang J M, Xie C H. Interstitial telomeric repeats are enriched in the centromeres of chromosomes in Solanum species. Chromosome Res, 2012, 21:5-13.
doi: 10.1007/s10577-012-9332-x
[17] Lou Q, Iovene M, Spooner D M, Buell C R, Jiang J. Evolution of chromosome 6 of Solanum species revealed by comparative fluorescence in situ hybridization mapping. Chromosoma, 2010, 119:435-442.
doi: 10.1007/s00412-010-0269-6
[18] Pendinen G, Gavrilenko T, Jiang J, Spooner D M. Allopolyploid speciation of the Mexican tetraploid potato species Solanum stoloniferum and S. hjertingii revealed by genomic in situ hybridization. Genome, 2008, 51:714-720.
doi: 10.1139/G08-052 pmid: 18772949
[19] Wu F, Tanksley S D. Chromosomal evolution in the plant family Solanaceae. BMC Genomics, 2010, 11:182.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-182
[20] Malinska H, Tate J, Matyasek R, Leitch A, Soltis D, Soltis P, Kovarik A. Similar patterns of rDNA evolution in synthetic and recently formed natural populations of Tragopogon(Asteraceae) allotetraploids. BMC Evol Biol, 2010, 10:291.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-291 pmid: 20858289
[21] Mlinarec J, Satovic Z, Malenica N, Ivancic-Bace I, Besendorfer V. Evolution of the tetraploid Anemone multifida (2n = 32) and hexaploid A. baldensis (2n = 48) (Ranunculaceae) was accompanied by rDNA loci loss and intergenomic translocation: evidence for their common genome origin. Ann Bot, 2012, 110:703-712.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs128
[22] Pontes O, Neves N, Silva M, Lewis M S, Madlung A, Comai L, Viegas W, Pikaard C S. Chromosomal locus rearrangements are a rapid response to formation of the allotetraploid Arabidopsis suecica genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101:18240-18245.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407258102
[23] Metcalfe C J, Bulazel K V, Ferreri G C, Schroeder-Reiter E, Wanner G, Rens W, Obergfell C, Eldridge M D, O'Neill R J. Genomic instability within centromeres of interspecific marsupial hybrids. Genetics, 2007, 177:2507-2517.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.082313 pmid: 18073443
[24] Sato H, Masuda F, Takayama Y, Takahashi K, Saitoh S. Epigenetic inactivation and subsequent heterochromatinization of a centromere stabilize dicentric chromosomes. Curr Biol, 2012, 22:658-667.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.062
[1] 陈国欢, 张锐, 李艳迪, 赵佳琪, 任湧涛, 张天赐, 郭华春, 李俊, 杨芳. 外源硒叶面喷施对浅紫色马铃薯块茎花青素合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1876-1890.
[2] 王文辕, 燕雪嘉, 刘玉霖, 孙晓彤, 李亚楠, 唐鑫华, 石瑛. 耐弱光马铃薯品种筛选及转录因子编码基因StPIF3的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1631-1645.
[3] 田立涛, 丁宁, 王树林, 齐恩芳, 张荣, 王蕊蕊, 马利雯, 李建武, 杨江伟. 马铃薯Argonaute基因家族鉴定及晚疫病诱导表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1116-1126.
[4] 张宇, 刘芳, 蔡诚诚, 杨小华, 吉阿么石扎, 杨元军, 王西瑶. 溴乙烷与赤霉素协同处理破除马铃薯块茎休眠的机理初探[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 825-838.
[5] 汪玲, 胡好, 宋家凤, 程洁蓝, 陈颖, 郑婷婷, 吕钊彦, 朱晓彪, 侯华兰. 马铃薯UDP-糖基转移酶基因StUGT52的克隆及功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 665-676.
[6] 徐强, 谢奎忠, 胡新元, 岳云, 董博, 罗爱花. 连作对马铃薯根际土壤线虫群落结构与功能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 527-538.
[7] 杨飚, 杜帅康, 张继旺, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 马铃薯III类POD基因家族的全基因组鉴定及其表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 405-420.
[8] 姬炫彤, 卞春松, 金黎平, 李森, 秦军红, 李广存. 不同耐旱型马铃薯根际微生物对干旱的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 165-177.
[9] 田甲春, 葛霞, 李守强, 李梅, 田世龙, 张亚倩, 程建新, 李玉梅. 低O2高CO2贮藏环境延缓马铃薯块茎衰老的作用机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 262-278.
[10] 王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84.
[11] 卓峰琦, 唐振三, 雷雨俊, 程李香, 赵甜甜, 吕汰, 杨晨, 张峰. 基于烹饪方式及回生温度筛选低升糖马铃薯品种(系)[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2538-2546.
[12] 朱锦程, 杨秋华, 程李香, 李文丽, 石明明, 李惠霞, 张峰. 马铃薯抗南方根结线虫种质资源筛选及相关生理反应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2307-2317.
[13] 尹丽娜, 张锐, 陈国欢, 白磊, 李俊, 郭华春, 杨芳. 不同马铃薯品种块茎创伤愈合能力的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2399-2411.
[14] 贾小霞, 齐恩芳, 文国宏, 马胜, 黄伟, 吕和平, 李建武, 曲亚英, 丁宁. 中早熟马铃薯‘陇薯20号’高效再生体系建立及抗草铵膦种质创制[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2285-2294.
[15] 李秋云, 李世贵, 范军亮, 刘昊天, 赵晓斌, 吕硕, 王艳浩, 岳云, 张宁, 司怀军. 离子锌和纳米锌对马铃薯生理特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1838-1849.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2