欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (01): 125-137.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同青贮玉米品种与紫花苜蓿的间作效应

刘景辉;曾昭海;焦立新;胡跃高;王莹; 李海   

  1. 内蒙古农业大学,内蒙古呼和浩特010018
  • 收稿日期:2004-08-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-01-12 网络出版日期:2006-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 刘景辉

Intercropping of Different Silage Maize Cultivars and Alfalfa

LIU Jing-Hui; ZENG Zhao-Hai; JIAO Li-Xin; HU Yue-Gao; WANG Ying; LI Hai   

  1. 1Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot 010018, Inner Mongolia
  • Received:2004-08-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-01-12 Published online:2006-01-12
  • Contact: LIU Jing-Hui

摘要:

不同青贮玉米品种与紫花苜蓿的间作表明,间作青贮玉米边际效应显著,并因品种和生育时期的不同而异。大喇叭口期,间作青贮玉米光照强度和透光率比单作的提高,在基部为15.3%~88.1%和15.1%~89.0%,在中部为52.1%~74.1%和51.2%~73.0%。全生育期内,间作青贮玉米平均透光率比单作的提高,在基部为49.5%~62.1%,中部为40.7%~56.6%。5~30 cm土层地温从上到下呈递减趋势,同一土层温度均为间作高于单作;5 cm土层生育期内的平均地温间作比单作提高了1.0%~1.8%。收获期,间作青贮玉米株高、茎粗和叶面积指数比相同种植面积的单作玉米分别提高了2.3%~20.9%、0.4%~7.6%和2.2%~19.6%。间作复合群体的粗脂肪和粗蛋白含量比单作玉米分别提高了30.8%~59.1%和99.4%~137.5%,而鲜草和干草产量比单作玉米分别降低了22.7%~32.3%和17.6%~28.2%,比单作紫花苜蓿分别提高了156.7%~202.4%和176.5%~197.5%。间作紫花苜蓿初花期鲜草和干草产量及粗脂肪和粗蛋白含量表现出边行劣势,但差异不显著。综合分析表明,间作复合群体可充分利用田间光照和地温条件,并且紫花苜蓿是多年生豆科牧草,具有覆盖地面、防风固沙、培肥地力的作用,第2年5~6月份即可收获第一茬,不仅可以解决内蒙古因缺草而影响养殖业发展的问题,而且为间作青贮玉米提供了较大的生长空间。

关键词: 青贮玉米, 紫花苜蓿, 间作, 光照强度

Abstract:

Intercropping has been studied and practiced widely for crop production, but it has seldom studied in the forage production. In this paper, intercropping system of different silage maize cultivars and alfalfa was studied in regard to physiological ecology of the system, yield and quality of products. Results showed that magrginal utility of silage maize was remarkable, and it changed with silage maize cultivars and growth stage. As compared with monocropping of silage maize, at male tatrad, light intensity and light transmission of intercropping silage maize was increased by 15.3%-88.1% and 15.1%-89.0% respectively at bottom of plants population, and 52.1%-74.1% and 51.2%-73.0% at middle layer of plant population; average light transmission for whole growth stage was increased by 49.5%-62.1% at bottom, and 40.7%-56.6% for middle part; average temperature of five centimeters soil layer at whole growth stage increased by 1.0%-1.8%. At the harvest period, plant height, stalk thickness and green leaf area of cultivars Keduo 4, Keduo 8, Keqing 1 in intercropping system were 2.3%-20.9%,0.4%-7.6% and 2.2%-19.6% greater than those for monocropping. Crude protein and crude fat contents in plant intercropping system were increased by 30.8%-59.1% and 99.4%-137.5% respectively compared with those for monocropping maize. The yields of green forage and hey for intercropping system were decreased by 22.7%-32.3% and 17.6%-28.2% as compared with monocropping maize, and increased by 156.7%-202.4% and 176.5%-197.5% as compared with monocropping alfalfa. Crude protein and crude fat contents, green forage and hey yields of alfalfa in intercropping system were slightly decreased at early flowering stage, but there were not significant difference between two cropping systems. Integrated analysis indicates that intercropping system can take advantage of light, temperature resources of local fields sufficiently. In addition, alfalfa is perennial legume, which can cover the fields, fix and fertilize soil, therefore protect soil from wind erosion. The harvest of alfalfa from May to June next year not only solves the problem of forage shortage for livestock husbandry in Inner Mongolia but also provide bigger space for the growth of intercropping silage maize.

Key words: Silage maize, Alfalfa, Intercropping, Illumination intensity

中图分类号: 

  • S513
[1] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[2] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[3] 张译尹, 王斌, 王腾飞, 肖爱萍, 胡海英, 兰剑. 青贮玉米‖拉巴豆间作系统产量优势对空间配置的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 552-564.
[4] 陈宣伊, 张健伟, 张向前, 葛国龙, 路战远, 郭星星, 马子惠, 李欣艺, 陈立宇. 大豆玉米不同条带间作对玉米带水热时空动态变化及玉米产量效益的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 178-190.
[5] 杨姝, 白伟, 蔡倩, 杜桂娟. 玉米‖紫花苜蓿间作群体光分布特征及对植物性状和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2514-2526.
[6] 闫喆林, 任强, 樊志龙, 殷文, 孙亚丽, 范虹, 何蔚, 胡发龙, 闫丽娟, 柴强. 氮肥后移优化绿洲灌区小麦间作玉米种间关系提高氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2190-2203.
[7] 闫尚龙, 王琦明, 柴强, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 刘志鹏, 韦金贵. 绿洲灌区玉米籽粒产量及品质对密植及间作豌豆的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1665-1675.
[8] 张辰煜, 葛军勇, 褚俊聪, 王星宇, 赵宝平, 杨亚东, 臧华栋, 曾昭海. 燕麦红芸豆带状间作的产量效应及根系形态与土壤酶活性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 459-469.
[9] 王彦婷, 逄蕾, 赵建华, 郑浩飞, 麻文浩. 玉米配置不同豆科作物对间作体系产量稳定性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3292-3303.
[10] 李海龙, 柴强, 樊志龙, 殷文, 范虹, 何蔚, 孙亚丽, 张明龙, 胡发龙. 少耕及有机肥配施对河西绿洲灌区青贮玉米×拉巴豆系统土壤理化特性及作物产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3013-3025.
[11] 刘志鹏, 苟志文, 柴强, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 王琦明. 干旱灌区绿肥对多样化种植小麦玉米产量性能指标的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2415-2424.
[12] 桑会哲, 王超, 樊志龙, 殷文, 范虹, 何蔚, 胡发龙, 柴强. 氮肥减施对青贮玉米豆科饲草间作系统水分利用特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2848-2859.
[13] 蒋杨影, 唐铭均, 张林茜, 吕长文, 唐道彬, 王季春. 生长前期光照强度对甘薯叶片光合生理和结薯的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2575-2585.
[14] 王昀杰, 樊志龙, 张刁亮, 毛守发, 胡发龙, 殷文, 柴强. 不同灌水量下玉米的产量可持续性对间作绿肥的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2562-2574.
[15] 袁晓婷, 王甜, 罗凯, 刘姗姗, 彭新月, 杨立达, 蒲甜, 王小春, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 带宽和株距对带状间作大豆物质积累分配及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 161-171.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!